The only thing that explains this—the intentional attempt to control the global economy at this level—is the existence of genuine supernatural evil. Why would any human being do anything so horrifying? It makes no sense—unless you want to kill and enslave large numbers of human beings.
Ray Im older and only got on the internet starting a few yrs ago. Anyway right after i got your article i got e-mail someone uploaded a college paper of mine from early 80s to academia? The person is Adam Kegler- dash over the E- from HUNGARY. Head of dept of Hungarian academy of sciences. Looks like they r into globalization and digitalization and the EU. You knowi was posting on dr anas site bout the quantum dots in all of us being bio sensors that can b programmed to CBCD chip prior a few days ago. Also they wrote book on digitalization and the effects of society - the co author with him is Veronika Horvath.
Although I have nothing to do with Veronika Horvath, I've been covering the same areas for over a year. Yes, Hungary is part of the 2030 plan, but it's on a different schedule. For one, it received "only" five percent of the sooner-or-later lethal injections, as opposed to the Five Eyes, where the placebo rate was only 5-25%. Still, Hungary is on the bandwagon, apparently working on getting rid of most, if not all, skilled workers.
Hi Ray, just for people new to this, on the SEC page you looked up the Company called Hungary and found it is in NY and has XYZ owners and it used to be the Republic, is this what this is saying? And that means that the owners own all the Govt assets in Hungary? Pls give a little more introduction to this if you can.
This morning, the additional footnote became a whole chapter:
Stock Market 101
Majority shareholders determine the direction of their usually partially-owned companies, and in this case, there are only four of them. It’s unclear how much “Hungary” has reserved for itself, but all four owners are globalist fronts. Normally, majority shareholders can decide if they collect their periodic profits or invest further. In my understanding, what can be seen here is not even the tip of an iceberg in a Byzantine corporate-governmental money-laundering system in which, apart from the insiders, nobody really knows where the money is. The real culprits are hiding behind several facades that also keep being replaced over and over. This setup seems typical of modern “economies.”
Moreover, these shares are not publicly traded, which directly indicates the presence of corruption. The Stock Market is the largest playground of insiders. There, they can commit crimes that would land the average mortal in prison. For example, they can bet on the future prices of something or a failure of a company, and these blokes are powerful enough to manipulate prices values and make or break whole countries or, as the case is today, the whole financial system at global levels. “Hungary” and its four “owners” constitute an elite conglomerate of crooks.
Trading usually takes places in the global reserve currency, which still tends to be the USD. There is a market for trading currencies, too. In fact, George Soros made a killing from the fact that currencies were not trading at exactly the same rates all over the world, so he moved huge amounts fast (which obviously wasn’t his money, especially at the beginning) and made millions each time on differences amounting to pennies.
The approximately 160 privately-owned and usually Rockefeller-related central banks in the world has the power to issue money in the form of debt at the taxpayer’s expense (which amounts to the infamous “fractional reserve” system). These criminals have been stealing whole countries, while sentencing their citizens to generations of slavery. With the CBDC, there will be no more need for debt-based currencies, and the worldwide tracking/control system will ensure permanent dominance over the parts of the masses that will be allowed to survive in the IoT.
Thank you for the important question. I am adding the following:
Majority shareholders determine the direction of their companies, and in this case, there are only four of them. It's unclear how much "Hungary" has reserved for itself, but all four owners are globalist fronts. Normally, majority shareholders can decide if they collect their periodic profits or invest further. In my understanding, what can be seen here is not even the tip of an iceberg in a Byzantine corporate-governmental money-laundering system in which, apart from the insiders, nobody really knows where the money is. The real culprits are hiding behind several facades that also keep being replaced over and over. This setup seems typical of modern "economies."
The Republic of Hungary is supposed to be a country. Is it a country? As the saying goes, "America is not a country; it's a business." The same seems to apply to Hungary.
As it seems to apply to Italy (Republic of...). I read some about all this topic a couple of years ago and about people "escaping" from "the system". I am afraid, until it is a minority, like some hundred people within a single "country", NWO does not care about. Should this movement get stronger they will have some legislation rolling out in no-time.
There is a building in town that has the name ROCKEFELLER Capital Management on it. I've called around and nobody seems to know what they are about. The Police and Fire Department are on the
same street. I called and none of them knew about this company that opened on the same street.
BNP Paribas gets, along with a few others of those mentioned, on every Australian corporate shareholding in existence. Including all the major banks. In Australia the Commonwealth, Westpac & ANZ banks of the "big four" are all owned by these guys and the National Australia Bank. In turn the National Australia Bank has some local share holding but is mostly owned by Paribas et al. So the other 3 banks of the 4 majors are even more so owned by overseas interests (the big banks of the world).
I've had a BNP account since 1981 (year when I moved to France). I returned to Oz in 2011 and opened an account with Westpac because BNP told me they were the only ones to have special arrangement with BNP - i.e. no transfer charges or for ATM withdrawals. Maybe BNP expanded since? I only kept my account open because I had property to sell which happened in Feb2020 and the transaction went through my agency in Paris 16e arrondissement. Since then my agency has closed like many others throughout France. I actually owe them money on PROVISIO account but they seem to have forgotten me ... since 2020. They're about to collapse.
Yes still there but not operating properly. The fact they seem to have forgotten my small PROVISIO debt says to me they're not bothering to waste time with small fry. In any case at 18 per cent interest for revolving credit I've already paid them back and again. Maybe they'll come for me via Westpac, but they're shutting down their agencies too, esp. in Tasmania.
Probably just add you to a Credit report aka the moronic forerunners of social credit scores. Where your score can go down overnight but not up overnight.
I think the ANZ is even registered as a non-Australian entity on the registry (ASIC) in Australia these days. The interesting bit is that I think that the NZ ANZ is owned by Bank of America completely whereas the Australian ANZ is as above.
Fyi, I've been looking into "Australian" four big banks' policies re. sustainability/carbon zero & bail-in policies and sent a request for feedback in 2021 to ANZ, Westpac, Commonwealth Bank, & NAB. I asked:
1. Sustainability. Can you please outline how you envisage implementing your zero carbon goals vis a vis customers. Will you be implementing, or have you already implemented, a social credit system based on customers' carbon footprint? If so, could you please describe how such a system works/will work.
2. Bail-ins. Can you please confirm, in the event of a banking liquidity crisis, that your bank is legally able to borrow, replace, retain, withhold or confiscate customer deposits and if so, please provide details.
Only ANZ bot responded: "Thank you for your enquiry. Unfortunately, we are unable to resolve your enquiry. Do you have the ANZ App? We have a number of features to make your banking easier blablabla Check out the different features that you can action at the touch of a button: https://www.anz.com.au/ways-to-bank/mobile-banking-apps/anz-app-demos/ As for my bank, Westpac, the customer resolution team sent it off to some other team to answer and that was the last I heard from them. So whoever they belong to now, their customer service departments seem to have no accountability towards their customers or even in attracting new customers. As if they know they're not going to be around for much longer.
To this day, Australians still believe their bank deposit up to $250,000 in their account is safe, when it is not. Most western countries legislated bail-in laws wherein the bank can confiscate depositors savings to pay for its losses in risky investments. Check out Senator Malcolm Roberts concerns for bank savings.
Agree. I've been aware of this for a long time, well before anyone in Oz gov't began raising the issue. I sent attached questions to my Westpac advisor mid-2020:
I do not see the seal displayed on my Westpac accounts. Why is this?
The list of accounts protected in case of bank liquidation is not definitive and we are advised to contact our bank for confirmation. Can you confirm my accounts are protected?
* The deposit-checker informed me anything >AUD 250,000 can be confiscated in case of bank liquidation. so strictly speaking this would not apply to me, but can I be sure that this figure will not be revised downwards?
*Australia signed an agreement at G20, Brisbane, 2014 on "Approved adequacy of loss absorbing capacity of global systemically important banks in resolution" ("resolution" meaning "liquidation") https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/TLAC-Condoc-6-Nov-2014-FINAL.pdf. Are you familiar with this document and if so would the terms of this agreement override Australia's deposit guarantee scheme?
*I believe all this is currently under review in Parliament. Are you aware of any legislation having been passed yet?"
Their response:
"The information I have to provide to you is possibly information you have already read.
In relation to the G20 state that this Australian scheme is the relevant scheme. Deposits with the bank are covered up to the $250,000 stated. You may also wish to peruse the balance sheet/Annual report of the Bank. I have included the link to this report below
We have no knowledge of any plans to change the scheme by lowering the cap. However, current deposits would remain covered until they reach maturity."
I went back to them with further questions but no response received to date. I am copying all this here in case it is of use to other Australians seeking clarity on this. The agreement signed by G20 countries at 2014 Brisbane summit is very technical and in no way reassures me my deposits are safe, nor Westpac's response.
When I went looking for Westpac reports just yesterday for those shareholders it was very noticeable how much virtue signalling dystopia they were doing on climate change. 4 out of 6 of their reports.
I know that Merrill Lynch is in that umbrella and that John Key ex PM of NZ moved effortlessly from ML to NZ PM and then back to Bank of America via the ANZ bank.
The only thing that explains this—the intentional attempt to control the global economy at this level—is the existence of genuine supernatural evil. Why would any human being do anything so horrifying? It makes no sense—unless you want to kill and enslave large numbers of human beings.
Couldn't agree more. I believe, this is what theologians call "the mystery of evil."
Rockefeller? Rothschilds bag man.
https://themillenniumreport.com/sample-page/
Ray Im older and only got on the internet starting a few yrs ago. Anyway right after i got your article i got e-mail someone uploaded a college paper of mine from early 80s to academia? The person is Adam Kegler- dash over the E- from HUNGARY. Head of dept of Hungarian academy of sciences. Looks like they r into globalization and digitalization and the EU. You knowi was posting on dr anas site bout the quantum dots in all of us being bio sensors that can b programmed to CBCD chip prior a few days ago. Also they wrote book on digitalization and the effects of society - the co author with him is Veronika Horvath.
Although I have nothing to do with Veronika Horvath, I've been covering the same areas for over a year. Yes, Hungary is part of the 2030 plan, but it's on a different schedule. For one, it received "only" five percent of the sooner-or-later lethal injections, as opposed to the Five Eyes, where the placebo rate was only 5-25%. Still, Hungary is on the bandwagon, apparently working on getting rid of most, if not all, skilled workers.
There is more stock traded privately than on the stock markets according to the Apes on Reddit.
Which also confirms the criminality of the system...
Hi Ray, just for people new to this, on the SEC page you looked up the Company called Hungary and found it is in NY and has XYZ owners and it used to be the Republic, is this what this is saying? And that means that the owners own all the Govt assets in Hungary? Pls give a little more introduction to this if you can.
This morning, the additional footnote became a whole chapter:
Stock Market 101
Majority shareholders determine the direction of their usually partially-owned companies, and in this case, there are only four of them. It’s unclear how much “Hungary” has reserved for itself, but all four owners are globalist fronts. Normally, majority shareholders can decide if they collect their periodic profits or invest further. In my understanding, what can be seen here is not even the tip of an iceberg in a Byzantine corporate-governmental money-laundering system in which, apart from the insiders, nobody really knows where the money is. The real culprits are hiding behind several facades that also keep being replaced over and over. This setup seems typical of modern “economies.”
Moreover, these shares are not publicly traded, which directly indicates the presence of corruption. The Stock Market is the largest playground of insiders. There, they can commit crimes that would land the average mortal in prison. For example, they can bet on the future prices of something or a failure of a company, and these blokes are powerful enough to manipulate prices values and make or break whole countries or, as the case is today, the whole financial system at global levels. “Hungary” and its four “owners” constitute an elite conglomerate of crooks.
Trading usually takes places in the global reserve currency, which still tends to be the USD. There is a market for trading currencies, too. In fact, George Soros made a killing from the fact that currencies were not trading at exactly the same rates all over the world, so he moved huge amounts fast (which obviously wasn’t his money, especially at the beginning) and made millions each time on differences amounting to pennies.
The approximately 160 privately-owned and usually Rockefeller-related central banks in the world has the power to issue money in the form of debt at the taxpayer’s expense (which amounts to the infamous “fractional reserve” system). These criminals have been stealing whole countries, while sentencing their citizens to generations of slavery. With the CBDC, there will be no more need for debt-based currencies, and the worldwide tracking/control system will ensure permanent dominance over the parts of the masses that will be allowed to survive in the IoT.
Thank you for the important question. I am adding the following:
Majority shareholders determine the direction of their companies, and in this case, there are only four of them. It's unclear how much "Hungary" has reserved for itself, but all four owners are globalist fronts. Normally, majority shareholders can decide if they collect their periodic profits or invest further. In my understanding, what can be seen here is not even the tip of an iceberg in a Byzantine corporate-governmental money-laundering system in which, apart from the insiders, nobody really knows where the money is. The real culprits are hiding behind several facades that also keep being replaced over and over. This setup seems typical of modern "economies."
Yes, this seems like the beginning of an enquiry and more information required.
Does "Hungary" mean the country of
Magyarország (Hungarian) or a company with the name Hungary.
The Republic of Hungary is supposed to be a country. Is it a country? As the saying goes, "America is not a country; it's a business." The same seems to apply to Hungary.
As it seems to apply to Italy (Republic of...). I read some about all this topic a couple of years ago and about people "escaping" from "the system". I am afraid, until it is a minority, like some hundred people within a single "country", NWO does not care about. Should this movement get stronger they will have some legislation rolling out in no-time.
There is a building in town that has the name ROCKEFELLER Capital Management on it. I've called around and nobody seems to know what they are about. The Police and Fire Department are on the
same street. I called and none of them knew about this company that opened on the same street.
Under "Hungary's owners", change "PNB Paritas" to "BNP Paribas"??
BNP Paribas gets, along with a few others of those mentioned, on every Australian corporate shareholding in existence. Including all the major banks. In Australia the Commonwealth, Westpac & ANZ banks of the "big four" are all owned by these guys and the National Australia Bank. In turn the National Australia Bank has some local share holding but is mostly owned by Paribas et al. So the other 3 banks of the 4 majors are even more so owned by overseas interests (the big banks of the world).
And every once in a while, ownerships seem to rotate, too. The system is shadowing the real owners.
I've had a BNP account since 1981 (year when I moved to France). I returned to Oz in 2011 and opened an account with Westpac because BNP told me they were the only ones to have special arrangement with BNP - i.e. no transfer charges or for ATM withdrawals. Maybe BNP expanded since? I only kept my account open because I had property to sell which happened in Feb2020 and the transaction went through my agency in Paris 16e arrondissement. Since then my agency has closed like many others throughout France. I actually owe them money on PROVISIO account but they seem to have forgotten me ... since 2020. They're about to collapse.
It was quite a while ago that I looked and at the time the BNP was there.
Looks like it's all been rolled into Blackrock/Vanguard/State Street's control now.
https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/WESTPAC-BANKING-CORPORATI-6492063/company/
Yes still there but not operating properly. The fact they seem to have forgotten my small PROVISIO debt says to me they're not bothering to waste time with small fry. In any case at 18 per cent interest for revolving credit I've already paid them back and again. Maybe they'll come for me via Westpac, but they're shutting down their agencies too, esp. in Tasmania.
Probably just add you to a Credit report aka the moronic forerunners of social credit scores. Where your score can go down overnight but not up overnight.
Seems to me with Blackrock basically "owning" everything and running everything that there is one point of failure.
Such as?
Well Blackrock.
I think the ANZ is even registered as a non-Australian entity on the registry (ASIC) in Australia these days. The interesting bit is that I think that the NZ ANZ is owned by Bank of America completely whereas the Australian ANZ is as above.
Fyi, I've been looking into "Australian" four big banks' policies re. sustainability/carbon zero & bail-in policies and sent a request for feedback in 2021 to ANZ, Westpac, Commonwealth Bank, & NAB. I asked:
1. Sustainability. Can you please outline how you envisage implementing your zero carbon goals vis a vis customers. Will you be implementing, or have you already implemented, a social credit system based on customers' carbon footprint? If so, could you please describe how such a system works/will work.
2. Bail-ins. Can you please confirm, in the event of a banking liquidity crisis, that your bank is legally able to borrow, replace, retain, withhold or confiscate customer deposits and if so, please provide details.
Only ANZ bot responded: "Thank you for your enquiry. Unfortunately, we are unable to resolve your enquiry. Do you have the ANZ App? We have a number of features to make your banking easier blablabla Check out the different features that you can action at the touch of a button: https://www.anz.com.au/ways-to-bank/mobile-banking-apps/anz-app-demos/ As for my bank, Westpac, the customer resolution team sent it off to some other team to answer and that was the last I heard from them. So whoever they belong to now, their customer service departments seem to have no accountability towards their customers or even in attracting new customers. As if they know they're not going to be around for much longer.
To this day, Australians still believe their bank deposit up to $250,000 in their account is safe, when it is not. Most western countries legislated bail-in laws wherein the bank can confiscate depositors savings to pay for its losses in risky investments. Check out Senator Malcolm Roberts concerns for bank savings.
Agree. I've been aware of this for a long time, well before anyone in Oz gov't began raising the issue. I sent attached questions to my Westpac advisor mid-2020:
* "Re. "Australian Gov't Deposit Guarantee Scheme Seal":
I do not see the seal displayed on my Westpac accounts. Why is this?
The list of accounts protected in case of bank liquidation is not definitive and we are advised to contact our bank for confirmation. Can you confirm my accounts are protected?
* The deposit-checker informed me anything >AUD 250,000 can be confiscated in case of bank liquidation. so strictly speaking this would not apply to me, but can I be sure that this figure will not be revised downwards?
*Australia signed an agreement at G20, Brisbane, 2014 on "Approved adequacy of loss absorbing capacity of global systemically important banks in resolution" ("resolution" meaning "liquidation") https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/TLAC-Condoc-6-Nov-2014-FINAL.pdf. Are you familiar with this document and if so would the terms of this agreement override Australia's deposit guarantee scheme?
*I believe all this is currently under review in Parliament. Are you aware of any legislation having been passed yet?"
Their response:
"The information I have to provide to you is possibly information you have already read.
https://www.apra.gov.au/about-financial-claims-scheme
In relation to the G20 state that this Australian scheme is the relevant scheme. Deposits with the bank are covered up to the $250,000 stated. You may also wish to peruse the balance sheet/Annual report of the Bank. I have included the link to this report below
https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/ic/Westpac_AU_2020_Annual_Report.pdf
In addition, the legislation on Banking gives depositors priorities, please see below
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ba195972/s13a.html
We have no knowledge of any plans to change the scheme by lowering the cap. However, current deposits would remain covered until they reach maturity."
I went back to them with further questions but no response received to date. I am copying all this here in case it is of use to other Australians seeking clarity on this. The agreement signed by G20 countries at 2014 Brisbane summit is very technical and in no way reassures me my deposits are safe, nor Westpac's response.
When I went looking for Westpac reports just yesterday for those shareholders it was very noticeable how much virtue signalling dystopia they were doing on climate change. 4 out of 6 of their reports.
Isn't Bank of America Korean-owned? Asking for a friend. :)
I've no idea.
I know that Merrill Lynch is in that umbrella and that John Key ex PM of NZ moved effortlessly from ML to NZ PM and then back to Bank of America via the ANZ bank.
Well, yes, Key was laughing all the way to the bank.
NZ and Australia and China and some many others are registered there. Likely all so-called countries are in fact registered subsidiary corporations
Bill Gates and his "foundation" haven no qualms making more billions on "vaxxines" while implementing his planned genocide.
I still like Viktor Orban, but I didn't know someone else owns Hungary. Maybe he should confiscate their assets.
You might want to check out my article from last year about Orban's "Hungary."
Good one, Ray.