26 Comments

Karma? What is it? Wouldn’t it have been better for the world if Adam and Eve had killed their fratricidal son Cain instead of turning him loose on the world and leaving it to Karma? As far as I can tell we are still living in a world filthy with Cain’s spawn and Karma is in short supply. A strong man avenges crimes and doesn’t let evil run rampant. We are living in a myth that is still unfolding. Cain’s crime will be avenged. Adam and Eve were irresponsible parents for leaving it up to “karma”. Best wishes, ray. I love your posts.

Expand full comment

😍

::picturing Fauci with 50 billion needles sticking out of his skin and Malone with LNP and transfected DNA from his patents oozing out his eyeballs::

Expand full comment

Their reward will not evade them. They might have to spend Eternity in their current disposition in each other's company. :)

Expand full comment

Eternity is like Karma. Neither helps to resolve the shithole situation we find ourselves in. As you've stated before, only individual, direct action is going to matter. The way I see it, we are all sitting ducks and time is nigh. Be prepared in your mind to do whatever it takes to stamp out evil. Start by confronting the 'inclusion' freaks like your local food co-op. Like 'open to the public' isn't inclusive enough? Give me a fricken break!

Expand full comment

Yessss, let's invite MORE to come here!

Expand full comment

Ah, it was TWO sisters, not just one...

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/two-indian-sisters-raped-punishment-6335954

August 28, 2015 - Two sisters have been sentenced to be raped as punishment after their brother ran off with a married woman. An unelected all-male village council in India also ordered that 23-year-old Meenakshi Kumari and her 15-year-old sister are paraded naked with blackened faces.

Expand full comment

Wow, it's getting better and better with all these people from the Stone Age...

Expand full comment

Great cartoon.

I'm not a fan of going after all the genocide cabal criminals in never-ending legal cases however some sort of lustration would be required or it would happen all over again.

Those currently holding top jobs in coercion industries should be replaced.

The others who just went along to get along will know what new side their bread is buttered on and will dance to a new tune easily.

Those who were so sucked in that they were clotshotted have been punished already.

Culpable zillionaires of course will need a bit of defunding as restitution for all the clotshot injuries.

But mostly better to put energy into village scale society, gardening and healthy lifestyle as Rick says.

It's a big club and I am not in it: too big a club for any easy purging.

Expand full comment

You made me write today's article! :)

Expand full comment

The problem is that even if they "confessed," it would be dubious; because most of them have convinced themselves they were doing the right thing, so they have no guilt.

For obvious actions (Fuxxi, Gates etc.), banishment to a deserted island would be probably appropriate; let them sort it out among themselves.

I am afraid that it is the system itself that is rotten; it will turn anyone else into the monster (s)he replaces.

The whole system must be changed. How would the changes be determined and by whom? Who could/would enforce the changes?

Expand full comment

The Villagers make the "rules" for their Village;

Do no harm to others; Simple; even the most basic of us can comprehend what that means;

Do no harm (damage) to anothers property; again, simple to comprehend;

Do not steal from another; so simple it's almost ridiculous;

Do no harm to the Children; easy enough to comprehend i would imagine;

Do no damage to Public Property; "hey, we all own and benefit from that dickhead"

If any of this seems to easy, perhaps that is by design and it is this way so there can be no mis-understanding[s] as to what you cannot do;

and you know what........this system of Rules is already in place but has been swept under the carpet by those who wish to benefit more from so-called "crimes" that "They" made up;

The system is quite simply known as Common Law, where each has inalienable rights to live in peace as long as they do no harm to others;

Those who have swept this oh so simple and oh so effective Rule Of Law under the carpet, have created the LEGAL system and all that goes with it......

Child molesters are protected but if you dare steal some money or heaven forbid be even accused of assaulting someone who deems themself to be of Authority, you will more than likely go to prison;

Call someone a justified name like pedo, queer, tranny, poofter, dike, faggot, homo, dickhead, moron, idiot, corrupt bastard etc.......and they don't like it even if they are of that description, then off to court you go to get your "fine";

Name any of those above types and you will be held to account.....no doubt ordered to pay them gazillions in retribution for the "crime" of letting all know who and what they are;

I say bah humbug to your solutions Ray;

Let the punishment fit the crime; infact, demand the punishment fit the crime;

Do you know that even to this day, in a tiny little civilised nation named Fiji, If you are caught stealing, you lose the hand you stole with so all will know from that day forward that you are a thief ?;

If you are caught harming another with malice intent, you are also dealt harm decided on by the Villagers;

If you take anothers life and there is no doubt you intended to do as such, you forfeit your right to life; again, the Villagers decide your fate;

If you harm a child in any way, you forfeit your right to life;

If you cause wilful damage to anothers property, you are banished from the village; good luck trying to find another place to call home;

Most Fijian Criminals do not have "criminal records" as such; the punishment handed to them by their former peers is more deterrent than that of any court; most Fijians who have been banished from their communities usually end up travelling overseas in an attempt to escape their self made prison

If you harm livestock or pets; banished;

Expand full comment

I like it. Community Immunity. Got that from Arthur and Fiona Christian of 'Love for Life' down under.

Expand full comment

Yes, but then we get such insanities as: a BOY 'insults the prophet' -- so the PUNISHMENT is his SISTER gets raped by all the village elders.... I don't know the answer but: it does need to be simpler AND more formal than cutting off hands!

Expand full comment

I surely have no idea what that is all about. :)

Expand full comment

Even villagers need a unifying ideology. That is not "my" "solution; it's a fact.

And all of a sudden, you jump to villages from a complex social setup; 270 million people in the US live in cities, so "villagers" don't really count, and even if they did, they don't have a unifying ideology at the moment.

Expand full comment

Here is a good example of applied American Jurisprudence at the community level. The Leo Frank Case: The Lynching of a Guilty Man. Brief synopsis:

https://www.the-savoisien.com/blog/index.php?post/2011/09/03/The-Truth-about-Leo-Frank

And a more in depth analysis highlighting a remarkable distinction between the courtroom behavior of the accused Black man and the actual Jewish perpetrator of the heinous crime of child rape and murder.

https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/09/the-frank-case-unmasks-the-adl/

Expand full comment

Real resources required to maintain the system are in short supply. The question is when.

Expand full comment

Good article. The rule of law is typically necessary for capitalism to flourish, particularly contract law. Without an adjudication mechanism to handle disputes, the system does not function well. Whether the rule of law prevails marks the difference between a functioning free market and a banana republic, which the US is fast becoming.

For criminal and civil law:

“Justice“ is merely a middle class illusion

The rich know better

The poor know better

Each from opposite directions

As for what can be done, that is a great question...

Expand full comment

The primary function of law, as you are also confirming it, is to protect private property. (Life is also "property" in this sense. In the 1970s young people still ended up in juvie after suicide attempts; in legalese, they tried to take what didn't belong to them. The article focuses on the criminal aspects, because they are so prominent these days.)

Everything that matters in the US has been a cartel or a monopoly since the victory of the Northern Agression...

I like your pointing out the role of the middle class. Is it possible that the law is more and more being ignored, because the middle class is being forced out of existence?

Expand full comment

****So, what can I say to those, who want to lunch the current perpetrators or have them legally sentenced and executed?****

Ray, who or what are the "current perpetrators" of which you speak?

I watched an interesting documentary on Hulu yesterday evening about the three girl scouts who were murdered at Camp Scott in Oklahoma in 1977.

https://www.hulu.com/series/keeper-of-the-ashes-the-oklahoma-girl-scout-murders-ef3c55e1-0799-4432-a0fd-868d29566a7e

They were 8, 9 and 10, respectively. I'm convinced after careful review of the evidence that Gene Leroy Hart was the perpetrator of these horrific, heinous murders. He actually raped the 10 year old Denise Milner for hours before he finally strangled her. That poor black girl suffered in torment for hours as this monster brutalized her. He was found not guilty by a jury made up largely of his fellow Native Americans. The verdict was their payback to the white man, I suppose, but why did poor black Denise Milner have to pay that price?

Expand full comment

It doesn't matter what I think.

What matters is what the lynch mob thinks or is going to think...

I did offer a tentative segmentation of the people involved...

Not familiar w/the OK case, but being a father of two daughters, you can only imagine my reaction...

Expand full comment

To complicate matters further, the lynch mob sometimes gets it right, meaning they hang the guilty person. I agree there are no easy answers. An interesting thought exercise is, what would you or what would I do if it was our daughter who was raped and killed at that girl scout camp if there were no laws and no rules? Would we just roll over and accept it, or would we seek our own brand of justice, whatever that may be?

Expand full comment

Sometimes the lynch mob catches the perpetrator in the act, which would have been nice in the OK case...

If it were my daughter, I know how I would feel, but I don't think I would take revenge. Cannot say for sure, because I've never been in a comparable position, but I literally never took vengeance on anyone. Eliminating incorrigibly antisocial elements also boils down to statistics, and I have seen some subhumans in my life, who probably would not even deserve a day in court... Immediate self-defense, however, is likely to be an exception for everyone, although I have always managed to take the venom out of threatening situations by simply looking at the attacker in the eyes. According to a good friend of mine, who passed away four years ago, "they can see it in my eyes" and prefer not to take their chances. Until my friend told me, I had never known I could look so intimidating, because I am usually a good-natured fellow (who is still not nice to people who take advantage of others). I guess, that's a result of growing up in a poor, crime-ridden neighborhood, where often, I was the only person in the library. :)

But is crime nature or nurture? Ganging up with other no-use morons is definitely conformist behavior, which I despise, because it means to transfer personal responsibility to a group. Of course, I don't buy into that process.

Early-childhood conditioning, in my experience, is the decisive part. There are people, whose more-or-less inherited limited intellectual capacity renders them to seeking out violent confrontations. Still, there is too much smoke-screening around the subject and one can only stand for oneself... It doesn't make it easier, because I know that my knowledge is always fragmentary and, quite often, plain wrong...

Expand full comment

The majority of Germans were compliant in Hitlers regime (a guess). I wonder how many left the country after? Probably many. I am sure families were broken over that, just as they will be broken over morals in this battle. I know mine has suffered, become divided. I can only be so frank with them, not sure what their minds can handle. I didn't think the 'gov' would kill my family, just for bucks and for kicks. Boy was I wrong.

Expand full comment

Hitler's Germany was a nation of laws. According to German law as crafted by the Nazis, everything they did was perfectly legal. So much for the phrase "a nation of laws." It's not enough to be a "nation of laws," it's the quality of those laws and what manifests from the application of those laws that really matters.

Expand full comment

Thanks SBN...yes, it was technically legal to kill so many, if you did you were law abiding in Germany. I think a class in medical ethics and rights and the extant rights codes is in order, I heard IPAK is offering one I might take. My housemate was born here, but schooled internationally and her father a German immigrant. All of them and theirs are vaxxed but I would think they are having regrets of a very deep sort by now. I had sent out a family warning (Dr Bhaktis first 'oh shit' video), and the responses I got were predictable, that I was in danger by refusing. Folks trust in the govs still astounds me, what more evidence do we need that our gov is running us off a cliff for cupcakes. I envision explosions of one kind or another, actual or personal, and it will be enormously satisifying to see any of the extended cabal suffer, but they do not have enough lives to give to make amends here. I vote for death by injection(s).

Expand full comment