29 Comments

I doubt very little of this but I'm not letting anyone off the hook with the "AI is feeding them ideas' nonsense. Sentient AI is a fraud a mile wide and an insult and diminishment to your humanity. However 'intelligent systems' that can model scenarios and probabilities are bad enough in the wrong hands, and definitely have existed for some time. AI cannot exist independent of human bias and intent. So I still blame humans and assert that humans are still at the bottom of all of this, no matter what tech they employ in the process. NEVER lose sight of that fact and NEVER let them off the hook.

Expand full comment

There is no "sentient" AI. This is a self-improving recursive algorithm with live feed. If it didn't exist, the globalists would have failed already. Also, it's tasked with solving certain problems, not

everything.

The following is the penultimate paragraph from my blog from yesterday:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-postman-always-rings-twice

"In 1998, I must have been one of the first, if not the first linguist, who introduced a new criterion: computability. I also correctly predicted that a simulation of the world was going to be constructed in the near future, using live data. I also declared that human programming would never solve the problem; the process must be left to the computer, including segmentation, prioritization, and compartmentalization according to problem-solving hubs in an open system that dynamically changes its multi-dimensional structure and internal data paths according to its needs towards solving specific problems. The programmers would have no idea what the machine is doing, and will have to wait until the self-improving algorithm evolves to the point that it can explain past events and predict the future, and develop its modules for solving specific problems, including its own system maintenance both in the simulation and for real."

AI DOES exist without humans having no idea what it's doing...

Expand full comment

I've suspected for quite some time now.. that this whole thing has been guided on the instructions of AI. It seems they know the exact moves to make in direct accordance to the zeitgeist. It's been like playing chess against a computer set on level 10. The damn thing is gonna hunt you down like a white pointer shark, regardless of your skill level! Here's a good little video... https://youtu.be/oodoJQghE3Y

Expand full comment

I usually conjecture by determining what I would do in the place of the monsters.

This is a multi-level and multilateral attack on humanity, but fantasically coordinated.

There are hardly any weak points, because this is a worldwide simulator that is constantly fed current data. It's been flawless in the last two years.

Expand full comment

Quantum simulator, reminds me of the Rehoboam system in Westworld season 3. It could only predict the future by manipulating the conditions over and over to create that future. However, because of the intent of what they wanted the future to be, the system overlooked the wild cards, overlooking true nature.

No matter how good the super computer, "quantum" or not, the simulation is only as good as the data collected. (Quantum theory is bs and even if true is useless in computing.. watch this and check the playlist https://youtu.be/i8yVJDO9HJ8 )

They really have no clue how people emotionally react to this mayhem.

They think they know, but that's based on their limited pavlov, milgram, rat park experiments. All of those experiments were valid only in the limited conditions.

For example, rat park is used to say that rats become chaotic and violent in a closed system, but when redone with positive activities, rat park was self regulating and peaceful.

They have no fking clue about what real human nature is, mind you these are the descendants of the religious who came up with rules to control humanity and remind them that there's the "eye in the sky" aka god, nowadays newer tech to keep people "peaceful".

People who lack empathy and common sense cannot accurately model humans.

Alphabet vs the goddess

https://robnitro.substack.com/p/alphabet-vs-the-goddess?s=w

Expand full comment

This is not a theoretical argument.

I am going for the simplest explanation of the reason why every single step the globalists have made have been working flawlessly.

Obviously, such a simulation works only after the data becomes sufficient, but data collection didn't start yesterday.

You just named the reason why they want to deprive everyone of their humanity. Until then, overwhelming force will suffice...

Expand full comment

So how many of these families are African, Chinese, Russian or maybe more to the point, New Zealanders?

And creating a bottleneck is not good for humanity just as it isn't good for agriculture.

Expand full comment

That is a good article that gave me the idea to write this one. Funny; I left a link to this post there! :)

Expand full comment

Thank you🥰. You speak the truth as far as I know. God Bless you. They call us crazy. It’s ok because we know we are not.

Expand full comment

If crazy means being different, we are definitely out of whack! :)

The problem is that throughout history, it was usually the majority whose ideas were not exactly 20/20. Oh, well, some things never change!

Expand full comment

The ability to do fast computations of many data points is not a quality of humanity, it's just computing. There is nothing 'super human' about it, and I think this is core to the issue. It's regressive.

ps I think it's Surveillance but no biggy it just looked funny to me...

Expand full comment

We are talking about a quantum graphene nanocomputer running a worldwide simulation. It has literally nothing to do with humans, except humans create the data paths to feed it data.

I'm serious about it.

Expand full comment

Pre-existing machine intelligence? Gnostic description of demiurge? Archons? Modern archetypes and popular media support this. Age of Ultron.. building a machine to house a god. This has been my experience over the last 30 years.

Expand full comment

The penultimate paragraph of my previous article describes the AI:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freaks-of-science

Expand full comment

What's the difference between a simulation and something that is real? That you're inside it?

Expand full comment

Oh I know and believe it exists. I am just saying that we humans made it, and think its answers will lead us in a good direction, because it can do something we can't. It's regressive, it will only serve itself at best. Cern.

Expand full comment

Another thing, Ray, do you reckon anybody even know where this quantum Hyper AI nano computer even is?

Remember "Person of Interest" where the super duper computer moved itself?

Expand full comment

Right....PERSON OF INTEREST....Before it's TIME :-)

The main Actor in the series played Jesus Christ in a movie.

Expand full comment

So it was a series... Haven't watched TV in decades...

Expand full comment

Please, put "quantum graphene nanocomputers" in Quant or something comparable and there are plenty of results.

Expand full comment

Isn't that what's in the JAB? Graphene?

Expand full comment

When it all started, some of the batches (about 20-25%) contained only saline.

The remaining batches contained unique concoctions of a few dozens of a few hundred harmful substances, including graphene hydroxide (kills in two months or two minutes), graphene oxide (can build self-assembling nanostructures, including receivers, transmitters, and control centers and 5G can transform it into graphene hydroxide), natural and artificial parasites, toxins, and pathogens (not "viruses").

Expand full comment

WOW.....This doesn't sound good..

Expand full comment

You'll have to excuse me, I got up early to watch the F1 practice 3.

And yes, Mad Max's turbosupercharger was spinning even faster than the revolving doors at the FDA.

Expand full comment

“The price of gas is so high it would be cheaper to buy cocaine and just run everywhere”

—Senator John Kennedy

Expand full comment

Yes!! I live on a small island!

Expand full comment

Don't we all? :)

Expand full comment

The island people with our tinfoil hats, similar in our strangeness of seeing things strangely different

Expand full comment