Do People Really Want To Know the Truth?

You tell me.

This sign is surely telling the truth!

---

What does it mean “to know”?

Nobody is truly “red-pilled,” unless they know right from wrong, good from evil, and their own personal angels and demons. The acceptance of being defenselessly exposed also seems to be a requirement for becoming an independent, well-meaning, and responsible human being.

So, are all those proud people who claim to be looking for the truth serious or just want to feel superior over the totally ignorant?

The “truth” is often mandated

When the truth is mandated, it’s human nature to embrace Stockholm syndrome: the victims justify the perpetrators’ actions and defending them, perhaps because they feel they would be even worse-off by not doing so.

The current mode of mass manipulation is traveling on the wings of the idea that the individual must be willing to be sacrificed for the masses (often fraudulently referred to as some sort of “community”). The lie relies on the traditional assumption that three human lives are worth more than two. Do humans amount to nothing more than mere numbers in an equation that uses only rule-of-the-thumb calculations? “Usefulness” and “functionality” have definitely become the slogans on the technocrats’ banners. It’s not an accident that the scam of “democracy” is being pushed on people:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-about-democracy

Such abuse of power is a certifiable a criminal act, but those in power have have never bothered about such little things, because they make the laws for themselves.

What laws?

So, what can be the most functional basis for passing and enforcing laws in an ideal place, where both laws and their enforcement serve the well-being of the people without hurting some of them or violating the individual’s life?

In tribal cultures, evil, stupid, and ludicrous are sometimes denoted by the same word. In theocracies, bad, criminal, and evil, often overlap. Modern western cultures can’t even agree on how to write a book of law: they either rely on “Roman Law” that tries to collect all possible situations in its legal codes (which is impossible) or on “common law” that leaves the decision to tradition (which, of course, keeps changing, especially these days, when cultures are forced to mingle to the point of extinguishing each other). Laws at least have one thing in common: they support the maintenance of social equilibrium and, consequently, are always partial towards those in power. The false hope telling people that the globalist criminals could be tried is a good example:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-far-can-you-expect-the-globalist

What does it take to search for the truth?

In my experience, people are often more interested in “being right” than in the truth. After investing significant resources in their current positions, they are more than willing to lie to themselves and to everyone around only to stay in control and to come out “winning.”

The truth is usually inconvenient, because the person becomes responsible after making truth judgments. The truth is also unprofitable, because it’s impartial; it makes sense only for those who are able and willing to take a perspective that is larger than instant gratification or the frames of justifying a lifetime of lies.

Life experience, benevolence, and a certain level of mental capacity are also necessary for being able to handle the truth (at least as much of it as one can comprehend at a time), which further limits the number of feasible candidates of real truth-seekers.

More challenge is presented by the fact that evaluating information in a consistent manner requires deductive thinking:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-formidable-tool-at-your-disposal

The alternative

The alternative is offered by the system and those who fail to follow the difficult path, inevitably default to it.

For the latest brand of “authorities,” the only “truth” their subjects must accept is compliance through conforming to an environment in which all forms of cultural identity are erased, which eliminates the chance to form stable communities. It is easy to rule over isolated people, especially after they are deprived of any remnants of human dignity by canceling their cultural tradition and constant humiliation, as it happened during the muzzle mandates. Yet there is comfort, consolation, and even some delusional sense of security in the warmth of the pig-stye. Those, combined with the pleasantness of being redeemed from personal responsibility for one’s decisions present an enticing mode of existence, in which everything is blissful, and the one submitting to it don’t even have to worry about owning anything, including an identity and personal possessions, because they have exclusively become their owners’ assets and property and are treated as such:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/you-are-an-asset-owned-and-robbed