Mass Shootings

What is going on?

In order to arrive at any halfway-meaningful conclusions, at least two questions must be answered:

1. What causes mass shootings?

2. Who benefits from them?

When the causes of mass shootings are considered, psychiatric medications keep coming up. Psychiatric chemicals are poisons and many “shooters” were also on some of those.

Psychiatrists, these days, are acting without a working paradigm, because the last one (“chemical imbalance”) was refuted just about the time, when statins were publically proven poisonous.

Still, other complementary features emerge as well.

There is always a chance that the event is pre-arranged with crisis actors.

Mass shootings can also be trial runs using a single shooter, who

1. acts either under hypnosis (as it happened to Sirhan; when he shot Kennedy, he seems to have acted under hypnosis and thought he was target shooting at the range...)

https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/government-accidentally-sends-files-on-remote-mind-control-to-journalist/

https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-world-economic-forum-talks-about-mind-control-using-sound-waves/

https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/07/revelation-of-the-method/

2. or is remotely controlled with the graphene receivers in their system receiving instructions by 5G or a similar microwave weapon. After all, those technologies need to be tested, too.

So, the only question left is, “Cui bono?” It is a bit too much coincidence that such events have been piling up at an alarming rate, which alone suggests that an ulterior motive is at play.

Enhanced gun control and, eventually, nearly complete prohibition of firearms can be at play, but thinking about the “riots” in the summer of 2020, when about 30 thousand people were released from prison and were bused around to wreak havoc (Rittenhouse’s attackers were all “recently-released”), it looks like creating an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty was a major reason as well.

Of course, both potential reasons are probably reasonable causes.

Americans have certainly not been buying 20 million guns a year in order to give them up under any circumstances, because they know what awaits them, if they are disarmed. For latest examples, Australia and New Zealand offer appropriate references, but perhaps the artificially-created "riots" by criminals released from prison for the very purpose in the summer of 2020 might also serve as decent guidelines, especially in food riots that, due to the intentional disruption of food supply (e.g. fires in plants and the fake "bird flu," resulting in tens of millions of poultry sacrificed on the altar of mass murder) and distribution, seem to be in the works.

Of course, satellites, drones, and DEWs are now actively in service for crowd control, but they do not discriminate between the “good” and the “bad” guys, which, again, seems to serve the same purpose the whole show has been serving since early 2020.

Moreover, law-abiding citizens are more and more cornered, because even in a case of justified self-defense (as was the case with Rittenhouse), they can face endless persecution and prosecution that, eventually, can result in martial law.