286 Comments

Love your work Ray and Karl's too. It is understandable that suspicion and skepticism abound but my gut feel tells me you are both good guys.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you kindly. I actually added to the intro that I have only said good things about him, and when I expressed my concerns, I was not personal.

Expand full comment

It would surprise me if he was "psyop" but he was a bit quick to label both you and me. So he may be getting some advice to do that.

Expand full comment
author

He is only hurting himself...

Expand full comment
Jan 9Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Yeah but $

Maybe not a lot but he has about 14k on buy me a coffee and I guess a similar amount in paid subs. Since August last year so about 56k a year. As a comparison I'm on $300 a year having an account that is 2 years older than his and no $ on buy me a coffee.

Expand full comment

He does not have paid subscribers. He doesn't have 14k on his wall. That is US dollars and convert to UK pounds and pence its a hell of a lot less than you think. He shows us what he buys and it all goes back into research. How much slagging off can you two do?

This is serving no purpose in helping people, this is not research and is just damaging. Mr Horvath you have alienated many substuckers and their followers when all they want is answers like you. Since this was posted Karl's Substack has flourished with new readers with great opinions. I have read you before as part of reading everything about strange microscopic findings, people's thoughts and suggestions. A few on here know that many years ago I worked for many charities and raised funds for charities. Karl needs far more funding and we all know it. He is not out to harm anyone. A paid subscriber is a wage, donations are for his work. If only you two could make amends as we all need each other. So please don't confuse anyone's work by being contraversial as it serves no purpose. We need all of you researching and sharing so we can form our own opinions and donate to those people who we think are doing great work. I am glad that your life has been saved with your treatments. Let us pray that others are saved. Sodium citrate is a well known reducer and has been used as treatments in hospitals. For now many are feeling benefits and no one yet knows much more than that. So please, as adults let's focus on the work.

Expand full comment
author

Actually, you can check out his income at BuyMeACoffee and roughly double it (I don't charge for access, either, but have paying supporters).

If he were taken seriously, instead of banning me and labeling me an agent, he could have engaged into a civilized discussion. He emerged at the same time with authors of similar focus, while I have a nearly 800-article track record proving who I am.

Perhaps it's not an accident that none of the "microscopy people" managed to say anything meaningful about the legitimate concerns I am describing in the article.

Moreover, microscopy alone doesn't prove a thing; the "virus people" are using the same level of "evidence." Plus, people are dying from so many causes that damaged RBCs is only one of many, easily passing as a diversion, if only treated as a symptom.

"Focusing on the work" must include the other integral elements of the process, and nobody is even writing about altered proteins:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/not-knowing-is-not-the-problem

Expand full comment
author

Actually, my readership grew exponentially after this post. If you cannot counter my concerns, you might as well let it go. Please, be specific and don't change the problems I describe in the article. They are all legit.

Even Karl cautioned his readers in his first post on sodium citrate, but that's in my article.

It's not the substance alone that is mainly the problem, but its combination with other elements, but that's also in my article.

And there is no "we" here; everyone has to make their own decisions.

Expand full comment

If you try to fund Karl you're contributing to your own demise.

Expand full comment
author

Actually, some people seem so mesmerized that I have already seen a paywall on one of these "microscopy" stacks. At the same time, taking a few photos and videos every once in a while of nobody-knows-what (which includes the photographers) is not hard labor, and the whole thing seems to follow the same timetable as the other public heroes'.

Expand full comment
Jan 9Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Karl was quick to mention me in a post as well. Trying to work up his subscribers.

Expand full comment
author

That's more than my annual income from work and the few dollars I receive from my readers, but I never planned to do this for the money. In fact, I could easily make a lot of money here, if I had no integrity. Actually, I got five coffees in December and lost a paying supporter. I can't see a point in publishing every day as I used to, because even outstanding articles receive little attention that way. Even every other day as I'm doing now, seems a bit too fast. That's after 783 posts.

Expand full comment

If somebody bombs my mailbox with that many articles I finally have to unsub. I read too many to deal with that.

Expand full comment
Jan 9Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Hi, I am having great success with using Sodium Citrate. Common sense prevails. It has been around forever, and fearmongering about it, is not what is needed right now. There have been no huge problems with it, and the positives outweigh the negatives. The NaCitrate, has been looked at under the microscope, and does not have nasties in it, as you are inferring. Supporting others, who do not habve an income, apart from what they can scratch together, is to me, what should be happening. Other people's finances are actually none of anyone else's business. I have grey hair and wrinkles, and I'm not afraid to use them...

Expand full comment
author

This operation has NOT been around forever.

I’m not inferring anything, but considering the option that sodium citrate is an ingredient in an operation that is eventually harmful. No great imagination is needed that the global attack on humans is complex enough that such a gambit can be preplanned.

The article itself is about this modularity, and is asking why this aspect, the sequentially, and the human-AI interface are not receiving the attention they deserve.

And someone just looked at dental anesthetics and found nanotechnology “only” in 10 out of 13…

Expand full comment

I was referring to the fact that Sodium Nitrate has been around forever, and that people who have health, esp. cardiac issues, are well up to speed on the limiiting of sodium intake etc. If you feel that Human-AI interface is important, mayby you could direct your energies there? Thanks.

Expand full comment

Big sigh. This is sad, we are all completely different and as such have different beliefs and personalities.

I follow you both and you for a while Ray, we don't have so many numbers that we can afford to splinter further.

To me understanding that others believe differently and while the methods and opinions may vary are goal's are the same or at least similar.

I'm a crane operator working remotely and I'm also doing microscopy and for a while. I'm as far from controlled opposition as you can get.

"Except the help from people and forgive them their failings because they may be doing similar for you"

Expand full comment
author

It is indeed sad that people are so divided, but that's what infiltration accomplishes.

Strangely, I haven't seen a single word about the way the microscopy people draw blood (hypodermic syringes can be obtained in the US only by prescription or at needle-distribution centers for junkies) and prevent contamination... As far as I have read about it, the nanotech is also in the air (from chemtrails and whatever else).

Expand full comment

Most will using diabetes pricks, I am. As much as I would like to get sample's from arteries/viens Idon't have the ability to get needles or the skill to draw blood.

Unfortunately Idk, believing isn't knowing but I respect Cliffords manner.

What I know is the person I use has near 30 years experience doing live blood and he has never seen the like before.

i.e.

https://rumble.com/v2e2nls-unknown-moving-structure-within-the-blood.html

I'm a lot happier that Dr Chetty in South Africa is becoming involved as I respect his opinions.

For me I just except what others offer and if it follows my values/right I'll follow. If it doesn't my support vanishes.

Personally I like the people that argue against because they're doing us a favour by letting us know the potential shortcomings and what to expect.

Expand full comment
Jan 12Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Hi, I buy syringes and needles on amazon. Good value for money and you can buy bargain boxes of 200. Last ones I got were 12 diabetic syringes for £6.99 on special. They cost more for a small pack.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks. Apparently, both eBay and Amazon has them in stock.

Expand full comment
Jan 12·edited Jan 12Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Thanks, the insulin needles wouldn't be any use for drawing blood and I'm not keen to go through the learning problems.

In Australia the medical supplies field is highly regulated and I have zero chance of getting the appropriate needle gauge.

If someone knows a nurse in Australia let me know :)

Expand full comment

Go to David Nixon Substack. Lots of live blood analysts on that from your way. All the best to you.

Expand full comment
author

The idea is to find out in person...

Expand full comment
author

Injectables, including insulin, have been seen to be "contaminated."

Expand full comment

Yes they are. I'm diabetic

Expand full comment
author

I knew about the RBC destruction already over a year ago without microscopy, but Mihalcea confirmed what I only conjectured.

This time, the question it, where are these particles coming from, what are they doing, and what can be done about it. The sorely absent part is the second one: how are these interfaced with the body after anchoring themselves to it (most likely in the bone marrow, but the spleen is also a suspect). How far are they pre-programmed beyond collecting and transferring data and receiving instructions?

Expand full comment
Jan 9Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

The third one os the most important to me. I run protocols and assess for change.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for calling my attention to this important aspect, and inspiring me to write today's article:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-is-the-human-ai-interface-deployed

Expand full comment
Jan 9Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Consider looking at the following because THE science has a lot of its scientists visiting pedo island.

Both links show outstanding investigation skills and effort

https://twitter.com/JesseMatchey/status/1744021417640001866?t=qrSsEJY8d8VJw0LWqyW5BQ&s=19

https://odysee.com/$/embed/@Liberals_Get_the_Bullet_Too:2/Epstein's-Eugenics:d

The video is terrifying tbh, both what they're doing and the ramifications

Expand full comment

I'll check it out

Expand full comment

SC could block the body from absorbing needed base minerals (sodium does this), despite it helping some to feel much better in the beginning....

Expand full comment

Many people are diligent in working to solve this very important problem facing humanity, we'll do it together, we aren't alone in this wicked battle God's love is forever and brings us together ❤️

Expand full comment
Jan 8Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

You do know you can make sodium citrate yourself on your stove with citric acid and sodium bicarbonate and water, right?

Im not sure why you put in all these wikifacts about sodium benzoate and propylene glycol, but sodium citrate is already in a bunch of commonly consumed items and no one is dying from it.

If someone is on a sodium restricted diet, then no, they should not take SODIUM citrate... although perhaps that is actually the Darwin-In-Action effect.

Whats your solution? Trust the plan?Might have been a good thing to include in your article but you sound like someone who doesnt realize they have the shedding yet.

Or what that Really means... for not just the formerly unvaxxed, but for humanity. Time is short, I hope you figure it out.

Expand full comment
author

I'm also wondering how sodium citrate interacts with heavy metals from various compounds, but I am not a chemist.

Expand full comment
Jan 8Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Yep I reckon we have proof of nanotech shedding-it’s certainly showing up in unvaxxed people’s blood.

That’s why I asked Ray if he does high mag. microscopy-I should have included darkfield, all the better to see those nasty things!

Expand full comment
author

Actually, my RBCs have been destroyed about two and a half years ago, thanks to a freshly injected's shedding. I nearly died at the end of last summer, but miraculously survived.

Expand full comment

Oh! Did you have to have a blood transfusion? It seems the only way to fix that. And; Romans 8:31

Expand full comment
author

You are NOT funny.

Expand full comment

It’s not meant to be funny. Why are you saying that?

Expand full comment
author

In all your comments, you had a single intelligent one: How do one knows that viruses exist?

In all other cases, you were mostly disruptive, basically behaved like a young man who is having fun irrespective of the consequences.

I'd rather you found a different platform for your entertainment, but your relevant contributions are most welcome, just like Karls, whom I haven't banned as he banned me.

Expand full comment

It seemed to me that it started here right after the pneumonia started in China. Two people I work with had to go to the hospital. Hard for me to believe it was a virus or something like that. I increassed my shielding around my chest and haven't been sick this year. Lots of thin layers of titanium, brass, mu-metal with magnets on both sides positioned so they want to repel from each other. Positive side facing out. Worn between two wrap around X-ray vests.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Ray for posting this. I’d never tried it. Ordered some yesterday (;

I had gotten Boron years ago, and forgot about. So, I appreciate your sharing here.. unfortunate about K… ✌️

Expand full comment

Strange. Thanks Ray for this informative article.

Expand full comment

My reaction to Karl's assault is cooly rational and analytical. I never trust anybody named Karl. As an afterthought, I also think he is intemporate. Anyway, I like Ray.

Expand full comment

Never trusted any Karl ? Would you make an exception for Karl Pilkington ?

Expand full comment

No. Nor anybody sans a sense of humour. But, anyway, who is Pilkington?

Expand full comment

intemperate, and what assault? I’m new here

Expand full comment
Jan 8Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Unless someone else also said they'd nothing to lose by trying SC, that'd be me then. :)

But, I've had it with all online spats, I honestly have. Just last week Sasha Latypova had a go at me in a very juvenile manner for simply disagreeing with one of her viewpoints. Given that we're meant to be here to share our work, info *and* lay it open to dialogue (I assume. We are, right?) folks need to be wary of the emerging storms in teacups currently developing.

I find it interesting that there seems to be increasing attacks on those folks (myself included) who believe there *is* technology in jabs, water, air, pretty much everything including our food, meds and environment, and that it was designed to enter us and create technological devices designed to be manipulated via AI by the globalists.

That's what I believe and it's based on the work, clearly displayed and researched to the best of their abilities, of the likes of Karl, Outraged, matt, Dr Ana, Dr David Nixon and others.

This is because when I see someone adding, say, one drop of a vial of Pfizer or Moderna C19 injectible fluid to blood, or simply onto a slide to study then use a microscope to show what is there or what develops and in many cases, how it reacts, well, it's hard to argue or unsee that work. It matters. It explains much. It also gets examined and tied in with other issues being studied, such as emf. It's important to furthering our understanding of exactly how we are being attacked.

So, some folks don't believe transhumanism is a thing, e.g. And that is fine, but they don't need to tear down those who do out of pique. Others don't see the search for mitigating methods to help our health as valuable. That's fine too, in the end all that matters is that the information is freely shared, as accurate as possible based on research and that each one of us trying it takes full responsibility for our own actions.

Because, we're grown ups.

I'm not getting drawn into any more online stramash because at this point my time and energy's too valuable to me. That that are culling us is surely undeniable. That finding means to prolong our lives as soon as possible is desirable is certainly a fact.

In the end, it's my personal belief that only one single thing will remove the globalists from power and their ability to do harm, and that is violence.

No judicial system will do it for us. That can certainly be seen by the fact that we're four years into this by now and has anyone seen anyone jailed for their part in global genocide?

They have the connections, clout and resources to believe themselves untouchable.

Yet despite all the deaths to date, despite those that will continue, despite the injected now having become en masse programmable, soulless drones, we *still* have one advantage.

We are more than then. For now.

I don't think it's a coincidence that there is a renewal of online infighting, and those of us who've been awake from the get go will recognise the futility, diversion and deployment of it designed to pit us all one against the other.

Well folks, take this for what it's worth...

We are *all*, every single bloody one of us, every human, animal and even plant on this planet, currently being culled, re-designed or otherwise invaded by technology at the hands of the globalists in order to usher in their desired goal, that of a largely synthetic world that *they* alone will control in total.

Nobody has a get out of jail free card.

And in the event of the Great Culling, we ALL have equal status.

This means we're all in the same damn boat.

Don't you all think we should stop behaving like bairns and put that energy into fighting the actual enemy?

I do.

I have nothing left to lose because I am dying. COPD and a heart arrhythmia, now untreated by the established medical system through personal choice and informed decision, means it's unlikely I will see the end of this in my foreshortened lifetime.

If, by making of myself a willing guinea pig so that at the least, if it turns out to be unhelpful (and I stress to date, it isn't) then others will know to think carefully about trying it.

Isn't that how the best trials work? If you want an alternative, one happened pretty recently involving no informed consent, no advance information and complete lies about efficacy which could never have been validated given the time span the supposed "cure" was brought into play.

And millions died.

And more will die.

Come on folks. Let's point our energies at the real enemy. Because when they see online squabbles, they merely laugh.

Expand full comment
Nov 1Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

I agree with your conclusion - that only sheer use of FORCE aka VIOLENCE of extreme measure will bring about any change in this TOTAL WAR being waged against us the ordinary people.

We need to become fearless warriors going into battle with no fear because we have nothing to lose and fully realize that we are already dead.

You have my empathy you for having serious health issues. Patrick Jordan , which most people are probably familiar with, has said that since the very first vaccine we've been given, our lifespans have already been shortened and that most of us will come down with one or more debilitating disease during our short miserable lives. I scream at the top of my lungs all day and every day that we really have nothing to lose. We really never had anything the begin with. Our very life force has been stolen from us. I'm mad as hell and I wan't revenge.

MOLON LABE

We live in hell.

Expand full comment
author

Total war it is, but it's like a world-class boxer against a five-year-old. Talk is certainly cheap, and whatever can be done, must be in the preparations, and flexible responses must be applied, as time progresses.

Concerted action is possible only to an extremely limited extent, only locally, and only between VERY old friends. Otherwise, opposition is infiltrated and/or beheaded. Communication channels will be cut, so walkie-talkies and, perhaps, CB radios might work to some extent.

Other than that, everyone is alone with the decisions they make. Those who are waiting for "we," are only divided even more than they already are...

Those who have nothing left to lose can be formidable, and "we" don't have anything to lose. Still, the enemy is light-years ahead in armament and in technology, so I strongly discourage everyone to use violence in open confrontations. Gaining time, however, might work for those who know how to survive in groups of 2-3 (dogs included)...

If I wanted revenge and all participants (enablers, enforcers, and useful idiots) were "punished," the 95% death rate the globalists want is most likely hugely underestimated:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/crime-and-punishment

Nearly everybody is suffering from "health issues":

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/reconsidering-madical-treatments

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for sharing. I only wish the enablers and the enforcers also realized that they are also in the same boat and will be culled, once their dirty job is done.

I also said that I experimented only when I already had nothing to lose . One out of many worked, but only temporarily, and it ended up being harmful, while some others, hotly recommended by several "alt" sources, were immediately bad. This experience definitely contributed to my motivation to write this article.

Expand full comment

Well-stated. I’ve noticed in certain Substacks (even paid) my comments sometimes get shifted to the bottom, or near the bottom of all comments. These are usually those that offer a different suggestion or an addition to some point. This policy just feeds into the negative, repressive, censoring mainstream narrative mentality these Substack writers rightly rail against themselves.

Expand full comment
author

As I don't want to bore my readers, I set up the comment section so that the latest comment is visible first. This way, readers don't have to go through what they have seen before, and bots get nowhere by pressing the "Like" button to silly or disruptive comments. Never had a problem.

Expand full comment

100% truth. Easy to see when its being spoken in earnest. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Great comment.

I like your plain speaking.

Expand full comment

you go girl...well said !

Expand full comment
Jan 8Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Latypova can't cope with anyone who challenges her claims. She will end up with a bunch of sycophants as subscribers.

Expand full comment

Hugs my friend. I also have many health conditions. I stand by Karl. I wish you good health x

Expand full comment

Hugs to you too. x I also stand by him and others doing this kind of research. Nobody's forcing me to try SC or anything else I might attempt, but the fact they are sharing their research complete with video and photography back up and other means of following their work speaks for itself. They aren't hiding it from us, they're openly saying "early days yet and we haven't gone far as we can with this but here's what is happening" and so, we choose. Which is a damn sight more than most did with the killshots.

Good health to you too, friend, and to all of us simply trying to survive in what has become a largely hostile world.

Expand full comment

Exactly right. I'm wondering about this author as this post has only been to serve to slate and show negative. I read everything and check out people links in comments. It was all getting confusing with people keep posting stuff about treatments that I didn't have to research because I already knew that stuff did not work. People on Karl's Substack are researching sodium citrate themselves by investing in there own microscopes. And as you say it's down to us what we take. Feels like this is a syops attack. That's my thought. Stay strong and positive. And again I wish good health xx

Expand full comment

I think that it’s just Ray asking some relevant questions about whether citrate is appropriate. Pretty out there to be accused of psyops because of it. Either that is projection or naivety.

Expand full comment
author

Exactly; I'm only asking questions. Based on the comments since yesterday, I further expanded my introduction.

Expand full comment

I thought this newsletter was negative, and maybe some sort of psyop also. He, I guess it’s he, won’t say what therapeutic helped his condition, won’t say what his condition is, and won’t say why he can’t say which agent helped. Not helpful. I was hoping to get some good info.

I’ve heard of Karl, I think I’ll check him out, thanks Lou and Val!

Expand full comment

Karl is one of the most honest, genuine and patient persons you'd be likely to ever meet. He is one who gives freely of all his time and resources to find answers to health issues we all are facing. I have followed his efforts closely for some time now, and remain amazed at his calm personal control - despite his own suffering - and absolute attention to not only the riddles of this malevalent curse befallen humanity...but, to hear out every single person's pleas for assistance and help who comes to him. I am nothing but proud of Karl and the team of "likewise" fellow researchers he collaborates with to this end. He and they are the real deal.

What I don't appreciate, Ray, is this very blatant un-warranted take-down on your part.

Expand full comment

You know what gets me, is how much time we all have to dedicate ourselves to this.

I haven’t work for 7 years. No one has asked me when I’m going back, but they seem to know I’m going back, which I am. Maybe a year. Don’t know what will happen. I’ve gotten over the disbelief at my colleagues and peers, but I’ve avoided most certain heated dialogue. Friendships are already strained without us making it worse; friends have mostly been avoiding me for a while now! You get used to it!

The psyop is real. @Ray. I also wished they’d spoken like this more often to us at Medical School.

Expand full comment
author

Of course, the psyop is real. That's why I wrote the article.

The problem is that it's one person's word against another. It doesn't matter what I believe.

Moreover, I have expressed my concerns in the article. If you can refute any of them, please, do it, but refraining from a discussion and moving the goalposts only weakens your position...

Expand full comment

I guess you don’t do high mag. microscopy, or darkfield. I have to guess, as you haven’t answered.

Expand full comment

Which psyop do you mean? There are so many

Expand full comment

Reflecting on your reply, that goes down as probably the sulkiest so far.

Expand full comment

Sorry, I may have made a mistake Dr Annabel, were you reply ing to me or not? These threads lines go all over the place. I’m easily confused.

Expand full comment

Why do you say that? I genuinely thought what you said was funny!

Expand full comment

I may be in the wrong thread .

Expand full comment

Do you do high magnification microscopy?

Expand full comment
author

Virologists use microscopic images to prove their fraudulent theory. Such images are not convincing either way.

Expand full comment

You're starting to sound like Stefano Scoglio. He claims the microscopists are using CGI!

Expand full comment
author

"Microscopists" can very well be AI... :) A growing number of entities on the Web now are.

Expand full comment

oh please!!!!

Expand full comment

Hi kat, nice to see you, but sorry, I’ve got to go and cook tea right now! I’ll get back to you.

Expand full comment

Oh no!!

Expand full comment

Well they are really, the ol electron microscope and its fictional tales.

Expand full comment

Not sure what game he's playing. We now have the no-virus people - with whom I broadly agree - bickering with the microscopists.

Expand full comment

No, I asked do you do high magnification microscopy? And I’ve made a comment re virusi and microscopy further down.

Expand full comment

Virusi 😁😂🤣

Expand full comment
author

Let me thank Karl for giving my note some more publicity at https://managainstthemicrobes.substack.com/cp/140461264, although he understandably banned me from his site (I stopped reading him a few weeks ago, anyway).

As I am not allowed to respond to the author’s comment at https://managainstthemicrobes.substack.com/p/information-regarding-sodium-citrate/comment/46824734?r=p0xo0 (which kind of speaks for itself), here is my answer to Karl saying,

“I am not a globalist my friend. Many know that already. I am kind of insulted to be honest by the suggestion i might be labeled a piece of crap basically after al my efforts and struggling. It would seem highly unlikely i do all this work and expose so many things just to drop an evil food supplement on you. C'mon. And yes many of us are aware that Citrate and many other things can be used to make nanotechnology structures at certain stages but so can many things. Applied at the wrong stage some of these things can seriously interfere with the structures already created and Sodium Citrate is a powerful reducer."

My response:

Nobody said you are a globalist. The problem is that your field is certainly infiltrated and it's impossible to tell the real thing from the agents’ work.

Expand full comment

Ray, can you please clear up my question about citrate being used to make nanotech?

Expand full comment
author

Everything I know is already in the article.

Expand full comment

Citrate can be used to make nanotech? I’m a bit confused here, did you, Ray say that, or did Karl?

If you, Ray said it, where’s some proof, please, or something, an article, as I just don’t understand that statement.

And Ray, this seems more clear, as it’s under My response: it’s impossible to tell the real thing from the agents’ work. I ask, what agents? What do you mean Ray? I’m asking as I might subscribe to Karl. I would like to know what you mean. I don’t want to go near “agents”.

Expand full comment

Fucking hell, K, it’s wild

Expand full comment

Don’t swear, this may be seen by people in the EU!

Expand full comment
author

Limited linguistic code has its functions, but it might not be the most useful tool in a discussion. :)

Expand full comment

What I see is it’s not linguistic style, it’s ability to communicate and keep everyone on board. Do you have communication issues, or are you just tired and pissed off?

Expand full comment

Works amazing well in some professions.

Expand full comment

It’s meant to be a joke!

Expand full comment
author

Same here. :)

Expand full comment
Jan 8Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Oh, sorry, I didn’t get it!

Expand full comment
author

Of course not. :)

Expand full comment
author

I wish Karl and I could have had a civilized discussion, but he stayed in his safe zone of "we," whatever that means, and remained content by labeling me, instead of engaging me in a conversation. Moreover, I said nothing specific about him, except for expressing my doubts and asking readers to make up their own minds.

Expand full comment

What about what you said about agents? I’m really needing to know what you mean about agents!!!!! Please.

Expand full comment
author

That was not specific of anyone. When I talked about Karl before, I was actually praising him:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/something-promising-seems-to-have

Expand full comment

And that is what he asks his readers to do there own research. As for the "we" he mentions many of the on the Maria Zeee interview

https://open.substack.com/pub/managainstthemicrobes/p/in-case-you-missed-the-interview?r=2o2hpu&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

Maria Zeee is unstoppable!

Expand full comment
author

She sure is, but cooperating with Kingston has its drawbacks:

https://zeeemedia.com/interview/14373/

Expand full comment

She's great.

Expand full comment

Hugely appreciated post, Ray.

I currently consume sodium bicarbonate in apple cider vinegar to counteract a bout of gout caused by Xmas over-indulgence but, when cured, I will take sodium citrate for a while to counteract whatever shedding occured while looking after jabbed rellies.

But overall, to me, it is concerning that people actually believe peaceful protest and dodging mRNA-type bullets will save them. Yes, we need to identify the weapons as best we can and to take evasive action, but this is playing Russian roulette and the globalist gun has way more than six chambers. In the numbers game, they hold all the aces.

For what it is worth, after sixty years of researching the globalists and their psychology, my conclusion is that the source of the multiple threats must be completely eliminated. As every search avenue has taken me to Zionist initiators and collaborators, it seems clear to me that Israel and the HQs in Switzerland, London, and New York must be taken down first, and then all active contacts traced and removed. What better time than now. Obviously, I am not the first to say "Cut off the head of the snake", however, unfortunately, it is not as simple as that.

Perusing the various lists of WEFfers and Bilderbergers shows the brain of the snake is excluded. These people may be psychopaths but they are not stupid. The lists are bait. as are fools like Schwarb, Fauci, Gates, and other smirking psychos. It was clearly always anticipated that the jab might fail to debilitate the necessary proportion of the population; and future targets for possible retaliation and vengeance was an obvious tactic.. That is why they are dangled before us, so tantalisingly.

We need to stop and think. Who is doing the dangling? Answer: The online and mainstream media,

What was the primary weapon that precipitated the jab, the paranoia, and the targeting of resisters? Answer: The online and mainstream media.

What conduit is being used to deliver the various faces of Plan B (faux heroes and messiahs to slay the monsters and take us to freedom)? Answer: The online and mainstream media.

Upon whom did David Rockefeller bestow dynastic succession and globalist leadership in 1973? sponsoring his appointee for US citizenship, and handing over the global Zionist media? Answer: Rupert Murdoch.

Behind his invisibility cloak of "grumpy old man, now in retirement", he has orchestrated this entire human catastrophe. Does this accusation fit his profile? Why do so few know that he sipped champagne with Ariel Sharon in their comfortable helicopter and viewed the vista of Shatilla Massacre? 3500 Palestinian refugee women and children. Who destroyed the credibility and careers of critics of globalisation?

All roads lead to Rupert.

There may even be sombody behind Rupert. I doubt it but we must be sure.

I appreciate all these heroic doctors and scientists who are identifying our cause of death in advance, and for some who are actually providing remedies, but it is all too little too late. Cut off the head of the snake; NOW; or write your wills, to be read by dead lawyers to dead benificiaries.

Expand full comment
User was indefinitely suspended for this comment. Show
Expand full comment

There are none so blind as those who do not want to see, Clutch your cherished beliefs, by all means, but this will get awkward when Israel ceases to exist. Currently, Syria, Turkey, South Africa, Iran, India, Russia, China, and most BRICS nation's leadership views geopolitics pretty much the same as I do. I suggest you offer them the same advice. But as the top military nations are now Russia, China, Turkey, and Iran, they may suggest you seek help.

Expand full comment

Wow, all those countries view geopolitics as you do. You must be proud.

There’s something like this, but not quite the same in the Bible-Pride cometh before a fall.

Expand full comment

You presume too much. That was my cumulative view after 25 years daily research into that particular aspect. Other countries concluded likewise, decades later. And they are clearly not about to fall, but the US is going to largely disintegrate due to its foolish citizens' beliefs. Let's define belief... Belief is the adoption of an attitude or position despite contravening logic and evidence. This is also a definition of insanity. So you just snuggle down in your cuckoos nest and try not to think about the inevitable... being kicked out by an intruder (who is crossing the US border as we speak; all 30,000 of it)

Expand full comment

I don’t live in your country

Expand full comment

The US is not my country. Which one is yours?

Expand full comment

It’s all a psyop

Expand full comment
author

Sometimes that’s what I suspect, too, but there are a few convincing details:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-path-to-my-current-standing-an

Expand full comment

I thought your link was going to prove something about Israel and the other countries mentioned.

Expand full comment
author

The globalists operate all these countries.

Expand full comment

As its not evident here now, Leslie said I am sick and need help. LOL. Yes please.

Expand full comment
author

You have just shown who YOU are. :)

Expand full comment

Excellent advice, Ray. Kudos.

Expand full comment
author

I don't advise; only ruminate over specific problems. :)

It's the reader's job to make their decisions.

Expand full comment
Jan 4Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

I sent a text along those lines, and the lines in your above article, to a friend on NYE. He was complaining of some medical issues so I gave him the link to Nixon's (who I don't particularly trust) musings on the topic with "buyer beware" advice.

Expand full comment

A bit more funding and I’m sure anything is possible..

Expand full comment
Jan 8Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

You'll have to explain that one. Funding of what?

My funding from subscribers on here is about $300 a year less charges. I don't get a cent from anywhere else.

Expand full comment

Ray's Substack is being attacked by a couple of commenters out to cause trouble.

Expand full comment

Yeah I just got accused of being his sidekick.

Expand full comment

BTW David Nixon has a somewhat unique accent. It's not a combination of NZ & Australian as you might expect for a NZr long resident in Australia. But a very stereotypical concept of a NZ accent that you might expect of someone who has learnt it.

I know of two others only who speak like this.

The ex PM John Key and National Party stalwart David Farrar.

Expand full comment

I mean it could be a 'closeted' accent. But nevertheless it is still rather unique.

Expand full comment

I think his style of speaking is unique, not the accent. He’s fair dinkum.

I’ve only heard him being interviewed by Maria Zeee, but his style of speaking stood out to me.

Maria interviews good people, interesting people, people who have something to offer the world.

I’ll leave it there, I could say more, but I have to go. 🙁

Expand full comment

I compared him, Key and Farrar again a few hours ago.

They do sound similar.

Expand full comment

His accent is fine

Expand full comment

As a NZr I find his accent somewhat unique. I don't run into anybody in real life who speaks with the same sort of accent. So I stand by my post.

Expand full comment
author

For some reason, something is smelling fishy about all this microscopy stuff. That doesn't mean it's a psyop altogether, but there seem to be players participating, too, and they are hard to tell from the amateurs, who are simply curious and/or well-meaning.

Expand full comment

NO psyop, REAL microscopy

Expand full comment
author

As a result of further considerations, I have added the following to the article:

"I’m finding it somewhat peculiar that I haven’t seen a single word about the way the microscopy people draw blood (hypodermic syringes can be obtained in the US only by prescription or at needle-distribution centers for junkies) and prevent contamination... According to respectable sources (Mihalcea and OUTRAGED come to mind), the nanotech is also in the air (from chemtrails and whatever else)."

Expand full comment