Weaponized Arguments Are Now the Standard

Random formulas of segmentation gaslight public debates.

I love the logic in the following article!*

Pro-vaxxer tacitly admits: They cannot find an error in Norman Fenton's paper

The article doesn’t mention that Fenton’s chart also substantiates that not all countries received the same number of deadly batches, just like not all states in the US received the same percentage of them (KY was the worst):

Fenton’s Chart of countries with excess deaths and the percentage of the “vaccinated”

The counter-argument against Fenton, besides re-contexualization (switching the subject without declaring the switch), uses the tactic of compartmentalization that has so successfully weaponized western “Medicine”:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/compartmentalized-medicine-turns

At this point, even arguments are being compartmentalized; a strategy that relies on the limited capacity of people’s working memory**. To put it plainly, you can’t argue against something you can’t understand.

Excess deaths can always be blamed on new “variants” of the non-existent “virus,” but that wouldn’t converge with other findings that Steve is aptly describing. Everything is pointing in the same direction.***

---

*But I don’t care for the terminology that reinforces the official narrative about “killer viruses” and “vaccines.”

**On average, the mind can process 7 plus/minus 2 elements at a time and has to reshuffle its findings in various parts of the person’s episodic and semantic memory.

***The technique is called conjecturing, which is what I use most of the time instead of the most popular form of decision-making that is based on analogies from personal experience:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-can-go-wrong-in-the-2030-plan