My little article yesterday attracted an unusual amount of attention, so I assume, the discussion may not be fully over:
There are plenty of factors and variables to consider.
At this point in the course of the plandemic, one can safely and effectively deduce that anything injected, taken, tattooed, or even inhaled is a potential source of poisoning, while equipping the subject with graphene-based nanotech that functions as transmitters, receivers, and a command center that obeys incoming instructions (from 5G or similar technologies) that are based on the decisions of the “super AI” that now seems to be running much of the “civilized” world towards its total destruction.
The pseudo-medical sick-care relies on "diagnostic" data that turns people into figures in statistics.
People, and perhaps many "doctors" as well, seem to forget that the same symptoms can be caused by various sources, but investigating for causes doesn't even seem to be in the scope of today's "Medicine."
Large-scale centralized collection of personal data, along with “public education,” started in Prussia after 1870. Starting at the beginning of WW1, the process was embedded in nation-states’ record-keeping, and as the technology kept improving, it became omnipresent and more-and-more all-encompassing. Technology-based record-keeping has been going on in the US for several decades (the first computer data centers served no other purposes since the early 1950s and the communist witch-hunt served as a good excuse for its financing), although it's been only in the last 20 years that storage and analytical capacities have erupted to the point that they made it possible to develop personal emulations for specific person’s speech and thought patterns. I’ve hear and seen both over the phone (landlines included) and on internet videophone services.
As three-letter agencies started demanding such centralized data collections from the Internet, internet search and “social” websites also became breeding grounds of the data that, eventually, led to the construction of global simulations for the sole purposes of prediction and control. These simulations have now, apparently, been merged into a singularity that, judging by the last six months’ of events, seems to able to advise its owners with surprising or even stunning precision.
It's most peculiar that people themselves are willing to provide data about themselves (on Fakebook et al., but your internet activities and your search history is also collected) in a world, where the only remnants of their freedom lie in your unpredictability. Sadly, even your network of "friends and family" is enough most of the time by now for you to become predictable and for those, who don't have an e-mail account and a cell phone, the USPS is taking photographs of every piece of mail you send out and receive, possibly using scanners that also scan and record the contents of the envelopes.
By now, even cell phones can take, measure, store, and forward biometric data, but a lot more can be accomplished, if the person is not smart enough not to use a "smart" watch.
Many people seem to have developed a narcissistic trend of reveling in their own data, which is an addiction, because their self-image depends on data generated by machines. That habit places such self-serving victims into a computer-game environment, where their pursuit for perfection never ends (they “achieve levels” in their role-playing games in a “virtual” reality, where they are playing “themselves” or, as it was phrased in The Matrix, their “residual self-images”), while they keep providing data about themselves to their own detriment.
The machines are forwarding the data to processing centers and the refined results end up in the "super AI" that is already making life-or-death decisions for the unsuspecting targets.
Your unpredictability might place you on a longer leash, where you can exercise more privacy and personal freedoms. What can you do in order to stay more unpredictable? Haven’t you swallowed the hook already and are only waiting to be reeled in?
It’s nice to enjoy the last rays of the autumn sun of a little independence, but the main question now turns its focus on who you are.
How can you prevail to maintain the integrity of your personality in a digital world that turns you into numbers and assesses your “right to live” on its impersonal number-crunching, while it abandons your analogue self, simply because it cannot comprehend it and cannot use it against you?
Kla.TV: Okay, so let's get started. Welcome Ricardo Delgado Martin. A short Introduction of yourself for the German-speaking audience. Well, Ricardo Delgado Martin is founder and director of "la Quinta Columna" (The Fifth Column). He has a degree in Biostatistics from the University of Seville. He has a Master in Biostatistics, Postgraduate in Health Biology, Clinical Microbiology, Epidemiology and Clinical Immunology, applied at the European University Miguel de Cervantes. University expert in clinical genetics from the University Antonio de Nebrija. Certificate of scientific contribution, from the University of Seville and Postgraduate Master in Child Psychology. Master's degree in banking and finance from the Instituto Superior de Técnicas y Prácticas Bancarías (Master in Banking and Finance from the Higher Institute of Banking Techniques and Practices. Master in personal training. In other words, a long and extensive dossier. Mr. Delgado: Thank you Angel for the invitation and to the Kla.tv channel for the opportunity to present our research there. Kla.TV: Ricardo, if you had to describe yourself, who would you say Ricardo Delgado Martin is? Mr. Delgado: Actually, since the human being is probably under a constant evaluation and change, we can say that a person, close to awakening, in a sense, that we have realized, we have ascertained that the world, in which we live is not exactly the one we were told. From a certain moment, I've had to put in quarantine all the great dogmas and official paradigms that come from what we call science. Kla.TV: Well, what is biostatistics about? Mr. Delgado: Biostatistics is a specialty of statistics, which in turn is a branch of mathematics, an exact science, and it is more about the subject of epidemiology, applied to the field of health. It is practically the same thing, they are synonyms...https://www.kla.tv/22906