Marc Crispin Miller asked me yesterday in https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/scotus-smashes-colorados-case-on/comment/49154494:
So what kind of government would you prefer? Here's a novel thought: How about an electoral democracy in which elections ARE decided by the will of the electorate?
Here is my response:
Thank you for asking.
I kind of agree with Thomas Payne, but the problem deserves its day in court.
There is nothing wrong with the original setup of the US, where the upper middle class dominated. Voting for those, who pay taxes. Confederalism instead of a central federal government. Constitutional rights honored, instead of being taken away for the “government” offering protection, mostly from itself, as in an extortion scheme, which is what federal taxes remain (with the IRS introduced along with the Federal Reserve Act that stole the country in 1913).
According to Aristotle, democracy is the most despicable form of government, because it's the rule of the mob. Inalienable rights provide some protection against the tyranny of the majority (the majority is always wrong, by the way). A single ruler is certainly the most transparent--and probably the most cost-efficient--form of government, although it’s rarely pretty. However, it's based on protecting an existing culture, and the US has been just about fully ruined culturally. Without a fundamental ideology that keeps the masses at bay, all civilizations collapse.
The constant US government is a clown show in which pre-selected globalist stooges act up to occupy and entertain their voters’ minds, while their electorate is left out in the cold. The “national budget” is purposefully bankrupting the country, and the Fed is constantly picking up “loans” from itself, distributes it among friends and family, while the taxpayer is supposed to foot the bill that already includes the interest towards the loan, which is an integral part of the USD’s controlled demolition en route to the CBDC.
An ideal government is transparent and its politicians are accountable:
Still, the government must remain trusted enough by the people not to have to be afraid of the mob. That sounds like an irreconcilable contradiction to me.
Worse, forms of government seem to cycle, progressing from the communal to the tyrannical, and the path usually doesn’t end well for a civilization. Power always gets concentrated before the inevitable civilizational collapse. It is usually another group that takes over, and the technocratic globalists are ready to do that, while still making people believe that their opinion matters. Theirs is certainly NOT my preferred form of government, but they decided a few decades ago that I am a parasite and a pest on the face of the Earth, and I deserve to be exterminated. It’s happening. With the insect population diminishing due to all forms of radiation, my turn is coming up soon.
I JUST WANT TO BE LEFT THE FUCK ALONE!
I'm sure there is a word for that .......
I don’t know what it’s like in the States, but down here in Australia, it’s simply hilarious watching those who’re out there vehemently protesting for Palestine, now being openly branded as “anti-semitic,” by the very same tyrannical monster they helped usher in through three and a half full years of blindly fanatical unwavering compliance.
I’d like to ask them— So how’s it feel to be on the ‘wrong side’ of this thing you all so enthusiastically and obediently helped to create, huh?