What Is Your Lot?

Or are you in a batch?

Here is the latest version of the American Dream! Okay, make it worldwide!

---

PREAMBLE

This blog is a response to an article that is easily one of the best I’ve ever read on Substack. While the Doctor and I often differ in opinion, we also admit that two honest people are extremely unlikely to ever completely agree, so we communicate with each other respectfully and I have definitely learned new things from his essays, mostly from the first few on smallpox “vaccines.”

Please, forgive the Doctor for calling the lethal injections “vaccines.” Well, I was quite sick of it by the end of the article, so be prepared…

The HPV injection is not in the article, but it would deserve further investigations, too, as it seems to be the most devastating children’s “vaccine.” Originally, I thought it was mostly about preventing fertility, but strangely enough, it was given to boys, too... Also, there are the three Hep-B injections that are supposed to prevent an STD in infants! If that doesn’t raise suspicion, what does?

***

Here is the link to the Doctor’s article that summarizes the significance of “lots” or “batches” in the distribution of traditional (DTP), “experimental” (Anthrax, mRNA), and “covid” “vaccines”:

What Do We Now Know About Hot COVID-19 Vaccine Lots?

As the article confirms, the tradition of spreading exceedingly toxic lots in large areas in order to prevent noticeably-concentrated amounts of damages/deaths in a single area, injection site, or institution started already in 1979! The excuse was that it was unpredictable which lot was more toxic than the rest. I would believe in the Tooth Fairy before I believe that!

It’s high time to pay attention to the toxic injections by the batches. The Doctor even goes back in time to scrutinize a couple of previous “vaccines” as well.

The truth has been out there for nearly a year in the VAERS data, yet hardly anyone dared to touch it! Even I (whose opinion is inconsequential) realized the gist of it only after my wife called it to my attention in November, 2021 (I needed her input, because, as usual, I avoided official sources, because I didn’t expect anything good coming out of them).

***

WHAT ABOUT DEADLINESS AND LEGALITIES?

If I had had any doubt about the lethality of the injections, my 69-year-old mechanic telling me a year ago that three of his veteran friends had passed away after the injections would have dissolved most of it, yet the final blow arrived, when I learned a few months ago that five of my injected neighbors had developed cancer and four are already dead... It turned out later that Kentucky, where I live, received the highest number of deadly batches in proportion to its population.

By now, it must be quite clear that not a single independent study has ever confirmed that “vaccines” have ANY benefits, while studies abound that show the large variety of harmful ingredients and countless “side effects” even in traditional “vaccines.” SIDS (“Sudden Infant Death Syndrome”), for one, NEVER happened to “unvaccinated” children, but by now, SADS (“Sudden Adult Death Syndrome”) has become so fashionable that in Alberta, Canada, it has become the most common cause of death...

Don’t even get me started on “untested,” “poorly tested,” or “experimental” “vaccines.” “Vaccine” trials, as all clinical trials, are financed by the parties that profit from the outcome (if a third party finances them, it is usually supported by the profiting ones). That applies to all “medical” procedures and chemicals that the profession daringly and painstakingly calls “medications.” On the rare occasions, when the fraud comes to light, manufacturers pay fines that are barely more than slaps on the wrist compared to the profits amassed. Not a single operative is ever held personally responsible, which is a telling sign that the powers involved are making concerted efforts.

“Vaccine injuries” are evaluated by a government body, funds come from the taxpayer, and damages are maxed out around $250k. Only a small fraction of litigants (4-5%) are ever awarded a penny. Manufacturers are exempt from liability, when a “vaccine” is among “children’s vaccines,” but strangely enough, the government granted them the same indemnity for their “covid” injections, while even infants are being injected.

How, anybody, it their right mind, would accept anything for which the manufacturer is exempt from liability?

Manufacturers can be taken to court only if “intent to harm” can be substantiated. Even criminal negligence is handled by government agencies, whose representatives usually use the revolving doors between pharmaceuticals and the government. Criminal lawsuits are only allowed, if the courts allow them and when they go to trial, judges can always determine the outcome by allowing and disallowing witnesses, experts, and evidence.

***

MISLEADING CONCEPTS ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN

Pretty please, somebody, tell me how “covid” can be diagnosed!

The “tests” are dangerous, toxic, humiliating, painful, and fraudulent.

The symptoms can be caused by several other things than a “virus,” even if viruses existed the way they are described in the official narrative.

Consequently, every single “covid” diagnosis is a fraud.

“Autoimmune diseases” (and even “allergies”) seem to have been invented to cover up for people who have been overloaded with toxins (even harmless substances can be toxic, when they are disproportionately present in the body).

“Herd immunity” is pure fiction or, if you prefer to say so, nonsense. Controlled opposition loves to refer to it, just like it likes to emphasize “natural immunity,” because both terms appear to go against the official lies; nevertheless, both terms preserve the fundamental tenets of the narrative, the narrative that locked down the economy, destroyed small and medium-sized businesses, prevented necessary treatments, isolated and poisoned the elderly, humiliated and tortured people with toxic muzzles and “tests.”

Immunity itself is NOT the presence of “antibodies,” whose very existence is in question, just like the assumption that dead particles that carry fragmented human DNA can cause an “infection” is highly questionable (“viral transmission” from an “infected” person has never been proven to cause illness). How long are the so-called “antibodies” present and can they be used against further “infections” could clarify the situation, but the problem is that the toxins (or whatever else) causing illness are usually covered up in order to hide “medical” ignorance and/or to preserve the diabolical narrative of “infectious viral diseases/infections/epidemics/pandemics,” while even the concept and nature of a “virus” has never been reliably determined:

What Is a Virus?

Immunity seems to be the body’s ability to remember previous situations in which it successfully fended off an illness. Illnesses are usually caused by chemical or radiological toxins, parasites, stress, deficiencies, or bacteria (although the proliferation of bacteria that is supposed to cause an illness can very well be a sign of illness, since antibiotics tend to kill a lot more bacteria than the ones targeted, even when the “treatment” is based on a culture taken from the patient).

As for a “virus” causing cancer, the very assumption might reverse the sequence of cause and effect. Logically, the tiny particles that are also called “viruses” are products of the body’s detoxification, so they can certainly contain carcinogens, but the original cause of the disease is not necessarily the same carcinogenic particles, just because the body got rid of them. The varying levels of uniformity “viruses” exhibit may be simply due to particular types of toxins et al. ejected from specific parts of the body.

***

BACK TO THE LETHAL INJECTIONS

I still maintain that, while mRNA technology exists (it was first developed by the Soviets in the early 1980s and Malone never invented it, only perhaps developed a specific type or a few types), it is too dangerous to use it in public even for democidal purposes, because it cannot be controlled and it can eventually kill the perpetrators, too:

mRNA?

The idea of mRNA delivery through “vaccines” was first announced in public around August, 2020, and enough details were provided to convince anyone that it was not something one would willingly accept in an injection. Less than a year later, it already seemed more likely that mRNA was used as a red herring in order to divert people’s attention from the actual ingredients in the injections (toxins, parasites, pathogens, and graphenes) that were successfully kept “secret” from the victims and, for that matter, from everyone else until the summer of 2021, when new revelations emerged about the contents. Introducing a red herring was necessary, because the manufacturers could always plead “accidental contamination” in response to (the very intentional) “side effects” only until graphenes were found in some vials. Graphenes are not exactly children’s toys that can mysteriously find they ways into the syringes... Most importantly, the delivery methods for mRNA are compatible with the ones that can install graphene structures into humans… According to the article,

Steve Kirsch’s colleague recently was able to do so with mass spectrometry and made an interesting discovery.  Of the 4 vaccines that were tested, (2 Moderna and 2 Pfizer), all appeared to contain the lipid nanoparticles, but none contained any mRNA.  This suggests some lots are placebos and once again argues for significant lot-to-lot variability.

No, it doesn’t suggest placebos; rather, it suggests that the delivery system was for graphenes, not for mRNA. (Certain batches did contain only saline solution, but probably only in order to lower the noticeable impact of the injections.)

It is a good question that, if Pfizer was perchance performing actual experiments, what were these experiments all about? In such a scenario, subjects may have been lab rats for various grades of “mRNA deterioration” after the vials were exposed to specific temperatures (and perhaps other conditions like light or microwaves that may have also served specific purposes) for specific lengths of time. If such experiments did take place, whatever they were about, it was insane to try to intervene with the human DNA, as the inevitable, but quite lethal “glitches” will probably manifest themselves in no more than a few years from now.

Pfizer’s “internal data” might simply refer to secret experiments, the like of which have been part of the American military and corporate cultures for a long time, so it doesn’t prove that mRNA is being used in the widely-distributed injections… The super-low temperatures the injections needed for storage, however, does suggest that some live experiments have been conducted on the credulous, the impressionable, and the imbecile…

As each batch was carefully compiled from hundreds of harmful ingredients to contain only a combination of a few dozens of them, plausible deniability was planned from the beginning by the manufacturers. Chances are the very process was controlled by a computer program to the extent that even those working for the manufacturers had no idea what was in specific batches. Still, according to VAERS data by November, 2021, cyclical damages were present periodically in the batches, irrespective of the manufacturers (which suggested coordinated action among them), and about one in 200, coming up in sequential order, killed quickly. (Graphene hydroxide kills fast, but other graphenes also kill faster, if the injections directly enter the bloodstream, which was easily an option, considering how few nurses can administer an injection properly and how many of the butchers were not even medical personnel.) The VAERS data alone seemed to satisfy the legal condition of proving the intent to harm:

Evidence that "Covid" Symptoms Came from Poisonings, but Not from Secret Labs

What’s in the lethal injections? As the article observes, it’s not subject to speculation anymore:

“… while there is some room for misinterpretation with microscopy, to the best of my knowledge, the same cannot be said for the recent mass spectrometry results.”

Self-assembling graphene nano-structures that seem to respond to remote microwave commands (5G alone can do it, but there are alternatives) and conglomerate into transmitters, receivers, and control centers, definitely pose severe concern. Add the large variety of toxins, parasites, and pathogens, and you are in the picture.

***

CONCLUSIONS

Manufacturing “dirty vaccines” is simply part of the fraud imposed on the masses by criminal or even criminally-insane “medical” practices. Considering that the lethal injections must have been developed for decades in the secret labs worldwide, one can hardly assume that many “side effects” are accidental. In fact, the large versatility of subsequent deaths (last time I checked, the list was about 1,200 long) suggests intelligent design.

Human DNA has been collected in “covid” tests, blood tests, genetic tests, biopsies, and even in breathalyzers. Such information can be used for tracking and controlling a person or a whole bunch of people, but in my opinion, at least for now, it is mostly fed to the “super AI” that in the last 2-3 years, must have been used for running a global simulation that has been advising the eugenicists on the next move(s) on their paths to their worldwide takeover.

Messing with the human genetic code relies on the self-proclaimed elite’s overconfidence that doesn’t allow for recognizing and admitting that DNA combinations mutate and switch focus, priorities, and complexity all the time, which is completely unpredictable even for the smartest and most elaborate quantum-nanotech, graphene-based, self-improving AI in the world that is, even at this moment, processing live data, collected from “mass surveillance.” In the foreseeable future, this AI will not have sufficient data for accurately predicting and/or controlling the manipulation of human DNA. If the globalist masters proceed with the implementation of the technology, new Frankensteins will come out of it and the DNA-modification will irretrievable affect, and probably kill, the technocrats, too.