This is another of my groundbreaking articles.
Today, G. E. Griffin posted,
“As of August 1, the Energy Department will fully enforce new efficiency regulations that the old incandescent bulbs can’t meet, effectively prohibiting their retail sale. Over half the country still appears to be using mostly incandescent lighting.”
You can say that this is “only” another way to push the fraud of “climate change,” which it certainly is, but that’s far from the end of it.
Last August, I posted two articles about how light can be used for killing you:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-infernal-light
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-infernal-light-part-two
What’s wrong with LEDs?
LEDs can be used for delivering subliminal pulses of light (and an accordingly fluctuating electromagnetic field) that affect, or even determine, human health, stamina, thoughts, mood, and perhaps even deliver “messages” as a form of extremely rapid Morse code, traveling through the electric grid nearly at the speed of light:
https://mrelectric.com/blog/how-fast-does-electricity-travel
The electric grid can deliver many times more powerful magnetic pulses, so what’s the deal with LEDs?
According to The Scientific American, LEDs are bothersome to begin with, even if malfeasance is not present:
“Scientists used to think we could see no more than about 90 flashes of light a second but now we know it’s more like 2,000 because the eyes move so rapidly when we change gaze from one point to another. During the eye movement, the flicker of light creates a pattern that we can see. And this has some surprising consequences for our health thanks to the way some types of lighting can affect us. In particular, it could discourage people from using more energy-saving LED lightbulbs.”
Theoretically, the flicker is planned to be mitigated by regulatory standards:
https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/1789/4479/
Well, there are no active regulations, and you know what that means. And don’t bother guessing if they were enforced, if they existed.
Use of LEDs for human programming
How fast can a LED blink? Here is a taste of it:
https://forum.arduino.cc/t/how-fast-can-you-blink-an-led-theoretical-fastest-speed/913057/2
“The arduino UNO, nano, mini, (ATMEGA328) when connected to 5V, has a clock of 16 Mhz (16,000,000 Hz).
It has a cycle of 62.5 peak seconds or 0.0625 microseconds.”
A second contains a million microseconds, which you have to multiply by roughly 25, so this particular LED can blink 25 million times a second. That can surely opens up a lot of room for conditioning people, especially when combined with other methods of manipulating them, including, but not limited to wireless signals.
Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea published the following only a few hours after my current one. It shows how hydrogels can be applied in the programming interface from microwaves or from stimuli from the visible spectrum to humans:
Light can activate graphene oxide:
https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2023/07/09/phonons-key-to-harvesting-consciousness/
What can you do to limit the damages?
Use a translucent shade that fully covers the LED. No leaks! Halogens might also be an option, although their spectrum is not as natural as incandescent, and depending on the type, they need transformers that emit EMF.
They still sell 40watt incandescent pulls for appliances, in clear and soft for Fridges, fans, ovens. I’ve used those with small lamps, sconces, ceiling fans, overhead kitchen can lighting and it’s fine. Going to bed early helps too
Ray, what do you think of this: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/limitations-of-ai/comments?