The globalists have all the money they want (definitely more than what they need) from taxpayer sources for free, so they are in it in order to construct their idea of "the perfect society."
There are three ways to "convince" the collaborators and the enforcers:
1. Lavish financial support/deals (as you also suggest);
2. Promises of survival (absolutely fake, will never be kept);
3. Good old-fashioned intimidation (it's fast, cheap, and it nearly always works).
The problem I can see is that no matter which offer one receives, turning it down ensures low life expectancy.
Of course, as you also suggest, the useful idiots are for free, but they are already dead; they just don't know it yet.
Again, exactly as you are saying, as a result of the gargantuan size and varieties of gaslighting and the lack of sufficient information, everybody against the official narrative is "controlled opposition." Some are more than others, but nobody, including me, can conjecture the reasons and the objectives of the full scope of events.
He has a view that is mainstream. Do not all mainstream sources suffer from our distrust?
I disagree with him often. I think he has inaccurate history. I accept he has his historic view even as the Saker has and nearly every one has as commentator. His opinion is interesting for his resume. He has a particular point of view. I read it. I think about it.
I have my theory. Like David Stockman also he is a recognized professional.The 80's both men's peaks and now 40 years later comes time to have a Post-Covid reassessment of our civilization and culture. And it is interesting that DADA and not theory grasped this in 1916.
I agree with the contextual premise that many doctors support the globalist narrative,i.e., validating the extremity of a "bioweapon" that was as survivable as any common cold-flu bug--while stating that Ivermectin and HCQ could've been promoted instead of the experimental vaxx. However--this was also about a profit schedule and I address this in my recent articles--re Money Laundering. Money is a tool of war. To ignore this as a factor is historically naive. I am not stating this in order to promote antagnonism--just clarity.The elite's de-population agenda has been known to many researchers for going on 20 years at the very least! The Billionaire club members use a profit scheme in order to maintain supremacy in a "capital dominant" realm. I tell folks to watch "The Tiny Dot" for clues re power. pax [my recent post:https://rikitikitavi.substack.com/p/more-money-laundering-and-spin-cycles]
Yes, a great feature of SubStack. As a writer I share that ethic. Without the reactions of readers it gets old fast. Writing to watch yourself explain what you think has limited value.
https://truthpress.com/news/24-year-old-hockey-player-forced-to-retire-due-to-sudden-heart-problem/
The perpetrators and genocidal ideologues are not in it just for the money, other than that controlling our money is power.
But the lower level tools and oligarchs are bribed by money and belonging to the power cabal.
Those at the minion level are in it for social acceptance and money in terms of being allowed to earn an income.
As for who is controlled opposition; I guess that we all are. It''s a big club and you and I are not in it.
The globalists have all the money they want (definitely more than what they need) from taxpayer sources for free, so they are in it in order to construct their idea of "the perfect society."
There are three ways to "convince" the collaborators and the enforcers:
1. Lavish financial support/deals (as you also suggest);
2. Promises of survival (absolutely fake, will never be kept);
3. Good old-fashioned intimidation (it's fast, cheap, and it nearly always works).
The problem I can see is that no matter which offer one receives, turning it down ensures low life expectancy.
Of course, as you also suggest, the useful idiots are for free, but they are already dead; they just don't know it yet.
Again, exactly as you are saying, as a result of the gargantuan size and varieties of gaslighting and the lack of sufficient information, everybody against the official narrative is "controlled opposition." Some are more than others, but nobody, including me, can conjecture the reasons and the objectives of the full scope of events.
He has a view that is mainstream. Do not all mainstream sources suffer from our distrust?
I disagree with him often. I think he has inaccurate history. I accept he has his historic view even as the Saker has and nearly every one has as commentator. His opinion is interesting for his resume. He has a particular point of view. I read it. I think about it.
It's embarrassing that he manages to keep a good name...
I have my theory. Like David Stockman also he is a recognized professional.The 80's both men's peaks and now 40 years later comes time to have a Post-Covid reassessment of our civilization and culture. And it is interesting that DADA and not theory grasped this in 1916.
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2022/09/07/biden-declares-war-on-white-america/
I agree with the contextual premise that many doctors support the globalist narrative,i.e., validating the extremity of a "bioweapon" that was as survivable as any common cold-flu bug--while stating that Ivermectin and HCQ could've been promoted instead of the experimental vaxx. However--this was also about a profit schedule and I address this in my recent articles--re Money Laundering. Money is a tool of war. To ignore this as a factor is historically naive. I am not stating this in order to promote antagnonism--just clarity.The elite's de-population agenda has been known to many researchers for going on 20 years at the very least! The Billionaire club members use a profit scheme in order to maintain supremacy in a "capital dominant" realm. I tell folks to watch "The Tiny Dot" for clues re power. pax [my recent post:https://rikitikitavi.substack.com/p/more-money-laundering-and-spin-cycles]
Great post, thanks. AWS was involved with publishing the computer model. They bragged about it.
It is I, who must be thankful for my considerate readers! :)
Writers need readers like musicians need listeners. We are all in this for life.
Ray enjoys his commenters not just the sound of his own voice.
Yes, a great feature of SubStack. As a writer I share that ethic. Without the reactions of readers it gets old fast. Writing to watch yourself explain what you think has limited value.
It doesn't matter what I think; what matters is what my readers think! The whole site is of them! :)
Us commenters get some of that positive effect too.
An audience of at least one other.
Secretly, I also hope that people manage to find friends or even get together here.
The comment sections are shaping up nicely towards a community that shares cultural standards.
Yes, it is a conversation.