The Three Most Common Types Misdirections Combined Can Reveal More Than Intended
My preferred method is deductive, as usual.
Around 2001, I devised a pattern that could be used for eliminating the non-compliant. Just
INVENT AN ILLNESS, MARKET IT AS DEADLY, OFFER A “VACCINE,” AND POISON THE POPULATION WITH SOMETHING FOR WHICH THE “VACCINE” CONTAINS THE ANTIDOTE.
Apparently, it’s happening. For a moment, forgive the author for the wrong terminologies, and observe the design; it’s what I originally imagined:
EVEN “SHEDDING” CAN BE A RED HERRING, IF MY ORIGINAL IDEA HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED.
It turns out, the author is employing the most common misdirections: using “viruses” as a bait to distract, and “vaccines” as the only/new/major sources of deaths.
The author assumes that “viruses” exist, which they don’t, unless exosomes count as such, but those are not pathogenic…
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-is-a-virus
The virus/no-virus discussion is red herring, because the problem is “health” tyranny:
To add insult to injury, the injections themselves are no red herrings, because there are so many alternatives to deliver the toxins… Already two years ago, a lot of that was visible:
The other day, I collected the 13 most common sources of controlling/harming/killing the population. All of them can be used interactively for activating something else or enhancing the impact of an existing element:
Indeed, the idea of viruses (deadly) has been used to sell Us on a ton of ghastly stuff - all part of Their (the psychopaths in control) agenda. They poison Our food, They poison Our water, They poison Our air, They poison Our electromagnetic environment, and on and on. Then claim bugs are the culprit (We should eat bugs, right? LOL!). All to sell Us on something.
Good find Ray, the shedding lady seems to be a mouthpiece for some group doing virus and vax PR, very similar to info that came out in 2020. They make it complex so most people can't understand it but the germ indoctrination seeps in. Good post Ray!