The 'VIRUS' has to be emphasized is because that's what mesmerized the sheep. I am 70/30 into the no virus camp and maybe a little more and that goes far beyond COLDvid of course.
But, when we are trying to awaken the aforementioned sheep the last thing we should be doing is trying to convince them that COILDvid never existed as well as virus itself does not exist.
We should be focused on stopping people from getting the jabs, show them detox options and more importantly shown them the importance of vitamin d and the myriad other nutrients and vitamins that makes our bodies function correctly.
Exposing the COLDvid fraud and all surrounding it will in the end lead to exposing germ theory as a fraud as well.
People like RFK Jr. still accept the dogma of mainstream "science." Believing in viruses as pathogenic entities is a core belief that cannot be sacrificed. This theory has never been proven or properly vetted. By arguing that it is fact, we are giving ammunition to these tyrants so they can deceive themselves and all uncritical thinkers that they are going to keep us "safe." RFK Jr. will argue that the "pandemic"represented an "overreaction." I say there never was a pandemic.
Meanwhile all they can do is babble “Trust the Science.” Now “Doctor” Fatty Arbuckle and Buster Keaton have joined forces to remind us “Trust the Science.” Watch TRUST THE SCIENCE RAG here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/trust-the-science-rag
He still believes it's all the Republican's fault, and never blames 1 demonrat, I read his book, Fauci, and all the blame was on the GOP. NOT EVEN THE CROOKS WHO KILLED HIS DAD AND UNCLE.
RFK, Jr. was allegedly hurt by a "vaccine," and if that is true, I would find it hard to believe that he unconditionally believes in "medical science."
Fortunately he doesn't buy all the propaganda. But he still believes in the main tenets of virology. Despite his shortcomings, he's still done a lot of good.
So if I understand Eric Coppolino's article correctly Children's Health Defense is posing as a humanitarian organisation but in actual fact makes a cost/benefit analysis to determine their line of action? Just like any business? Thank you for telling me. I had heard rumours but didn't know where to verify them.
RFK, Jr. certainly doesn't shy away from fundraising, allegedly towards legal expenses, but nothing is transparent these days, and I don't care for making guesses on it in either direction. He does produce temporary relief through lawsuits, and his truth-telling remains spectacularly limited, which is no wonder, because otherwise I don't think he would be allowed to publish at all.
If "the truth about viruses" has been established, why do professionals get so edgy when the question is brought up? Do they fear a Copernican revolution and try to postpone it? Or are we just waiting for a generation of scientists to dodder into their eternal home?
Not being one of the elect I'd love to have a set of names I could rely on for the "the truth about viruses".
In his conversation wit Eric C. he came up with 9/11 as a good example of stuff he could not really delve into. As a matter of fact I think he gave himself away entirely, and without any need. Ominous.
If they are allowed to appear in public, chances are, no, they cannot be trusted. The media is owned and the alt-media (above a certain level or readership) is controlled by the globalists. Being small has its perks, like I can say whatever I want, but it's surely not financially tenable. :)
At the core of this whole immense technology-induced humanitarian catastrophe there is plain old lying and plain old gain-seeking. As old as any old pharao or bescribbled monument.
The 'VIRUS' has to be emphasized is because that's what mesmerized the sheep. I am 70/30 into the no virus camp and maybe a little more and that goes far beyond COLDvid of course.
But, when we are trying to awaken the aforementioned sheep the last thing we should be doing is trying to convince them that COILDvid never existed as well as virus itself does not exist.
We should be focused on stopping people from getting the jabs, show them detox options and more importantly shown them the importance of vitamin d and the myriad other nutrients and vitamins that makes our bodies function correctly.
Exposing the COLDvid fraud and all surrounding it will in the end lead to exposing germ theory as a fraud as well.
Why DOESN'T he support terrain theory?
When all the noise dies down, that's the ONE remaining question.
Can't post.
Is that at all related to mass formation psychosis? People want to bond, often bond very wrongly.
Don't want to 'think differently', get shot down for that.
When the truth is found to be lies
And all the joy within you dies
Don't you want somebody to love?
Don't you need somebody to love?
Wouldn't you love somebody to love?
You better find somebody to love
Love, love
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKtJ0XTwgTE
When the truth is found to be lies
And all the joy within you dies
Don't you want somebody to love?
Don't you need somebody to love?
Wouldn't you love somebody to love?
You better find somebody to love
Love, love
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKtJ0XTwgTE
People like RFK Jr. still accept the dogma of mainstream "science." Believing in viruses as pathogenic entities is a core belief that cannot be sacrificed. This theory has never been proven or properly vetted. By arguing that it is fact, we are giving ammunition to these tyrants so they can deceive themselves and all uncritical thinkers that they are going to keep us "safe." RFK Jr. will argue that the "pandemic"represented an "overreaction." I say there never was a pandemic.
The anthem of the medical freedom movement. Watch the hit music video FOREVER FREEDOM BRIGADE. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/forever-freedom-brigade
Meanwhile all they can do is babble “Trust the Science.” Now “Doctor” Fatty Arbuckle and Buster Keaton have joined forces to remind us “Trust the Science.” Watch TRUST THE SCIENCE RAG here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/trust-the-science-rag
BONUS: Free Download. THE ALTERNATIVE COVID-19 NARRATIVE HANDBOOK. A Collection of useful links. Get it here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-alternative-covid-narrative-handbook
Subscribe to Turfseer's Newsletter. Songs, music videos and much more.
He still believes it's all the Republican's fault, and never blames 1 demonrat, I read his book, Fauci, and all the blame was on the GOP. NOT EVEN THE CROOKS WHO KILLED HIS DAD AND UNCLE.
How interesting
RFK, Jr. was allegedly hurt by a "vaccine," and if that is true, I would find it hard to believe that he unconditionally believes in "medical science."
Fortunately he doesn't buy all the propaganda. But he still believes in the main tenets of virology. Despite his shortcomings, he's still done a lot of good.
So why is it? Did I miss something or is the answer in one of the links?
Pete, please, clarify. The answer to what?
The question in your posts title?
That's from the other author.
So if I understand Eric Coppolino's article correctly Children's Health Defense is posing as a humanitarian organisation but in actual fact makes a cost/benefit analysis to determine their line of action? Just like any business? Thank you for telling me. I had heard rumours but didn't know where to verify them.
RFK, Jr. certainly doesn't shy away from fundraising, allegedly towards legal expenses, but nothing is transparent these days, and I don't care for making guesses on it in either direction. He does produce temporary relief through lawsuits, and his truth-telling remains spectacularly limited, which is no wonder, because otherwise I don't think he would be allowed to publish at all.
There is no need to guess, RFK Jr. spelled it out in his email that Eric published. And lots of people manage to publish the truth about viruses.
If "the truth about viruses" has been established, why do professionals get so edgy when the question is brought up? Do they fear a Copernican revolution and try to postpone it? Or are we just waiting for a generation of scientists to dodder into their eternal home?
Not being one of the elect I'd love to have a set of names I could rely on for the "the truth about viruses".
People tend to get edgy, when their livelihood depends on the lies. :)
Ray come on, what do you take me for?
What's the question?
Such as?
Such as what? Which people?
That was my question, too. :)
In his conversation wit Eric C. he came up with 9/11 as a good example of stuff he could not really delve into. As a matter of fact I think he gave himself away entirely, and without any need. Ominous.
The usual political theater.
Sad though.
Is there actually anybody who shows their face publicly one can really trust?
If they are allowed to appear in public, chances are, no, they cannot be trusted. The media is owned and the alt-media (above a certain level or readership) is controlled by the globalists. Being small has its perks, like I can say whatever I want, but it's surely not financially tenable. :)
At the core of this whole immense technology-induced humanitarian catastrophe there is plain old lying and plain old gain-seeking. As old as any old pharao or bescribbled monument.
Coppolino (chiron) has a truly unique take on the digital aspect of all of this nonsense.
He also does field work. It is respectable to dare to pick up some dirt.