Are You the Expert of Your Life or a Believer in Scientists?

It's up to you.

It has become a commonplace that the new religion is “science” and the new priesthood is “scientists,” “researchers,” and “experts.”

What does it take to “follow the science”?

Whose science?

“Scientific research” is overwhelmingly funded by parties who profit from the results, which applies to military technology, “medical” research, and just about anything else. Profiting doesn’t necessarily mean monetary benefits. Cartels and monopolies have to reach dominance before they can freely profit from their activities and, as it happened to the global efforts towards a single group’s chokehold over humanity, the same controllers of global money flow have managed to buy, bribe, and blackmail themselves to the top.

They are now in the position to dictate to the masses and expect them to “save the Earth” from becoming overpopulated by “useless eaters,” whose self-interest would otherwise prevent the controllers from completing their self-assigned task to reach full domination.

People are supposed to believe or, at least, accept that the bribed, bought, and intimidated “experts,” “scientists,” and “researchers” know better what’s good for them and as a result, obey even the most insane directives. Complacency through comfort and impotence through dependency have been drilled into the remaining active grey matter of those, who still believe they can make a difference, perhaps because they can still cast political votes in the Dominion voting machines.

Anyway, it makes no difference what they believe as long as they conform and comply, which they subserviently do.

At this point, they might want to make up whatever has been left of their neglected minds: do they want to follow “experts” whose activities have nearly exclusively hurt them in the last two or two thousand years, or they would like to wake up and pay attention to their own lives instead of the “science” fiction?

***

People don’t have to pose as “scientists” to have a pretty good idea of what kind of a country they want to live in. They are the "experts" of their own lives.

Science always operates based on unprovable assumptions and the only principle it can use for testing its truthfulness is usability. For example, bloodletting worked in the Middle Ages, because it activated the patient’s energy reserves, which had nothing to do the theory surrounding it, claiming that “bad fluids” were released from the body. The theory was crazy, but the practice still worked (when it didn’t, the patient was no longer able to complain), so it was used. The same applies to ALL “scientific” activity, making it of equal value as the person’s awareness of what constitutes a life worth living: trial and error. Science, moreover, cannot even scratch the surface most of the time, when it comes to the decisions regarding how life must be lived.

In today’s official narratives, which have reached dogmatic levels of mandated ideologies, “science” rules, but only within its permitted domain that will never be allowed to affect the rulers’ living standards. Science, as it is presented to the proles, is always restricted. No matter which side "scientists" represent in public, the full spectrum of potential choices are not even allowed to be covered in public "debates." The sidelines of the official criminal narrative are always carefully observed.

***

Are you a believer of “science” or you believe you know better how to live your own life?

If I were forced to play a game called "Which of my fingers should I bite?", I would prefer not to play.