18 Comments

satan and his priests have decieved the elite and now "own " them...karmically the dumb sheep are levels of magnitude better off than the super evil smart elites... Jesus the revelator " what benifits the soul if it gets the whole temporal world but loses his soul and eternity....all true ... i think the real battle is first in our subconscious { astral and causal plane ... vedic scripture}... their conscious mind and ego will filter ,disregard, reject ,logic , truth, critical thinking ,facts etc etc if their subconscious programing is in power... therefore we have to bypass their consciousness and affect their subconscous ,,, how ? silent intersessory prayer to a higher power for help in changing them and their return to the original program of goodness and truth ...or " ho pono pono hawian healing method "etc etc or from the christian revelation ...

13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. if the spiritual realm exists .... these highly intelligent astute elites are being decieved and lead to believe they are doing their gods " baal " work and will be rewarded in their next incarnation or go to paradise... this is what their priests tell bthem that its their duty to god to subjugate the half human beasts " and now due to the gene altered humans " vvaxxed" dont qualify as humans made in Good Gods image and likeness anymore they may do whatever they please with us vaxxed " no more human rights " just as we treat the animals , they may now treat us . they are lead to believe they can escape karma " as you sow so shall you reap " their evil mastermind intelligence "{ satan ] is orders of magnitude more evil intelligent than they " satan " the nature of is sado machocistic pshycopath who hates everything the good God created including himself and wishes the complete destruction of everything including life itself, non existance //.... we are instructed by the existance of goodness to pray for their salvation from evil ,,, praying and wishing them to return to goodness and truth, and everyone too... ps what good is owning the whole world " temporal" and loseing our eternal soul ??? its the worst dumbest idiotic imbisilic " deal " in all eternity and in the known and unknown universe

Expand full comment

My Comment (Part Two)

You say in your article that it isn't that people do not care about the global problems we are facing, it's that they know they can't do anything about it, and that such people are not masochistic enough to rub their faces in their helplessness.

And, elsewhere, you acknowledge that isolation of people is one of the main weapons of tyrants.

Well, it's true that isolated people not only can't do nothing or cannot change nothing, but also FEEL helpless with all their being.

And if someone repeats constantly and in different ways to isolated human beings the mantra "You can't do nothing against the establishment (or whatever name you want to use here)", then that people will act accordingly on a permanent basis, because they themselves feel already that way, and such mantra just reinforce their feeling.

So that's exactly what the "ellites" have done for centuries, but mainly since the last one: promoting selfishness and atomization among the masses, so they remain "masses" of isolated human beings and never become a real society... a real WE, capable to oppose them and defeat them.

This is called by others, you know, Learned Impotence.

And that's why is true something that you repeat very often: that there is not a "WE" in existence.

If we were talking in the 1800's, I would tell you that therefore the construction of a huge WE must be started inmediately...

But wait: Karl Marx talked about it in those days; more precisely, he spoke about the creation of a critical and united mass of thinking and fighting people... but, back to our days, that "we" and that critical mass aren't yet in existence.

Why? You know the answer: because the "ellites" won't allow the emergence of such critical mass. And with the surveillance and control tools and resources they have now at their disposal, even less will allow it.

One of the main weapons they had to prevent the emergence of such critical mass or "We" was the satanization of all sort of people organizations related to social and economic matters: that was just "evil communism", they told to the masses. And they kept an eye over the smallest ones (which remained few), infiltrated them and even dismantled them if they began to become "annoying".

So what is the solution? You and I have talked about it before: many little communities (littles "we") dispersed throughout the territory but in some way in contact and coordinated with each other, with simple tasks (like home gardening), with no main leader and with a major purpose, one which trascends inmediate interests, like temaining HUMAN.

Well, I have to go now. Later I will talk about "sheeple" and "psychopaths".

(Sorry, to be continued... again).

Expand full comment

My comment (Part One) 😁

Hi, Ray.

To begin with, the answer to the question at the beginning of your article today is NO. Or, at least, not necessarily.

An absolutely helpless person can be someone who was abused to the extreme despite all his attempts to defend himself, or someone who was deceived and therefore did not defend himself, or someone whose weaknesses were encouraged and taken advantage of by a third party.

In all three cases these are real victims. But this doesn't mean that they're necessarily "pure": a gangster can be deceived by his "fellas" and end murdered. He was a victim of treason, sure; but he wasn't "pure" at all.

The only absolute pure victims in this world are children and (the majority of) youngsters. And, two thousand years ago, it was Our Lord Jesus Christ.

As for the vast majority of adults, levels of "purity" are much lower, meaning with "purity" here the total absence of compliance, admiration and/or identification with the perpetrator.

Indeed, the other kind of helpless person it can also be (and I say this because I personally knew several cases throughout my life) a person who was absolutely complacent with his victimizer for twisted psychological reasons; that is, someone who did not want to listen to arguments or advice, did not want to recognize evidence, and did not accept any help when it was offered to him.

Just as a vast amount of people since 2020.

To this last case it can be applied the following Spanish proverb, which translated to English goes like this:

"He who dies for his own sake, let him be buried standing upright".

And I know you get the point: no one can help someone who doesn't want to be helped, someone who rejoice in his helplessness because he feels that this same helplessness relieves him of responsability, or because he thinks it confers on him an air of pretended "sanctity" or because he pretends to atone for some guilt (real or invented) with his vulnerability before the abuser.

Or just because his ego doesn't allow him to recognize that he was wrong, and then he prefers to remain vulnerable than to correct his mistake.

That is why I think (and feel) that the question in the quote was an ironic one, one that precisely questions the idea so deeply rooted among so many people that vulnerability, suffering and helplessness confer necessarily a kind of "sainthood" on the sufferer...

...when that vulnerability, suffering and helplessness could be perfectly the result of stupidity (in the sense of stubbornness) and cowardice. Or, as I said some lines above, a secret admiration for the perpetrator.

To recognize this is not equal to "blame the victim", because when you know you are being abused and you know there is a way out for you, but the difficulties involved in that way out make you cower or feel uncomfortable, you go from being a victim to being an accomplice.

And, I repeat, I have met several cases like this in my life.

In "Part Two" I will comment on the isolation issue, and about the terms "sheeple" and "psychopaths".

Blessings.

(To be continued...)

Expand full comment

Healing itself might be a myth the way it is understood these days:

https://evolutionaryhealthplan.info/

Expand full comment
Dec 18, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Some might say I am a sheep for fearing the needle. But that refusal of all vaccines for more than 50 years has keep me well. Avoiding all big pharma drugs is a badge I wear proudly. Bah, bah, bah.

Expand full comment

I don't know about hope, but I surely have a will to solve for the problem of psychopaths in control. (Yes, I use "psychopath" - because that is what They are. What They do is psychopathic; ergo, They are psychopaths.)

And all Their power derives from money. In any form that We use as proof of energy added into a system - trade/barter to electronic bits. Such a practice made sense initially, when proof of input was needed in scarcity to ensure no One skated on the efforts of Others. But now, We are post-scarcity (no political baggage attached - just a factual statement), but for the artificial scarcities created for profit.

But such practices WILL promote the psychopaths amongst Us. They tend to lust after power over Others, and money = power over Others.

So rather than look at it as impossible to do anything about the mess the psychopaths are creating, I choose to see that the presently hidden and avidly suppressed technologies that offer free energy as the key, and work to motivate Ones with the wherewithal to experiment and share successes freely - no patents, as that system alerts Them and They will go after the patent, and the inventor if (S)He won't sell.

The whole idea of patents is to ensure the inventors make money off the inventions. But free energy tech would remove that psychopaths' tool. Money buys all the rest the psychopaths in control use, the things and the People.

Instead, We would see a world where We ALL are able to fulfill Our potential, rather than seeking ways to plug Our energy in, whether We love it, find it boring, or downright hate it. We would see the caring Ones taking care of things, not psychopaths controlling things. Where there is no poverty as the abundance of Our planet flows to Us.

And abundance was seen in a few societies around the globe, mainly on "island paradises" like Tahiti. In all cases where there was abundance, where needed things were there for the taking, They did not develop any energy accounting tools. They used the social currencies for motivation - thanks, reputation, admiration, respect, love, and so forth.

They had no poverty, the caring Ones took care of things, and the People were creative, happy, sharing, harmonious, relaxed, and free. The psychopaths amongst Them learned to choose Ethical behavior or be outcast (or killed).

Some links to ponder:

The Detailed Blueprint (for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns) (7 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-detailed-blueprint-vocal-redo:9?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72

Is Money Evil? (14 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/is-money-evil:9?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72

Heart-Driven Economy vs. Greed-Driven Economy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/heart-driven-economy-vs-greed-driven

The Foundational Function of Money (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-foundational-function-of-money

Have You Noticed That I Ask For No Money? (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/have-you-noticed-that-i-ask-for-no

The Simplicity of Ethics (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-simplicity-of-ethics

Expand full comment
Dec 18, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Thanks for addressing the "sheeple" annoyance. Sometimes I comment with a "blaming the victim? " question, which is easily dismissed.

Also the isolation agenda. I tell people they are heroes of the resistance when they shun the self-check out line 🤪

Expand full comment

Yes, actually great article, many thoughts in it that I like, good observations, but what now, what is the hook in our case?

Expand full comment
Dec 18, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Hi Ray, I think you misspelled prosecutor as persecutor?

Expand full comment