Beauty and goodness must prevail. Well, having a brain for thinking wouldn’t necessarily hurt, either, although if ignorance is bliss, it’s not serving happiness. Independent thinking seems to be already against “the law” already, anyway, so one must choose between the paths to human values and to “happiness.”
The following video (nearly 19 minutes) can give you an idea that it has been in the plans for several years:
https://iaindavis.com/itt-video-new-world-order/
Especially the “climate change” part deserves special attention.
The problem with the video is that it’s evaluating everything in the past as if it had happened in the present.
Why would those who are “taking over the world” openly congregate, unless
It’s about to mislead the populace about their identities (which is what I would do, if I were one of the currently-cooperating tribes);
They are indeed different tribes that are afraid to meet, unless in public.
I am still sticking to my guns that the real culprits remain invisible. Or maybe not, only out-of-reach, while sipping their drinks on their self-sustaining islands on the southern Pacific. Even a captured actor, Nicolas Cage, owns six! Imagine what the uber-rich can do under the circumstances.
Finalizing Who Is Responsible
As the following is a flagship article and the vanishing resources that disallow previous supporters to contribute financially, I am making an exception here:
Perhaps they're too weak and cowardly to show their faces. Afraid they'll be targeted or strung up like the rats they truly are. All that power and control is a facade. It does not and will not make you a better person.
Who is the New World Order? Who is Responsible?
It's probably been the same arrangement of cults since the Iron Age.
The Powers of today are the Equity Owners and their Corporate System, which includes and is not limited to; Governments; Corporations; Banks and Financial Trusts; NGO's and Philoanthropaths.
But it's not simple -- it's not a Hierarchy, at least in part it's a "Heterarchy" which is not opposite to the top down systems that we may have thought.
To find a pattern that shows more clearly, I have taken a closer look at the ancient world origins for this "System."
In a basic sense, there were at least three major parts:
1. The Priests of the Temple -- Managed Temple Economies.
Mediated agreements within Trade and made it exclusive to those who favored the temple.
2. The Kings of the Palace -- Managed Palatial Economies.
Kings made political decisions on alliances or war. But they needed to fund armies.
3. Merchants at the Temple managed it like a Bank -- Religion and Commerce became hybrids between Priests and Merchants.
Temples became Banking branches and mediated Kingdoms into Empires.
The three legs to a stool shown above were always attached to a network of power brokering; eventually they were merged into a system of Monotheism that formed a base that connected Commodification of resources with Psychological Control of People.
The material world governed by Kings and Priests was then complimented by the Theological Capitalism of Big Religion. This was a metaphoric Giant, yet those who orchestrated this type of manipulation were very few, they were actually a weaker power.
The best way for them to gain an advantage over the larger powers around them was to learn how to play those larger powers against each other to weaken them. This is a strategy the cult of control does today; the news cycle is designed to keep people divided by their own vain conceits, ideologies, religions or financial interests. To find out who the culprits are, just ask exactly who benefits from what we see today?