Looks familiar? The Muslim invaders of Europe have been showing the same sign since 2014. Over whom did he prevail?
Alternatively, he may have made a mistake here and is showing an unneeded index finger to the public, which he never meant to extend.
In Britain, after two world wars with martial law, by 1990, less than two percent of legal cases were tried by a jury, effectively depriving the people from influencing the law, because in Natural Law, jury verdicts would become the law.1
What is clearly known about Churchill, apart from him being an exemplary hero of the rulers, who force their propaganda on their subjects?2
His first job was that of a soldier and war correspondent’s between 1895 and 1900:
He was there during the British war against Dutch settlers in South Africa. That was the first time concentration camps were used in modern history, but you won’t hear much about those, just like you won’t hear about the 1.5-2 million German civilians exterminated in open camps by the French and the Americans (Montgomery refused to participate) after WW2, and another 1-1.5 million killed by the Soviets, who openly killed women trying to run away from them in order not to be raped.
Well, uncle Winston (from now on, “Winnie”) was a boozer all his life, and as a good friend of the Rockies, he always managed to get his fill of expensive French champagne until the time he croaked at the age of 91.
He replaced Chamberlain3, who simply wanted peace for the Brits, which would have been the best for his countrymen.
Chamberlain, of course, couldn’t hold the dam against the tide, and Britain declared war on Germany for taking its pre-1920 territories back in 1939. Germany didn’t start WW2; France and Britain did:
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/britain-and-france-declare-war-on-germany
Winnie, however, took over in 1940, and made sure things escalated, despite Hitler letting the British army leave Dunkirk, instead of annihilating it, which he could have easily done:
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/dunkirk
Winnie became an iconic figure, whom, by the way, British subjects hated, but you cannot read about that in your history books, either:
https://britishheritage.com/history/winston-churchill-becomes-prime-minister
Shortly after, he, accompanied by France for a little while, kept pursuing the war on Germany, effectively waging WW2 for the bankers. Hitler admired the British Empire and wanted to have an ally in another “Aryan” race, but Winnie preferred his banking allies than serving the people. Well, the international bankers introduced the world’s first fiat money with the British Pound as early as 1692, giving the bankers full control over both domestic and foreign policy after that, so a full-throttle control over Britain by the bankers was not exactly surprising. To put it bluntly, he sacrificed many of his countryman in a war against Germany, but when Stalin occupied all of Poland beyond pre-WW1 German-majority lines, he forgot to declare war on the Soviet Union. What the Soviets did after that is part of the reason why Poles are still not fond of Russians, although citizens of both nations are still being played against each other. Both Brits and Americans can still proudly declare that Stalin, the most prolific mass murderer in world history, is still in history books as the Allies’ main ally4…
During WW2, when it came to the incendiary carpet-bombing German cities (Dresden5 and Leipzig), where there were no military installations, but plenty of POWs resided, he, despite advice from British military leaders, Winnie preferred to go for fire-bombing, which escalated to two of the largest massacres in two single days in western military history, with the possible exceptions of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, assuming a few tens of thousands of deaths make a difference to you. I am still wondering if his causing hundreds of thousands of victims burnt alive, including some of his own countrymen, gave him more than psychological satisfaction…
So, if you had a chance to choose from the two, which one would it be? Okay, only for Prime Minister, not for a pet.
Notice the blue eyes. Only 7% of people have those. My wife noticed that that NWO lackeys usually do.
Although you can request a jury trial even for a speeding ticket, the vast majority of US cases end with plea bargains, because public defenders have less than an hour for a case, and most suspects cannot afford a lawyer. The DA’s office aggressively pursues cases (except against professional t*ist like BLM or Antifa) in order to secure a “high conviction rate.”
Plenty of well-written articles are available for more details:
If you prefer to listen, here is something to refute many popular myths regarding WW2:
In 1945 the German commander invited U.S. General George Patton to seize Prague, but Patton's superior, General Eisenhower, forbade it:
According to Mathis, there is a good chance that much of the Dresden bombing is fake:
After reading the article, a friend of mine sent me the following e-mail. It contains essential information:
"Here's a little extra dirt on Mr. Winnie 'Terror bomber' Churchill. No mention on his complicity in setting up wealthy heirs to property eyed by Rothschild for 'no win' military campaigns like Gallipoli... You know, give them a 'commission' but make sure they and their troops are slaughtered in a set up battle; so the estates their families once had could be consolidated into the hands of the counterfeiting Rothschilds.
"When it's said, 'war is a racket', this is how the racket started out. Used to kill particular men, from particular families, leading troops of men, selected for their libertarian like political proclivities. Now it's done with the hell care system...the other 'racket'."
https://dailytimes.com.pk/815952/churchills-dubious-financial-dealings/
Very strong post, thank you.
Churchill also was utterly corrupt and had to be regularly bailed out by his benefactors, including a massive 1 million pound bailout in 1940: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3231410/Winston-spendaholic-teetered-brink-bankruptcy-saved-secret-backhanders-new-book-Chuchill-s-finances-reveals-spent-40-000-year-casinos-54-000-booze.html
Much of the horrors which you describe perpetrated against the Germans, and basically no one in the west knows about, are articulated in the book "Hellstorm", the review of which is here: https://cienciologia.wordpress.com/category/hellstorm/