It seems to me that it's not a case of either/or, either it's germ theory OR it's terrain theory. Having read "Béchamp or Pasteur", Ethel Hume's classic, it's not clear to me that there is no such thing as a germ, or at least a virus, and equally clear that having a healthy "terrain" is critical in fighting off disease. And clearly, Covid-19 is an engineered virus.
The problem is that Germ Theory is used for justifying global enslavement and genocide. Already in January, 2020, when I was not even doubting the existence of a "killer virus," I already decided that I would prefer to remain human instead of living in fear, even if the "virus" would kill 98-99% of people. I preferred to take my chances.
Would anyone really want to live in a world like it has been for over two years? Giving up humanity for a false sense of security? Consider others plague spreaders who must be avoided? Wearing a muzzle? Submitting to fraudulent tests and accepting lethal injections?
That is what's at stake. (For that matter, Terrain Theory has a lot more explanatory power than Germ Theory and in his diary, donated to Princeton University by his last descendant in 2014, Pasteur himself admitted that he was a fraud (not that Beauchamp was an angel).)
It was the lethal injections that have been developed and tested in the secret labs worldwide. (Even according to mainstream "Medicine," coronaviruses mutate faster than it would take to create a culture, and they become weaker after every mutation in order not to kill their host. As such, coronaviruses are impossible to develop into bioweapons.)
I think we're largely in agreement. However, as you say, it's clear that, contrary to the usual course in Nature for viruses—that in order to survive they must scale DOWN their lethality, not up—the Covid-19 variants seem to do the opposite. I was struck down by one of them at the beginning of May during a book tour to promote my latest book. It has taken me 6 weeks to recover and I have some symptoms of Long Covid or Post-Covid Syndrome. Although it's too early to tell, it seems some of these symptoms may be permanent. While I was ill, I noticed how the virus progressively attacked almost every system in my body, including my eyes and ears. Never in my life had I ever experienced anything like it with a normal flu. This clearly indicates to me some genetic engineering is involved.
The latest trends in "viruses" become stronger only on TV. If it was true that "variants" or "mutations" become more and more powerful, humanity would be doomed, no matter what.
There are no diagnostic tools for ANY virus, so how would anyone know if they "have 'covid'"? The symptoms can come from various resources.
There are plenty of toxins around, but it was mostly new 5G installations that caused upsurges in the symptoms. In the UK, for that matter, installers had to go on Worker's Comp and suffered from radiation illness after working on the towers... Still, chemtrails or insane disinfectants are also good candidate for creating symptoms that actually coincide with those of radiation illness. You must have kept being exposed to the source of poisoning, whether chemical toxins or radiation...
FYI, the "flu" is another invented illness in order to cover up common poisonings...
I doubt that genetic engineering is out in the open, because it could not be controlled and eventually would harm/kill the perpetrators, too. That sort of thing will be reserved for experiments "for the greater good" in the "Green Zones," where the subject can be hermetically isolated.
Well you're telling me to deny the experience of my own senses. Trust me, I have never been so ill in all my life. At one point I had symptoms that made me think I might go blind. Then it was loss of hearing in one ear. These are not typical "flu" symptoms. For about a week I had to walk with a cane. Six weeks of sheer hell. I eat a fully organic diet, I'm slim in physique, I live in a community with clean drinking water, and have NO prior co-morbidities.
I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that the military is at a sophisticated level of genetic engineering, and thus can engineer viruses. (Covid-19 is a registered patent.) In fact, I may have been the target of a direct bioweapons attack, though I have no evidence. It happened—coincidentally?—while I was on a book tour promoting a book that questions the official coronavirus narrative. For two years I'd not been sick a day, then suddenly within two days on tour, far away from home, I was struck down hard.
By the way, when Pasteur admitted he was a fraud, what he meant was that he had routinely stolen Béchamp's research and then tried to pass them off as his own, even when Pasteur didn't understand them. That is well established by Ethel Hume's research in "Béchamp or Pasteur."
There is no doubt in my mind that "it" is unlike any sickness I have ever had. Symptoms, in order of appearance, were initially flu-like, with high fever and deep painful cough, severe fatigue. Within a day I lost sense of taste & smell (coffee tasted like burnt cinders). Then I had 4 hours of SVT with a heart rate of 160-170 bpm. I was not sure I would survive. Went to the ER next day and tested positive for "it". All heart enzymes elevated - they though it was a STEMI until echo proved no heart attack. In the hospital I rapidly developed vertigo and louder tinnitus, with an annoying repetitive musical pipe-organ noise. "crushed glass" bi-lateral pneumonia, crushing fatigue and almost no ability to eat, unable to navigate without assistance due to vertigo. O2 Sat at 93 the whole time (luckily, as I didn't need oxygen). Took about a month to get back to a minimal state of normalcy.
I do wonder what, if anything is actually being diagnosed. PCR tests prior to the "pandemic" always tested for about 15 or 20 different viruses with one swab - several types of influenza, RSV, 4 types of coronaviruses, etc. But if they had used this type of swab, too many people may have had something other than the COV and it would have been just a bad flu/pneumonia season.
The Fed doesn't issue physical money (doesn't "print"); it lends money to to taxpayer at an interest, which is spent at the discretion of politicians. It is the Treasury that prints. If the money printed is not transferred to the mercy of the Fed, it is considered a trick to go around the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
Frankly, do you think the taxpayers knows just about anything about the money issues, printed, or used in his name?
It still doesn't change the fact that JFK did not try to end the Fed. JFK didn't challenge the Fed in any way. This is from Edward G. Griffin.
****Let's put this issue into perspective. The proponents of the JFK Myth assert that Kennedy was assassinated because he was about to issue Silver Certificates, thereby denying the bankers their customary interest payments on the nation's currency. However, the reality was just the opposite. Previously, the President could have issued Silver Certificates on his own authority; but, with the signing of EO 11110, he delegated that authority to the Secretary of the Treasury. At that time, the Secretary of the Treasury was Douglas Dillon from a well-known and powerful banking family. That means Kennedy surrendered the power to issue Silver Certificates and gave it to a member of the banking fraternity who could do with it as he pleased "without the approval, ratification, or other action of the President." Dillon, of course, would have strong motive to preserve the dominance of Federal Reserve Notes. The theory that Kennedy was getting ready to issue Silver Certificates is without evidence or logic.****
Griffin is someone I trust most of the time, too. He is definitely one of the best. The problem is that the link to his article doesn't work, so I am not convinced he wrote anything like that...
Thank you for your correction; I'll keep it in mind. Not changing the text in order to make sure your observation doesn't vanish without a trace.
Of course, JFK was only an example that bounced.
Even if it was true, it would be an exeggaration to claim JFK was killed for this reason. There were truckloads of other convincing reasons that must have piled up, especially his plans to dissolve a few alphabet-soup orgs...
I certainly do not believe Oswald assassinated Kennedy. Oswald was quite a complex character but an assassin he was not. In fact, he never criticized Kennedy to anyone in his circle so he had no beef with Kennedy. Of course, we know Oswald goes much deeper than being a mere civilian nobody, but following the official narrative that he was a nobody loser, that profile never revealed any deep-seated animosity toward Kennedy so the official narrative provides no motive that makes sense.
And of course, before we had mass shootings, we had mass bombings, i.e. Freedom Club. I just wrote up a little something on that after watching the documentary series about it on Netflix yesterday evening.
At some point individual choices must coalesce on a societal level, but there has to be change on a personal level that allows that larger change to take place. It may look like humanity is doomed, but I think we will stumble along until we reach a higher level of maturity in money, health and power and regard for others.
In capitalism, the interests of the individual is building an economic system and, along with that, a culture that trains people to be competitive and sociopathic.
My concluding that the expiration date for humanity is close is based on the observation that all civilizations eventually terminated themselves and were replaced; once the process reaches the global level, there is no room for anything new to replace the old one that self-destructs.
A new ideology might save civilization, but it would require people to internalize something that they consider more valuable than their own lives and act with responsibility towards the end that this entity imposes on human life. I don't attach much hope for that, based on my observing my students in my 23-year-long academic teaching. Already Aristotle observed in Politics that about seven out of ten people simply do not or cannot take responsibility for themselves and as such, deserve to be slaves. What will happen to those in a world that can survive the approaching devastation?
Capitalism isn't a system, nobody invented it and nobody wrote it down, and does none of that.
You are talking about cronyism and corruption. Maybe cronyism and corruption can't be eliminated, but we don't want to throw the freedom and liberty babies out with the bathwater.
Capitalism is just the result of people interacting over centuries and longer, each iteration being usually better than the last.
Are you worse off than your grandparents? As Dave Rubin likes to ask. (not that I am a Dave Rubin fan.)
Personally I think it will all be sorted out in the coming apocalypse. We are going to fall (are falling?) off an energy cliff, (being accelerated on purpose) and the ones who grow up in the new world, generations from now, will probably be living in a world made by hand, to use James Howard Kustler's phrase.
And there will be new attempts to control the world, but it will be the type of world that the Roman's controlled, for example, a small subset of the actual world.
A system doesn't need to be invented. Two plus two makes four and yes, a tree falling in a forest does amit a sound, even if nobody can hear it. Without the world being systematic, it would not exist.
Cronyism and corruption has always been around, irrespective of the level of technological or economic stages.
Please, explain, who "we" is, that is, the ones who "don't want to throw the freedom and liberty babies out with the bathwater." I am also wondering what you mean by the statement.
Why would it matter, if I am worse off than my grandparents? Anyway, even if it did matter, how could such a thing be determined? I guess, I don't care for Dave Rubin, either, whoever he is (I had to look up to find out that he is a "commentator," whatever that is). :)
Just an afterthought to my article; without restoring industrial and agricultural production, the survivors of the coming apocalypse, assuming there will be any (which I doubt), will have to revert to ancient technologies.
Ouch, sorry to hear that... I told my wife to buy Bitcoin when it was $2k, but she rejected the idea. I would have sold at $50... Wuodda, shoudda; it's all mootn. Didn't buy gold for $660 in 2008 and sold it for $1.8k and didn't buy Ford at the same time. Oh, well.
At the same time, I can be sloppy without anyone or anything lending a hand! :)
I think capitalism can work without it leading to sociopathy or psychopathy, but that requires a maturity that is not present in large numbers at present.
You are right about civilizations having an expiry date. The question is will it be different this time? Will enough people change their ways? Are there off world beings who may step in to help? Yes, it does look grim, but I am an optimist until I can no longer be.
pHARMa has global reach, but doesn't mean there is no room for alternatives. There are already alternatives in health care, money exchange, etc. The question is will enough people engage them to make the change significant? If seven out of ten will not take responsibility that is certainly grim, but isn't there always room for people who do? The question here is will the structure of society make life too uncomfortable for those who want to be independent?
They moved from the UK to the US for freedom, there are no more continents to move to, so we have to do it where we are, or perhaps move to a place or create one where the sentiment is dominant, like the Mormons did with Utah??
Now, that is an interesting potential answer to my dilemma: would it be enough if only the leaders change their ways? Would the rest follow? Raising the level of consciousness is a painful process, even if done alone; most people cannot even tolerate their own company, so they constantly seek out digressions...
The problem is that ultimately it boils down to those, who control the money supply, and they can pre-arrange just about any process and/or event that will determine the direction that humanity will be forced to take.
The structure of human coexistence ("society") has always been the same, but the driving force ("ideology") kept changing, along with the means to achieve the goals assigned by the ideologues. Still, individualism vs communalism is a good question, one I cannot answer for the time being, not even for myself. :) Tradition is certainly the central guide in every culture, but what if all traditions are destroyed? As long as a person can survive alone, he will probably prefer individualism and the weak will always vouch for the collective...
When it comes to Utopia, I'd side with the Amish. :) They are currently attacked in PA for not having their children injected with the childhood poisons, which is against the "law" requiring "childhood vaccines" for school attendance. They can easily lose everything they have, if the state starts putting liens on their properties. Dunno, it may have happened already or is happening right now, but I'm quite certain it will happen sooner, rather than later...
did you really just say you can't decide between individualism or communism? Either you are using these terms in a non correct way, or you are, (how can I say it? I have no desire to be insulting) not thinking things through.
No, I didn't say that. I know what I want, but I cannot argue for it in a way that would convince me once and for all. Possibly, different environments call for one or the other. And I didn't say communism, but communalism. And no, you are not insulting me and I am grateful for your freely expressing your thoughts. :)
oh, ok, my bad, I read communism but now see that you didn't say that.
My apologies.
I think communalism (maybe it's not a word) works in the family and in highly homogeneous societies that have common goals. That will be coming in the future, but it's a long way from here, and on the other side of that collapse scenario.
I wish I was wrong, but logically speaking, these are the steps. When I was young, I was a chess player, a 2nd-division soccer player, a writer, and an independent thinker. I also built furniture, amplifiers, and speakers. Spent three years as a metal worker in factories and one year as a nurse in a hospital (but later, worked with doctors for another ten years).
In chess, I used to be able to think 10-15 moves ahead, which made me feel everything is predestined. That made me feel so bad that I quit playing altogether.
There has been too much play on restricting people to the spiritual prison space between hope and fear that I am reluctant to buy anything selling either of those.
Perchance your conclusion is amiss... all that is needed for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing... here we are doing something... what qualifies as something... hmmm... i seem to have missed your post explaining Terrain...
Which way I fly is Hell; myself am Hell; And in the lowest deep a lower deep Still threat'ning to devour me opens wide, To which the Hell I suffer seems a Heav'n
John Milton
I will agree that "Humanity" as thought of prior to post WW-2 is doomed. The human soul is not doomed but the material form of what humans define as human is a slippery slope. A fetus is exterminated as non-human. The parts of the non-human are able to be used in humans or help the cyborg human come into existence. A car wreck victim has a kidney or heart or cornea that is useful for humans as well or to help the cyborg come into existence.
For your first thesis we assume humans and not cyborgs. This likely is the error. We are born human and devolve, degenerate, decline into cyborgs daily. Since the French Revolution the cry has been passionate and growing louder Ni dieu ni maître!
(Neither God nor master)
Man was created in the image of God. As a creature man must serve something greater than their pride. If not, then the creature having lived passes into the body dismemberment hospital.
huh? inevitable death and taxes comes to mind, but becoming cyborgs? cyborgs are an inadequate replacement for humanity, as you mentioned the soul... therefore, their "flash in the pan" of history will not be sustainable and will perish... i submit... as in the days of Noah... and the tower of babel... as i have always said, "we [humans] don't make very good gods!"
It seems to me that it's not a case of either/or, either it's germ theory OR it's terrain theory. Having read "Béchamp or Pasteur", Ethel Hume's classic, it's not clear to me that there is no such thing as a germ, or at least a virus, and equally clear that having a healthy "terrain" is critical in fighting off disease. And clearly, Covid-19 is an engineered virus.
The problem is that Germ Theory is used for justifying global enslavement and genocide. Already in January, 2020, when I was not even doubting the existence of a "killer virus," I already decided that I would prefer to remain human instead of living in fear, even if the "virus" would kill 98-99% of people. I preferred to take my chances.
Would anyone really want to live in a world like it has been for over two years? Giving up humanity for a false sense of security? Consider others plague spreaders who must be avoided? Wearing a muzzle? Submitting to fraudulent tests and accepting lethal injections?
That is what's at stake. (For that matter, Terrain Theory has a lot more explanatory power than Germ Theory and in his diary, donated to Princeton University by his last descendant in 2014, Pasteur himself admitted that he was a fraud (not that Beauchamp was an angel).)
It was the lethal injections that have been developed and tested in the secret labs worldwide. (Even according to mainstream "Medicine," coronaviruses mutate faster than it would take to create a culture, and they become weaker after every mutation in order not to kill their host. As such, coronaviruses are impossible to develop into bioweapons.)
I think we're largely in agreement. However, as you say, it's clear that, contrary to the usual course in Nature for viruses—that in order to survive they must scale DOWN their lethality, not up—the Covid-19 variants seem to do the opposite. I was struck down by one of them at the beginning of May during a book tour to promote my latest book. It has taken me 6 weeks to recover and I have some symptoms of Long Covid or Post-Covid Syndrome. Although it's too early to tell, it seems some of these symptoms may be permanent. While I was ill, I noticed how the virus progressively attacked almost every system in my body, including my eyes and ears. Never in my life had I ever experienced anything like it with a normal flu. This clearly indicates to me some genetic engineering is involved.
I am glad, we agree on the central point.
Still, I can't help emphasizing the following:
The latest trends in "viruses" become stronger only on TV. If it was true that "variants" or "mutations" become more and more powerful, humanity would be doomed, no matter what.
There are no diagnostic tools for ANY virus, so how would anyone know if they "have 'covid'"? The symptoms can come from various resources.
There are plenty of toxins around, but it was mostly new 5G installations that caused upsurges in the symptoms. In the UK, for that matter, installers had to go on Worker's Comp and suffered from radiation illness after working on the towers... Still, chemtrails or insane disinfectants are also good candidate for creating symptoms that actually coincide with those of radiation illness. You must have kept being exposed to the source of poisoning, whether chemical toxins or radiation...
FYI, the "flu" is another invented illness in order to cover up common poisonings...
I doubt that genetic engineering is out in the open, because it could not be controlled and eventually would harm/kill the perpetrators, too. That sort of thing will be reserved for experiments "for the greater good" in the "Green Zones," where the subject can be hermetically isolated.
Well you're telling me to deny the experience of my own senses. Trust me, I have never been so ill in all my life. At one point I had symptoms that made me think I might go blind. Then it was loss of hearing in one ear. These are not typical "flu" symptoms. For about a week I had to walk with a cane. Six weeks of sheer hell. I eat a fully organic diet, I'm slim in physique, I live in a community with clean drinking water, and have NO prior co-morbidities.
I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that the military is at a sophisticated level of genetic engineering, and thus can engineer viruses. (Covid-19 is a registered patent.) In fact, I may have been the target of a direct bioweapons attack, though I have no evidence. It happened—coincidentally?—while I was on a book tour promoting a book that questions the official coronavirus narrative. For two years I'd not been sick a day, then suddenly within two days on tour, far away from home, I was struck down hard.
By the way, when Pasteur admitted he was a fraud, what he meant was that he had routinely stolen Béchamp's research and then tried to pass them off as his own, even when Pasteur didn't understand them. That is well established by Ethel Hume's research in "Béchamp or Pasteur."
There is no doubt in my mind that "it" is unlike any sickness I have ever had. Symptoms, in order of appearance, were initially flu-like, with high fever and deep painful cough, severe fatigue. Within a day I lost sense of taste & smell (coffee tasted like burnt cinders). Then I had 4 hours of SVT with a heart rate of 160-170 bpm. I was not sure I would survive. Went to the ER next day and tested positive for "it". All heart enzymes elevated - they though it was a STEMI until echo proved no heart attack. In the hospital I rapidly developed vertigo and louder tinnitus, with an annoying repetitive musical pipe-organ noise. "crushed glass" bi-lateral pneumonia, crushing fatigue and almost no ability to eat, unable to navigate without assistance due to vertigo. O2 Sat at 93 the whole time (luckily, as I didn't need oxygen). Took about a month to get back to a minimal state of normalcy.
You see, my problem is that “covid cannot be probably diagnosed.
I believe, we have both presented our case and I am leaving it up for the readers to make up their mind, much in the way you and I have. :)
I do wonder what, if anything is actually being diagnosed. PCR tests prior to the "pandemic" always tested for about 15 or 20 different viruses with one swab - several types of influenza, RSV, 4 types of coronaviruses, etc. But if they had used this type of swab, too many people may have had something other than the COV and it would have been just a bad flu/pneumonia season.
JFK did not try it. That is a false myth.
https://www.alt-m.org/2013/11/19/just-say-no-to-the-jfk-fed-conspiracy/
The Fed doesn't issue physical money (doesn't "print"); it lends money to to taxpayer at an interest, which is spent at the discretion of politicians. It is the Treasury that prints. If the money printed is not transferred to the mercy of the Fed, it is considered a trick to go around the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
Frankly, do you think the taxpayers knows just about anything about the money issues, printed, or used in his name?
It still doesn't change the fact that JFK did not try to end the Fed. JFK didn't challenge the Fed in any way. This is from Edward G. Griffin.
****Let's put this issue into perspective. The proponents of the JFK Myth assert that Kennedy was assassinated because he was about to issue Silver Certificates, thereby denying the bankers their customary interest payments on the nation's currency. However, the reality was just the opposite. Previously, the President could have issued Silver Certificates on his own authority; but, with the signing of EO 11110, he delegated that authority to the Secretary of the Treasury. At that time, the Secretary of the Treasury was Douglas Dillon from a well-known and powerful banking family. That means Kennedy surrendered the power to issue Silver Certificates and gave it to a member of the banking fraternity who could do with it as he pleased "without the approval, ratification, or other action of the President." Dillon, of course, would have strong motive to preserve the dominance of Federal Reserve Notes. The theory that Kennedy was getting ready to issue Silver Certificates is without evidence or logic.****
Thank you for the details.
Griffin is someone I trust most of the time, too. He is definitely one of the best. The problem is that the link to his article doesn't work, so I am not convinced he wrote anything like that...
Thank you for your correction; I'll keep it in mind. Not changing the text in order to make sure your observation doesn't vanish without a trace.
Of course, JFK was only an example that bounced.
Even if it was true, it would be an exeggaration to claim JFK was killed for this reason. There were truckloads of other convincing reasons that must have piled up, especially his plans to dissolve a few alphabet-soup orgs...
What do you think about the rest of the article?
I certainly do not believe Oswald assassinated Kennedy. Oswald was quite a complex character but an assassin he was not. In fact, he never criticized Kennedy to anyone in his circle so he had no beef with Kennedy. Of course, we know Oswald goes much deeper than being a mere civilian nobody, but following the official narrative that he was a nobody loser, that profile never revealed any deep-seated animosity toward Kennedy so the official narrative provides no motive that makes sense.
Yes, I am using Oswald in an article about "mass shootings":
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/mass-shootings
And of course, before we had mass shootings, we had mass bombings, i.e. Freedom Club. I just wrote up a little something on that after watching the documentary series about it on Netflix yesterday evening.
At some point individual choices must coalesce on a societal level, but there has to be change on a personal level that allows that larger change to take place. It may look like humanity is doomed, but I think we will stumble along until we reach a higher level of maturity in money, health and power and regard for others.
In capitalism, the interests of the individual is building an economic system and, along with that, a culture that trains people to be competitive and sociopathic.
My concluding that the expiration date for humanity is close is based on the observation that all civilizations eventually terminated themselves and were replaced; once the process reaches the global level, there is no room for anything new to replace the old one that self-destructs.
A new ideology might save civilization, but it would require people to internalize something that they consider more valuable than their own lives and act with responsibility towards the end that this entity imposes on human life. I don't attach much hope for that, based on my observing my students in my 23-year-long academic teaching. Already Aristotle observed in Politics that about seven out of ten people simply do not or cannot take responsibility for themselves and as such, deserve to be slaves. What will happen to those in a world that can survive the approaching devastation?
Capitalism isn't a system, nobody invented it and nobody wrote it down, and does none of that.
You are talking about cronyism and corruption. Maybe cronyism and corruption can't be eliminated, but we don't want to throw the freedom and liberty babies out with the bathwater.
Capitalism is just the result of people interacting over centuries and longer, each iteration being usually better than the last.
Are you worse off than your grandparents? As Dave Rubin likes to ask. (not that I am a Dave Rubin fan.)
Personally I think it will all be sorted out in the coming apocalypse. We are going to fall (are falling?) off an energy cliff, (being accelerated on purpose) and the ones who grow up in the new world, generations from now, will probably be living in a world made by hand, to use James Howard Kustler's phrase.
And there will be new attempts to control the world, but it will be the type of world that the Roman's controlled, for example, a small subset of the actual world.
A system doesn't need to be invented. Two plus two makes four and yes, a tree falling in a forest does amit a sound, even if nobody can hear it. Without the world being systematic, it would not exist.
Cronyism and corruption has always been around, irrespective of the level of technological or economic stages.
Please, explain, who "we" is, that is, the ones who "don't want to throw the freedom and liberty babies out with the bathwater." I am also wondering what you mean by the statement.
Why would it matter, if I am worse off than my grandparents? Anyway, even if it did matter, how could such a thing be determined? I guess, I don't care for Dave Rubin, either, whoever he is (I had to look up to find out that he is a "commentator," whatever that is). :)
Just an afterthought to my article; without restoring industrial and agricultural production, the survivors of the coming apocalypse, assuming there will be any (which I doubt), will have to revert to ancient technologies.
but, we, as in those who think, and I need to point out that I said 'worse off', not worse. That's a very different question.
You are right, I was sloppy. Thank you for the correction; implemented.
Yes, I think that's what I am getting at. (your last paragraph)
Sorry I am a bit distracted losing money hand over fist in the crypto collapse as we speak. Makes it hard to concentrate.
Ouch, sorry to hear that... I told my wife to buy Bitcoin when it was $2k, but she rejected the idea. I would have sold at $50... Wuodda, shoudda; it's all mootn. Didn't buy gold for $660 in 2008 and sold it for $1.8k and didn't buy Ford at the same time. Oh, well.
At the same time, I can be sloppy without anyone or anything lending a hand! :)
the main thing to keep in mind is that you will soon have another chance to get into bitcoin sub 10,000 I am almost sure of that.
Harry Dent is calling for a 3200 low
but it will plummet still from here, so you are not too late.
well, I did buy gold at 640 but a while before then, and I still have half of it.
Really have gotten all my principal back from cryptos, but I was paper rich just a short time ago, and now I am not.
Am trying to learn how to margin trade on perpetual contracts, but I have lost more than I have won so far. Just got stopped out three times in a row
so have given up for the day.
I think capitalism can work without it leading to sociopathy or psychopathy, but that requires a maturity that is not present in large numbers at present.
You are right about civilizations having an expiry date. The question is will it be different this time? Will enough people change their ways? Are there off world beings who may step in to help? Yes, it does look grim, but I am an optimist until I can no longer be.
pHARMa has global reach, but doesn't mean there is no room for alternatives. There are already alternatives in health care, money exchange, etc. The question is will enough people engage them to make the change significant? If seven out of ten will not take responsibility that is certainly grim, but isn't there always room for people who do? The question here is will the structure of society make life too uncomfortable for those who want to be independent?
They moved from the UK to the US for freedom, there are no more continents to move to, so we have to do it where we are, or perhaps move to a place or create one where the sentiment is dominant, like the Mormons did with Utah??
Now, that is an interesting potential answer to my dilemma: would it be enough if only the leaders change their ways? Would the rest follow? Raising the level of consciousness is a painful process, even if done alone; most people cannot even tolerate their own company, so they constantly seek out digressions...
The problem is that ultimately it boils down to those, who control the money supply, and they can pre-arrange just about any process and/or event that will determine the direction that humanity will be forced to take.
The structure of human coexistence ("society") has always been the same, but the driving force ("ideology") kept changing, along with the means to achieve the goals assigned by the ideologues. Still, individualism vs communalism is a good question, one I cannot answer for the time being, not even for myself. :) Tradition is certainly the central guide in every culture, but what if all traditions are destroyed? As long as a person can survive alone, he will probably prefer individualism and the weak will always vouch for the collective...
When it comes to Utopia, I'd side with the Amish. :) They are currently attacked in PA for not having their children injected with the childhood poisons, which is against the "law" requiring "childhood vaccines" for school attendance. They can easily lose everything they have, if the state starts putting liens on their properties. Dunno, it may have happened already or is happening right now, but I'm quite certain it will happen sooner, rather than later...
did you really just say you can't decide between individualism or communism? Either you are using these terms in a non correct way, or you are, (how can I say it? I have no desire to be insulting) not thinking things through.
No, I didn't say that. I know what I want, but I cannot argue for it in a way that would convince me once and for all. Possibly, different environments call for one or the other. And I didn't say communism, but communalism. And no, you are not insulting me and I am grateful for your freely expressing your thoughts. :)
oh, ok, my bad, I read communism but now see that you didn't say that.
My apologies.
I think communalism (maybe it's not a word) works in the family and in highly homogeneous societies that have common goals. That will be coming in the future, but it's a long way from here, and on the other side of that collapse scenario.
As I was reading something in me was screaming :"But HOW?!" and then I came to the end. Utopian it is but, there is no other way. All other changes
would be "cosmetic" and prolong.
I wish I was wrong, but logically speaking, these are the steps. When I was young, I was a chess player, a 2nd-division soccer player, a writer, and an independent thinker. I also built furniture, amplifiers, and speakers. Spent three years as a metal worker in factories and one year as a nurse in a hospital (but later, worked with doctors for another ten years).
In chess, I used to be able to think 10-15 moves ahead, which made me feel everything is predestined. That made me feel so bad that I quit playing altogether.
wow... check this out.... something is being done!
https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/we-knew-the-hhs-and-who-was-doomed
There has been too much play on restricting people to the spiritual prison space between hope and fear that I am reluctant to buy anything selling either of those.
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/stuck-between-fear-and-hope
The tricksters are also great illusionists...
hmmm... so it's fake news?
No, but it's definitely a diversion.
The game is not over yet.
Perchance your conclusion is amiss... all that is needed for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing... here we are doing something... what qualifies as something... hmmm... i seem to have missed your post explaining Terrain...
Actually, Evil is infinitely stronger than man. Humans, in addition to doing their best, need Divine Grace...
divine grace -- agreed!
we should be burning germ theory at the stake along with all the liars that try
to defend it, honesty is another one of those old theorys that most people no
longer understand the meaning of not because they are dishonest but because
they never see examples of it in the modern world.
Adolf Hitler is the prime example of what the banking empire will do to you and
your country if you dare to challenge their control of the monetary system, Germany,s
economy was a basket case for several years after WW1 when the national socialists
came to power Hitler put the rothchild head banker in jail and threw out their central
bank they created their own monetary system based on the value of work, three short
years later Germany was having unprecedented growth and prosperity at the same time
the US and the western world were collapsing due to banker induced depression.
This is why Adolf Hitler is still demonised till today, the lesson throw out your central
bank and usury aka interest and watch countries prosper and grow, this is also why
the holocaust narrative was invented. As Henry Ford said if people understood how
banking worked there would be a revolution by morning
if only....
Which way I fly is Hell; myself am Hell; And in the lowest deep a lower deep Still threat'ning to devour me opens wide, To which the Hell I suffer seems a Heav'n
John Milton
I will agree that "Humanity" as thought of prior to post WW-2 is doomed. The human soul is not doomed but the material form of what humans define as human is a slippery slope. A fetus is exterminated as non-human. The parts of the non-human are able to be used in humans or help the cyborg human come into existence. A car wreck victim has a kidney or heart or cornea that is useful for humans as well or to help the cyborg come into existence.
For your first thesis we assume humans and not cyborgs. This likely is the error. We are born human and devolve, degenerate, decline into cyborgs daily. Since the French Revolution the cry has been passionate and growing louder Ni dieu ni maître!
(Neither God nor master)
Man was created in the image of God. As a creature man must serve something greater than their pride. If not, then the creature having lived passes into the body dismemberment hospital.
huh? inevitable death and taxes comes to mind, but becoming cyborgs? cyborgs are an inadequate replacement for humanity, as you mentioned the soul... therefore, their "flash in the pan" of history will not be sustainable and will perish... i submit... as in the days of Noah... and the tower of babel... as i have always said, "we [humans] don't make very good gods!"
Men do not. A cyborg is Titanism, Promethean in impulse. And this is exactly my observation. Man is a creature.
Man is not Master.
Creating a political Saturnalia after WW2 brought us to this hour.