On eugyppius
Banned me "for 100 years," which is making me proud! :)
Is Eugyppius a Prima Donna or someone else in disguise?
Whoever Eugyppius is on Substack, he managed to give himself away.
I am not sure how much of this is still available at
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/sars-2-surges-only-in-the-winter/comments?s=r
So, let me provide all the details.
This is the last piece of e-mail I received from the “author”:
“banned indefinitely for being an obnoxious tit.”
While that speaks for itself, let me add a few details.
My original post:
“Actually, I checked mortality rates in five countries in August, 2020. It turned out that fewer-than-usual people had died that year, proving that there was no pandemic. The mass murderers must have figured out the same, because from September, the numbers were doctored retroactively. Theese days, the same ingenious habit seems to be maintained in VAERS, too.
The “author” disliked the idea that no virus has ever been isolated. When I wanted to post my response to that, I had been already banned. Of course, I withdrew my recommendation from the page and unsubscribed right away.”
This was in response to the following:
“So good to see someone focus on the essence of the matter, namely excess mortality. The data don't care about cause of death, just the numbers of deaths: That's the sort of data that's very hard to fake. Test results, numbers of cases, hospitalization rates, causes of death, not to mention the wildly inaccurate 'data' from Imperial College projectionists -- all these metrics have an arbitrary element to them that at best is subject to unknown bias, and at worst can be politically manipulated. It's much harder to fudge excess mortality, so focusing on that is eminently sensible, as this article shows.”
The “author” wrote”:
“people say things like this because misunderstandings about what it means to "isolate" a virus. basically, koch developed his postulates before viruses were discovered and when bacteria were the thing everyone was working on. you can have bacteria hanging out by themselves in a petri dish, but viruses *need cells* to replicate. you need a viral culture, by which you introduce the the virus to cells and look for cytopathic effects or replication. indeed this has been done, many many times. for example here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036342/”
Here is my reply to the idea that “isolating” a “virus” can be done only in a mixture; it couldn’t make it because of the “ban”:
Yup, a brew that is supposed to contain a “virus” is added healthy cells deprived of nutrients. The concoction also contains harmful contaminants.
The cells start dying and, Bingo! the “researcher” paid by the pharmaceuticals declares that the “virus” has been isolated!
Scientific fraud, if there ever was one.
And you are right about one thing: this has been done many times.
Virology is a fraud, along with most of the Rockefellerian flavor of “Medicine.”
On Virology:
I just checked and the link no longer goes to your comment. There are people who are so invested in the virus narrative they don't want to spend time digging into the assumptions that underpin that narrative. Malone, McCullough, Bigtree, Kennedy et al don't want to go there for various reasons. It is quite a paradigm shift from Germ to Terrain and many people are not going to do it. It is an emotional shift, not just a logical one. When one is invested in a paradigm, it takes energy to investigate, learn, and reformulate one's worldview in light of new information. It is also a maturing process to move from falsity to truth. It is easier to just let the experts give you the world view.
Some of those mentioned above think the better strategy is to defeat the current quackcines and then move on to quackcines in general. They don't want to 'lose people' by becoming virus deniers. They have a point to some degree, but on the other hand, if we don't go deeper, i.e. is virology valid, then we are susceptible to the nonsense we see going on.
The general public is not interested in the minutiae of virology, they just want to get on with their lives. There is also a strong need to have alternate explanations, i.e. if contagion doesn't explain disease, what does?
There are also people who support the idea of germ theory and terrain theory as both being true to some degree. There are some who say viruses exist, but are helpers, not invaders.
One of the problems is we are trying to understand biological processes that happen on micro or even nano levels and we cannot observe them directly, which leads to a lot of inference which leads to misinterpretation.
Engaging with some writers, as you did with eugippius leads to them closing the door on discussion and even locking it so you can't get back in. For some there will be no way to reach. For others, perhaps questions are a better way to go, rather than direct statements that are taken as confrontational and not worth their time.
Since these people dont wish to listen or learn, they are likely operatives sent to quelch certain challenges to the official narrative.