He has a view that is mainstream. Do not all mainstream sources suffer from our distrust?
I disagree with him often. I think he has inaccurate history. I accept he has his historic view even as the Saker has and nearly every one has as commentator. His opinion is interesting for his resume. He has a particular point of view. I read it. I think about it.
I agree with the contextual premise that many doctors support the globalist narrative,i.e., validating the extremity of a "bioweapon" that was as survivable as any common cold-flu bug--while stating that Ivermectin and HCQ could've been promoted instead of the experimental vaxx. However--this was also about a profit schedule and I address this in my recent articles--re Money Laundering. Money is a tool of war. To ignore this as a factor is historically naive. I am not stating this in order to promote antagnonism--just clarity.The elite's de-population agenda has been known to many researchers for going on 20 years at the very least! The Billionaire club members use a profit scheme in order to maintain supremacy in a "capital dominant" realm. I tell folks to watch "The Tiny Dot" for clues re power. pax [my recent post:https://rikitikitavi.substack.com/p/more-money-laundering-and-spin-cycles]
https://truthpress.com/news/24-year-old-hockey-player-forced-to-retire-due-to-sudden-heart-problem/
The perpetrators and genocidal ideologues are not in it just for the money, other than that controlling our money is power.
But the lower level tools and oligarchs are bribed by money and belonging to the power cabal.
Those at the minion level are in it for social acceptance and money in terms of being allowed to earn an income.
As for who is controlled opposition; I guess that we all are. It''s a big club and you and I are not in it.
He has a view that is mainstream. Do not all mainstream sources suffer from our distrust?
I disagree with him often. I think he has inaccurate history. I accept he has his historic view even as the Saker has and nearly every one has as commentator. His opinion is interesting for his resume. He has a particular point of view. I read it. I think about it.
I agree with the contextual premise that many doctors support the globalist narrative,i.e., validating the extremity of a "bioweapon" that was as survivable as any common cold-flu bug--while stating that Ivermectin and HCQ could've been promoted instead of the experimental vaxx. However--this was also about a profit schedule and I address this in my recent articles--re Money Laundering. Money is a tool of war. To ignore this as a factor is historically naive. I am not stating this in order to promote antagnonism--just clarity.The elite's de-population agenda has been known to many researchers for going on 20 years at the very least! The Billionaire club members use a profit scheme in order to maintain supremacy in a "capital dominant" realm. I tell folks to watch "The Tiny Dot" for clues re power. pax [my recent post:https://rikitikitavi.substack.com/p/more-money-laundering-and-spin-cycles]
Great post, thanks. AWS was involved with publishing the computer model. They bragged about it.