Sometimes human thinking looks absolutely hopeless and the lack of information, while the constant exposure to gaslighting and morons (the two quite often overlap) further hamper the hope for success.
Conceptual segmentation is culture/language-specific, so it never hurts to be able to use more than one. When compartmentalizations from different cultures are compared, the fallacy of the idea of "science" is revealed. (That's one of the reasons why I've never been able to stand Chemistry and Biology.)
Reductionism is a tool that can be applied to logical problems, but there are miserably few of such problems that the human mind can actually process. Problems must be solved at the cognitive levels, where they arise, which is why Wittgenstein managed to get on Bertrand Russell's nerves by suggesting that logic cannot prove that there is no rhinoceros in the room. Indeed, the verification of such a presence is an empirical process.
The ruling classes have always needed an ideology that convinced the disempowered that they deserve their fate and they are okay there. This time, "scientists" are posing as members of the eternal priesthood...
"Medical" myths used to change only about every five years, but the process has been accelerated, possibly because the genocide can't wait until 2030.
All "knowledge" needs a paradigm for processing and the initial tenet must be accepted without questioning. In that sense, all knowledge is religious belief. The only way to break free from the imprisonment is by keeping the paradigm open, thus constantly maintaining an open system. Of course, such a system cannot be used as an ideology for the masses, because the average person is hardly ably to think in simple two-dimensional models and count further than up to two (action - reaction). At least 4-5 steps are necessary for relatively-reliable truth judgments, so such feats are on Lala-land for most people...
Still, most people have gifts and they hardly ever know about them, perhaps because they were never allowed the space to develop them. When it comes to your ability to see future events, it is definitely not a "mental disorder," especially because you have experienced them coming true and because there is no such thing as a mental disorder. I have also experienced stuff that came true and I used to be able to "predict the future," but decided against it, because it makes me feel that free will is a delusion (about 99.8% of the time, it is, even for the most independently-thinking person), it creates a realm of responsibility for me for no good reason, while it drains my mental power excessively. I did predict in the fall of 1999 how the US would look in 20 years, but that was effortless and I was off by only a few months. That is only one example out of many.
Have you read that solar activity affects human health? Apparently, "the flu" and medieval plagues can be explained on that basis. Also, I am getting to the point that I can see resonance as the third source of illness (after poisoning and deficiencies). At first, it sounded far-fetched, but at this point, it sounds feasible (the hypothesis was born, when the transfer of syphilis was investigated).
Did you notice that popular beers are becoming more and more synthetic? (For some reason, my tastebuds are extremely responsive, especially considering my age, and I can taste/smell, if there is something wrong with food/drinks.)
Recently, I had to return Stella Artois (Anauser-Busch has been messing with this forever, but now it has become undrinkable), Heineken, and Erdinger (from Germany) to the store because of the sweet smell/taste resembling formaldehyde (Stella was an abomination and Heineken was the least deterring, but still not for human consumption).
Music for me can come in many forms, but I need some melody. For example, Deep Purple was boring, but Ritchie Blackmore was fine (the only good song from Deep Purple is Many Wasted Sunsets). There is good stuff in most musical genres with the exception of rap, which is not music, and I find blues unnerving. Medieval and classical are mostly fine, although for different purposes, just like pop music. I'll look into your recommendations! :)
Agreed, some rap passes for poetry, but musically it's in the darkest corners of Africa. Still, why don't we continue this conversation either online or in e-mail?
Rap makes me angry, because it was used for killing off much of progressive rock and what came after that was only a disaster.
Funny that you have also concluded that "allergies" are also invented conditions.
I find the following part of your note especially intriguing and worthy of further discussion:
"My mom was told she's "allergic" to iodine. But the thing is, she wasn't, and she's also currently not allergic to iodine. It's impossible to be allergic to iodine. She had bad reactions because of toxic unnatural synthetic shit. Povidone-iodine for instance, is used by pharma, never do they use any actual iodine, kelp, etc. The rockefeller IOM lies about iodine RDIs and try to project a limitation that is 10-100x lower than people who are more intelligent, have less disease and live longer."
I am also signing up for that Substack.
You and I seem to suffer from the same condition: we cannot use our abilities, knowledge, and intelligence in this world. :) Of course, we are in good company!
Apparently, Sanderman deleted his contributions here.
Sanderman is high and on booze all the time. While he makes valuable contributions, he is acting psychotic...
Thank you for the latest modifications. I can understand a lot more out of it.
Conceptual segmentation is culture/language-specific, so it never hurts to be able to use more than one. When compartmentalizations from different cultures are compared, the fallacy of the idea of "science" is revealed. (That's one of the reasons why I've never been able to stand Chemistry and Biology.)
Reductionism is a tool that can be applied to logical problems, but there are miserably few of such problems that the human mind can actually process. Problems must be solved at the cognitive levels, where they arise, which is why Wittgenstein managed to get on Bertrand Russell's nerves by suggesting that logic cannot prove that there is no rhinoceros in the room. Indeed, the verification of such a presence is an empirical process.
The ruling classes have always needed an ideology that convinced the disempowered that they deserve their fate and they are okay there. This time, "scientists" are posing as members of the eternal priesthood...
"Medical" myths used to change only about every five years, but the process has been accelerated, possibly because the genocide can't wait until 2030.
All "knowledge" needs a paradigm for processing and the initial tenet must be accepted without questioning. In that sense, all knowledge is religious belief. The only way to break free from the imprisonment is by keeping the paradigm open, thus constantly maintaining an open system. Of course, such a system cannot be used as an ideology for the masses, because the average person is hardly ably to think in simple two-dimensional models and count further than up to two (action - reaction). At least 4-5 steps are necessary for relatively-reliable truth judgments, so such feats are on Lala-land for most people...
Still, most people have gifts and they hardly ever know about them, perhaps because they were never allowed the space to develop them. When it comes to your ability to see future events, it is definitely not a "mental disorder," especially because you have experienced them coming true and because there is no such thing as a mental disorder. I have also experienced stuff that came true and I used to be able to "predict the future," but decided against it, because it makes me feel that free will is a delusion (about 99.8% of the time, it is, even for the most independently-thinking person), it creates a realm of responsibility for me for no good reason, while it drains my mental power excessively. I did predict in the fall of 1999 how the US would look in 20 years, but that was effortless and I was off by only a few months. That is only one example out of many.
Have you read that solar activity affects human health? Apparently, "the flu" and medieval plagues can be explained on that basis. Also, I am getting to the point that I can see resonance as the third source of illness (after poisoning and deficiencies). At first, it sounded far-fetched, but at this point, it sounds feasible (the hypothesis was born, when the transfer of syphilis was investigated).
Did you notice that popular beers are becoming more and more synthetic? (For some reason, my tastebuds are extremely responsive, especially considering my age, and I can taste/smell, if there is something wrong with food/drinks.)
Recently, I had to return Stella Artois (Anauser-Busch has been messing with this forever, but now it has become undrinkable), Heineken, and Erdinger (from Germany) to the store because of the sweet smell/taste resembling formaldehyde (Stella was an abomination and Heineken was the least deterring, but still not for human consumption).
Music for me can come in many forms, but I need some melody. For example, Deep Purple was boring, but Ritchie Blackmore was fine (the only good song from Deep Purple is Many Wasted Sunsets). There is good stuff in most musical genres with the exception of rap, which is not music, and I find blues unnerving. Medieval and classical are mostly fine, although for different purposes, just like pop music. I'll look into your recommendations! :)
Agreed, some rap passes for poetry, but musically it's in the darkest corners of Africa. Still, why don't we continue this conversation either online or in e-mail?
Rap makes me angry, because it was used for killing off much of progressive rock and what came after that was only a disaster.
Funny that you have also concluded that "allergies" are also invented conditions.
I find the following part of your note especially intriguing and worthy of further discussion:
"My mom was told she's "allergic" to iodine. But the thing is, she wasn't, and she's also currently not allergic to iodine. It's impossible to be allergic to iodine. She had bad reactions because of toxic unnatural synthetic shit. Povidone-iodine for instance, is used by pharma, never do they use any actual iodine, kelp, etc. The rockefeller IOM lies about iodine RDIs and try to project a limitation that is 10-100x lower than people who are more intelligent, have less disease and live longer."
I am also signing up for that Substack.
You and I seem to suffer from the same condition: we cannot use our abilities, knowledge, and intelligence in this world. :) Of course, we are in good company!
Right, but whatever is down under, will arrive everywhere else, too. They picked Australia and New Zealanders for a test run.