33 Comments

Jesus Returning by a specific date was always a gamble. Hasn't paid off yet. Haley's Comet didn't give a lift to Heaven's Gaters. Just Do it, Didn't. Y2K fizzled. Years before 2012, the Mayan Hunab Ku, clucked but didn't quack.

Expand full comment

have to laugh. But we haven't seen S.M.O.D. (sweet meteor of death) yet. that could be anytime now.

Expand full comment

We are supposed to be in another pandemic starting on September 13?? Wow, I must’ve missed it… oh well, I still refuse to participate…

I guess I need to perfect my eye rolling again… 👻

Expand full comment
author

Nobody in their right mind will participate, when the time comes, but they will be the minority. :)

Expand full comment

Aye. There is also some beauty in the world, if only our communing here to chronicle its end. Doesn't take much inductive/deductive reasoning, or simple pattern recognition to determine which groups want most of the world gone. Nor would it be hard to research who is most oft expelled in human history, created communism, feminism and almost every false flag, dysgenic component of the past 125 years.

Still, here WE are. A small group of bedraggled, hangers-on. Sitting on a rapidly flooding promontory, on the edge of sanity...

Expand full comment
author

The problem is that people often mix up the useful idiots, the enablers, and the enforcers with the criminals on the top, whose identity is still impossible to ascertain with exacting clarity... The plan is certainly older than the oldest person alive...

Expand full comment
Sep 17, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Well, the Sumerians did come first! So we are "told." At some atavistic level Ray, each of us must decide what could possibly be true. It's all a joke. The only way I can find the strength, in my massively hypertrophic body to type, is to think this is a joke. A bad joke, but still...

Expand full comment
author

You are saying perhaps the most important thing under the circumstances: everybody has to decide on their own and take responsibility for their lives and actions. Of course, being open to change one's stance is a must, and it often needs a good sense of humor. :)

The current cabal can be dated back to 1692, when they took control of the money supply by the Bank of England. However, it's unclear if that role remained permanent and/or required association or alliance with other groups. Somehow, I have the feeling that all the publicized wrongdoers, as bad as they are, are only patsies or red herrings.

Expand full comment

Well said, and agreed. The common Saturnalic worship and references takes me back to the days of Noah. And the reality is, just as with the existence of our own souls, we will never know! Were we put here to mobilize some resistance to forces antithetical to free and happy human existence? Or, do these obvious eugenicists know something we do not, and the reality is their toxins are merciful, in comparison to a future in which of the 50 billion lives, 25 billion a year starve? Above our pay grades, but certainly not our keyboards...

Expand full comment
Sep 17, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

I think that maybe you're mixing up dates.

1692 - Salem witch trials

1692 - Paterson proposes use of public debt

1694 - BofE established

Also - first section of your blurb. Paragraphs ... Heard of them?

Expand full comment
author

Indeed; thank you for the correction!

Expand full comment

Indeed, the psychopaths in control are diffusing an aggregate with substanceless fear porn in all directions. Thanks for this breakdown

Expand full comment
author

I'm finding any labeling dangerous, because it provides a false sense of superiority, while causing some conceptual disorientation. The term "psychopath" is extremely popular:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/looking-for-psychopaths

Expand full comment

I contend that what They do is psychopathic, and ergo, They are psychopaths. It has nothing to do with "superiority," but stating observable facts.

Expand full comment
author

Obviously, there is something wrong with those who feel so superior that they have no problem with killing off 95% of all people. This level of detachment is already criminally insane. Labeling them, however, confirms the detachment and mirrors the behavior. Anyone can do it anytime...

Expand full comment

I'm not sure what the difference between labeling Them criminally insane and labeling Them psychopaths (which amounts to the same thing) is.

And placing a descriptive label will wind up "mirror[ing] the behavior?" How so? I describe Them by Their psychopathic behavior, but that does not mean I'm therefore a psychopath. [shrug]

Expand full comment
author

The points I'm trying to make is that

1. everyone can behave like a psychopath, but that doesn't mean the person is one.

2. Also, categorizing can easily reduce the scope of considerations later on, because previous judgments usually make further ones unnecessary.

Expand full comment

politely disagree: everyone who's not a psychopath cannot 'behave like a psychopath....'. that's a core point: only a psychopath can behave like a psychopath (and it is said they can recognise each other - creeeepy....).

Expand full comment

Whether "everyOne" can or not, the Ones in control on Our planet fit the bill to a T. What They do is psychopathic. It is psychopathic to sell a death jab as "safe and effective." It is psychopathic to manipulate society for a century and more with lies aimed at culling and controlling 100%.

It is psychopathic to strip Our natural foods from Us with lies of "Human-created global warming." It is psychopaths to wag dogs to justify bankers' wars. It is psychopathic to focus children on sex with lies of "zillion genders" - "What are You?"

It is psychopathic to push People onto currencies (CBDC's) that They can control 100% and thereby control Us - stripping Us of freedom.

To sit around suggesting that They should not be called what They are empowers Them by removing the focus from solutions.

Call Them Prifflecblants, or whatever. We need to solve for Them.

Expand full comment

They´re more like sociopaths, so sociopathetic, lol!

https://liborsoural.substack.com/p/immanuel-kant-fool-stop

Expand full comment

Actually, by My decades-long research, it seems that "psychopath" is an umbrella term for sociopaths, narcissists, and a few others. Here is a great video I mirrored long ago, discussing primary (genetic) psychopaths, the various sorts, and in the end He brings up secondary (conditioned) psychopaths...

Learn About The Human Psychopath: https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/learn-about-the-human-psychopath:8?

Expand full comment

LOL! I thought I coined the term sociopath when I was in Hollywood as a screenwriter. in the 90´s, pedaling my bombastic script with the same name, scaring the shit out of the studio producers and owners. Practice is the best research, forget about theory, LOL!

https://liborsoural.substack.com/p/peter-8-wendy

https://liborsoural.substack.com/p/jumping-off-the-same-bridge

https://liborsoural.substack.com/p/homeless-no-more

Expand full comment

Ban DiHygrogen Monoxide as well (H2O), it kills thousands every year. Maybe the reason the lock-downs didn't go further was that in the form we experienced it provided for a massive wealth transfer from small to large business.

I had some thoughts on changes to school curriculum that might help, but don't hold your breath.

https://drp314.substack.com/p/things-not-taught-in-school

Expand full comment

LOL! I agree! Di-hydrogen Monoxide! Ghastly stuff! We should eradicate it 100%!!!

Expand full comment