I am a proponent of a solutocracy, where problems are solved for Ethically, rather than passing legalates and enFORCING them on Others. Where the three Laws of Ethics are used to determine whether there is any wrong-doing.
I've followed Kirsch for about a year and enjoyed his presentations of statistics and critical stance vis-a-vis Covid, Inc. my enthousiasm ended when, sometime earlier this year (Atlanta?) his foundation VSRF organised an international meeting with some of the shadier figures (Malone) as speaker while deterring certain independent journalists from attending. one learns new things every day :-))
Alternatively to this view he simply reflects an intelligence disrupted by a post-truth world. I believe in his view other than social agreements and social arrangements qua truth is unknowable outside a tiny sliver of Das SCIENCE. And Das SCIENCE is what HIS social agreements say it is. In fact most of the putative RESISTANCE is caught up in the contradiction of say No Virus.
Yes but more than that as a cultural force of post truth. Das Science is not qua truth. By political power a faith and priesthood arises insisting dogmatically Das Science in their priestly hands is alone qua truth.
I am a proponent of a solutocracy, where problems are solved for Ethically, rather than passing legalates and enFORCING them on Others. Where the three Laws of Ethics are used to determine whether there is any wrong-doing.
Solutocracy (7 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/solutocracy:c?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
Man has three enemies:
himself, the world, and the devil.
Of these the first is, by far,
the most irresistible evil.
The Cherubinic Wanderer
What if you don't believe in the Devil; is he still considered an enemy? For many humans, they are their own worst enemy. Something to think about.
At the time the poet strolled the Rhineland the devil lived in the minds of many. And if no devil you are left with "himself and the world."
Is Steve deluded or is Steve deluding?
both
I've followed Kirsch for about a year and enjoyed his presentations of statistics and critical stance vis-a-vis Covid, Inc. my enthousiasm ended when, sometime earlier this year (Atlanta?) his foundation VSRF organised an international meeting with some of the shadier figures (Malone) as speaker while deterring certain independent journalists from attending. one learns new things every day :-))
Alternatively to this view he simply reflects an intelligence disrupted by a post-truth world. I believe in his view other than social agreements and social arrangements qua truth is unknowable outside a tiny sliver of Das SCIENCE. And Das SCIENCE is what HIS social agreements say it is. In fact most of the putative RESISTANCE is caught up in the contradiction of say No Virus.
Not quite sure I'm following that. Das Science = establishment science?
And contradiction means that resistance has fallen on two sides of that issue?
Yes but more than that as a cultural force of post truth. Das Science is not qua truth. By political power a faith and priesthood arises insisting dogmatically Das Science in their priestly hands is alone qua truth.
And here is the resistance who agree in science unless they decide otherwise. Dr. Vernon Coleman say. https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/a-response-to-dr-vernon-coleman