15 Comments
Jul 27, 2022Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Ray,

Thank you for the kind words and for posting the article.

I am not sure how you make a determination regarding whether anyone follows or reads a certain substack - by the number of “likes” and/or comments?

This one https://davidlat.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=reader2?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Flaw&utm_medium=reader2, for instance, has – shockingly – “thousands of paid subscribers” but fewer comments and “likes” than mine. Lol. I saw many substacks with similar statistics. (I do NOT endorse or recommend the substack above in any way, just as an example).

But what I am actually trying to say in all my posts, for example,

here: https://1dissident.substack.com/p/corrupt-michael-mcshane-of-federal

here: https://1dissident.substack.com/p/corrupt-ann-aiken-of-the-federal

and here: https://1dissident.substack.com/p/criminals-of-the-federal-court-for

- is that the narrative and especially the pseudo-alternative narrative is heavily controlled and the mind-shaping and manipulation is being fully implemented. I argue that the “government” has planted the frauds all over to dumb-down the population. The ones who trust only the NY Times are easy to control but to brainwash those who believe that they are “enlightened” or belong to some kind of “resistance,” the gov. needed all those frauds who pose as “opposition” and “alternative media.” They all are being promoted by the gov. media, including the bogus alternative media websites, e.g., zerohedge, off-guardian, etc. The “smaller” ones get “boosted” through an association with the heavy hitters. Nearly all “alternative journalists” are just the malicious frauds, distraction, and a tool for dumbing down and shaping opinions.

Certainly, “popularity” has nothing to do with quality, value, or uniqueness of the content, just with marketing, brainwashing, and advertising (again, many such “alternative writers” are literally being aggressively promoted by the most powerful mainstream media outlets).

How do I know? For years, I have been trying to find at least one honest and genuine “investigative journalist” or “gov. accountability” establishment, offering various documents and evidence of the truly ghastly government misconduct (tampering with court dockets, falsification of the court’s “opinions,” fabrication of the police reports (here, I provide the portions of the actual police report and email exchange with the dirty cops, the portion of the deposition, and an audio file: https://1dissident.substack.com/p/the-police-report-that-the-dirty), entirely barricading meaningful access to courts, and much worse.

The result was ALWAYS the same: NO ONE was “interested” although everyone was claiming that they “fight corruption,” “investigate gov. misconduct,” etc. And then I started to research – do they ever cover any truly incriminating stories of the criminal gov. conduct? No. They only cover some rubbish, distract, lie, and defraud (as they literally suck money out of people under false pretenses – for example, malicious fraud Berenson makes well over a million on his substack subscriptions alone: https://1dissident.substack.com/p/the-censorship-wars-engineered-by).

Finally – because I mostly write about the actual dirty gov. misconduct, and people have been specifically “trained” to dismiss such narrative unless it comes from a fraud that works for the gov. – and of course, neither of those frauds would ever “cover” anything that the gov. wants to suppress – many people do just that – they dismiss such information. I had people subscribing to my journal, “liking” some posts, and then discovering that I actually write about real things, and my blog is not for empty demagoguery, pandering, endless generalizations they are so used to. Upon discovering it, they would immediately unsubscribe and even “unlike” the posts that they “liked” before.

As only the ones promoted by the media and those who masterfully “sell” their rubbish to clutter people’s minds really amass thousands of followers, then yes, compared to those - “hardly anyone reads” my blog. But that would not change because the narrative is being very well controlled, people are being conditioned to “reject” certain information, and, unfortunately – as you yourself said – people are so easy to manipulate.

Expand full comment

I'd litigate based on the evidence of prior art. I am Unborn. The term “Unborn” itself is a common one in classical Buddhism, where it generally signifies that which is intrinsic, original, uncreated.

Expand full comment

I don't know what to say but many places don't go deep. Brainchip lol lol

Also, the claim of the chip is laughable, you can patent anything even if it's not been invented yet.

The worst of the swab is that they use ethylene oxide to sterilize them.

Ethylene oxide is a gas above 32f so just wave the swab at room temperature and any residual gas is off the swab.

But feel free to speculate, another psy op besides chips are the graphene narratives.

Surely if these things exist, others would check too and show the data, like using a spectrum analyzer.

We know that microscopy is not reliable because the methods to look that small introduces artifacts.

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2022Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Love the cartoon AND the fact that a (questionably sterilized with deadly chemicals) snot rocket has never been in my nose to test for Covid. And never will.

Expand full comment

Thanks Ray!

Expand full comment
deletedJul 26, 2022Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)
Comment deleted
Expand full comment