Poisoning Can Be Legal!
Poisoning Can Be Legal!
As long as the declared targets are bad! Just how "bad" are you?
Really? You don’t say! Should I be worried?
Apparently, once full elimination of life is justified, killing becomes legal.
All that’s needed for justification that the officially-declared targets are bad, usually for “society,” whatever that word is meant to mean besides directing the audience to shut up, because it is “society” speaking now! Doesn’t that make you think? Just how “bad” are you? When is it your turn to be exterminated? It came pretty close with the “asymptomatic superspreaders,” the “unvaxxed,” or even the “anti-vaxxers” or, in a worst-case scenario, those, who refused to be muzzled and were denied access to essential services.
While monied interests have always presided over “authorities,” the globalist plan to get rid of 95% of humans intimates that the killing might be targeted well beyond the smallmouth bass population and might target other food sources, causing severe interruptions in the food chain, and causing irredeemable damages to the biosphere. Killing humans only accelerates the global dehumanization process.
According to Mr. Smith in the first part of The Matrix, humans are a pest; they go to a place, use up its resources, and move on. Well, the scriptwriter(s) of the film compared humans to a “virus,” which may have comprised a part of the global predictive programming towards “pandemics,” but when it comes to a good analogy for human behavior, it’s easy to settle for the patterns followed by parasites or, shall I say, invasive species.
The Invasive Species Act of 1996
Certain animals can be used for affecting the food and the water supply. During WW2, the US released Colorado potato beetles in countries allied with Germany. The war ended 77 years ago, but the bugs are still causing infestations.
That was a weaponized application of an invasive species and it was the first one I can recall.
The US passed legislation against such bioweapons; a federal law was passed regarding “invasive species” in 1996:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/4283
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasive_species_in_the_United_States
https://www.usgs.gov/programs/invasive-species-program
https://www.fws.gov/law/national-invasive-species-act-1996
https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/
Was this legislation already a preparation for just another kind of poisoning? Or, better, a bit late with the legalization?
A legitimate way of killing in the wild
The procedure has been regulated and you can buy the book on how to plan and execute the destruction of ecosystems; on Amazon, your purchase will cost a pesky $130:
The 2010 edition
https://www.amazon.com/Planning-Standard-Operating-Procedures-Management/dp/1934874175
The killing accelerates, affecting the water supply
Jan 2018:
The enemy is formidable!
There is a story to tell here from New Brunswick, Canada. There was a discovery of dozens of smallmouth bass which were presumably escapees from nearby Miramichi Lake. The fugitives had emerged in Miramichi’s southwest branch . This type of fish endangers the salmon habitat. The decision to get rid of the invasive species was made by auhorities, regardless of the way the process would affect the environment that was also a habitat for humans and other creatures. The New Brunswick Sport Fishing Association, instead of marking the species for erasure, has tournaments in order to lure in turists for smallmouth bass fishing. According to New Brunswick’s salmon conservation groups, wild Atlantic salmon is a desired fish that generates lucrative proceeds, so its enemies must go. Consequently, the organization wants to remove preferred species from the water temporarily:
After that, as they say, they can “safely and effectively” poison the whatever is left behind that uses gills, which includes tadpoles. No more Enchanted Prince of Princess:
Lease expired!
After the killing spree, another chemical is applied, which naturalizes the poison. A week or two later, the lake can be restocked with desirable species.
The toxin is Rotenon, which is so dangerous, poisoning on contact, that hazmat-suited lackeys have to pour only 4.5 gallons into an inflow stream to kill all lives on its way. The person who caught them in their act had to get checked out for poisoning, because he was in the water without protection. Can that be considered “collateral damage”?
Here is his video:
The following comments are intriguing:
https://twitter.com/GotstuffStoppa/status/1569915473126477825
The first case of applying the toxin dates back to 1962:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1577/1548-8446-33.12.611
There are detailed data from 1988 to 2002:
By 2009, it’s “kill them all”:
https://www.bassresource.com/fish_biology/rotenone.html
This paper from 2010 is using 45 citations:
2012, Wyoming and Montana:
https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/07/29/two-government-fish-kill-projects-different-outcomes/
2006-2016; various locations:
“Prior to the rotenone treatment, tadpoles (stages 40- 43) and adult spotted frogs were placed in mesh sentinel cages at different locations in the treatment area and in two of the nearby wetlands not being treated with rotenone (figure 4). While the caged animals in the nearby wetlands survived, all tadpoles in the cages held in High Lake died as a result of the treatment. All adult spotted frogs held in High Lake survived. No live tadpoles were found elsewhere in the lake after the treatment, but nongill- breathing juveniles and adults were found at multiple locations (Billman et al. 2012).”
2022, Saratoga Lake, Wyoming:
The public is invited
Notice of treatment:
Miramichi, NB, Canada:
There are a few unanswered questions. What exactly is the plan? How are they going to restock the lake with fish?
Some of the refugees might resist any further relocation:
Dec 2020:
https://www.canadian-sportfishing.com/ok-to-poison-smallmouth-bass-with-rotenone/
August, 2021:
Volunteers are out there in a so-called aquatic rescue mission, catching salmon and other native species using a long net, before the poisoning starts
Also in August, 2021:
Indigenous grandmothers and mothers got to the lake in their canoes, because they knew if there is other human present on the lake they cannot do the poisoning, it is too dangerous for humans also.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/miramichi-lake-fish-salmon-1.6148132
Aug 2022:
Paddling to the lake, hoping to stop them
https://www.theregional.com/9051-2/
Sept 2022:
Roterone is allowed in organic farming, too, albeit with some restrictions:
https://www.motherearthnews.com/organic-gardening/rotenone-organic-zb0z1405zsto/
Roterone can be sold as “ALL NATURAL,” which reminds me of the way I usually counter the term: poisonous mushrooms and crap are also “all natural,” but that doesn’t mean they are good for human consumption!
https://www.gardenandgreenhouse.net/articles/july-august-2012/rotenone-a-botanical-insecticide/
Conclusions:
So, what’s the big deal? Fish and tadpoles dying in a pond? Maybe a few humans, if they go into the water in the wrong time?
Not exactly.
The biosphere operates as a whole. For example, if all insects were gone, humans would follow. Humans, at the same time, are acting as if they had a one-way ticket to the cemetery and to the museum of exinct species with an urgency request:
With all forms of geoengineering, humans have been playing God for too long, but they cannot step over their own shadows. Unless they realize that they have next-to-no idea what they are doing, they will end up like the Magician’s apprentice, who cheated from the spellbook and started a spell, but didn’t know how to stop it.
So, where does the magic start, and where will it end?
This time, the same mistake can easily end with the elimination of the last important invasive species:
THE HUMAN RACE
Killed by the Attack Snail!
The hubris of men appears to have no limits....
But we know that, don't we!
The lid is on the coffin & l can hear the nails being hammered into place....
How are we supposed to fight against such pure ignorant evil?