"Fake communities also provide foundations for dividing the people"
It's the old Divide & Conquer again, and again, and again. Hell, fake everything.
Even a fake "we."
It must drive those Marxists crazy that they see some of us arguing and even insulting each other one minute, and then happily discussing various aspects of a completely different subject the next!
Some of them actually think a "game" is being played on them by us.
Ray, these people have lost all option for discussion, illumination, education, or simple improvement of their educational position.
Did you ever watch the video of the gun safety class by this leftist group.
It's always an honor to receive acknowledgement from you!
As long as "Marxists" means "Satanist," you and I agree. Marx was apparently part of that flock.
It's hard to get people out of their cocoon and show them they don't need experts, but occasionally, it seems to work.
These are my two pieces directly addressing them; you know these, but I'm inserting the links for new readers (my readership is still steadily growing, and only a few new readers care for reading my old stuff without the links, although most of my articles don't go obsolete):
You might remember a story I told about an elderly preacher.
Well, one of the most impressionable moments with him, we were talking about Communism and Satanism. I asked him if the Communists knew who they were working for. He told me, that a few at the top certainly knew, but the others who found out were quickly eliminated. Ray, that actually shook me up a bit. And you know the exact same thing is going on over here, for decades at least.
Nice. My conclusion is Judaism = Communism = Satanism = certain death. And if you haven't heard Communism is 'What's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine'.
Thanks Edwin. I came to that conclusion after reading the Book: 'Under the Sign of the Scorpion' by Juri Lena. That book is available as a free downloadable pdf and in other formats on the Internet. I noticed yesterday, you can actually buy the book from the author in Sweden if memory serves correct.
Sep 25, 2022·edited Sep 25, 2022Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)
When Ray mentioned the use of "we" by some I immediately thought of the "Royal We" which I remember my dear mum explaining to me when I was quite young and asked who the we was when there was only one person, "them" saying it. In her very calm, polite and gentle manner she basically said that people sometimes use the royal we to make themselves feel more important than they actually are. Words to that effect which weren't judgmental but distinguished between "We" meaning, Me but not You. She referred to it as the royal "we."
In the past few years, I've noticed, online only, some people write "does" when they mean "doesn't," This makes me stop and try to figure out what they're really saying. When I first started seeing that, I would ask the person, why do people do that, and the answer would always be, oh it's a typo. But I don't believe that, it happens too often, mostly young people do that. If the rest of the comment is typed perfectly, why only that typo? Not random.
To me, it's a symptom of bad education and the fact that real, accurate meaning is subversive, so teachers are teaching young people that it's not important to be clear about distinctions. Accurate communication is bougie and racist, maybe. Can anyone explain what this is really about? People of my generation (old) would never have let this pass, but now it's an established and okay way of writing "doesn't," you don't have to bother with those negatives anymore, just write "does," what's the difference if your sentence is ambiguous.
The new education is all relative to how you 'feel' about whatever topic is at hand. An example of the new education; teachers sending the students home with 'homework' and then instructing them to complete the assignment if they 'feel' like it. In other words, do what thou will. Implication: the new education is soft Satanism. They've got to baby step you into it.
Hmmm. I don't think I've run across that yet; or I've been too tired when reading comments that it went over my head. And given the fact that there is such a deep lack of....DEPTH any more; of almost ANYTHING (Knowledge; wisdom; understanding intelligence, insight; foresight, character, etc., etc.); I think I'm sort of used to all of it. But I HAVE seen something else that I and my husband have found unsettling.
Some months ago we were watching some TV show; and one of the characters said to another "He's playing it close to the CHEST." WHAT?!?! Close to the CHEST?!?! It's close to the VEST!
And we MARVELLED that; apparently, NO ONE on the set noticed the gaffe. Not the writers; directors, actors/actresses, cameramen; soundmen...NO ONE. Or; they don't CARE. OR; it's PLANNED. Either MANY, MANY people have been SO dumbed-down that they truly DON'T know proper words and phrases any more. AND/OR some DO; but they want to CONTINUE the dumbing down of OTHERS. The 'funny' thing is; that after that TV show; a few months after THAT; we were watching ANOTHER TV show and a character used the SAME LINE. Hmmm. So what does it all mean? It means that we have been on a slide downwards for a long long time; but many of us had no idea. It all makes me feel SO sad; because when I read the writings of people from my parents/Grandparents generation and before; I'm astounded. A TEENAGER from 'back then' could write with such depth; such BEAUTY; such deep understanding; that it would make a grown man or woman from our present time sound like babbling idiots. Simpletons. I don't even mean that in a cruel or mean way; people now may have the CAPACITY to be HIGHLY intelligent. It's NOT that they/we DON'T, it's just that we have no longer been TAUGHT how to CONDUCT ourselves with character; integrity; wisdom; insight; or any other good and right things; but instead; we are continually dumbed down and speak unintelligently; sometimes unintelligibly; and we act like overgrown children. Not everyone of course; but enough so that it makes me feel at times as if I'm walking amongst second graders who only LOOK like they are grownups.
So I DO believe that ALL of this; every single individual thing that we see in our society now has been planned. Today I just heard a 'doctor' saying how the 'medical community' believes that EVERYONE over the age of...I think it was 60...maybe 50....SHOULD be 'SCREENED' for ANXIETY.
WHY? Because if they can't murder 100% of us; then they at LEAST want us all COMPLIANT.
DRUG everyone into OBLIVION. The US is ALREADY the MOST HIGHLY over-drugged country in the WORLD; we have been for DECADES. Now; they WANT even MORE of us drugged.
I had to take two semesters of freshman comp in college. The teachers pointed out my mistakes and had me rewrite essays routinely. I wonder if they still do that or are afraid of a mob showing up outside their house.
That's a good point. I hate to be filled with assumptions about people; but given our present state; it would seem likely that none of those things are done any more.
When I was in High School I took "Business Ed"; where we learned shorthand, typing; and other secretary skills. My teacher was a VERY kind and sweet woman; but she was strict, in a good way. She made sure that we not ONLY learned shorthand and typing; but she taught us how to sit up straight; make sure our nails were clean and neat; and that we presented ourselves as professional young women. (Or men. There were a few guys in the class but I think they were there to be surrounded by girls!)
Yeah; THAT wouldn't fly today either; the parents (Some at least) would be all upset at the teacher for telling the kids how to sit up straight; God forbid! You can teach the kids how to be sexually active; but PLEASE don't tell them how to sit up straight!
Anyway; you brought up a good point. I would like to know myself if what you shared is something that is still done or not. Pity if it isn't.
I am a rapid reader and I don't notice my typos (that's quite normal, because the brain complements the missing/misspelled parts). Every time someone likes what I have written, I try to re-read it and in 24 hours, most of my typos are gone. My readers, I guess, know that by now, and wait 24 hours until they read my posts. On the other hand, I am usually one of the first (usually the first) to post something, and in journalism, speed is more important than typos.
Previous generations used to have higher standards, but I am on my own, so I have to do what I can as best as I can. I am not exactly young, either.
I make typos, in fact there was one in my comment, but as far as I know, I have never ever made a typo that makes the entire comment ambiguous. I think careless punctuation and spelling are one thing, not bothering about meaning is something else. Only young people do the thing I mentioned. I used to read a lot of fan sites about popular music, that's how I know what's going on with the kids. I gave up on pop culture, but when I see "does" for "doesn't," I know it's a young people thing. I'm still waiting for some articulate young person to comment on it.
When I was a kid, I didn't understand the expression "because" as an answer to "why." This wasn't random either. Kids of my generation would answer "because" if they were unable or unwilling to give an answer. I never did this because I was a nerd and tried to understand things, I couldn't possibly have told a lie like "because." My answer would have been, I don't know, or none of your business, never because. Every generation has things like this. I think I understand why my classmates said because, but I'd like a young nerd to explain the "does" thing, it's really what they do, not a typo.
As for my typos, I have no clue if they are ever ambiguous. Sometimes I leave whole words out or repeat them.
I can remember that my grandfather's generation was a hundred times tougher than I was. My parents' (WW2) generation ten times. I am 10 times tougher than my children's and a 100 times tougher than their children... That might, at this point I am guessing, be partially due to the "vaccinations."
Just like Sattelite TV with a multitude of channels to tune into, they (the mind-manipulation grid) have created a multi-channel virtual reality metaverse for everyone to sink themselves into their own version of reality to fit their biases and world view. Everyone is running around in their own personal reality bubbles that are maximized for separations instead of connections with others. They pump this stuff out 7x24x365 and have made deep incursions into the alt-media sphere putting in huge number of endless rabbit holes to look down into and waste your time on earth. It's just another day in paradise or where ever you may be in the matrix.
Speaking of personal reality bubbles. While dining out, I never take my phone into a restaurant. This allows me to observe people. I see nearly everyone else looking at their phones. Some restaurants require you to QR Scan their menu, which I refuse to do. I'll ask for a paper menu, and if they don't have any, I just exit stage left.
Tbh I don’t like the light from LED. Prefer halogen. But find only LED at shops and must go to hardware outlets for anything but.
Given a choice, clear filament light gave out the best for reading. I still have a stash too.
Matrix. I get absorbed by the online chatter only to come back to reality when attempting to catch yet another escaping loose animal. I live on a small holding. Thankfully the demands are such that I need to tend to animals or fear I Would be absorbed into the internet.
Incandescent is the best, but halogen is fine. Whenever my wife and I go to stores, we are buying up the last reserves of incandescent bulbs. Without those, we would be back to even older tech.
For the perpetrators, it is possible to use the electric grid for impulses that regulate mood/behavior for those using LED bulbs. Of course, the technology works without LED, too, but LED amplifies the results.
After over 3 dozen years in the community pharmacy, I simply can't take the damn things anymore. I know this sounds weird, but I almost can see them blinking! This Doc did a test with light sources, he had LED, incandescent, fluorescent, HID, a couple others, and in a blind study (no pun intended) I failed miserably on all but the fluorescent identification in which I succeeded 100% of the time! He couldn't explain it.
Gary isn't one I put much credit too anymore. He has it figured that we can get by with just total anarchy. He thinks the Constitution is no good as written. We disagree because I'm convinced that if it was being FOLLOWED we would be in a lot better shape than we are. Gary's latest: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/09/gary-d-barnett/a-solution-for-the-masses-does-not-exist-perceived-reality-is-in-fact-only-theatre/ is totally off the wall. I told him that we need to be willing to KILL the enforcers that are willing to use their power to enforce bullshit "laws" where there is no victim and the "ruling class" would become powerless. It has ALWAYS been the enforcers that are the problem for "just doing their job". They should be PEACE OFFICERS and refuse to enforce ANY "law" where there is no victim. I support that kind of government. We were founded as a COMMON LAW country. We have turned into a COMMUNIST one. The psychopathic ruling class has to use psychopathic enforcers to do their bidding. I've often said this:
No "law" should exist for a crime unless there is a victim involved. If they are willing to cage or kill me for keeping the fruits of my labor, THEY are the criminals, not me. If they are willing to cage or kill me enforcing a law telling me that I cannot smoke, eat or drink what I want, THEY are the criminals not me. If they are willing to cage me or kill me while enforcing a law that says that I can't own a certain type of gun or because I decide to put a AR pistol to my shoulder, THEY are the CRIMINALS, NOT ME. If they are willing to kill me or cage me because I refuse to fight for them in an illegal war of aggression, THEY are the CRIMINALS not me. If they are willing to cage me or kill me while enforcing ANY LAW where there cannot be shown that a VICTIM existed, THEY ARE THE CRIMINALS, NOT ME. Taking the property of the people without a warrant or probable cause makes THEM the criminal not me. THEFT is THEFT. A badge or "position of authority" does not do away with the fact that THEY are the criminals not me. When those who administer "GOVERNMENT" VIOLATE THE LAW, THEN THERE IS NO MORE LAW...JUST A FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL.
Exactly. There is no law in America but the law of the Jungle which is kill or be killed. You own your body and therefore you own 100% of the fair compensation you receive in exchange for your labor and/or your services. The dollars/debt notes are war script, and the legal system laws are based on the use of said war script.
Here is my vote for Gary. The Constitution is a Statist piece of Garbage. If followed, it will ALWAYS lead us to the shit hole we have today. You seem to forget that anytime any group/government, etc. goes against Natural Law, (The only REAL Law), Shit happens.
I'm moving more in that direction because frankly if some of the provisions in it that are supposed to be followed for a more orderly and fair society AREN'T...what the fuck good is it? For instance, the monetary clauses which were shit canned in 1913. Or the use of obvious excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishment. 10 years and $250K for not paying for a $200 tax stamp? Or the fact that the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED of the 2nd amendment is CONSISTENTLY infringed. Or the fact we haven't had the first 13 words of the 2nd amendment in force and effect since 1916. Which was the part that actually put TEETH in the Constitution. Yeah, if it isn't statist, it's a paper tiger at the best...
We need more "Declaration of Independence" and less Constitution. Tom Jefferson is my man. We are long past the need for a new "revolution", although is does not have to be bloody. We simply need to Dis-Engage in large numbers.
That's where Gary and I concur, although he and I advocate for similar things and, when it comes to reality, we agree most of the time. Not all the time, but that's normal between two thinking persons! :)
Once people start making responsible decisions, you and I won! After all, the two of us, in some good company, want to save only humanity! That can only work as long as any of that sort of thing is still left! :)
You and I had our disagreements, which we gracefully managed to handle. At this point, it looks like we are closer than I would have ever imagined was possible. Of course, a few terms like "communist" must be eliminated and new terms must be agreed on, but those are the little things. :)
Killing enforcers will be impossible. They are infinitely better-equipped and all you can do is run and hide, but only if you are lucky. I am aiming at convincing them that they will be next on the road to the slaughterhouse. They will be, but it might take more time to convince at least some of them. The current system can be brought down only by sabotage by insiders. You and I stand no chance. :)
Our local sheriff refused to enforce the edicts, which is why sheriffs are elected!
There are so many "laws" that the average American breaks three a day on average; that's one of the ways the criminals "own" people!
Gary is still one of the best. He prefers the Articles of Confederation, as most would, were they familiar with them. Gary is correct by saying that the power of the Federal Government goes back to the Constitution. You are also right that the original version didn't give such power to the feds, but after they have been bought, they can pass any "law" they want to... Which they did, especially in 1913...
Yesterday's article by Gary was apparently in response to my criticism, in my article about it:
It is the same article as the one in your link. I managed to discuss a few details with Gary. He somehow doesn't seem to realize that his emphasizing personal responsibility and still saying "we" comprises an irreconcilable contradiction...
If you read my original criticism, you can see that you and I are on the same page, yet Gary has a number of religiously-faithful followers, who don't want to think about it any further. I lost more subscribers over that single article than possibly ever before, but my net growth was still positive...
My site is for responsible thinkers, not for followers, so I'm not going to shed tears over it. The sooner, the better such things must happen.
Such is life. If there was no government, there would still be a government. If some bad ass gets together a bunch of bad asses and decides to rob, rape and pillage, he will have formed a form of government. The response would be to be able to coordinate a bunch of people together to wipe his ass out and in the process would have formed a sort of government. Even a VOLUNTARY association has governing principles. It's just the way life works. You can't have a 50/50 relationship in a marriage. A family has rules. The rules are the government. They are what governs the family. A society will have rules, the rules are the government, they are what governs society. Voluntary association is better than forced associations. I have a magazine I have to finish and I keep using my time here! LOL! I've GOT to finish it!
Natural Law has always been around. For example, the Iroquois used to banish those, who killed someone among them for like six months. If the person survived, he definitely learnt his lesson.
I'm actually going through that with one of my granddaughters right now.
When her and my girlfriend, her grandmother, have a falling out it is up to me to "fix it."
I'm going to fix it good for both of them, and maybe they both will grow up a little! After being depressed all weekend about it, some of you may have noticed my mood, I apologize if I offended anyone, I am now quite optimistic about the prospects, quite optimistic!
"Fake communities also provide foundations for dividing the people"
It's the old Divide & Conquer again, and again, and again. Hell, fake everything.
Even a fake "we."
It must drive those Marxists crazy that they see some of us arguing and even insulting each other one minute, and then happily discussing various aspects of a completely different subject the next!
Some of them actually think a "game" is being played on them by us.
Ray, these people have lost all option for discussion, illumination, education, or simple improvement of their educational position.
Did you ever watch the video of the gun safety class by this leftist group.
The instructor actually shot himself in the leg!
Great, another, great article, Ray.
Edwin,
It's always an honor to receive acknowledgement from you!
As long as "Marxists" means "Satanist," you and I agree. Marx was apparently part of that flock.
It's hard to get people out of their cocoon and show them they don't need experts, but occasionally, it seems to work.
These are my two pieces directly addressing them; you know these, but I'm inserting the links for new readers (my readership is still steadily growing, and only a few new readers care for reading my old stuff without the links, although most of my articles don't go obsolete):
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-you-need-a-license-to-think
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freaks-of-science
No, I haven't seen the video, but must have been fun to watch the two-sided propagandistic crap! :)
You might remember a story I told about an elderly preacher.
Well, one of the most impressionable moments with him, we were talking about Communism and Satanism. I asked him if the Communists knew who they were working for. He told me, that a few at the top certainly knew, but the others who found out were quickly eliminated. Ray, that actually shook me up a bit. And you know the exact same thing is going on over here, for decades at least.
Nice. My conclusion is Judaism = Communism = Satanism = certain death. And if you haven't heard Communism is 'What's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine'.
I’m beginning to think you are right!
Thanks Edwin. I came to that conclusion after reading the Book: 'Under the Sign of the Scorpion' by Juri Lena. That book is available as a free downloadable pdf and in other formats on the Internet. I noticed yesterday, you can actually buy the book from the author in Sweden if memory serves correct.
Thank you for the tip!
Write about the ‘he’ King Big Ears spoke of at WEF
‘He will have military forces under His command’
‘He will have Trillions in funding’.
Is that a new derivation of the Royal We or is he referring to an Actual He that He as in Charlie follows?
Royal We is interesting. Meaning Me but not you.
When Ray mentioned the use of "we" by some I immediately thought of the "Royal We" which I remember my dear mum explaining to me when I was quite young and asked who the we was when there was only one person, "them" saying it. In her very calm, polite and gentle manner she basically said that people sometimes use the royal we to make themselves feel more important than they actually are. Words to that effect which weren't judgmental but distinguished between "We" meaning, Me but not You. She referred to it as the royal "we."
Thank you kindly for the explanation! :)
For what it''s worth! 🤣 It's funny interesting how something so seemingly simple can trigger audiovisual memories from a long time ago.
Actually, the Royal "we" was not manipulative. This one is...
In the past few years, I've noticed, online only, some people write "does" when they mean "doesn't," This makes me stop and try to figure out what they're really saying. When I first started seeing that, I would ask the person, why do people do that, and the answer would always be, oh it's a typo. But I don't believe that, it happens too often, mostly young people do that. If the rest of the comment is typed perfectly, why only that typo? Not random.
To me, it's a symptom of bad education and the fact that real, accurate meaning is subversive, so teachers are teaching young people that it's not important to be clear about distinctions. Accurate communication is bougie and racist, maybe. Can anyone explain what this is really about? People of my generation (old) would never have let this pass, but now it's an established and okay way of writing "doesn't," you don't have to bother with those negatives anymore, just write "does," what's the difference if your sentence is ambiguous.
The new education is all relative to how you 'feel' about whatever topic is at hand. An example of the new education; teachers sending the students home with 'homework' and then instructing them to complete the assignment if they 'feel' like it. In other words, do what thou will. Implication: the new education is soft Satanism. They've got to baby step you into it.
Hmmm. I don't think I've run across that yet; or I've been too tired when reading comments that it went over my head. And given the fact that there is such a deep lack of....DEPTH any more; of almost ANYTHING (Knowledge; wisdom; understanding intelligence, insight; foresight, character, etc., etc.); I think I'm sort of used to all of it. But I HAVE seen something else that I and my husband have found unsettling.
Some months ago we were watching some TV show; and one of the characters said to another "He's playing it close to the CHEST." WHAT?!?! Close to the CHEST?!?! It's close to the VEST!
And we MARVELLED that; apparently, NO ONE on the set noticed the gaffe. Not the writers; directors, actors/actresses, cameramen; soundmen...NO ONE. Or; they don't CARE. OR; it's PLANNED. Either MANY, MANY people have been SO dumbed-down that they truly DON'T know proper words and phrases any more. AND/OR some DO; but they want to CONTINUE the dumbing down of OTHERS. The 'funny' thing is; that after that TV show; a few months after THAT; we were watching ANOTHER TV show and a character used the SAME LINE. Hmmm. So what does it all mean? It means that we have been on a slide downwards for a long long time; but many of us had no idea. It all makes me feel SO sad; because when I read the writings of people from my parents/Grandparents generation and before; I'm astounded. A TEENAGER from 'back then' could write with such depth; such BEAUTY; such deep understanding; that it would make a grown man or woman from our present time sound like babbling idiots. Simpletons. I don't even mean that in a cruel or mean way; people now may have the CAPACITY to be HIGHLY intelligent. It's NOT that they/we DON'T, it's just that we have no longer been TAUGHT how to CONDUCT ourselves with character; integrity; wisdom; insight; or any other good and right things; but instead; we are continually dumbed down and speak unintelligently; sometimes unintelligibly; and we act like overgrown children. Not everyone of course; but enough so that it makes me feel at times as if I'm walking amongst second graders who only LOOK like they are grownups.
So I DO believe that ALL of this; every single individual thing that we see in our society now has been planned. Today I just heard a 'doctor' saying how the 'medical community' believes that EVERYONE over the age of...I think it was 60...maybe 50....SHOULD be 'SCREENED' for ANXIETY.
WHY? Because if they can't murder 100% of us; then they at LEAST want us all COMPLIANT.
DRUG everyone into OBLIVION. The US is ALREADY the MOST HIGHLY over-drugged country in the WORLD; we have been for DECADES. Now; they WANT even MORE of us drugged.
Yeah; it's planned all right.
I had to take two semesters of freshman comp in college. The teachers pointed out my mistakes and had me rewrite essays routinely. I wonder if they still do that or are afraid of a mob showing up outside their house.
That's a good point. I hate to be filled with assumptions about people; but given our present state; it would seem likely that none of those things are done any more.
When I was in High School I took "Business Ed"; where we learned shorthand, typing; and other secretary skills. My teacher was a VERY kind and sweet woman; but she was strict, in a good way. She made sure that we not ONLY learned shorthand and typing; but she taught us how to sit up straight; make sure our nails were clean and neat; and that we presented ourselves as professional young women. (Or men. There were a few guys in the class but I think they were there to be surrounded by girls!)
Yeah; THAT wouldn't fly today either; the parents (Some at least) would be all upset at the teacher for telling the kids how to sit up straight; God forbid! You can teach the kids how to be sexually active; but PLEASE don't tell them how to sit up straight!
Anyway; you brought up a good point. I would like to know myself if what you shared is something that is still done or not. Pity if it isn't.
Not sure. I can only speak for myself.
I am a rapid reader and I don't notice my typos (that's quite normal, because the brain complements the missing/misspelled parts). Every time someone likes what I have written, I try to re-read it and in 24 hours, most of my typos are gone. My readers, I guess, know that by now, and wait 24 hours until they read my posts. On the other hand, I am usually one of the first (usually the first) to post something, and in journalism, speed is more important than typos.
Previous generations used to have higher standards, but I am on my own, so I have to do what I can as best as I can. I am not exactly young, either.
Not familiar with the does/doesn't phenomenon.
I make typos, in fact there was one in my comment, but as far as I know, I have never ever made a typo that makes the entire comment ambiguous. I think careless punctuation and spelling are one thing, not bothering about meaning is something else. Only young people do the thing I mentioned. I used to read a lot of fan sites about popular music, that's how I know what's going on with the kids. I gave up on pop culture, but when I see "does" for "doesn't," I know it's a young people thing. I'm still waiting for some articulate young person to comment on it.
When I was a kid, I didn't understand the expression "because" as an answer to "why." This wasn't random either. Kids of my generation would answer "because" if they were unable or unwilling to give an answer. I never did this because I was a nerd and tried to understand things, I couldn't possibly have told a lie like "because." My answer would have been, I don't know, or none of your business, never because. Every generation has things like this. I think I understand why my classmates said because, but I'd like a young nerd to explain the "does" thing, it's really what they do, not a typo.
As for my typos, I have no clue if they are ever ambiguous. Sometimes I leave whole words out or repeat them.
I can remember that my grandfather's generation was a hundred times tougher than I was. My parents' (WW2) generation ten times. I am 10 times tougher than my children's and a 100 times tougher than their children... That might, at this point I am guessing, be partially due to the "vaccinations."
Just like Sattelite TV with a multitude of channels to tune into, they (the mind-manipulation grid) have created a multi-channel virtual reality metaverse for everyone to sink themselves into their own version of reality to fit their biases and world view. Everyone is running around in their own personal reality bubbles that are maximized for separations instead of connections with others. They pump this stuff out 7x24x365 and have made deep incursions into the alt-media sphere putting in huge number of endless rabbit holes to look down into and waste your time on earth. It's just another day in paradise or where ever you may be in the matrix.
Speaking of personal reality bubbles. While dining out, I never take my phone into a restaurant. This allows me to observe people. I see nearly everyone else looking at their phones. Some restaurants require you to QR Scan their menu, which I refuse to do. I'll ask for a paper menu, and if they don't have any, I just exit stage left.
And most people wouldn't believe they can be programmed even through LED bulbs!
? Huh? Explain.
Tbh I don’t like the light from LED. Prefer halogen. But find only LED at shops and must go to hardware outlets for anything but.
Given a choice, clear filament light gave out the best for reading. I still have a stash too.
Matrix. I get absorbed by the online chatter only to come back to reality when attempting to catch yet another escaping loose animal. I live on a small holding. Thankfully the demands are such that I need to tend to animals or fear I Would be absorbed into the internet.
Incandescent is the best, but halogen is fine. Whenever my wife and I go to stores, we are buying up the last reserves of incandescent bulbs. Without those, we would be back to even older tech.
For the perpetrators, it is possible to use the electric grid for impulses that regulate mood/behavior for those using LED bulbs. Of course, the technology works without LED, too, but LED amplifies the results.
How about fluorescent?
After over 3 dozen years in the community pharmacy, I simply can't take the damn things anymore. I know this sounds weird, but I almost can see them blinking! This Doc did a test with light sources, he had LED, incandescent, fluorescent, HID, a couple others, and in a blind study (no pun intended) I failed miserably on all but the fluorescent identification in which I succeeded 100% of the time! He couldn't explain it.
Flourescent is bad, too, but it must also be working with sound, not only with flickers like LEDs.
Gary isn't one I put much credit too anymore. He has it figured that we can get by with just total anarchy. He thinks the Constitution is no good as written. We disagree because I'm convinced that if it was being FOLLOWED we would be in a lot better shape than we are. Gary's latest: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/09/gary-d-barnett/a-solution-for-the-masses-does-not-exist-perceived-reality-is-in-fact-only-theatre/ is totally off the wall. I told him that we need to be willing to KILL the enforcers that are willing to use their power to enforce bullshit "laws" where there is no victim and the "ruling class" would become powerless. It has ALWAYS been the enforcers that are the problem for "just doing their job". They should be PEACE OFFICERS and refuse to enforce ANY "law" where there is no victim. I support that kind of government. We were founded as a COMMON LAW country. We have turned into a COMMUNIST one. The psychopathic ruling class has to use psychopathic enforcers to do their bidding. I've often said this:
No "law" should exist for a crime unless there is a victim involved. If they are willing to cage or kill me for keeping the fruits of my labor, THEY are the criminals, not me. If they are willing to cage or kill me enforcing a law telling me that I cannot smoke, eat or drink what I want, THEY are the criminals not me. If they are willing to cage me or kill me while enforcing a law that says that I can't own a certain type of gun or because I decide to put a AR pistol to my shoulder, THEY are the CRIMINALS, NOT ME. If they are willing to kill me or cage me because I refuse to fight for them in an illegal war of aggression, THEY are the CRIMINALS not me. If they are willing to cage me or kill me while enforcing ANY LAW where there cannot be shown that a VICTIM existed, THEY ARE THE CRIMINALS, NOT ME. Taking the property of the people without a warrant or probable cause makes THEM the criminal not me. THEFT is THEFT. A badge or "position of authority" does not do away with the fact that THEY are the criminals not me. When those who administer "GOVERNMENT" VIOLATE THE LAW, THEN THERE IS NO MORE LAW...JUST A FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL.
Exactly. There is no law in America but the law of the Jungle which is kill or be killed. You own your body and therefore you own 100% of the fair compensation you receive in exchange for your labor and/or your services. The dollars/debt notes are war script, and the legal system laws are based on the use of said war script.
Here is my vote for Gary. The Constitution is a Statist piece of Garbage. If followed, it will ALWAYS lead us to the shit hole we have today. You seem to forget that anytime any group/government, etc. goes against Natural Law, (The only REAL Law), Shit happens.
I'm moving more in that direction because frankly if some of the provisions in it that are supposed to be followed for a more orderly and fair society AREN'T...what the fuck good is it? For instance, the monetary clauses which were shit canned in 1913. Or the use of obvious excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishment. 10 years and $250K for not paying for a $200 tax stamp? Or the fact that the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED of the 2nd amendment is CONSISTENTLY infringed. Or the fact we haven't had the first 13 words of the 2nd amendment in force and effect since 1916. Which was the part that actually put TEETH in the Constitution. Yeah, if it isn't statist, it's a paper tiger at the best...
We need more "Declaration of Independence" and less Constitution. Tom Jefferson is my man. We are long past the need for a new "revolution", although is does not have to be bloody. We simply need to Dis-Engage in large numbers.
Large enough armed numbers that any enforcer(s) would think twice about loosing their pensions via lead poisoning.
That's where Gary and I concur, although he and I advocate for similar things and, when it comes to reality, we agree most of the time. Not all the time, but that's normal between two thinking persons! :)
Thanks for saying it!
Two thinking persons!
I just love "thinking" persons.
My God, imagine "their" world where nobody thinks at all!
That's why you and I are also "brothers-in-arms"!
Once people start making responsible decisions, you and I won! After all, the two of us, in some good company, want to save only humanity! That can only work as long as any of that sort of thing is still left! :)
Excellent, very well said.
Thank You.
You and I had our disagreements, which we gracefully managed to handle. At this point, it looks like we are closer than I would have ever imagined was possible. Of course, a few terms like "communist" must be eliminated and new terms must be agreed on, but those are the little things. :)
Killing enforcers will be impossible. They are infinitely better-equipped and all you can do is run and hide, but only if you are lucky. I am aiming at convincing them that they will be next on the road to the slaughterhouse. They will be, but it might take more time to convince at least some of them. The current system can be brought down only by sabotage by insiders. You and I stand no chance. :)
Our local sheriff refused to enforce the edicts, which is why sheriffs are elected!
There are so many "laws" that the average American breaks three a day on average; that's one of the ways the criminals "own" people!
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-brief-history-of-compliance-training
Gary is still one of the best. He prefers the Articles of Confederation, as most would, were they familiar with them. Gary is correct by saying that the power of the Federal Government goes back to the Constitution. You are also right that the original version didn't give such power to the feds, but after they have been bought, they can pass any "law" they want to... Which they did, especially in 1913...
Yesterday's article by Gary was apparently in response to my criticism, in my article about it:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/can-you-see-what-is-happening
It is the same article as the one in your link. I managed to discuss a few details with Gary. He somehow doesn't seem to realize that his emphasizing personal responsibility and still saying "we" comprises an irreconcilable contradiction...
If you read my original criticism, you can see that you and I are on the same page, yet Gary has a number of religiously-faithful followers, who don't want to think about it any further. I lost more subscribers over that single article than possibly ever before, but my net growth was still positive...
My site is for responsible thinkers, not for followers, so I'm not going to shed tears over it. The sooner, the better such things must happen.
im still looking for the contract i signed to be ruled by a government
No kidding! :)
Such is life. If there was no government, there would still be a government. If some bad ass gets together a bunch of bad asses and decides to rob, rape and pillage, he will have formed a form of government. The response would be to be able to coordinate a bunch of people together to wipe his ass out and in the process would have formed a sort of government. Even a VOLUNTARY association has governing principles. It's just the way life works. You can't have a 50/50 relationship in a marriage. A family has rules. The rules are the government. They are what governs the family. A society will have rules, the rules are the government, they are what governs society. Voluntary association is better than forced associations. I have a magazine I have to finish and I keep using my time here! LOL! I've GOT to finish it!
You are right, if there was "No Government" there would still be CRIME!
Natural Law has always been around. For example, the Iroquois used to banish those, who killed someone among them for like six months. If the person survived, he definitely learnt his lesson.
Excellent point!
Every experience should be a learning experience.
I'm actually going through that with one of my granddaughters right now.
When her and my girlfriend, her grandmother, have a falling out it is up to me to "fix it."
I'm going to fix it good for both of them, and maybe they both will grow up a little! After being depressed all weekend about it, some of you may have noticed my mood, I apologize if I offended anyone, I am now quite optimistic about the prospects, quite optimistic!
And one more thing, thank all of you so very very much for being such great friends! You guys and gals really come through for me every time.
THIS, together, is how we WIN!
'we' need to convince 'them'
The ONLY way for the enforcers to become convinced is that they realize they will be next, replaced by robots.
its like they dont understand its their own children that they are hurting
Not sure; they might be getting the saline...