How Is the Human-AI Interface Deployed? You Cannot Find This Anywhere Else

Time to talk about it

Please, note that my next article contains important modifications and additional information:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/targeting-and-controlling-individuals

Assigning the task

Instead of staring, mesmerized by the impending doom, at images and videos on computer screens, it’s time to develop further ideas about the technology that connects AI to (already somewhat-cyborged) humans. Time to stop being the chicken watching the grill:

What is known and what is not

I knew about the self-assembling nanotech and the RBC destruction already over a year ago without microscopy, but Mihalcea confirmed what I only conjectured.

By now, the questions are:

1. Where are these particles coming from?

2. What are they doing?

3. What can be done about it?

As for #3, there have been temporary solutions, out of which one helped me for a month and then it seemed to cause damages, and the rest did either nothing or caused harm right away, at least out of those options that I dared to try after realizing I had nothing to lose (understandably, I lost faith in miracle meds even more than before):

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-comprehensive-list-of-detox-and

Previously, I conjectured that only the method that cause the illness(es) can fix them:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/there-is-a-cure-for-all-but-its-not

At this point, I am making an attempt at reverse-engineering the process.

Completing the circle

The sorely absent answer is to the following question: How are these interfaced with the body after anchoring themselves to it (most likely in the bone marrow, but the spleen is also a suspect¹). How far are they pre-programmed beyond collecting and transferring data and receiving instructions?

There have been some hypothesizing about the material for the AI-human interface, and it’s most likely some kind of protein, possibly modified somehow in order to be able to perform the task. Nevertheless, no matter how logical the following is, I haven’t seen a source that realized that installing the technology into a human must be a two-tier project, because the socket must be ready by the time the nanochips anchor themselves to them and plug into the human beings neurological network. I seem to be the first one to raise the question.

1. The interface goes in first. Now, THAT delivery system sounds exquisite, and nobody has even mentioned it anywhere before me talking about it NOW.

This is where “shedding” comes into the picture. I’m still in the dark regarding the way I got “infected” by “shedding” from a newly injected person, who only talked into my face for about 30 seconds from about 10-15 inches in a store (I asked her how come people were not muzzled, and she told me the governor said those who had received their injections would not have to wear one; she was not wearing and I have never worn one). It could have coincided with a nearby 5G tower being turned on; it was in the summer of ‘21. In a few minutes, I went to the car and for five minutes, I was so sick that I thought I was dying. After that, I drove home without a problem, but have been weak ever since.

2. The self-assembling nanochips are deployed and anchored to the interface.

I realize that the bone marrow is hard to examine², but it must be done. Once the interface is identified, it can be perhaps disabled, even by using sodium citrate, despite the potential dangers that entails³.

Technologically, graphene-based particles can be pre-programmed to assemble (with magnetic encoding), but it’s also possible that external radiation (5G or a comparable technology) is controlling them; one doesn’t exclude the other. Graphene-based computing nanodevices were already operational around 2012, and they were supposed to be 12k faster than silicon.

I don’t think everything is in the injections. There are plenty more delivery systems, and the sequence of deploying various modules apparently matters. For example, magnetic properties are not always detectable (but considering the nanosized particles, it would be a feat to detect them at all levels).

The rubbery clots that morticians found in the blood vessels of the dead are metallic, but I haven't encountered any accurate chemical analysis of them (which might or might not exist). The clogging is possibly based on magnetic properties.

Still, the actual details must be identified. Otherwise, treating symptoms can be mixed up with the remedy of the actual damage, as it nearly always done in allopathic “Medicine”:

1. The bone marrow must be reprogrammed in order to produce defective RBCs that also lack in numbers (unless the spleen swallows up as much as it can without killing the person). That is only possible, if the graphene-based nanochips are anchored in the body as a part of the neural network and can issue commands to the brain (they obviously can) and regulate cell production.

2. I have written about the bone marrow extensively. Here is a list of the relevant articles:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/archive?sort=search&search=bone%20marrow

3. https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/is-sodium-citrate-good-for-you