The WHO Amendments and Personal Independence

Exposure can turn one into a weakling or it can desensitize you too, but it can also increase your determination.

---

As the convid psyop proved fantastically successful in gaslighting the population and enforcing compliance, the conditioning is about to be expanded globally with treaties that grant the globalist World Health Organization (WHO) full control over muzzling, poisoning (aka. “medicating” and “treating,” often to death), and imprisoning (“quarantining”) the masses even in “pre-emptive” orders without any visible signs of another plandemic. Governments won’t have to dirty their hands, they will “only follow orders,” and their subjects will be able to blame the WHO to blow off some steam, albeit their opinion will not necessarily be tolerated, and they certainly won’t be allowed to disobey the “regulations.”

I realize the circus around the WHO has been going on for years, but the problem became pressing in the last few months, because deadlines are approaching or are being passed, and the list of threats are expanding. The plandemic treaty in its latest proposed form is calling for more attention and for further deliberation.

James Roguski kindly informed readers about the proposed WHO amendments a few days ago:

THESE AMENDMENTS ARE UNACCEPTABLE

The following must be considered, assuming there is a single considerate person with the power to change the “treaty”:

What difference can one make?

First and foremost, it’s good to know what to expect. Beyond that, it makes no difference if I reject the amendments, because the decision-makers and their enforcers will never ask for my permission.

Still, it’s intriguing to notice who represents whom in this “treaty,” and whatever that incurs.

The US envoy might follow the instructions of a committee, but there won’t be a public vote about it, and if there were one, it would be rigged, which can be normally expected from elections in general. The politicians issuing the instructions follow their handlers’ commands, delivered from higher above from entities that are unlikely to appear on the news or in the “alt” media anytime soon.

The Federal Govt is accomplice to the most successful highway robbery in history, carried out by the Federal Reserve, the private globalist central bank that distributes money among friends and family at the taxpayer’s expense, and picking up more loans from the private banks at an interest (money is issued as a loan in the form of taxpayer debt, anyway) which is spent lavishly without the taxpayer benefiting from it. “Taxation without representation” is a gracious understatement for the practice that has been going on since 1913, and is now planned to be phased out, which, however, doesn’t herald good news for the commoner. The USD is under controlled demolition en route to mandating the CBDC first, and some electronic chip later that will turn even the CBDCs redundant. Eventually, the “reward” for compliance will be mere “survival,” because money will not be needed for full global control for the criminals who, until then, control all governments by controlling the money flow. As they also own/control production and distribution, the hour has passed, when taking that power away from them would have been possible without a devastating number of casualties. These days, billions would die, if production and distribution stopped and, last time I looked, depopulation comprises the other objective besides total control. One can protest and petition until the cows come home, but that sort of thing never worked against the powerful. If only they could be convinced that sparing the Earth and its denizens would be in THEIR own best interest! Their enablers and enforcers would be a bit easier to convince, because they must know by now that they are not considered anything more than soulless tools in the technocratic machine, and will be spared only as long as they have a job to do, which will not be much longer: AI and robots can already do much of their jobs, but the time may not have come for that sort of thing, because once the extermination starts, the rest of the enablers and enforcers might just turn on their overlords.

Signing petitions and the like are good for two things:

1. getting registered as non-compliant, which is just a step away from what the official narrative so caringly calls a “t*ist”;

2. Acknowledging an illegitimate power.

Politicians, however, made a fatal mistake by using threats and force during the plandemic. After taking Mass Manipulation 101, which was a prerequisite for graduation, every influencer knows that once they employ force on the public, they will never be trusted again. This definitive lack of trusting the “authorities” is perhaps the most significant positive result of learning about facts or, as even the fake opposition puts it, getting “blue-pilled.” That, however, inevitably forecasts that more exhibition and use of governmental power is coming up.

During the plandemic, a mom was tazed in an open school game somewhere up north in the US for not wearing a muzzle outside, and I remember a shopper being tackled in a way that resembled American football or British rugby in a store for the same reason. On the other hand, as opposed to most other countries, no fines were imposed; enforcers were usually satisfied with shaming, threats, denying entry, refusal of “medical” treatment, or firing non-compliant employees. Physical violence was left out of the equation, and I’m sure you know why:

In my home state, Kentucky, everybody is amazingly polite, but I’m certain that the official statistic of 42 percent owning firearms is grossly underestimating the real figure.

Those, who realized they were on their own, started to arm themselves rapidly in 2020 faster than ever before¹. What’s new in terms of what to expect? Gun confiscation would leave law-abiding gun owners defenseless, if their firearms were taken, and a couple of weeks of food, water, or even lack of heat in the winter, would start large-scale looting and initiate martial law. During martial law, the first thing “authorities” do it take weapons away from legitimate gun owners; authorities always go for the easy targets. The unprotected, as a result, would be easy prey for looters and corporate or government troops who, much in the tradition of BLM and Antifa hordes from 2020 (who had been freshly released from prison and used in the psyop to intimidate normal people), would be allowed to rampage or mete out “justice” at will, which would graciously contribute to the practice of depopulation in progress. Of course, guns would have to be pried out of many gun owners’ dead hands, but the “authorities” are unlikely to have any reservations on that sort of thing, and leave the job to drones and minitanks. Still, gun registration is far from complete with many states not even requiring it, so mostly “registered” guns will be targeted first, the rest can come later. Incremental progress has always been part of the globalist strategy, which was “two steps forward, one step back,” and it was utilized from the very beginning of the introducing the idea of a “Pandemic Treaty”:

The NRA has been compromised, at least, legally, and is now (blackmailed into?) recommending its members to insure their guns. The following is from a recent e-mail from the organization to members:

That’s dirt cheap, wouldn’t you say? And remember what dad told you, “If something sounds too good, it’s usually not true.”

Okay, to me, this does NOT sound good. My reason is simple: this is a covert form of gun registration that can and will be used against owners, when the time comes. Here is the evidence from the insurer’s application:

I remember an insurance company that doesn’t require a detailed list, but the declared value speaks for itself, and having such coverage only confirms the ownership of a lot or valuable/dangerous weapons, which “raises a red flag.” Along that path, most recently, “red-flag” laws are spreading across the nation like roaches over a dirty kitchen at night, which means that the “authorities” can take your weapons anytime without telling you about the source that reported you as potentially dangerous. That also means they can trump up “evidence” anytime; not that they haven’t been able to do it even before, but this is another excuse they can use, and they can tell you to blame a relative or an acquaintance, whose identity they are not allowed to disclose. The question is, how will people react, when this practice becomes common, assuming they notice it at all, because it will be slow and incremental?

Perhaps it will not pan out quite like this, but I can assure you that the “cops” (unlikely to wear badges or even speak English by that time) won’t care.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4AUyLU0WGo

Somehow, it always defaults to being treated as a state asset:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/government-property-in-action

Conditioning people to take it for granted started during WW1:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-brief-history-of-compliance-training

1. I also tried to assist new and prospective owners in https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/gunning-for-success and https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/more-about-using-your-2nd-amendment (yesterday I proofread both again, corrected incomplete or faulty information, edited them a bit further, and expanded them some).