Ray - You are familiar with Todd Callender, the attorney who has gone farther 'down the rabbit hole' than most anyone?
He has allegedly documented that people whose DNA has been modified by synthetic modified mRNA - gene-altering technology - become property of the patent holder. The Supreme Court of the U.S. case he refers to which says that the patent holder own living things that have the genetic modification they patented probably doe not refer to humans. But patenting of ANY life form is a violation of our Constitution, which the courts ha long upheld.
I haven't yet had the time to go though all your posts, so I don't know if you are aware of Callender and his work.
My grasp is that Ones who have corrected Their status from debtor to creditor are no longer "owned." Once One is a secured party/creditor, They only have jurisdiction over the ALL CAPS name, which is a TRUST, and Your flesh and blood are Your own.
A friend of Mine, who corrects People's status for a living (US and maybe Canada only) corrected Mine as a gift. (No way, in My destitute state would I have had the $1,500 He charges!) I wrote an article about one encounter with the costumed bullies here (They leave Me alone now after one more encounter, which I may write up also):
I told You I was an agent, the chief of the FBI (Female Body Inspector). See My latest P P Post Tattoo, which was not censored. Sorry for the stutter, You know, Ray,, My professional deformation, being in the field almost 24/7, lol. Enjoy! Btw, I AM Professor Dixie ...
Yes, I know the argument... It the cat gets lost, an animal shelter or vet may have the right reader to read the chip. If it still functions. If the body hasn't expelled it. Or, if it has not 'wandered'.
I'll never willingly microchip an animal again.
"Vaccines" can be contaminated with a bunch of stuff, including nano-tech. We may nit be told if the vaccines our animals are being given contains synthetic modified mRNA, either.
Ray - You are familiar with Todd Callender, the attorney who has gone farther 'down the rabbit hole' than most anyone?
He has allegedly documented that people whose DNA has been modified by synthetic modified mRNA - gene-altering technology - become property of the patent holder. The Supreme Court of the U.S. case he refers to which says that the patent holder own living things that have the genetic modification they patented probably doe not refer to humans. But patenting of ANY life form is a violation of our Constitution, which the courts ha long upheld.
I haven't yet had the time to go though all your posts, so I don't know if you are aware of Callender and his work.
Yes, I have been familiar with the state of affairs, but not with Callender.
Still, the collateral for the government/taxpayer "debt" to the Fed is "the whole country, its inhabitants, their assets, and lives and limbs..."
Communism = What's mine is mine and what's yours is mine and from a historical perspective = starvation and certain untimely death.
Do you actually think that that is what I said?
exactly
Persons (not people) are considered Real Property .... legally
Kinda reminds me of corporations being "persons" as legal entities...
My grasp is that Ones who have corrected Their status from debtor to creditor are no longer "owned." Once One is a secured party/creditor, They only have jurisdiction over the ALL CAPS name, which is a TRUST, and Your flesh and blood are Your own.
A friend of Mine, who corrects People's status for a living (US and maybe Canada only) corrected Mine as a gift. (No way, in My destitute state would I have had the $1,500 He charges!) I wrote an article about one encounter with the costumed bullies here (They leave Me alone now after one more encounter, which I may write up also):
Walking the Walk (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/walking-the-walk
I told You I was an agent, the chief of the FBI (Female Body Inspector). See My latest P P Post Tattoo, which was not censored. Sorry for the stutter, You know, Ray,, My professional deformation, being in the field almost 24/7, lol. Enjoy! Btw, I AM Professor Dixie ...
Agree
Please, explain.
Why would that be the most important, when they already own everyone and most children couldn't survive without help?
Can it be dangerous for a human to have a microchipped cat?
Why would anyone microchip a cat? Or any animal?
Yes, I know the argument... It the cat gets lost, an animal shelter or vet may have the right reader to read the chip. If it still functions. If the body hasn't expelled it. Or, if it has not 'wandered'.
I'll never willingly microchip an animal again.
"Vaccines" can be contaminated with a bunch of stuff, including nano-tech. We may nit be told if the vaccines our animals are being given contains synthetic modified mRNA, either.
Chipping is always for the human, not the cat. :)
And, it seems, maybe not even for the owner.
In what sense?