This is my reaction to the following article by one of my well-meaning fellow authors on Substack:
https://kwnorton.substack.com/p/fascism-and-codependency-part-i
The article cross-published Tessa Lena’s, who is another well-meaning author here:
https://tessa.substack.com/p/zombies-of-algorithm
My comments are on both, but primarily on Lena’s (but she doesn’t mention codependency).
Codependency?
Although the idea of “codependency” is not fully acknowledged in the pseudo-science of Psychiatry, I can condone the following definition:
A co-dependent person relies on other people’s opinion for his or her self-esteem.
That certainly supports KWNORTON’s notes, because it certainly applies to those, who expect an “authority” to be responsible for their decisions, perhaps because they lack the self-esteem or the adventurous spirit to make up their own minds. Dangerous lot, indeed: they definitely exhibit characteristics of the proverbial “zombie” that Tessa uses for reference to such people.
Fascism?
Tessa, for some reason, is using the cuss word, “fascism,” which is meaningless and is only good for arousing emotions, while discouraging any further investigation of the subject. If you can offer an acceptable definition beyond the popular myths, I would highly appreciate it.
Tessa is setting up a straw-man opposition: fascism, which, frankly, I don’t believe can be identified in any of the major players* or even ever existed as it has been planted into popular culture after the international bankers’ only significant adversary was eliminated in WW2.
Who is your enemy?
Today, the people’s enemies are the globalist eugenicist technocrats, and they have literally nothing to do with “fascism,” unless the fact that they control and own governments and corporations is meant by “fascism.” In the traditional definition, the term only referred to the combination of corporate and governmental power, but didn’t include the globalist banking cartel and, it looks like in the way it is used today by most sources, it still doesn’t.
Mystifying the subject for the sake of rhetorical or artistic power doesn’t help
Tessa’s reference to “Thinking with your soul” only adds further mystification to the subject, which only does disservice to the otherwise (possibly) well-meaning article. Only problem-centered thinking can be “clear,” and only when it contains the cause, the owner, an acceptable solution, and the parties who have the power to solve the problem. Otherwise, the problem becomes an “issue” or, preferred by the MSM, a “controversial issue,” which is an insult to anyone’s intelligence.
Tessa also mentions the demonization of the uninjected, which is nothing new and the article adds literally nothing to what has been commonly known for about two years.
Tessa also suggests that “We all have the power, our power is in respecting our own souls and in standing up for our right to be dignified and loving toward others.”
Complete nonsense:
1. there is no “we”; the warm and fuzzy feeling the word generates also leaves responsibility to others, while maintaining that the person must shut up, because it is “we” who are talking (it’s called The Rhetoric of Power);
2. people have no power. The time for saying “no” successfully expired, when they obediently wore their muzzles, and by now, the damage is done; they might as well start considering why and how they will inevitably lose:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-will-ensure-you-will-lose
3. “respecting ‘our’ own souls” is also in dire need for a definition in order to prevent mystification of the subject.
All in all, I am not impressed with Tessa’s article. (KWNORTON tried to contextualize it, but your building materials determine the quality of the building you can erect.)
More often than not, Tessa does a whole lot better.
Say “no”?
Somehow, “say no” and the like have become popular slogans, which will accomplish literally nothing at this point.
Why?
Because
only affirmation of a greater good can defeat Evil. Fighting Evil on its own turf only dooms you to failure: sooner or later, everyone breaks.
* It’s a bit like throwing around the feel-good term “psychopath” that, as all labeling, only prevents thinking specifically and confines the mind to the realm of popular tropes, while encompassing a self-defeating mechanism:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/looking-for-psychopaths
I recall that Andrew Jackson (old Hickory), who's career was otherwise very loathsome to me, as he was a native killer, born from barbarously skewed greedy principles, was a staunch opponent of the Bankers, who attempted his assassination after his rejection of their newly drafted charter, and was (loosely, by me) quoted as having said upon his death bed, when asked what his most important victory as president was, "I kept out the damned bankers", or some such.
I point this out as Strong Evidence of our country's moral degeneracy being coveted from it's inception by the hidden powers. They are all following the Illuminated Path to a Order that few of "them" are even aware of.
Everyone should be enlightened to the personality that was Albert Pike, a fellow that was seated fairly high, and is credited with having knowledge of the three (yes, three) world wars before his death in 1891.
Many will call this "conspiracy theory", as much of it very likely is, as all of the lies mixed with truths that are let out by the various sources are designed to be, and yet I must cherish this man's work, much as I treasure the protocols of the Elders of Zion, which are slandered in the same way, oddly enough, and are mainly held back and away, therefore, not likely to be embraced (or braved) by the willing sycophants of satanic humbuggery, except to spill disdain and mockery upon it.
Knowledge is power, and so of course, with that as a motto, most that crave such will do as they have predictably done, as the drama unfolds...
Playing nice has a bad wrap, and so most will call meekness a "weakness", yada, yada, yada, but genuinely held love within a heart, and the faith requisite for such to be maintained is A Force to Contend With.
Blessings while walking through the Fire, or the lion's den...
Thanks Ray. I truly love it when people assist me in making sense. Feels like that strange concept - interdependence? Making sense is highly overrated these days. Maybe elementary math would help more than psychology?