If the US Restrictions Haven't Been Enough, Quatar Welcomes You!
A blueprint for all future liberties?
Relax; there are only a few rules to follow!
The story from Qatar would be funny, if it wasn’t true
The sign has been circulating on social media for a while, and it does read like a creative jest. However, it would be fair to post something like this at Arrivals in Qatari airports.
The shocking truth for fans hit home only a couple of days before the tournament began: alcoholic beverages would be banned from stadiums. Irrespective of the truthfulness of the poster, the news must have been so shocking to foreign fans that already during the first game on Sunday, the crowd loudly chanted, “We want beer!”
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/fans-we-want-beer-world-cup-video?auto=true
After all, how else could all those tourists put up with all the definitely-existing restrictions imposed on them on a Muslim land, unless drunk all the time during their visit?
Happily, they can compensate in their hotels. Although I don’t have the prices of booze at Qatari hotels, one can only imagine, they must be punitive.
At the same time, according to an article in newsy-today.com, the Qatari “Supreme Committee” is denying the existence of such a poster:
That alone would not mean the rules are not to be enforced in a Muslim country, because not knowing the law doesn’t exempt anyone from legal liability under any jurisdiction.
During the US occupation of Iraq, there were underground courts that caught people who were found smoking or drinking and gave them a good unofficial whipping.
So, if you are at least faintly familiar with Sharia law, you know that the poster, whether fake or not, is telling much of the truth, although in a somewhat grotesque manner. If you want have the time and the inclination to find out more, here is a link:
https://qatarofw.com/qatar-islamic-system-law/
Or, from an opposing point of view:
https://www.johnwalton-is.net/download/Story%20of%20Mohammed%20Islam%20Unveiled.pdf
It is also possible that newsy-today.com is engaging in a farce; the reference to a “Supreme Committee” alone sounds suspicious enough.
Either of the two sources can be true or false, but does it matter? If it does, why it doesn’t?
How does this pertain to the USA?
According to, of course, unofficial, statistics, the average American breaks “the law” three times a day without even realizing it.
Legally, that turns everyone into potential convicts and, as such, the property of the state.
After realizing this and similar trends in the US, a remarkable number of commenters in the last couple of years ended their comments to articles that addressed such problems with,
“Cheers!”
What are the alternatives?
For further reference, the following is interesting to read:
https://www.johnwalton-is.net/download/Story%20of%20Mohammed%20Islam%20Unveiled.pdf
"Legally, that turns everyone into potential convicts and, as such, the property of the state."
I consider myself 100% sovereign, and the state only exists at my pleasure. Here in the US, most people who are well studied in the US constitution, the Declaration of independence and Federalist papers also would agree with me.
Human social structure writ large globally is split between those who are self reliant, independent thinkers and those who are inherent blind "followers" always willing to be told what to do.
Governments are only the organs of the Globalists' illusion of control, those who contest that control, outnumber them by the billions. We will nullify "control" by being local close nit communities of individualists.