Who is leading whom?
Is it success, when your dreams come true?
The documentary called “The Secret” (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0846789/) was a hit about 15 years ago. It suggested that if you consistently and persistently keep imagining your desires in minuscule details, they will come true. Well, the place where everyone’s desire comes true irrespective of anyone else’s, already has a name: it’s called Hell.
Moreover, something that looks good or desirable today, can turn out devastating tomorrow and a choice that looks bad today can prove to be the best possible option later, when even that choice is not be available anymore.
Some people are dreaming about becoming leaders. Do they know what they are doing? Leadership is supposed to be a safe position because, according to popular beliefs, nobody bosses leaders around. In return, leaders have to navigate on capricious waters and sometimes walk on eggshells. Leadership doesn’t even guarantee safety; just ask Saddam Hussein.
Successful leaders in history
When I look at the most successful people in history, for example, Alexander the Great or Napoleon, what did they have in common?
They realized that most people don’t want to or just don’t have the ability to make decisions for their own lives, so they prefer to follow a leader (especially, if the leader wins fights).
Their followers believed that their leader was one of them.
They united their followers and turned them into a fighting force. These followers were willing to die for their leaders.
The method hasn’t changed ever since:
Great leaders granted their followers dignity and, whether you like it or not, a sense of superiority. The idea of the Übermensch officially started with Aristotle, whose student, Alexander the Great, represented the ideology of Greek superiority during his conquests. Unofficially, a sense of superiority has always been ingrained even in tribal cultures. More recently, the same concept was/is present in Pan-Slavism, in Zionism, in most religions and spiritual practices, in the communist ideology that more often than not, generated “Supreme Leaders,” in Germany between 1933 and 1945, or in American exceptionalism that has successfully recruited soldiers to fight in foreign lands for those, who have owned the US since 1867. Notice that some of the leaders were good, while others were bad even for their own subjects that, as far as I can see, usually manifested itself by their subjects’ being granted or deprived of human dignity and/or an official ideology that created enemies out of nothing. These strategies can be combined or used separately, as needed.
Is there really such a thing as a superior culture? Technocratic functionalism is, apparently, not alone by saying so.
When would you consider a culture truly superior? That’s a good vantage point that can lead to deeper understanding and an increased ability to make personal decisions, so keeping that in mind, you might want to consider reading this article from the beginning again.
How do classic “great leaders” compare with today’s globalist control freaks?
The globalist control freaks usurp their power by installing their people into positions of power:
their own politicians to “lead” countries, their “scientists” to tell people to follow their “science,”
their own media people to restrict the availability of data and to manipulate public opinion (even with false statistics),
their own central bankers to enforce full control over the global money flow, their own stock market traders who can coordinate insider trading and profit from future events that the globalist can arrange to happen (while only spending the people’s money),
their own corporations to control production and distribution, and
their own “medical” hired killers, who can easily destroy lives at all levels.
These monsters are now presiding over the commoners by annihilating all self-respect and subject their slaves to constant humiliation that ensures feeble, if any, resistance.
Their motto seems to be:
“You cannot consider people stupid and powerless enough!”
The powers-that-be seemingly treat people as morons, but according to the actual situation, commoners are blindfolded, trapped, and disempowered to the point that they are ready to lick boots even for the permission to remove their muzzles… And these days, they keep writing petitions to those, who usurp the power to destroy lives.
Today, the “leaders” who look down on all others, are winning, which makes them successful on their own terms, and they couldn’t care less for others.
What choices do you have?
Voting?
Quite a few people still believe in politicians, who will save the day. Such “voters” don’t seem to notice that no politician can even run for office, unless they are okayed by the puppet-masters. Remember Ross Perot? He was probably the last one, who tried to be “independent,” but must have needed an adult diaper after being so scared that he jumped out of the presidential race faster than he would have been able to reach the restroom.
The masses can vote on which of the sock puppets they want to work on humanity’s destruction for the next few years, but Dominion “voting” machines, mail-in “votes,” “votes” by the dead, ID-less “votes,” and a number of other tricks would make sure there would be no surprise for the globalists, even if voting was fair. By voting, the suckers called “voters” acknowledge the criminal system and become unsuspecting accomplices to their own demise, which makes them look all the more ridiculous through their masters’ eyes.
Vote with your wallet? You are using their money that you are borrowing for them from their central bank at an interest…
They risk nothing, while working on the controlled demolition of the current system, so “strikes,” for instance, only accelerate the progress to their technocratic Paradise by breaking down the current system faster. The same applies to violent demonstrations that can be easily dispersed with Directed Energy Weapons.
One choice is certainly open for everyone
Where is it logical and prudent to place your trust, so you wouldn’t lose all hope?
That is your decision.
Menschendämmerung? Is it that no more leaders are needed, because there is nobody left to lead?
Ray, you remember Ross on election night, dancing, smiling, clearly he was the happiest man on planet earth?
I still think Trump would have been smarter to have followed his "lead."
Alexander and Napoleon who are very similar characters even down to their portrayal in art (and you can add Hannibal here) are also somewhat unbelievable characters.
At the very least most of what we know about both is fiction.