Of course I don't know what exactly will happen, but this high technology requires a lot, A Lot of resources, which is why these resources are declining, becoming more expensive to accumulate. The whole power thing will fail indeed.
The AI thing is just stupid... they are marketing it but they arent even close.
Keep in mind that our scientific establishment is run by corporations who have the government do their bidding.
They spend more money on PR and media than research
And when you see them bragging, like they did about gene editing here and there, you got to remember that if it really worked, why aren't we using it now... instead we get teasers of how they cloned so and so, or gene edited cancer out... but its just PR advertising. The more they brag the more you know that they're far behind.
And I agree with Dr. Andreas Noack that mRNA and, consequently, spike protein, is a red herring, because the chain reaction it would start could not be controlled and it would kill the murderers, too.
Nothing new under the sun...until...this, our latest Frankenstein. To consider possible outcomes in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th generations etc. is seldom done, wrt humans and our ways. I know I am not very disciplined to consider long term outcomes, and gosh all that grey matter up there just holding space.
It's more like a question of having been conditioned and some patience, the latter of which I need more as well.
After a single step of considering action/reaction, all one has to do it keep asking, "then what?" and several more steps can be considered. As a chess player, I used to be able to think 15-20 moves ahead, but I quit playing, because it made me feel that everything was predestined, which is true most of the time, but I didn't want to give up and turn it into games of chess. :)
I do plan alot of things on paper, do plans and cad drafting...but I guess i am saying that wrt my personal habits and or political ideas we approve of or don't...i also have run into situations where too much 'planning ' has been done 'virtually' and the thing did not work in reality, or that the process of real life testing and evolving the concept to adapt to reality is not done. Plans usually do and probably should change as time goes on. Like buying house plans before you even know what the lot or land is like. Carts and Horses. Best
By thinking a few steps ahead, I mean that it makes planning easier, but not infallible. The spectrum of potential events seem quite restricted, which makes planning a little more failure-proof, but also shows that only the extremely well-situated have a realistic chance to survive the next 5-6 years. Survival, however, is not the goal; a meaningful life is.
It looks like preppers are sowing seeds, while they know that there will be no rain for seven years. :)
not all vials carry the same solution, some have parasites, others nanoparticles in them etc.: there's no transparency and despite document dumps we still don't know what's in the inoculations. the US, UK and Europe, as many other countries, use systems to track adverse events, but 1) on a global scale not all countries use such a system and 2) on a global scale governments are manipulating data concerning adverse events and/or deaths. because there is no reliable, objective information concerning adverse events/deaths on a global scale, it's a big step to suggest that the vaxx is targeting 'Western Europe and America'.
That's the point: the concoctions are probably computer-generated and the batches are carefully distributed from region to region, depending on further plans, preventing immediate suspicion and maintaining plausible deniability.
It is more or less clear that each vial, with the exception of the ones containing saline only, contains a couple of dozens of parasites, bacterial/fungal toxins, old-fashioned poisons that have been used in previous "vaccines," and nanotechnology, while some amplify or even activate a previous/concurrent one. I have been observing anomalies in various countries in the world, but the data I have managed to collect are still insufficient for a meaningful article.
I also concur that the governments providing data nearly always lie and when they don't, they change the information retroactively. Of course, there are no "side effects" or "adverse effects"; everything is a result of long-term planning and is intentional.
my best friend lives in S'pore and had never heard about side effects or adverse effects (untill I introduced her to the idea). some of my relatives live in Indonesia, ditto, kept in the dark :-(( also it seems the spike-study https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439997/ didn't include Australia/NZ (Caucasian minorities).
and yes, we are the trial, but those who carry it out are not very good at doing research.
Of course I don't know what exactly will happen, but this high technology requires a lot, A Lot of resources, which is why these resources are declining, becoming more expensive to accumulate. The whole power thing will fail indeed.
One can only hope it will before most people are exterminated.
I'm not hopeful in that regard. Sorry.
Well, I don't hope in this sense, either; it was only a figure of speech. :)
The AI thing is just stupid... they are marketing it but they arent even close.
Keep in mind that our scientific establishment is run by corporations who have the government do their bidding.
They spend more money on PR and media than research
And when you see them bragging, like they did about gene editing here and there, you got to remember that if it really worked, why aren't we using it now... instead we get teasers of how they cloned so and so, or gene edited cancer out... but its just PR advertising. The more they brag the more you know that they're far behind.
https://odysee.com/@TLAVagabond:5/Whitney-Webb-Interview-7-14-22:2
For me I say hook, line and spike protein.
And I agree with Dr. Andreas Noack that mRNA and, consequently, spike protein, is a red herring, because the chain reaction it would start could not be controlled and it would kill the murderers, too.
https://emc2.substack.com/p/the-curious-case-of-dr-andreas-noack
Nothing new under the sun...until...this, our latest Frankenstein. To consider possible outcomes in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th generations etc. is seldom done, wrt humans and our ways. I know I am not very disciplined to consider long term outcomes, and gosh all that grey matter up there just holding space.
It's more like a question of having been conditioned and some patience, the latter of which I need more as well.
After a single step of considering action/reaction, all one has to do it keep asking, "then what?" and several more steps can be considered. As a chess player, I used to be able to think 15-20 moves ahead, but I quit playing, because it made me feel that everything was predestined, which is true most of the time, but I didn't want to give up and turn it into games of chess. :)
I do plan alot of things on paper, do plans and cad drafting...but I guess i am saying that wrt my personal habits and or political ideas we approve of or don't...i also have run into situations where too much 'planning ' has been done 'virtually' and the thing did not work in reality, or that the process of real life testing and evolving the concept to adapt to reality is not done. Plans usually do and probably should change as time goes on. Like buying house plans before you even know what the lot or land is like. Carts and Horses. Best
By thinking a few steps ahead, I mean that it makes planning easier, but not infallible. The spectrum of potential events seem quite restricted, which makes planning a little more failure-proof, but also shows that only the extremely well-situated have a realistic chance to survive the next 5-6 years. Survival, however, is not the goal; a meaningful life is.
It looks like preppers are sowing seeds, while they know that there will be no rain for seven years. :)
not all vials carry the same solution, some have parasites, others nanoparticles in them etc.: there's no transparency and despite document dumps we still don't know what's in the inoculations. the US, UK and Europe, as many other countries, use systems to track adverse events, but 1) on a global scale not all countries use such a system and 2) on a global scale governments are manipulating data concerning adverse events and/or deaths. because there is no reliable, objective information concerning adverse events/deaths on a global scale, it's a big step to suggest that the vaxx is targeting 'Western Europe and America'.
That's the point: the concoctions are probably computer-generated and the batches are carefully distributed from region to region, depending on further plans, preventing immediate suspicion and maintaining plausible deniability.
It is more or less clear that each vial, with the exception of the ones containing saline only, contains a couple of dozens of parasites, bacterial/fungal toxins, old-fashioned poisons that have been used in previous "vaccines," and nanotechnology, while some amplify or even activate a previous/concurrent one. I have been observing anomalies in various countries in the world, but the data I have managed to collect are still insufficient for a meaningful article.
I also concur that the governments providing data nearly always lie and when they don't, they change the information retroactively. Of course, there are no "side effects" or "adverse effects"; everything is a result of long-term planning and is intentional.
my best friend lives in S'pore and had never heard about side effects or adverse effects (untill I introduced her to the idea). some of my relatives live in Indonesia, ditto, kept in the dark :-(( also it seems the spike-study https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439997/ didn't include Australia/NZ (Caucasian minorities).
and yes, we are the trial, but those who carry it out are not very good at doing research.
Many people are not even ready to admit they have been had.
The "spike study" makes no difference; it's based on lies and piles them up even higher. :)