You send me a link to any of the articles, and I'll point out the mistakes at least in the title or even the first paragraph in it, as I did to the following articles:
In a way, yes; I used the Socratic method in order to inspire thinking. And yes, I know how to manipulate people with questions (e.g. I am using click-baits for my titles here), but I avoided that as far as I could.
Still, I never expected my students to agree with me. All they had to do was set up an acceptable defense for their points of view (and I was gentle and didn't enforce high-end "academic" rules; you don't pick a flower or reap a harvest before it's grown).
It happened quite often that even after the semester ended, students asked me what my opinion was. I told them, my opinion didn't matter; theirs did, because they were the bosses of their own lives.
In that sense, I am conducting myself in the same manner on my Substack.
The stinging ray has the same word in it as the Sun's rays. I believe, I have both in me, whether I like it or not, but that doesn't make me special.
I am "the Source," because I am usually ahead of most others, so I cannot name any references and, in a worst-case scenario, I simply forget the source. :)
Yes. A tidbit. These commentators and writers, for all their apparent connectedness and CV’s and collective worth, have made no inroads on msm for more than 2 years. Some are late to the party, but if any of them they believe what they write….all hell should have broken loose by now.
LIBBY EMMONS: Biden Issues Transhumanist Biotechnology EO Calling to 'Program Biology in the Same Way' We Program 'Computers' | Human Events 100 EO'S.
VIDEO, WELCOME TO LOGAN'S RUN
Additionally, the order undertakes to create biotech data banks, which, after the digital medical records provisions were enacted via Obamacare, or the ACA, would be a much simpler task as medical records are already digitally available to doctors, providers, and insurance companies.
One thing that troubles me, is this idea that keeps getting bandied about, that all we need to do.. is separate ourselves from the current system and setup our own! Our own currency and facilities etc. Yeah right! As if a controlling tyranny wouldn’t have its armed forces knock all that down in minute! See ‘David Koresh’ for details.
This is the only article by me that you may have read to a certain extent, but understood, apparently, only in part. Aren't you passing judgment a bit too hastily?
If analyzing from a Cognitive Linguist's/Communications Professor's point of view is nit-picking for you, you have already revealed enough of yourself; no need for responding any further.
You consider yourself to be a suitable judge for determining what "service to Humanity" means, yet your comment clearly manifests that you didn't understand what you have read. Your role here seems to be disruptive and nothing else!
Also, please, notice that your "comment" is a typical bot/troll one (generalization combined with accusation(s). Last time I was attacked by one was on Apocalyptic Yoga; I can see, you are a paid subscriber there. Don't fret it; it was not you are the time.
I submit "control" and "brainless mob people" are similar to that use of language you object to seeing. Control presumes at best "justified Paternalism" and at worst master and slave. Mob people dehumanizes the neighbor - your fellow adult and again presumes an adult who is not caught up in the spirit of the mob. As Covid showed us elites are as much a mob as any inner city. Indeed Kings and Aristocrats came to be precisely due to thinking like this about the public.
All of us are free or none of us are free. We can have free people in free Republics when Mass Media propaganda ends. The road out of barbarism has been built many times in many places. Even residents of the 50 states can build one. The method is respect. Joe may not be your intellectual equal but Joe is as good a man as you and cannot be governed without consent.
And building consent by rifle point is how everything brought us to this day.
So, are you saying that I must respect those, who have been brainwashed enough to be willing to sacrifice their lives to protect those, who are killing them, and kill me instead?
In such not-so-rare occasions, the eugenicists seem to be right, but as opposed to them, I wouldn't start killing people I don't care for. My respect extends as far as ignoring them and preparing for their zombie march, just in case. I don't dehumanize them; they have done that to themselves, I'm only acknowledging the fact...
What "elites" do you mean are mobs? I've never met with any "elites" in my life, and I've met with tens of thousands of people. Who is "we," anyway? (you are saying "showed us")
I am nobody to judge people; their actions judge them. When did you read in my articles that I respect "intellectuals" at all? I respect people for their actions and, for that matter, most of the "uneducated" Joes here, in rural Kentucky, didn't fall for the scam, while many college "graduates" did.
Overestimating people (by "respecting" them without preparing for defending myself against their imminent or somewhat-delayed abuse) cost me the biggest losses in my life.
As Einstein said, "There are two things that are infinite: human stupidity and the Universe. I'm not sure about the Universe."
Sorry, I have no clue what you mean by your last sentence. Who is "building consent," where, how, and between whom?
Let us reason together as two human beings about other human beings. First the premises. And this is where the difficulty lies. We as human beings in Century 21 inherit history and are history as individual persons orphaned at birth belonging to the extended orphan family.
Secondly we strive as persons to fulfill goals and thereby thrive. Thirdly despite being historic individuals bound in time and space our common embodied human imagination is so powerful through Being humans are strong enough to break time up like a Dim Sum on the cart. By virtue of existence we existing people can with language make words to demarcate existence and boundaries. Using language we can be inside a past lived world or dwell in another world of the technology future. Man is existentially free and plastic. Man can choose to co-create Gods and Demons out of an abyss complete freedom unfathomed. Fourth, this historic person "as is" is equal in their personhood to any other human being. As Shylock said, prick me I bleed. These are the 4 foundational premises I hold before I go forward with ending Tyranny one way or the other in my opinions.
Moving then to answer:. like minded people to perpetuate freedom of speech and language and thought and governance have to organize around goals they are willing to die to hold. With Covid in the atheist society the value chosen was obedience to the law in exchange for Salvation. Obeisance to the irrationally and the value of Salvation was on this side of bare life. Life without freedom except to work and shop from home unmasked. Now while all the Establishment attempted with varying degrees of ability to bribe or to have compelled Salvation by force the nation was truthfully collapsed with the decision by the few to have Biden as President.
So the first freedom move on the chess board of politics is a new value formation. I think with a sizeable numbers of sick and dead this winter and into the following next 20 years the best movement is one embracing healing. The healing of the person injured by vaccine and the healing of people injured by modern medicine. Let me call this the Love Formation. We must as citizens come together with love. Sobornost is word with a number of broad translations, among them “togetherness” and “symphony.” This word, in the Slavonic version of the Nicene Creed, corresponds to “catholic.” It does not, however, mean “universal” but denotes a perfect organic fellowship of redeemed people united by faith.
The Love Movement is pro human. Freedom to choose life is freedom to choose health practice and health care worker. The next freedom once organized is to co-create a rhizome world and not a new building of the Tower of Babylon.
There is nothing for you and me to reason about; grounds for communication must be established for us. I am quite familiar with several traditions (philosophy must be left out, because its implications are always subject to culturally-specific interpretation), but I'm not sure where you are coming from. I have lived on the East Coast, in the West, and now, I am in the South. The all have different premises. I have my own, but I can adjust for the sake of making contact with a fellow human being. :)
Pilate asked, "What is the Truth?"
That was, of course, a way for him to avoid responsibility, but let me ask, "What is Love?" The answer to that can establish a foundation for us to communicate with each other.
I know; it all sounds familiar and perfect on paper. How about in practice? Can you come up with a single specific example? I can't.
I am familiar with C. S. Lewis's Four Loves. Still, somehow, I feel that the word has been abused too many times to make any sense anymore. Not your fault, not mine.
It's not the many languages of Babylon; it's the culturally-specific implications that are separating people. Most of them spring from primary socialization, so people are not even aware of the basic tenets of their lives.
A concept I have managed to grasp and live by is "harmony" or "balance," which is why my moniker is a dolphin, based on the Enneagram:
Sure. In the 60's we had each one teach one. We had volunteers loosely coordinated helping others for no pay. We had free health clinics, we had whole food health food stores, we had the invention of community currency, we had low to no cost entertainment done by participants not booking agents. Community first. The spirit of the times favored freedom. I recall fondly arising in the Anarchist community a bookstore meeting house that still exists on Haight and Masonic-Bound Together Books-and in the community various households having once a month potlucks with live music .
What we need is to return to our happier humanity not judge one another. Healing sick, helping others, not using the System but from a common humanity. This is politics.
I'm a 74 year old, barley tech savvy, I do NOT want to learn any more Tech crap. I don't want to use QR'S I can't read, or buy a new $1,000+ phone that can. Or replace gas with Green Energy that pollutes and cost more. Still don't know what it says, KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID, goes a long way. Nor am I about to let a SENILE DESPOT, TELL ME WHAT TO DO. I don't even allow my ignorant brainwashed doctors do that. I'm a educated woman, a Alpha, can't help the age thing. My Dad didn't spend 5 years in WW2, in the Philippines, killing a atrocious, cuel enemy, under Gen. MacArthur. That crappy Marshall Plan flooded our markets with cheap toxic lead painted toys, just as China is doing today. To lay down and let this Senile Despot tell me what to do.
As Robert Yoho does in his book, Butchered by Healthcare, Pharma, Government. $5 bucks on kindle, be sure to watch his podcast on Substack. You will thank him for the ability to understand RFK Jr, Fauci better, and even that is unravelling at good speed.
Bill Gates ordered the President of the United States twice not to investigate the ill effects of his mRNA injections because he knew they killed and maimed people. He is responsible for millions of deaths, infertility, and injuries around the world.
CHD unfortunately publishes quite a bit of stuff that Barnett is talking about...
I don't care if RFK, Jr. is "controlled opposition" or not; I think, he means well and he is authentic b/o his childhood "vaccine" injury. Still, he often seems to be late with his published info and sometimes he manages to be blatantly wrong, so one must read his stuff with caution. As with all sites, sources must be collected as long as they look halfway-decent, especially because internet search results are now becoming a bad joke.
What makes you state that LRC "overwhelmingly publishes misleading information"?
Which part of my statement is not clear?
You send me a link to any of the articles, and I'll point out the mistakes at least in the title or even the first paragraph in it, as I did to the following articles:
Desmet
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-mass-formation-of-morons-using
Mercola
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/one-article-one-title-a-dozen-lies
Paul Craig Roberts
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/was-the-plandemic-necessary
Are you doing that thing Ray, where the class has to guess what you are thinking?
And gets in trouble for not keeping up.
In a way, yes; I used the Socratic method in order to inspire thinking. And yes, I know how to manipulate people with questions (e.g. I am using click-baits for my titles here), but I avoided that as far as I could.
Still, I never expected my students to agree with me. All they had to do was set up an acceptable defense for their points of view (and I was gentle and didn't enforce high-end "academic" rules; you don't pick a flower or reap a harvest before it's grown).
It happened quite often that even after the semester ended, students asked me what my opinion was. I told them, my opinion didn't matter; theirs did, because they were the bosses of their own lives.
In that sense, I am conducting myself in the same manner on my Substack.
Regarding clickbait; the name of your Substack "Ray's newsletter" isn't very catchy, although it does you credit to correctly use the apostrophe:) .
"The Source" is much better.
Here's some ideas for you:
Rayzer Sharp Source
Rays Your Ideas
Rays of Light
Rays Up
Raysin Source
That's enough for the moment.
Cheers,
Cairn
So sweet of you!
I am not playing for any appeal.
The stinging ray has the same word in it as the Sun's rays. I believe, I have both in me, whether I like it or not, but that doesn't make me special.
I am "the Source," because I am usually ahead of most others, so I cannot name any references and, in a worst-case scenario, I simply forget the source. :)
I don't want to be famous or rich.
I think, I have accomplished all my goals!
Going to bed now!
:D
Yes. A tidbit. These commentators and writers, for all their apparent connectedness and CV’s and collective worth, have made no inroads on msm for more than 2 years. Some are late to the party, but if any of them they believe what they write….all hell should have broken loose by now.
LIBBY EMMONS: Biden Issues Transhumanist Biotechnology EO Calling to 'Program Biology in the Same Way' We Program 'Computers' | Human Events 100 EO'S.
VIDEO, WELCOME TO LOGAN'S RUN
Additionally, the order undertakes to create biotech data banks, which, after the digital medical records provisions were enacted via Obamacare, or the ACA, would be a much simpler task as medical records are already digitally available to doctors, providers, and insurance companies.
https://humanevents.com/2022/09/21/libby-emmons-biden-issues-transhumanist-executive-order-to-remake-human-beings-to-achieve-societal-goals?utm_source=PMI_Ecquire&utm_medium=deployer&utm_campaign=Human+Events+Daily&utm_term=4705
One thing that troubles me, is this idea that keeps getting bandied about, that all we need to do.. is separate ourselves from the current system and setup our own! Our own currency and facilities etc. Yeah right! As if a controlling tyranny wouldn’t have its armed forces knock all that down in minute! See ‘David Koresh’ for details.
err.. I wasna actually talkin bout you Ray.. :)
Look, John,
I said that is the ONLY way, but didn't say it was possible! :)
Nope. Dis-Engagement is the only way out. If I had to choose between you and Gary, I'll go with him.
You are nit-picking and doing a dis-service to Humanity.
Please, re-read my updated article; you will find that Gary and I are saying just about the same. Well, nobody is perfect, and that includes us! :)
This is the only article by me that you may have read to a certain extent, but understood, apparently, only in part. Aren't you passing judgment a bit too hastily?
If analyzing from a Cognitive Linguist's/Communications Professor's point of view is nit-picking for you, you have already revealed enough of yourself; no need for responding any further.
You consider yourself to be a suitable judge for determining what "service to Humanity" means, yet your comment clearly manifests that you didn't understand what you have read. Your role here seems to be disruptive and nothing else!
Also, please, notice that your "comment" is a typical bot/troll one (generalization combined with accusation(s). Last time I was attacked by one was on Apocalyptic Yoga; I can see, you are a paid subscriber there. Don't fret it; it was not you are the time.
That's what this site is all about! It's YOUR decision and I never expect anyone to agree with me!
Out of curiousity, WHAT EXACTLY would you "choose"?
You are categorizing and not paying attention...
In this case, I was talking about your two perspectives relating to his article. I prefer his take rather than your critique of his take.
What two perspectives? Please, specify.
Beyond that, you are most welcome to your decisions! :)
I submit "control" and "brainless mob people" are similar to that use of language you object to seeing. Control presumes at best "justified Paternalism" and at worst master and slave. Mob people dehumanizes the neighbor - your fellow adult and again presumes an adult who is not caught up in the spirit of the mob. As Covid showed us elites are as much a mob as any inner city. Indeed Kings and Aristocrats came to be precisely due to thinking like this about the public.
All of us are free or none of us are free. We can have free people in free Republics when Mass Media propaganda ends. The road out of barbarism has been built many times in many places. Even residents of the 50 states can build one. The method is respect. Joe may not be your intellectual equal but Joe is as good a man as you and cannot be governed without consent.
And building consent by rifle point is how everything brought us to this day.
So, are you saying that I must respect those, who have been brainwashed enough to be willing to sacrifice their lives to protect those, who are killing them, and kill me instead?
In such not-so-rare occasions, the eugenicists seem to be right, but as opposed to them, I wouldn't start killing people I don't care for. My respect extends as far as ignoring them and preparing for their zombie march, just in case. I don't dehumanize them; they have done that to themselves, I'm only acknowledging the fact...
What "elites" do you mean are mobs? I've never met with any "elites" in my life, and I've met with tens of thousands of people. Who is "we," anyway? (you are saying "showed us")
I am nobody to judge people; their actions judge them. When did you read in my articles that I respect "intellectuals" at all? I respect people for their actions and, for that matter, most of the "uneducated" Joes here, in rural Kentucky, didn't fall for the scam, while many college "graduates" did.
Overestimating people (by "respecting" them without preparing for defending myself against their imminent or somewhat-delayed abuse) cost me the biggest losses in my life.
As Einstein said, "There are two things that are infinite: human stupidity and the Universe. I'm not sure about the Universe."
Sorry, I have no clue what you mean by your last sentence. Who is "building consent," where, how, and between whom?
Let us reason together as two human beings about other human beings. First the premises. And this is where the difficulty lies. We as human beings in Century 21 inherit history and are history as individual persons orphaned at birth belonging to the extended orphan family.
Secondly we strive as persons to fulfill goals and thereby thrive. Thirdly despite being historic individuals bound in time and space our common embodied human imagination is so powerful through Being humans are strong enough to break time up like a Dim Sum on the cart. By virtue of existence we existing people can with language make words to demarcate existence and boundaries. Using language we can be inside a past lived world or dwell in another world of the technology future. Man is existentially free and plastic. Man can choose to co-create Gods and Demons out of an abyss complete freedom unfathomed. Fourth, this historic person "as is" is equal in their personhood to any other human being. As Shylock said, prick me I bleed. These are the 4 foundational premises I hold before I go forward with ending Tyranny one way or the other in my opinions.
Moving then to answer:. like minded people to perpetuate freedom of speech and language and thought and governance have to organize around goals they are willing to die to hold. With Covid in the atheist society the value chosen was obedience to the law in exchange for Salvation. Obeisance to the irrationally and the value of Salvation was on this side of bare life. Life without freedom except to work and shop from home unmasked. Now while all the Establishment attempted with varying degrees of ability to bribe or to have compelled Salvation by force the nation was truthfully collapsed with the decision by the few to have Biden as President.
So the first freedom move on the chess board of politics is a new value formation. I think with a sizeable numbers of sick and dead this winter and into the following next 20 years the best movement is one embracing healing. The healing of the person injured by vaccine and the healing of people injured by modern medicine. Let me call this the Love Formation. We must as citizens come together with love. Sobornost is word with a number of broad translations, among them “togetherness” and “symphony.” This word, in the Slavonic version of the Nicene Creed, corresponds to “catholic.” It does not, however, mean “universal” but denotes a perfect organic fellowship of redeemed people united by faith.
The Love Movement is pro human. Freedom to choose life is freedom to choose health practice and health care worker. The next freedom once organized is to co-create a rhizome world and not a new building of the Tower of Babylon.
There is nothing for you and me to reason about; grounds for communication must be established for us. I am quite familiar with several traditions (philosophy must be left out, because its implications are always subject to culturally-specific interpretation), but I'm not sure where you are coming from. I have lived on the East Coast, in the West, and now, I am in the South. The all have different premises. I have my own, but I can adjust for the sake of making contact with a fellow human being. :)
Pilate asked, "What is the Truth?"
That was, of course, a way for him to avoid responsibility, but let me ask, "What is Love?" The answer to that can establish a foundation for us to communicate with each other.
I know; it all sounds familiar and perfect on paper. How about in practice? Can you come up with a single specific example? I can't.
I am familiar with C. S. Lewis's Four Loves. Still, somehow, I feel that the word has been abused too many times to make any sense anymore. Not your fault, not mine.
It's not the many languages of Babylon; it's the culturally-specific implications that are separating people. Most of them spring from primary socialization, so people are not even aware of the basic tenets of their lives.
A concept I have managed to grasp and live by is "harmony" or "balance," which is why my moniker is a dolphin, based on the Enneagram:
https://www.enneagraminstitute.com/type-descriptions/
Sure. In the 60's we had each one teach one. We had volunteers loosely coordinated helping others for no pay. We had free health clinics, we had whole food health food stores, we had the invention of community currency, we had low to no cost entertainment done by participants not booking agents. Community first. The spirit of the times favored freedom. I recall fondly arising in the Anarchist community a bookstore meeting house that still exists on Haight and Masonic-Bound Together Books-and in the community various households having once a month potlucks with live music .
What we need is to return to our happier humanity not judge one another. Healing sick, helping others, not using the System but from a common humanity. This is politics.
I'm a 74 year old, barley tech savvy, I do NOT want to learn any more Tech crap. I don't want to use QR'S I can't read, or buy a new $1,000+ phone that can. Or replace gas with Green Energy that pollutes and cost more. Still don't know what it says, KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID, goes a long way. Nor am I about to let a SENILE DESPOT, TELL ME WHAT TO DO. I don't even allow my ignorant brainwashed doctors do that. I'm a educated woman, a Alpha, can't help the age thing. My Dad didn't spend 5 years in WW2, in the Philippines, killing a atrocious, cuel enemy, under Gen. MacArthur. That crappy Marshall Plan flooded our markets with cheap toxic lead painted toys, just as China is doing today. To lay down and let this Senile Despot tell me what to do.
You go Gail! Thanks for comments .
What's an A.O.?
As Robert Yoho does in his book, Butchered by Healthcare, Pharma, Government. $5 bucks on kindle, be sure to watch his podcast on Substack. You will thank him for the ability to understand RFK Jr, Fauci better, and even that is unravelling at good speed.
Bill Gates ordered the President of the United States twice not to investigate the ill effects of his mRNA injections because he knew they killed and maimed people. He is responsible for millions of deaths, infertility, and injuries around the world.
https://twitter.com/SpartacusJustic/status/1570511230338727938
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fauci-misled-congress-about-gain-function-research-protected-biden-admin-former-cdc-chief
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/smart-meters-surveillance-control-energy-use-emf-cola/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e143d6dd-f1a8-4dff-8e11-65b3063aaa54
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mrna-covid-vaccine-vials-data-leak-cola/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e143d6dd-f1a8-4dff-8e11-65b3063aaa54
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/bill-gates-indian-government-lawsuit-snehal-lunawat-death-astrazeneca-vaccine/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e143d6dd-f1a8-4dff-8e11-65b3063aaa54
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rockefeller-foundation-nonprofits-behavioral-psychology-covid-vaccines/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e143d6dd-f1a8-4dff-8e11-65b3063aaa54
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/federation-of-state-medical-boards-covid-misinformation/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e143d6dd-f1a8-4dff-8e11-65b3063aaa54
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/wisconsin-healthcare-workers-religious-medical-exemptions-novavax-covid-shot/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e143d6dd-f1a8-4dff-8e11-65b3063aaa54
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/great-reset-ultra-processed-foods-cola/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e143d6dd-f1a8-4dff-8e11-65b3063aaa54
Thank you for going through all this trouble.
CHD unfortunately publishes quite a bit of stuff that Barnett is talking about...
I don't care if RFK, Jr. is "controlled opposition" or not; I think, he means well and he is authentic b/o his childhood "vaccine" injury. Still, he often seems to be late with his published info and sometimes he manages to be blatantly wrong, so one must read his stuff with caution. As with all sites, sources must be collected as long as they look halfway-decent, especially because internet search results are now becoming a bad joke.
Sorry my spaced links seemed to have all merged, I did put in spaces.