I have seen websites destroyed by being swamped by lengthy and irrelevant comments, so IF YOU WANT THIS SITE TO LAST, please, consider the following.
It has become a MAJOR problem that lots of topics are raised that do not pertain to the subject of the article. I am guilty, because I started to participate in such conversations previously, but I won’t be able to do it any longer.
I guess, it is because my time is limited, I haven’t done anything about it, but people are coming up with several good topics that I must start separately in order to keep discussions on the subject. Swamping a comment section with irrelevant comments, no matter how interesting they are, deters good commenters, and eventually readers, in the long run.
Would you like to suggest topics for which I can start up articles for discussions?
Comment here or respond to the e-mail about any of my posts:
Was Atlantis real? I sometimes wonder. Look at the lies from MSM in current day. I'm sure back thousands of years ago, they must have had "rumor mills". Anyhoo, I do believe parts of the Earth were under water that are not today. I follow Suspicious Observer about the poles shifting; he seems to have a lot of data, but still. It doesn't make him 100% correct. When we pass onto the next phase, I think thats where we will get the real answers. For now on this planet, I am giving it a Big No!
This post brings up a VERY IMPORTANT topic. That of the interconnectedness of all things.
Every story, subject, topic is connected to each other in multiple ways, math calls them dimensions, so if each topic is facet in an infinite multidimensional network you can call it a Hyper-Facet.
I am thinking of a house floor plan, it is two dimensional, add stories, raised ceilings, colors, furniture, personal belongings ... and it all blows into chaos when you add time as a dimension and a living human family. A home is a multidimensional object across time. Each facet of the house has infinite connections.
My current house sits on top of the shore of an ancient island, a glacial compressed moraine in a vast glacial inland sea. I can dig a three foot hole in my yard (buried my cat) and find a bottomless layer of compressed sand, it perks, a little gravel. Puget sound was 300 ft higher 15k years ago, I am 300 ft above sea level. I live in Seattle. There is an glacial ice deposited erratic 10 min from my house.
Yes I live in a network of hyperfacets. I feel I need a feynman like diagram to determine the ‘best’ most probable matching reality.
Edgar Cayce has so much he has “seen” regarding Atlantis. From what Cayce saw in his trances, Atlantis was extremely well advanced spiritually and technologically (perhaps their focus on the wrong things destroyed them). Sounds quite familiar…
Very interesting indeed. Especially after having just finished watching Ancient Apocalypse with Graham Hancock. I don't have a theory on Atlantis yet, but this one is pretty plausible and it ties nicely into the Ancient Apocalypse theory. (Which I've always subscribed to, long before this Hancock documentary)
There is a hell of a lot they are not telling us and *they* seem particularly disinterested in what appear to be a lot of smoking guns around the planet of what really happened before...
This topic is a very large one; as it ties into the question of the true age of "Civilization," I tend to think of the age of civilization as directly related to how long humans have had functional language and a habit of cooperation.
So, civilization is probably as old as 230,000 years; probably not very sophisticated early on. Atlantis in one form or other DID exist; yet probably not the way we have thought it did.
Another alternative researcher; Brian Forester, has a YouTube Chanel and seems to have some fairly plausible ideas. His primary focus is on the Megalithic Structures found everywhere like Puma Punku in Bolivia. Check out the video link below.
You can toss out almost any topic and EVERYONE is capable of getting discussion level knowledge of the subject in a few minutes.
Deep diving takes a little longer, being willing to take a contra stance takes years of experience in a subject. Look at Ken Berry, Nina Teicholz, Dave Feldman for examples.
Benjamin Franklin was considered in his day to be a “polymath”. I do not know how he would rate today. How many today have read the Iliad or the Bible? Can not compare. A modern equivalent might be Richard Feynman.
The point I’m trying to make is that discussion on a topic is a scatter plot. When you get a large number on a subject they will all bring a point they think is relevant. Many of the other points in the plot will not seem related.
Again back to Feynman where there are many totally different maths to arrive at the same answer with completely different model problems.
As Larry Wall famously said, “There is more than one way to do it.”
Go out today and stand on a moraine in your city. My house sits on the crest of an Island in an ancient inland glacial sea.
Yes. The flood from God really happened. Whether or not there was a deity involved is irrelevant. The north ice sheet melted the inland seas were released, the ocean rose 300 ft and the continents rebounded 150- 200 ft.
I would have witnessed in awe and swear to the gods whether I believed or not.
I have seen websites destroyed by being swamped by lengthy and irrelevant comments, so IF YOU WANT THIS SITE TO LAST, please, consider the following.
It has become a MAJOR problem that lots of topics are raised that do not pertain to the subject of the article. I am guilty, because I started to participate in such conversations previously, but I won’t be able to do it any longer.
I guess, it is because my time is limited, I haven’t done anything about it, but people are coming up with several good topics that I must start separately in order to keep discussions on the subject. Swamping a comment section with irrelevant comments, no matter how interesting they are, deters good commenters, and eventually readers, in the long run.
Would you like to suggest topics for which I can start up articles for discussions?
Comment here or respond to the e-mail about any of my posts:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-not-swamp-my-comment-sections
Watch “Ancient Apocalypse “ by Graham Hancock on Netflix
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/23/ancient-apocalypse-is-the-most-dangerous-show-on-netflix
If the MSM says it's dangerous does that mean that they want me to watch it.
Was Atlantis real? I sometimes wonder. Look at the lies from MSM in current day. I'm sure back thousands of years ago, they must have had "rumor mills". Anyhoo, I do believe parts of the Earth were under water that are not today. I follow Suspicious Observer about the poles shifting; he seems to have a lot of data, but still. It doesn't make him 100% correct. When we pass onto the next phase, I think thats where we will get the real answers. For now on this planet, I am giving it a Big No!
This post brings up a VERY IMPORTANT topic. That of the interconnectedness of all things.
Every story, subject, topic is connected to each other in multiple ways, math calls them dimensions, so if each topic is facet in an infinite multidimensional network you can call it a Hyper-Facet.
I am thinking of a house floor plan, it is two dimensional, add stories, raised ceilings, colors, furniture, personal belongings ... and it all blows into chaos when you add time as a dimension and a living human family. A home is a multidimensional object across time. Each facet of the house has infinite connections.
My current house sits on top of the shore of an ancient island, a glacial compressed moraine in a vast glacial inland sea. I can dig a three foot hole in my yard (buried my cat) and find a bottomless layer of compressed sand, it perks, a little gravel. Puget sound was 300 ft higher 15k years ago, I am 300 ft above sea level. I live in Seattle. There is an glacial ice deposited erratic 10 min from my house.
Yes I live in a network of hyperfacets. I feel I need a feynman like diagram to determine the ‘best’ most probable matching reality.
Edgar Cayce has so much he has “seen” regarding Atlantis. From what Cayce saw in his trances, Atlantis was extremely well advanced spiritually and technologically (perhaps their focus on the wrong things destroyed them). Sounds quite familiar…
In regards to the flood myth in the oldest versions that I know of, Artrahasis & Gilgamesh, the flood seems to be of people rather than of the seas.
I thought that I recognized the rabbit.
Very interesting indeed. Especially after having just finished watching Ancient Apocalypse with Graham Hancock. I don't have a theory on Atlantis yet, but this one is pretty plausible and it ties nicely into the Ancient Apocalypse theory. (Which I've always subscribed to, long before this Hancock documentary)
There is a hell of a lot they are not telling us and *they* seem particularly disinterested in what appear to be a lot of smoking guns around the planet of what really happened before...
Ancient Architects Chanel on YouTube has an extensive number of videos regarding theories about Atlantis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieblA-Vf0mo
This topic is a very large one; as it ties into the question of the true age of "Civilization," I tend to think of the age of civilization as directly related to how long humans have had functional language and a habit of cooperation.
So, civilization is probably as old as 230,000 years; probably not very sophisticated early on. Atlantis in one form or other DID exist; yet probably not the way we have thought it did.
Another alternative researcher; Brian Forester, has a YouTube Chanel and seems to have some fairly plausible ideas. His primary focus is on the Megalithic Structures found everywhere like Puma Punku in Bolivia. Check out the video link below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5iIJXXVdww
I study ancient linguistics and symbolic meaning found in the writings, fascinating stuff.
i think you should watch Ancient Apocalypse if you want to catch up on a more believable timeline of humanity than the current bs
You can toss out almost any topic and EVERYONE is capable of getting discussion level knowledge of the subject in a few minutes.
Deep diving takes a little longer, being willing to take a contra stance takes years of experience in a subject. Look at Ken Berry, Nina Teicholz, Dave Feldman for examples.
Benjamin Franklin was considered in his day to be a “polymath”. I do not know how he would rate today. How many today have read the Iliad or the Bible? Can not compare. A modern equivalent might be Richard Feynman.
The point I’m trying to make is that discussion on a topic is a scatter plot. When you get a large number on a subject they will all bring a point they think is relevant. Many of the other points in the plot will not seem related.
Again back to Feynman where there are many totally different maths to arrive at the same answer with completely different model problems.
As Larry Wall famously said, “There is more than one way to do it.”
Go out today and stand on a moraine in your city. My house sits on the crest of an Island in an ancient inland glacial sea.
Yes. The flood from God really happened. Whether or not there was a deity involved is irrelevant. The north ice sheet melted the inland seas were released, the ocean rose 300 ft and the continents rebounded 150- 200 ft.
I would have witnessed in awe and swear to the gods whether I believed or not.