Far better than the ridiculous agitprop of projection, deflection, strawman,ad hominem gibberish from most intentional this information accounts. I have to give you that.
I really don’t understand that you don’t understand or your people that is, you’ve already got all the dumb people convinced. You’re totally wasting your data and broadband time 🤣
Gurdjieff put it this way: "To speak the truth is the most difficult thing in the world; one must study a great deal and for a long time in order to speak the truth. The wish alone is not enough. To speak the truth one must know what the truth is and what a lie is, and first of all in oneself. And this nobody wants to know." This statement applies in particular, in my own view, to certain pundits and purveyors of promoting non-stop "analysis" of patents and darkfield imaging along with proprietary (and costly) protocols, thereby elevating themselves as "illumined" leaders for "humanity" and life rafts for the great unwashed/you and me/the lost. As you rightly point out, recognition of physical helplessness is the first step to true strength (reverberations of Frankl's Logotherapy) as it motivates the mind inward where it can perchance locate resources otherwise intangible. And as Gustav Le Bon put it, " whosoever attempts to destroy their illusions (i.e. of those of the masses) is always their victim". The phrase "malignant stupidity" was first coined, to my knowledge, by Trevor James Constable, and it invokes a complex alliance between human and discarnate forces intent on subverting freedom and impeding human evolution. It is this, above all else, that should be under the microscope today. That means of course, examining one's own role in everything that constitutes what we consider to be the world(s), which brings us right back to Gurdjieff's point. The "Got Milk?" bumper sticker comes to mind...
To me, the absurd court oath comes to mind: "... the whole truth, nothing but the truth..." Human cognition functions in an open system (the human being), and makes attempt to perceive (perception itself is fragmented, because it is based on conditioning) and "make sense" out of the outcome of processing sensory input. Working memory can handle only a handful of elements, and it can interpret data only in relation to its internal cognitive models, mostly as a result of pattern recognition. "The truth" can also be mandated by the current culture, and forced on those who don't want to risk being shunned, incarcerated, or killed. Conformity, in my understanding, is a major force to reckon with.
Moreover, in cultures that rely on inductive reasoning, knowledge is always compartmentalized. Darkfield microscopy is a good example: it takes a single phenomenon out of the whole without the ability to interpret it in a global cognitive frame.
Perception is at base level involuntary, whereas cognition is a post perceptual arrangement of experience (real or imagined) which has been processed through a series of filters. The filters include deletions, associations, compartmentalizations, and projections. Such filters can be deconstructed as socio-historical in origin or prima facie (limited attunement of the biological brain's "openness" to incoming information, or information density). Both socio-historical and onto-biological filters beg the question of so-called homo sapiens being capable of meeting his nomenclature with a straight face. Today's "human" is no longer "run" by a brain in the traditional sense of biological grey matter, but by a synthetic analogue whose location is extracranial and cloud based, and whose cellular matrix is both contaminated and over-ruled by deliberate extraneous input. Gnosis as a concept is purely idealistic and to the extent that it is truly possible, can only be so in an individual way through ineffable individual experience. The hive mind sought after by the transhumanists, is a flip version of gnosis, in so far as it encloses perception and cognition within a matrix where the owners can peer in and make adjustments to their advantage whilst the inhabitants have not a clue as to what is going on. As you know, the globalists took Teilhard's concept of the noosphere and ran with it, creating the neurosphere which, if fully rolled out, would ensure conformity is self-generated by wiping out endogenous questioning. That said, these perspectives all rely on a mechanistic modeling of reality. Electromagnetic totalitarianism is itself a complete illusion since it is based up the mere froth of things, in other words a secondary effect and not the primary wave.
No doubt, one of the finest example of pseudo intellectual, contextually void, semantical masturbation I’ve ever seen. I’m talking like, Olympic Medal stand, word salad worthy.
So, Mr. Hudson E Baldwin the 3rd. er, speaking of word salad names... but do you really masturbate semantically? Amazing. And you watch quite a lot of this stuff and even consider yourself a connoisseur? Wow.
Ad hominem seems to apply both ways, and frankly, I am not interested in participating, although you tried to draw me in. I prefer to let it go on its way as long as the discourse doesn't become too rough. :)
"Peer pressure" and "conformity" are hard to resist, but not impossible. During the mandates, my wife and I encountered about six people in stores without the muzzle (we didn't wear one, either); I usually shook hands with them and told them it was good to see some sanity left in a world gone insane. That doesn't mean I am immune to suggestion, but for one, I cannot be hypnotized (in fact, I've always thought hypnosis was a parlor trick), but the most basic level is where self-defense becomes difficult: humans think, imply, and infer culturally-encoded concepts, and not using them for personal thinking poses severe problems, albeit it is possible. For my part, I try to base my communication on the human experience in general that seems to involve the same typical problems irrespective of cultural restrictions.
As you are also suggesting, transhumanism wants to deprive humans from independent decisions, because that is the only way their IoT can function. The way I see it, existential decisions must be made BEFORE the situation arises, but Free Will is hardly ever exercised for several reasons: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/i-have-solved-the-question-of-free). Also, this is the reason why my stack is meant to create a forum for independent thinkers who are able and willing to take responsibility for their decisions.
Well, you and I seem to be saying the same things; only the presentations differ. Still, I am enjoying the delicacies. For one, I am finding your last sentence uniquely ingenuous.
Thanks. I too am enjoying this conversation. It is rare to find complete lack of presumptuousness, rather a pleasant absence of tentacles, a space which you exude. (Yes, I am commending you on your lack. And less is definitely more!) For whatever it might bring, I have recommended others to visit your stack. I also like your model of revisiting, rebuilding and expanding upon earlier posts. I think we do agree on the main points, yes, we just use different instruments or registers. I am also in complete accord with your wife and her daily conversations with the critters and plants. That is the real gnosis :) The last sentence is in reference to etherian physics and to the foundational work of Wilhelm Reich and Rudolf Steiner amongst others. When one understands electromagnetism as an effect, not a primary cause or fundamental physical force - and also as having untoward and deleterious effects upon the primary energy source - one is better positioned to consider the graphene enriched data trawl and control system from a vantage point invisible to the perpetrators. In other words, one can reverse engineer a weapons system in such a way as to perceive the limitations of its creators. That does not antidote it on a practical level, nor does it mean we are all not imminently threatened with physical extinction, or worse, but it allows the mind to move outside of a conditioning system that has reduced human inventiveness by imposing the spell of mechanistic science. If you look closely, you realize that the way we use and abuse electromagnetism is all done from a primary mechanistic perspective. I believe it was William Golding who first coined the term Homo Faber in contradistinction to Homo Sapiens. But if man has been a fabricator all along as opposed to a thinker/perceiver, who - what - fabricated him to be that way? This brings us to the topic of the false gods (Annunaki etc.) and their insemination into the bloodlines of the so-called ruling elites, an area very thoroughly explored by Dean Henderson in my opinion.
To me, this is a truly rare and enriching conversation. Thank you for recommending my site, not necessarily for my wife and for me, although some support is always welcome. While the level of support culminated a year ago, and has been staying about the same, the increasing number of the scarce humans who belong here provides a lot of encouragement. Everything on this site is free, as I promised it would be at the very beginning, and I tend to keep my word (well, I change it, if and when I realize adhering to it would hurt others). :) I have subscribed to your site, but I never pay for subscription, because I feel that free and full access to my nearly 900 articles suffices as such.
This whole site started up as a joke, but it didn't take a week for me to realize that it is sorely needed. My sister, before she died 32 years ago, told me, "Ray, if I had a lot of money, I'd give you an annuity just for writing down what you think." So, this site is also about fulfilling her wish, except there is no annuity, which is for the better, because I cannot be blackmailed with losing my little revenue here. :)
While I cherish your allusions (a rare condiment; perhaps you would enjoy the following author's company, too: https://stegiel.substack.com), in general, I refrain from "erudite" references (they might deter readers who would otherwise be valuable participants in the comment sections), and keep my narrative at the low-end of college level from about 30 years ago (well, that must be doctoral by now, but what the heck; my readers are mostly over 60 who are still able and willing to read :) ).
Perhaps the most admirable thing about you and, perhaps, me is that we both are elitists without the superiority complex or the killer mentality; that sort of thing DOES require quite a bit of a number of things that I prefer not to say here, I just hope, it's obvious for more than for you and for me.
Yes, I got the message from the last sentence in your previous comment, but it's still good to see your explanation (and I was not familiar with it).
Just for fun, I might as well mention that my wife and I often "communicate" with each other in animal sounds (I tend to say I am a dog speaking foreign languages).
Not using or even ignoring "their" tools (most of the media, including the "alt" one), their "remedies," their concepts, in my experience, offers some protection. Not sure about reverse-engineering the mind. Only the person can make the necessary decisions, and not everyone can make it...
It's not an accident that the younger generations are hooked on the technology that is taking over their lives and, eventually, will wipe them out. The "computer-game" type of addiction was actually employed during the Great Plandemic of 2020, and it is now operating in full force: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/interchangeable-roles-of-victims (only about two thirds of my readers can relate to this, and I wish everyone could).
Golding's Lord of the Flies is one of my childhood favorites, because growing up in a poor and crime-infested 'hood and being beaten up by members of two competing gangs on a nearly daily basis deprived me of the "humans are born good" nonsense by the age of 10. Miraculously, we moved a few weeks before I would have ended up killing someone, but spending time as a factory worker and serving as a "soldier" greatly expanded on my original (already lethal) experience, and I would strongly recommend everyone to test their limits, because under duress, being pushed to the extreme, they can learn things about themselves that everyone needs to know about themselves, but only a few do.
During my high-school years, I spent several hours a day doing sports and freeing up my mind to be able to write good poetry by becoming capable of free association (first poetry published at the age of 18, and while I can write something unusual and, perhaps, even world-class anytime, I stopped writing poetry about 10 years ago, and am still struggling to complete a collection of 32 stories). At the same time, throughout my young adulthood, my mind always tested out as an engineer's, and it usually automatically compiled the details of whole systems as long as I engaged in them for a few weeks. That is probably the reason why there are hardly any contradictions in my writings. Devoting 25 years to AI and the link between AI and natural languages resulted in my second doctoral dissertation, "The Prolegomena of All Future Communication between AI and Humans in Natural Languages" in 2005, which ended with a five-page-long recursive algorithm that I preferred no to publish, because I felt that whoever would know that, will control the world. By 2012, it was all out, and I'm not sure if it was leaked or just others figured it out too, and were not so considerate about selling the future of mankind. It doesn't matter now.
While I can't see more than the options to choose between a benevolent Creator in the Cartesian sense and succumbing to the idea that this world is being created by some infantile moron(s) who reside in an infinitely-more-complex Universe, and whether it's true or not, I prefer the first option, I also joke sometimes that "If God created humans after His own image, that doesn't say too many good things about Him."
Pleased to engage. It is not so common for me either to locate people for whom the act of thinking is not reducible to one dimension (or less). I agree with you about Gen Z and whatever the next "gen" is being hooked on technology just like fish (and thus being readied to become someone's supper). The usb port for extraneous control is actually at the rear of the head by the base of the occipital bone, adjacent to the brain stem, pineal gland and cerebellum. This might seem strange given that the neck bends forward when a person's attention is hypnotically focused on a miniature screen. In fact, such obsessive and addictive flexion of the neck dilates portals on the upper nape through which controlling input can infiltrate, a dynamic almost as old as the oceans. It is an anatomical signal of compliance and surrender, and also consistent with premature aging and senility.
I also grew up surrounded by gangs and violence in a decaying industrial wasteland of northern England, so Golding's vision in "The Flies" did not contradict the experiences I has as a youth. Dean Henderson has written a number of books on the Illuminati and bloodlines. He emphasized the role of Crown agents and British neo-mercantile covert agendas behind what is happening in America. Briefly put, particularly as someone who grew up there, what Henderson lays out in great detail says resonates with my early life intuitions and observations.
The main point however is not just the human corruption, or the psycho-spiritual, moral and intellectual debasement, but "who", besides the tangible players we know, is orchestrating, or managing this behind the scenes, or veil.
Etherian physics and the identification of entities hostile to human aspirations and intent on total control, humiliation and depopulation must be identified as best we can. Otherwise, no matter what, the goldfish will die believing that their little bowl is the universe itself.
The attempt to label TRUTH, some etherial, moving target, that can’t be pinned down was all I needed. Say hello to Felicia. Ciao
Glad to be of assistance. :)
Far better than the ridiculous agitprop of projection, deflection, strawman,ad hominem gibberish from most intentional this information accounts. I have to give you that.
I really don’t understand that you don’t understand or your people that is, you’ve already got all the dumb people convinced. You’re totally wasting your data and broadband time 🤣
Not sure what you mean.
Proof of my theory and concept. https://substack.com/@rayhorvaththesource/note/c-61690936?r=1r7im4&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Nobody with a PhD and possibly be connected to a ridiculous opinion and blatant stupidity of this
Please, explain. For the time being, you are only exposing yourself as not particularly smart. :)
You’re better at the agitprop game than most. Not that a high bar or anything….
Gurdjieff put it this way: "To speak the truth is the most difficult thing in the world; one must study a great deal and for a long time in order to speak the truth. The wish alone is not enough. To speak the truth one must know what the truth is and what a lie is, and first of all in oneself. And this nobody wants to know." This statement applies in particular, in my own view, to certain pundits and purveyors of promoting non-stop "analysis" of patents and darkfield imaging along with proprietary (and costly) protocols, thereby elevating themselves as "illumined" leaders for "humanity" and life rafts for the great unwashed/you and me/the lost. As you rightly point out, recognition of physical helplessness is the first step to true strength (reverberations of Frankl's Logotherapy) as it motivates the mind inward where it can perchance locate resources otherwise intangible. And as Gustav Le Bon put it, " whosoever attempts to destroy their illusions (i.e. of those of the masses) is always their victim". The phrase "malignant stupidity" was first coined, to my knowledge, by Trevor James Constable, and it invokes a complex alliance between human and discarnate forces intent on subverting freedom and impeding human evolution. It is this, above all else, that should be under the microscope today. That means of course, examining one's own role in everything that constitutes what we consider to be the world(s), which brings us right back to Gurdjieff's point. The "Got Milk?" bumper sticker comes to mind...
To me, the absurd court oath comes to mind: "... the whole truth, nothing but the truth..." Human cognition functions in an open system (the human being), and makes attempt to perceive (perception itself is fragmented, because it is based on conditioning) and "make sense" out of the outcome of processing sensory input. Working memory can handle only a handful of elements, and it can interpret data only in relation to its internal cognitive models, mostly as a result of pattern recognition. "The truth" can also be mandated by the current culture, and forced on those who don't want to risk being shunned, incarcerated, or killed. Conformity, in my understanding, is a major force to reckon with.
Moreover, in cultures that rely on inductive reasoning, knowledge is always compartmentalized. Darkfield microscopy is a good example: it takes a single phenomenon out of the whole without the ability to interpret it in a global cognitive frame.
Gnosis, in general, is impossible.
Perception is at base level involuntary, whereas cognition is a post perceptual arrangement of experience (real or imagined) which has been processed through a series of filters. The filters include deletions, associations, compartmentalizations, and projections. Such filters can be deconstructed as socio-historical in origin or prima facie (limited attunement of the biological brain's "openness" to incoming information, or information density). Both socio-historical and onto-biological filters beg the question of so-called homo sapiens being capable of meeting his nomenclature with a straight face. Today's "human" is no longer "run" by a brain in the traditional sense of biological grey matter, but by a synthetic analogue whose location is extracranial and cloud based, and whose cellular matrix is both contaminated and over-ruled by deliberate extraneous input. Gnosis as a concept is purely idealistic and to the extent that it is truly possible, can only be so in an individual way through ineffable individual experience. The hive mind sought after by the transhumanists, is a flip version of gnosis, in so far as it encloses perception and cognition within a matrix where the owners can peer in and make adjustments to their advantage whilst the inhabitants have not a clue as to what is going on. As you know, the globalists took Teilhard's concept of the noosphere and ran with it, creating the neurosphere which, if fully rolled out, would ensure conformity is self-generated by wiping out endogenous questioning. That said, these perspectives all rely on a mechanistic modeling of reality. Electromagnetic totalitarianism is itself a complete illusion since it is based up the mere froth of things, in other words a secondary effect and not the primary wave.
Face it Ray. This guy has you beat. To a pulp.
No doubt, one of the finest example of pseudo intellectual, contextually void, semantical masturbation I’ve ever seen. I’m talking like, Olympic Medal stand, word salad worthy.
So, Mr. Hudson E Baldwin the 3rd. er, speaking of word salad names... but do you really masturbate semantically? Amazing. And you watch quite a lot of this stuff and even consider yourself a connoisseur? Wow.
Ad hominem bullshit. Figures. Strike one baby you’re out. This ain’t fucking baseball
Ad hominem seems to apply both ways, and frankly, I am not interested in participating, although you tried to draw me in. I prefer to let it go on its way as long as the discourse doesn't become too rough. :)
I am finding it entertaining.
Thank you for taking the time; I am greatly enjoying our conversation.
Yup, as a result of human behavior during the plandemic, my favorite oxymoron changed from "military intelligence" to "human intelligence" (IQ is a pecualiar construct, anyway: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/are-you-intelligent).
"Peer pressure" and "conformity" are hard to resist, but not impossible. During the mandates, my wife and I encountered about six people in stores without the muzzle (we didn't wear one, either); I usually shook hands with them and told them it was good to see some sanity left in a world gone insane. That doesn't mean I am immune to suggestion, but for one, I cannot be hypnotized (in fact, I've always thought hypnosis was a parlor trick), but the most basic level is where self-defense becomes difficult: humans think, imply, and infer culturally-encoded concepts, and not using them for personal thinking poses severe problems, albeit it is possible. For my part, I try to base my communication on the human experience in general that seems to involve the same typical problems irrespective of cultural restrictions.
As you are also suggesting, transhumanism wants to deprive humans from independent decisions, because that is the only way their IoT can function. The way I see it, existential decisions must be made BEFORE the situation arises, but Free Will is hardly ever exercised for several reasons: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/i-have-solved-the-question-of-free). Also, this is the reason why my stack is meant to create a forum for independent thinkers who are able and willing to take responsibility for their decisions.
Well, you and I seem to be saying the same things; only the presentations differ. Still, I am enjoying the delicacies. For one, I am finding your last sentence uniquely ingenuous.
Thanks. I too am enjoying this conversation. It is rare to find complete lack of presumptuousness, rather a pleasant absence of tentacles, a space which you exude. (Yes, I am commending you on your lack. And less is definitely more!) For whatever it might bring, I have recommended others to visit your stack. I also like your model of revisiting, rebuilding and expanding upon earlier posts. I think we do agree on the main points, yes, we just use different instruments or registers. I am also in complete accord with your wife and her daily conversations with the critters and plants. That is the real gnosis :) The last sentence is in reference to etherian physics and to the foundational work of Wilhelm Reich and Rudolf Steiner amongst others. When one understands electromagnetism as an effect, not a primary cause or fundamental physical force - and also as having untoward and deleterious effects upon the primary energy source - one is better positioned to consider the graphene enriched data trawl and control system from a vantage point invisible to the perpetrators. In other words, one can reverse engineer a weapons system in such a way as to perceive the limitations of its creators. That does not antidote it on a practical level, nor does it mean we are all not imminently threatened with physical extinction, or worse, but it allows the mind to move outside of a conditioning system that has reduced human inventiveness by imposing the spell of mechanistic science. If you look closely, you realize that the way we use and abuse electromagnetism is all done from a primary mechanistic perspective. I believe it was William Golding who first coined the term Homo Faber in contradistinction to Homo Sapiens. But if man has been a fabricator all along as opposed to a thinker/perceiver, who - what - fabricated him to be that way? This brings us to the topic of the false gods (Annunaki etc.) and their insemination into the bloodlines of the so-called ruling elites, an area very thoroughly explored by Dean Henderson in my opinion.
To me, this is a truly rare and enriching conversation. Thank you for recommending my site, not necessarily for my wife and for me, although some support is always welcome. While the level of support culminated a year ago, and has been staying about the same, the increasing number of the scarce humans who belong here provides a lot of encouragement. Everything on this site is free, as I promised it would be at the very beginning, and I tend to keep my word (well, I change it, if and when I realize adhering to it would hurt others). :) I have subscribed to your site, but I never pay for subscription, because I feel that free and full access to my nearly 900 articles suffices as such.
This whole site started up as a joke, but it didn't take a week for me to realize that it is sorely needed. My sister, before she died 32 years ago, told me, "Ray, if I had a lot of money, I'd give you an annuity just for writing down what you think." So, this site is also about fulfilling her wish, except there is no annuity, which is for the better, because I cannot be blackmailed with losing my little revenue here. :)
While I cherish your allusions (a rare condiment; perhaps you would enjoy the following author's company, too: https://stegiel.substack.com), in general, I refrain from "erudite" references (they might deter readers who would otherwise be valuable participants in the comment sections), and keep my narrative at the low-end of college level from about 30 years ago (well, that must be doctoral by now, but what the heck; my readers are mostly over 60 who are still able and willing to read :) ).
Perhaps the most admirable thing about you and, perhaps, me is that we both are elitists without the superiority complex or the killer mentality; that sort of thing DOES require quite a bit of a number of things that I prefer not to say here, I just hope, it's obvious for more than for you and for me.
Yes, I got the message from the last sentence in your previous comment, but it's still good to see your explanation (and I was not familiar with it).
Just for fun, I might as well mention that my wife and I often "communicate" with each other in animal sounds (I tend to say I am a dog speaking foreign languages).
Strangely, one of my reader's comment also led me to presume that it might be possible to confuse or even attack the perps with their own tech. Reverse-engineering would need access to their central AI (https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/there-is-a-cure-for-all-but-its-not). I am not sensing them as a homogeneous group, so each of these allied evil forces must also be running their own global simulation (https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/ai-makes-the-world-go-round) and, eventually, they will have to fight it out with each other, unless their AI uses a gambit and assigns THEM as the enemy, which is most likely to happen: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-will-the-globalists-game-end.
Not using or even ignoring "their" tools (most of the media, including the "alt" one), their "remedies," their concepts, in my experience, offers some protection. Not sure about reverse-engineering the mind. Only the person can make the necessary decisions, and not everyone can make it...
It's not an accident that the younger generations are hooked on the technology that is taking over their lives and, eventually, will wipe them out. The "computer-game" type of addiction was actually employed during the Great Plandemic of 2020, and it is now operating in full force: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/interchangeable-roles-of-victims (only about two thirds of my readers can relate to this, and I wish everyone could).
Golding's Lord of the Flies is one of my childhood favorites, because growing up in a poor and crime-infested 'hood and being beaten up by members of two competing gangs on a nearly daily basis deprived me of the "humans are born good" nonsense by the age of 10. Miraculously, we moved a few weeks before I would have ended up killing someone, but spending time as a factory worker and serving as a "soldier" greatly expanded on my original (already lethal) experience, and I would strongly recommend everyone to test their limits, because under duress, being pushed to the extreme, they can learn things about themselves that everyone needs to know about themselves, but only a few do.
During my high-school years, I spent several hours a day doing sports and freeing up my mind to be able to write good poetry by becoming capable of free association (first poetry published at the age of 18, and while I can write something unusual and, perhaps, even world-class anytime, I stopped writing poetry about 10 years ago, and am still struggling to complete a collection of 32 stories). At the same time, throughout my young adulthood, my mind always tested out as an engineer's, and it usually automatically compiled the details of whole systems as long as I engaged in them for a few weeks. That is probably the reason why there are hardly any contradictions in my writings. Devoting 25 years to AI and the link between AI and natural languages resulted in my second doctoral dissertation, "The Prolegomena of All Future Communication between AI and Humans in Natural Languages" in 2005, which ended with a five-page-long recursive algorithm that I preferred no to publish, because I felt that whoever would know that, will control the world. By 2012, it was all out, and I'm not sure if it was leaked or just others figured it out too, and were not so considerate about selling the future of mankind. It doesn't matter now.
While I can't see more than the options to choose between a benevolent Creator in the Cartesian sense and succumbing to the idea that this world is being created by some infantile moron(s) who reside in an infinitely-more-complex Universe, and whether it's true or not, I prefer the first option, I also joke sometimes that "If God created humans after His own image, that doesn't say too many good things about Him."
I need your help with Dean Henderson.
Pleased to engage. It is not so common for me either to locate people for whom the act of thinking is not reducible to one dimension (or less). I agree with you about Gen Z and whatever the next "gen" is being hooked on technology just like fish (and thus being readied to become someone's supper). The usb port for extraneous control is actually at the rear of the head by the base of the occipital bone, adjacent to the brain stem, pineal gland and cerebellum. This might seem strange given that the neck bends forward when a person's attention is hypnotically focused on a miniature screen. In fact, such obsessive and addictive flexion of the neck dilates portals on the upper nape through which controlling input can infiltrate, a dynamic almost as old as the oceans. It is an anatomical signal of compliance and surrender, and also consistent with premature aging and senility.
I also grew up surrounded by gangs and violence in a decaying industrial wasteland of northern England, so Golding's vision in "The Flies" did not contradict the experiences I has as a youth. Dean Henderson has written a number of books on the Illuminati and bloodlines. He emphasized the role of Crown agents and British neo-mercantile covert agendas behind what is happening in America. Briefly put, particularly as someone who grew up there, what Henderson lays out in great detail says resonates with my early life intuitions and observations.
The main point however is not just the human corruption, or the psycho-spiritual, moral and intellectual debasement, but "who", besides the tangible players we know, is orchestrating, or managing this behind the scenes, or veil.
Etherian physics and the identification of entities hostile to human aspirations and intent on total control, humiliation and depopulation must be identified as best we can. Otherwise, no matter what, the goldfish will die believing that their little bowl is the universe itself.
Just think of the billions of lies we would have to undo to get to the truth.
I still believe that the Truth is in everyone's heart (sorry, if that sounds too cheesy, but I don't know how else to put it).
Lies are relatively easy to identify, but only as long as a whole-scale interpretive frame is employed.
Thanks for the comprehensive rundown, Ray! Appreciate your work here and plan to pass it along.
Thank you kindly. I am checking out your stack, too.
Thanks for the stimulation.
"We" all need to be "upgraded," but not exactly the way Bill Gates is recommending it. :)
👍 - one-finger-salute to billy goat
"We are in all this together. Alone" (sorry about quoting myself :) )
Also, the salute reminds me of most people's "reinforced" air defense against a drone attack: shaking both fists! :)