Yawn. All mankind can be framed. Politicians frame themselves. The culprits go free and the innocent denounced. The organization of daily life relies on perverts to get done. Psychological profiles of ordinary wage earning man to genius earning man reveal our common psychosis. No escape. Guilty until innocence is accepted.
It's indeed predictable, although I'm not sure if it's boring. There are so many ways to finish off people. Of course, that's nothing new, either, and the culprits are making up laws and are running the courts. Guilt and innocence are only for a show, anyway, and in the upcoming world only efficacy will matter. Standards for moral behavior are long gone.
In the US, plea bargains are the rule for those who can’t afford an attorney. State prisons tend to be privatized for profit, so they are usually filled up with petty and non-violent offenders. Introducing the three-strike law served the same purpose.
When it comes to politicians, entertainers, and high-profile business people, it not only spills over into their moral perversion but also their corruption to get where they are in politics, business, and entertainment. We are not talking about hourly employees punching a time clock to get by to pay rent and buy a few groceries. We are talking about people who take their yachts out to the high seas miles away from Maritime Law and have their way with underage children; we are talking about people who take bribes in Gold and Cash and get caught and deny their guilt and still hold office, we are talking about people who have millions if not billions who fly around the world and pay thousands for snuff films. We are talking about a bunch of degenerates where rules and laws don't apply to them except on judgment day when it really counts. We live in a world ruled by satan!
I'm 100% with you on this conclusion: "By voting, I would only legitimize the fraudsters and willingly submit to the outcomes." I've written a letter to rescind my voter "registration".
Only registered voters are invited for jury duty. The jury can determine what the law is (despite judges unconstitutionally instructing the jury "just to consider if the law was broken" and ignore if the law is unjust), so it is the place where citizens can exercise the highest level of power. On the other hand, those who can think on their own are likely to be dropped during jury selection. Unregistering also attracts unwanted attention... All this, of course, is only my opinion and what matters is the way you decide.
I call everything in that legal system a legalate, because none of it is Law. There are three and only three Laws. We can opt out of the legal system, but not the Laws - they are Natural Law.
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
And in fact... I withdrew My consent from the whole legal/governmental system and stand on Ethical ground.
Yawn. All mankind can be framed. Politicians frame themselves. The culprits go free and the innocent denounced. The organization of daily life relies on perverts to get done. Psychological profiles of ordinary wage earning man to genius earning man reveal our common psychosis. No escape. Guilty until innocence is accepted.
It's indeed predictable, although I'm not sure if it's boring. There are so many ways to finish off people. Of course, that's nothing new, either, and the culprits are making up laws and are running the courts. Guilt and innocence are only for a show, anyway, and in the upcoming world only efficacy will matter. Standards for moral behavior are long gone.
I saw a map of #'s in prison!! in each country. Why so very many, compared to other countries? Do these numbers make
US a worse place to live? As I think you...implied?...more dangerous? Say, than Scotland with it's enforceable hate speech law?
Is US more risky, dangerous than Mexico?
I've been watching some 'bad cop' videos on YouTube in
likely eastern, south eastern USA.
I wonder how many people are wrongfully in jail?
What can citizens do who live in US?
I'm wondering, 'Do you speak your mind politically to those responsible?', or 'let it go?', ..or? Or what?
Since I doubt it helps, then?? Then what?
Is it 'safe' to TALK to other citizens in your area? Or,
is that a waste?
You've outlined it clearly so it seems a dangerous country.
In the US, plea bargains are the rule for those who can’t afford an attorney. State prisons tend to be privatized for profit, so they are usually filled up with petty and non-violent offenders. Introducing the three-strike law served the same purpose.
When it comes to politicians, entertainers, and high-profile business people, it not only spills over into their moral perversion but also their corruption to get where they are in politics, business, and entertainment. We are not talking about hourly employees punching a time clock to get by to pay rent and buy a few groceries. We are talking about people who take their yachts out to the high seas miles away from Maritime Law and have their way with underage children; we are talking about people who take bribes in Gold and Cash and get caught and deny their guilt and still hold office, we are talking about people who have millions if not billions who fly around the world and pay thousands for snuff films. We are talking about a bunch of degenerates where rules and laws don't apply to them except on judgment day when it really counts. We live in a world ruled by satan!
I'm 100% with you on this conclusion: "By voting, I would only legitimize the fraudsters and willingly submit to the outcomes." I've written a letter to rescind my voter "registration".
I agree with you 100%! This will be the first time in 60 years that I’m not voting.
Only registered voters are invited for jury duty. The jury can determine what the law is (despite judges unconstitutionally instructing the jury "just to consider if the law was broken" and ignore if the law is unjust), so it is the place where citizens can exercise the highest level of power. On the other hand, those who can think on their own are likely to be dropped during jury selection. Unregistering also attracts unwanted attention... All this, of course, is only my opinion and what matters is the way you decide.
Excellent points.
I call everything in that legal system a legalate, because none of it is Law. There are three and only three Laws. We can opt out of the legal system, but not the Laws - they are Natural Law.
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
And in fact... I withdrew My consent from the whole legal/governmental system and stand on Ethical ground.
Dear AnyOne, I Am Not in Your Jurisdiction (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/dear-anyone-i-am-not-in-your-jurisdiction