Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stegiel's avatar

He has a view that is mainstream. Do not all mainstream sources suffer from our distrust?

I disagree with him often. I think he has inaccurate history. I accept he has his historic view even as the Saker has and nearly every one has as commentator. His opinion is interesting for his resume. He has a particular point of view. I read it. I think about it.

Expand full comment
Riki Tiki Tavi's avatar

I agree with the contextual premise that many doctors support the globalist narrative,i.e., validating the extremity of a "bioweapon" that was as survivable as any common cold-flu bug--while stating that Ivermectin and HCQ could've been promoted instead of the experimental vaxx. However--this was also about a profit schedule and I address this in my recent articles--re Money Laundering. Money is a tool of war. To ignore this as a factor is historically naive. I am not stating this in order to promote antagnonism--just clarity.The elite's de-population agenda has been known to many researchers for going on 20 years at the very least! The Billionaire club members use a profit scheme in order to maintain supremacy in a "capital dominant" realm. I tell folks to watch "The Tiny Dot" for clues re power. pax [my recent post:https://rikitikitavi.substack.com/p/more-money-laundering-and-spin-cycles]

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?