24 Comments

I fail to see why this needs to be an 'either or' binary scenario. It appears more complex to me. Variance in vial and batch constituents is well established, clearly with some containing high levels of DNA and microRNA or cRNA fragments, all potentially capable of dire pathological consequences. The clear, present and obvious individual unpredictability demonstrated and quietly acknowledged in comparative Pfizer/Moderna studies of immune response adds to this picture.

The presence of rGO/GO and/or electro-sensitive hydrogels also appears established.

So, in an uncontrolled pilot experiment with multiple arms, or one possessing a slightly more disciplined methodology, where different arms act as comparative faux-controls, why not explore a multiplicity of means to engineer a 'soft cull', probably better termed a 'silent cull'?

Accounting for the precise trend concordance in excess death above the mean 2020 - 2022 in Australia and New Zealand (with similarly tracking injection profiles) but significant variance in "cases" and "COVID deaths" points to the injections. The proportion of excess death is nigh on the same in both jurisdictions but quite at odds with Sweden both in proportion and trend. Oceania and Nordic countries, two different experimental arms?

https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/the-fingerprint-of-death

Expand full comment

Weird. SS won't let me x-post your article to my 'Stack either.

Shadow banned?

Expand full comment

What many don't know is that their Iphones are already using 5G, even if it doesn't say 5G on the phone, I wouldn't trust it- they're connected to the Cband spectrum of military satellites: https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-5g

Expand full comment