DNA Theory in Practice

Are you "it"?

People are certainly treated as “kids”; the authors, of course, are different from the ones in the picture.

---

DNA theory seems realistic to me. Mutation is real, and it usually happens as a result of environmental toxicity. It is possible to theorize that the three-legged or two-headed babies originate from the body’s attempt to adjust to changes, but to me, the whole story sounds like a failed attempt to justify a faulty theory. Gene-altering toxicity, however, can be planned and liberally deployed without “informed consent.” Based on the truism that “if something can be done, someone will do it,” it must be going on, and it must have been, for a while. Initially, such experiments on humans are necessary in order to bring DNA manipulation to a predictable and controllable level. Later on, once those prerequisites are met, all hell can break loose. Now that I think of it, to me, it looks like such experiments have been going on for a lot longer than perceived or even suspected; they might go back as early as the ideas of “natural selection” (Darwinism) “the survival of the fittest” (Spencer’s Social Darwinism). With the most recent AI analyses, I assume that the models are becoming quite reliable, as long as the AI is allowed to do its computations, and the outcome might not be intelligible for humans, but it works. For this to work, targeted populations must severely underestimate the capabilities of AI, which seems to be one of the recent psyops:

Another is the combination of this projected stupid AI and DNA theory manifests itself as trolling that emphasizes human ignorance and assumes that AI is stupid:

Perhaps all these make the end of the globalist project so predictable:

What can be expected after this? More experiments in the “Green Zones”?

Some may believe that that will be when

More likely, it’s already happening and, as Shakespeare also suggested, “Hell is empty, and all the devils are here.”