There Is a Cure for All, but It's Not What You Think

The most feasible solution can be identified by exclusion

“It’s a club, and you ain’t in it.” (George Carlin)

---

An intriguing title for an article

Stephan D’s article was recommended by Matt’s microscopy on October 25th, 2023:

https://stephandubeau.substack.com/p/polymer-nanotech-in-blood-and-anti

The title goes as Polymer Nanotech in Blood and Anti Nano Devices Solution. While “polymer nanotech” in the human body is not a novelty, the “anti nano devices solution” [sic!] caught my attention¹. The author’s slogan is not a bit less surprising: “GET YOUR POWER BACK!” I wish I knew what that power is, but let me put that on the back burner. You might be able to advise me on that in the comment section.

However, before assigning any magic devices to the task of bringing the living dead back to life, the poisoning process must be mapped up, and the process of the production of red blood cells must be described. Has that been done? I don’t think so; even a working hypothesis seems amiss.

However, while meanering among a few current offerings, it looks like I have bumped into the solution. I owe special thanks to Stephan for that, because his findings made me think further than before.

What exactly is the problem?

Microplastics have been found in urine, feces, and of course, blood. Would they congregate into some gooey slime? Possibly, but unlikely. Also, as they have been found even in urine, they seem to be discarded by the body.

Morgellons have been around for years:

https://www.morgellons.org/chemtrails-morgellons-worse-thought/

“Doctors” tend to deny that morgellons exist, and they often say it’s in the patient’s imagination. It’s nearly impossible to get rid of them, but they are something different from the rubbery stuff in the blood vessels.

While microplastics and morgellons certainly participate in the game, they are on the sideline as occasional subs. Traditional poisons have never been abandoned during the democide, either:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/old-and-fabled-toxins-for-the-public

As the most shocking development, after the “covid” injections started and mortalities exceeded a level that they couldn’t be hidden any longer, morticians frequently found rubbery metallic plastic stripes in the blood vessels of cadavers, which was a first. These horrific congelations were often and misleadingly called a “blood clots,” especially by allopathic practitioners and ideologues. The “alt” media often referred to the “covid” injections “clot shots,” as if the silent killers were blood clots. The author also found what seems to be the same substance in his own and in everyone’s blood he checked.

Red blood cells have been shown to be damaged both in the injected and in the uninjected:

https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/uncensored-maria-zeee-rages-uninjected

Shedding has been confirmed on various occasions, which ensures that everyone is damaged:

https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/cp/138256326

It remains a question, what is causing the problem, which is only one of many, but to me it seems to be the prominent one, calling for answers to two inevitable questions that seem to have been ignored:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-most-chilling-conclusion-about

After my conclusion that everyone is on their own, I asked OUTRAGED about the nature of poisoning and potential remedies after her article (https://outraged.substack.com/p/this-is-outrages-the-dose-makes-the), and in her reply she talks about neurotoxicity and says that nanoparticles settle

... in the bone marrow, liver, spleen, ovaries the most. This is a time bomb, because a small dose after a long time can be more toxic than a large dose after a short time.

Toxicity is time and dose dependent; 4 factors interact: pH, temperature, UV light, EMF, causing amyloid plaque formation and oxidative stress.

I think the most important thing is the delivery of oxygen to the cells.

If I had to stay with just one remedy, I think I would choose NAC, although many things work great. If people take care of oxidative stress, myeloperoxidase (an enzyme in the lungs) biodegrades graphene/nanotechnology. If they maintain the oxidative stress balance and prevent oxidative damage, they slowly cleanse themselves. There are various things that support detox

(https://outraged.substack.com/p/this-is-outrages-the-dose-makes-the/comment/42273471?r=p0xo0)²

Somehow it’s been forgotten that many types of toxins can cause the symptoms of the nonexistent illness, “covid,” but the traditional modes of mass poisoning don’t seem to have gone out of fashion, and “vaccination” is relatively new among them:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/old-and-fabled-toxins-for-the-public

Stephan is the first to acknowledge that he has access only to part of the picture. In his comment after the article, he notes,

Oh, by the way, I forgot to discuss that I have concerns about the wisdom of taking chelating agents³ “to clear up the blood”. The blood represents only somewhere around 10% of the total liquids of your body. So we don’t know what happens to the material if it goes out of the blood. Nobody’s measuring their urine or feces to see if it’s being excreted. What if it’s being pushed deeper into the body, as is surely the goal for the stuff. I think this is extremely important to consider. We have to see the whole picture here.

Throughout the video, you can look at pictures of blood, presumable improving as a result of “Eric’s” device from FM8, so the impression one gets is that from an infomercial.

When a reader tried to find out about the device, this is what happened in the comment section of https://firemedic8.substack.com/p/anti-nano-triangle-device-testimony:

Webe1

Oct 5

Matt’s Microscopy send an email informing me of your substack!👍 Wow! Where can I find such a device?

FM8

Oct 6

Author

Email me. FireMedic8@proton.me

After, obviously, finding out about the price, another reader observed,

Christine the Strawberry Girl

Not to mention how costly a treatment is….$ is the root of all evil. Beware that you may be following the false light into darkness.

Current publicized solutions can be only temporary

No matter who says what, current recovery methods don’t address the parts of the body where the nanoparticles get deposited. Their nature and their headquarters can likely explain the production of damaged blood cells, which hasn’t proven to stop after “treatment.” Poisoning through the lungs, which is common, directly affects the blood, but the toxins are stored somewhere else than the blood, so the RBC production itself is compromised. Fixing the blood, therefore, cannot provide more than a temporary solution.

Major concerns arise about FM8 and similar methods

So, what I can see here is a mysterious device that is expensive, which kind of reminds me of C1 from Blushield:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/more-on-c1-in-plain-english

While the science is unclear, several exultant testimonies are coming from marketers, who are re-selling C1 for a commission. That alone doesn’t necessarily discredit the device, but it surely hampers the marketers’ credibility. Could the same be happening here? Nothing is certain, but a few concerns must be soon addressed.

In comparison, C1 and FM8 have both avid supporters and users who couldn’t find a difference. C1 rewards distributors with a commission, and I don’t have any information about FM8. Signal strength, regularity, and length of application remain undefinable in both cases, leaving room open for long-term damage, especially when one considers the usually-detrimental impact of electricity and EMF on the human body, a topic on which I recommend Roman Shapoval’s site for details:

https://romanshapoval.substack.com/

C1 promises protection, while FM8 is supposed to fix red blood cells, so one might expect them to go down similar paths, dealing with different stages of a process that is still waiting to be identified. Not-so-surprisingly, the marketing philosophies of C1 and “FM8” contradict each other.

C1’s promoters claim that repeated and systematic radiation is bad, which is why it is shadowing it with variable impulses whose signal strength might or might not be damaging in the long run⁴. FM8, on the other hand, emits constantly identical impulses that do its magic. Both are claimed to fix red blood cells; C1 by taking stress off the body so that it can heal itself, and FM8 only the Good Lord knows how. That wouldn’t bother me, but where the heck is the gooey stuff disappearing? Does it settle in a more welcoming place in the body or it’s excreted, exhaled, or departs in the urine? Stephan also stresses the significance of such inquiries. Even if future investigations fail to answer that question, time will certainly tell if the reported recoveries, assuming they are genuine, will last. My major concern with both products is that

if someone knows how to heal the world, why doesn’t (s)he release the information for all people?

Could the spectacular results come from the placebo-effect? After all, that exceeded 60 percent already 20 years ago. I don’t think so. I actually believe that the microscopic images and videos are real.

The most likely real cure can be identified by exclusion

Can the “cure” be so easy as using something like C1 or FM8? That doesn’t sound feasible. If I were setting up the poisoners’ moves, I would create and market miracle devices for the masses, which is happening in hundreds of forms. However, I would also make sure that some marketers receive the proper kind and doses of electromagnetic radiation that truly heals them. The marketers don’t even have to be aware of my trick. Their time will come…

If my hypothesis holds water, healing with frequencies might actually work, but I doubt that those frequencies are in the audible spectrum, and the most certainly require special equipment and know-how that only the creators of the global mass murder possess.

According to Mihalcea’s article today, (https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/scientific-study-corona-is-technology), “Todd Callender just broke this with Maria Zeee on the Alex Jones Show” (https://banned.video/watch?id=653836d30779de4a37563534), suggesting what I have been talking about for years and writing about since I started this stack. However, the title of the video still promotes the existence of “viruses,” which is the usual red herring for those who are willing to swallow it, hook, line, and sinker: Whistleblower Exposes Globalist Plans to Use Wireless Networks for Tracking and Controlling the Population Through Viral Infections. The activation of the nanotech in human blood is certainly done by remote-control through electric devices, so it’s reasonable to assume that “immunity” for “covid” and recovering from the large variety of common conditions caused by nanoparticles can also be imposed with the same technology. It would be nice to find someone who knows the details and use the equipment for the common good for once in history.

Notice that the eugenicists need time, and people must remain hopeful and docile until the dirty job is completed. Everything that occupies the commoners’ mind or provides hope that placates them prevents them from facing the facts and from preparing for the near future:

People will need time and must wait until the globalist game falls into its own shadow:

1. As a rare exception, I even watched the 32:48-minute-long video.

2. I haven’t received an answer to my subsequent inquiry (if and when I do, I’ll add it to this footnote):

So, may I assume that most of the trouble is caused by the damaged RBCs and they are damaged, because the bone marrow and the spleen are compromised?

Do I understand it the way you mean it that you are saying that the primary site of ingestion is the lungs? How about all the other sources (food, water, and “medications”)?

Could you, please, compile a full map and a timetable of the harm? I believe, it would be the most important article you might ever write.

The dosage is also questionable. Is it possible that, as Mihalcea suggests, the poisoning is faster than any detox could be?

How about safe sources for the chemicals needed for the detox? Just about everything sold these days are now tainted, which includes injections, “medications,” and even food. Recently, I encountered two patients who started to develop symptoms after they were put on new “medications,” one of them received blood pressure pills and the other one got PPIs, suggesting that both pills were already tainted.

PPIs reminds me of the astronomical increase in IBD/IBS, whose causes “doctors” cannot or don’t want to identify. As I also mentioned in my article, even toddlers suffer from it and in a city hospital in England, a short while ago, 340 patients were “treated” with the condition. Basically, these are peptic ulcers that don’t seem to heal. Are they likely to be caused by nanotoxins and a combination of the other four variables you mention (pH, temperature, UV light, and EMF)?

A lot of people are suffering from conditions caused by the general poisoning (https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-summary-of-general-poisoning), and they are either told that the problem is in their mind or they are “treated” symptomatically with further toxins...

3. Chelation is offered by other sources for a good price, but it’s also floating around on the Internet, often promoted as a useful antidote for the RBC damages. Nonetheless, chelation doesn’t address the locations of the body where the toxins mostly get deposited; only the blood is meant to be cleansed, so the outcome is inevitably temporary.

4. Radiation exposure is important, but exact measurements cannot be performed for several reasons: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-you-want-to-know-your-radiation.