Invitation for Open Discussions
Pick your poison.
Substack, for the time being, permits open discussions. As long as this is the case, the opportunity must be tackled.
There are many excellent comments after my articles, but they are limited by the topic. I would like to open up an unlimited range of topics that my readers select for themselves. Of course, I will also contribute, assuming I am somewhat familiar with the topic and/or have something to say.
I am proposing that my readers start raising topics in the comment section after this announcement.
I will keep an eye on the proceedings, and once I find that there is an agreement between commenters about starting a specific topic, I will open a “discussion room” with a matching title. This will be in the form of an “article,” but its major function will be to create room for people to discuss their thoughts!
Notice that at least two commenters must request a topic, and if no discussion starts up in a comment section for a few days after it opens, I will erase the newly-posted article. In the comments below, please, CAPITALIZE the name of your selected topic in order to make sure I won’t miss it.
Waiting for your ideas!
Thanks for your openness and creative ideas. One thing I'd be interested in discussing is thoughts on action in the plandemic process, what's going on where people are at, if anything, what can be done, whether standing one's ground or heading for the hills. Where I'm at, it's dead, real zombieland. But I don't get much sense of it being all that different elsewhere, especially in terms of addressing the full agenda (Great Reset, etc.). I'm interested in theory translated into strategic practice for long-term goals.
POSITIVE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES - Usually the Law of Unintended Consequences refers to unexpected and negative results and side effects of a plan or policy. Since our intrepid WEF/Deep State/Supervillains/saboteurs/etc. plans and policies seem to be focused on ruination and despair, what (if any) unintended and positive consequences might result from their machinations? Discuss.