"Fake communities also provide foundations for dividing the people"
It's the old Divide & Conquer again, and again, and again. Hell, fake everything.
Even a fake "we."
It must drive those Marxists crazy that they see some of us arguing and even insulting each other one minute, and then happily discussing various aspects of a completely different subject the next!
Some of them actually think a "game" is being played on them by us.
Ray, these people have lost all option for discussion, illumination, education, or simple improvement of their educational position.
Did you ever watch the video of the gun safety class by this leftist group.
In the past few years, I've noticed, online only, some people write "does" when they mean "doesn't," This makes me stop and try to figure out what they're really saying. When I first started seeing that, I would ask the person, why do people do that, and the answer would always be, oh it's a typo. But I don't believe that, it happens too often, mostly young people do that. If the rest of the comment is typed perfectly, why only that typo? Not random.
To me, it's a symptom of bad education and the fact that real, accurate meaning is subversive, so teachers are teaching young people that it's not important to be clear about distinctions. Accurate communication is bougie and racist, maybe. Can anyone explain what this is really about? People of my generation (old) would never have let this pass, but now it's an established and okay way of writing "doesn't," you don't have to bother with those negatives anymore, just write "does," what's the difference if your sentence is ambiguous.
Just like Sattelite TV with a multitude of channels to tune into, they (the mind-manipulation grid) have created a multi-channel virtual reality metaverse for everyone to sink themselves into their own version of reality to fit their biases and world view. Everyone is running around in their own personal reality bubbles that are maximized for separations instead of connections with others. They pump this stuff out 7x24x365 and have made deep incursions into the alt-media sphere putting in huge number of endless rabbit holes to look down into and waste your time on earth. It's just another day in paradise or where ever you may be in the matrix.
Gary isn't one I put much credit too anymore. He has it figured that we can get by with just total anarchy. He thinks the Constitution is no good as written. We disagree because I'm convinced that if it was being FOLLOWED we would be in a lot better shape than we are. Gary's latest: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/09/gary-d-barnett/a-solution-for-the-masses-does-not-exist-perceived-reality-is-in-fact-only-theatre/ is totally off the wall. I told him that we need to be willing to KILL the enforcers that are willing to use their power to enforce bullshit "laws" where there is no victim and the "ruling class" would become powerless. It has ALWAYS been the enforcers that are the problem for "just doing their job". They should be PEACE OFFICERS and refuse to enforce ANY "law" where there is no victim. I support that kind of government. We were founded as a COMMON LAW country. We have turned into a COMMUNIST one. The psychopathic ruling class has to use psychopathic enforcers to do their bidding. I've often said this:
No "law" should exist for a crime unless there is a victim involved. If they are willing to cage or kill me for keeping the fruits of my labor, THEY are the criminals, not me. If they are willing to cage or kill me enforcing a law telling me that I cannot smoke, eat or drink what I want, THEY are the criminals not me. If they are willing to cage me or kill me while enforcing a law that says that I can't own a certain type of gun or because I decide to put a AR pistol to my shoulder, THEY are the CRIMINALS, NOT ME. If they are willing to kill me or cage me because I refuse to fight for them in an illegal war of aggression, THEY are the CRIMINALS not me. If they are willing to cage me or kill me while enforcing ANY LAW where there cannot be shown that a VICTIM existed, THEY ARE THE CRIMINALS, NOT ME. Taking the property of the people without a warrant or probable cause makes THEM the criminal not me. THEFT is THEFT. A badge or "position of authority" does not do away with the fact that THEY are the criminals not me. When those who administer "GOVERNMENT" VIOLATE THE LAW, THEN THERE IS NO MORE LAW...JUST A FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL.
"Fake communities also provide foundations for dividing the people"
It's the old Divide & Conquer again, and again, and again. Hell, fake everything.
Even a fake "we."
It must drive those Marxists crazy that they see some of us arguing and even insulting each other one minute, and then happily discussing various aspects of a completely different subject the next!
Some of them actually think a "game" is being played on them by us.
Ray, these people have lost all option for discussion, illumination, education, or simple improvement of their educational position.
Did you ever watch the video of the gun safety class by this leftist group.
The instructor actually shot himself in the leg!
Great, another, great article, Ray.
Write about the ‘he’ King Big Ears spoke of at WEF
‘He will have military forces under His command’
‘He will have Trillions in funding’.
Is that a new derivation of the Royal We or is he referring to an Actual He that He as in Charlie follows?
Royal We is interesting. Meaning Me but not you.
In the past few years, I've noticed, online only, some people write "does" when they mean "doesn't," This makes me stop and try to figure out what they're really saying. When I first started seeing that, I would ask the person, why do people do that, and the answer would always be, oh it's a typo. But I don't believe that, it happens too often, mostly young people do that. If the rest of the comment is typed perfectly, why only that typo? Not random.
To me, it's a symptom of bad education and the fact that real, accurate meaning is subversive, so teachers are teaching young people that it's not important to be clear about distinctions. Accurate communication is bougie and racist, maybe. Can anyone explain what this is really about? People of my generation (old) would never have let this pass, but now it's an established and okay way of writing "doesn't," you don't have to bother with those negatives anymore, just write "does," what's the difference if your sentence is ambiguous.
Just like Sattelite TV with a multitude of channels to tune into, they (the mind-manipulation grid) have created a multi-channel virtual reality metaverse for everyone to sink themselves into their own version of reality to fit their biases and world view. Everyone is running around in their own personal reality bubbles that are maximized for separations instead of connections with others. They pump this stuff out 7x24x365 and have made deep incursions into the alt-media sphere putting in huge number of endless rabbit holes to look down into and waste your time on earth. It's just another day in paradise or where ever you may be in the matrix.
Gary isn't one I put much credit too anymore. He has it figured that we can get by with just total anarchy. He thinks the Constitution is no good as written. We disagree because I'm convinced that if it was being FOLLOWED we would be in a lot better shape than we are. Gary's latest: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/09/gary-d-barnett/a-solution-for-the-masses-does-not-exist-perceived-reality-is-in-fact-only-theatre/ is totally off the wall. I told him that we need to be willing to KILL the enforcers that are willing to use their power to enforce bullshit "laws" where there is no victim and the "ruling class" would become powerless. It has ALWAYS been the enforcers that are the problem for "just doing their job". They should be PEACE OFFICERS and refuse to enforce ANY "law" where there is no victim. I support that kind of government. We were founded as a COMMON LAW country. We have turned into a COMMUNIST one. The psychopathic ruling class has to use psychopathic enforcers to do their bidding. I've often said this:
No "law" should exist for a crime unless there is a victim involved. If they are willing to cage or kill me for keeping the fruits of my labor, THEY are the criminals, not me. If they are willing to cage or kill me enforcing a law telling me that I cannot smoke, eat or drink what I want, THEY are the criminals not me. If they are willing to cage me or kill me while enforcing a law that says that I can't own a certain type of gun or because I decide to put a AR pistol to my shoulder, THEY are the CRIMINALS, NOT ME. If they are willing to kill me or cage me because I refuse to fight for them in an illegal war of aggression, THEY are the CRIMINALS not me. If they are willing to cage me or kill me while enforcing ANY LAW where there cannot be shown that a VICTIM existed, THEY ARE THE CRIMINALS, NOT ME. Taking the property of the people without a warrant or probable cause makes THEM the criminal not me. THEFT is THEFT. A badge or "position of authority" does not do away with the fact that THEY are the criminals not me. When those who administer "GOVERNMENT" VIOLATE THE LAW, THEN THERE IS NO MORE LAW...JUST A FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL.
'we' need to convince 'them'