It seems that it's becoming clearer to me that fear of death is inversely proportional to desire for freedom in Life.
Fear of Death ∝ 1/Desire for Freedom in Life
Or to say it another way, those who fear death the most are the same people who crave and demand security the most. These same people are most easily willing to exchange their freedom for (perceived & temporary) security.
Thus, spiritually Waking Up to one's eternal essence gives all of us the best chance to make things right. The best thing anyone can do toward establishing freedom for all is first get free yourself.
Yes, impersonating you is easy, especially if you use a password to log in. The innocuousness shows that it is AI and it is probably only a test run. Still, I am always extremely cautious with authors using "we," because it is a mob-creation device as well as pulpit for those who want people to shut up and stop thinking, because it's "we" who is talking...
I've seen strangely contradictory posts before by the same author (Celia Farber comes to mind).
I've also assumed that quite a few interviews with famous people are AI-generated.
I have a lot of "Like"s for every single comment I make on Substack, which seem strange to me, because they look like data collection. I am finding it hard that so many readers hunt down my comments.
Even I couldn't find is easily. Lucky me, I usually remember previous relevant articles so that I can at least insert links to them into new posts, because everything I write belongs together.
Once I start contradicting myself, you can safely assume that it's not me. :)
From a review of Scontenti by Marcello Veneziani (published by Marsilio): "a surprising book. It awakened in me a strange hope: that of a reformed Faust, capable of evoking, together with the medieval Mephistopheles, the ancient Seneca. This essay was a specialist in recovering the sense of limitation and destiny after having almost entirely lost it alongside Nero. He knew that the excesses of the infinite come from passions, but both Seneca and current politics ignore the "counter-logic" of the unconscious. And yet, if one horn of the dilemma is ignored, one does not manage to temper it thanks to the other horn - that of Aristotle's "logic". The unicorn is evil! "
Below is the review:
We are discontented with ourselves and with modern civilization… Discontent is not just about inequalities and hardships since it also pervades the wealthy. We are long-lived and wealthy, we have effective techniques and medicines, yet in every class we live badly. Discontent is now a universal condition, which in the West declines in a peculiar way. Discontent is not unhappiness, because it is also about context; nor is it sadness, melancholy and restlessness that do not lead to the animosity proper to the unhappy.
Once upon a time politics led to contentment - the worst was at hand - while today it arouses stable dissatisfaction with what we are, do and have, enslaving ourselves to unlimited desires and consumption that alienate. It is an individual and social malaise typical of modernity, which concerns human and institutional relationships, the pre-eminence of technology and the economy over culture, aggravated by the pandemic, environmental emergency, inequality and war.
Discontent is a state of incompleteness which has no religious outlet and which leads to discontent or rebellion, even if no revolution has freed us from discontent, because it does not depend only on oppression and injustice, being an internal and general, psychic and anthropological evil. Discontent is an alien who says to himself: "I am more than what life gives me in terms of body, age, gender, family, status, religion and expectation."
The ancients, on the other hand, ignored discontent: most resigned themselves soberly and easily to institutions, events and realities: they had fewer pretensions than amor Fati. Latin has the term contentus - "one who contains himself" - which is equivalent to being tenuously but lastingly content. Yet the Romans did not have the opposite term equivalent to "discontented." The imperial power did not want disgruntled citizens: it gave bread and circuses, as well as instilling fear. The ideal citizen of today, on the contrary, must change everything: status, ties, nature, sex, place of origin, houses, things and technological devices, moving forward the goals and sharpening the shortcomings to be filled.
Uninterrupted flow is the opposite of identity. If peoples and the weak lose their primary heritage, they no longer recognize each other and feel alone amidst consumption, suburbs, waste and global upheavals. Free time is a void to be filled with the most disparate goods, appetites and services. Desire has now replaced destiny, passing from identity to fluctuation, within liquid lives, temporary domiciles, precarious jobs. With no more principles, loyalty and coherence, we enter a void of firm points, of ties of origin, of horizons of expectation, of moral imperatives… It is the freedom of maniacally pursued whims that subjects us to the yoke of discontent.
More free time and means have led to less culture and the more wealthy one is, the more sumptuous one can be ignorant: opulence favors laziness, the pursuit of vulgar pleasures and addiction to distractions. In the United States Michelangelo's David has recently been mistaken for a pornographic image: we are - the United States is part of our intercontinental world - the opposite of what we have been... But culture is the only truly emancipatory energy, which the school destroyed it no longer arouses. Meanwhile, the banalities of the ignorant and the transgressions of the wise are rampant, united in disgust for Western civilization, for which we would be responsible for much of the evil in the world (while Putin seeks colonies and vassal states like an emperor).
Modernity is time, the West is the place and the mass is the subject of discontent: dissatisfied with the finite and the unfinished, it navigates the infinite, feeling omnipotent. The patron of modernity is Faust, to whom Mephistopheles gives all power. The first movements towards discontent were Sturm und Drang and Romanticism, which loved what was not there, the contradictions and confusions that are the faces of emotions… In antiquity there certainly were supermen who imitated Greek heroes — supremely amoral and arational (Brelich) —, like archaic and imperial tyrants. But the philosophers of the first Greek cities - together with other archaic sages of the globe - had discovered morality and reason, accusing omnipotence of arrogance and praising moderation.
Of course, discontent is inherent in Sapiens, because it has always been devoured and revived by faiths, emotions and desires. But this vice capable of changing into virtue has not remained the same in history: first the order of Fate governed by Zeus; then the salvation of that great impatient - if compared to the prophets - who wanted the Messiah immediately and the kingdom of God on earth within a generation... Thus Jesus broke up the cyclical time of the ancients and built unilinear time: officially from the end of the fourth century AD, when paganism was abolished. It is as if Christianity had said to the globe: "Do not afflict yourselves and be content: you can harbor infinity on this earth, however, living in goodness, because you will only reach it in heaven".
The industrial revolution killed God and humans began transferring infinity from the sky onto the planet. Then the divisible real and the indivisible fantastic began to fight each other more and more actively, giving the triumph to discontent. Thus were born the ideologies of progress, as strong as faiths even if they do not have an afterlife. The single God has been replaced by Mammon, with his entourage of goods and rubbish. Thus we are faced with the maximum contradiction: we feel the homogeneous and indivisible infinite while we experience the finite and divisible.
Science and technology, in progress, justify omnipotence, which however also arouses discontent in the rest of the humanities. Stretched out in the frenzy of satisfactions, we have forgotten the limits demanded by morality, value, duties, wisdom, beauty and education, sinking into the will to power, nihilism, relativism, ugliness, anger and sloth. We desire infinity and eternity and we obtain discontent, because there is nothing more that helps to contain greed in satiating us, benefiting us as only the spirit can do.
I don't know about you but I am relating most everything ( not recipes for dinner maybe, but most everything) to our current situation.
I have no time for mere "discontent", which sounds like a vague wishing for meaning.
However, I could think that TPTB have suffered from a life of leisure which has led to "discontent" and hence to using us inconsequentials as part of their giving meaning to their world. That we are fodder for them to use to their heart's content. :)
“Science and technology, in progress, justify omnipotence, which however also arouses discontent in the rest of the humanities. “
Bertrand Russell ‘The History of Western Philosophy’ 1945, describing the period of history called modern, makes a useful distinction between ‘theoretical science (an attempt to understand the world) and practical science (an attempt to change the world) which he claimed, ‘has ousted theoretical science from men’s thoughts’.
The effect to make ‘science’ more and more a technique and less and less a doctrine as to the nature of the world. He concludes, perceptively, this omnipotent ‘science’ means
“ends are no longer considered; only the skilfulness of the process is valued. This also is a form of madness” he opines.
‘It is, [practical science ] in our day, the most dangerous form and the one against which a sane philosophy should provide an antidote”. The result, he foresees, is a modern world with a social order imposed by force by the will of the powerful.
Russell was a(n empiricist-)rationalist and advocated that logic can solve all problems. Consequently, he defaulted to being an atheist. Not very smart, but at least intellectually honest. Still, Wittgenstein got on his nerves in Cambridge in 1928, when he pointed out that Bertie couldn't prove that there was no rhinoceros in the room. Logically, of course, it is impossible to prove that something doesn't exist, but I tackle the problem by assigning the problem to its matching cognitive level: a rhino in the room is a truth judgment for perception, not for logic. :)
So Wittgenstein was wasting his time appealing to Bertie’s logic. Perhaps one, such as a blind man, and even an uneducated one at that, would have improved the nature of such discourse. And therein rests the void of the modern science perhaps. Sadly, the sage Berties’ alone get to ‘talk’ and spin, their limits in logic often blatant and evident, catastrophically so. None so blind.
Between the two of us (and I would prefer not to post this in an article, because I don't want my readers to lose their appetite), the two probably slept together, so "philosophical" disagreements between them were not really addressed. :)
Bertie, by my standards, is a Satanist (relying only on perception and logic) and a moron (for the same reason).
For the cognitive levels of truth judgment, please, read my previous article (it is ground-breaking, but I've never cared for making money or even a career out of my knowledge):
Well nothing would come of those personal arrangements. I have been inclined to notice at times, when I revisit his Hx of Western Phil book that his selection of the historically ‘important’ and narrative supports your insight somewhat.
The ‘ awake’ is by degrees and seems to be on a scale with an unlimited range.
Just today, quietly, I discovered the might US dollar is no longer the World’s reserve currency, tipped that way a few weeks ago. You won’t hear it on any news source, for a while anyway. I think the media heads are all spouting things to produce calm, normalizing things, high crime rates, murders and the perpetrators being released. All this may be to make the masses calm, ‘don’t get upset, it may be dangerous for you to think for yourselves’. Trust us to handle all, don’t worry your little heads about anything.
Just the Postman here bringing the latest gossip ;)
Having been very rudely awoken precipitously a couple of decades ago, the genesis of which was a very rapid fall from good health into chronic disabling dysfunction, I have survived long enough to re-prioritize what "waking up would entail".
My first priority is to retain and where possible regain enough life force to address the very close next priority for me. Can't do the work if you can't breathe.
That very close next priority has been to take a deep, hard honest look at myself, my responsibility for who I am and what I do way beyond just in this 3D world of predator/parasite/prey paradigm. And then own it, all of it.
More importantly for my bigger picture is how I treat my relationship with eternal God/Source/Love, however one views or labels that indefinable power.
Last priority for me on what waking up entails is to share, whenever that looks like it would be advantageous to all involved, whatever I've experienced that might provide some life value to others in my sphere.
Thanks again to you and your discerning subscribers for the very useful forum. 🙏
Thank you kindly; it's always a good idea to give me a couple of hours with my typos, but this time, you caught me before I managed to correct it. Still, I am catching old ones, because nobody cares to warn me. :)
As my readership is expanding, I'll need proofreaders and people who peruse my comment sections, because from the very beginning, I promised everything would be free (I do offer a few perks to "paid subscribers," but that's beyond the site.
Sorry, I've been flooded. Your stuff looks pretty good, and I am more than willing to cross-post it and recommend it, but please, send me your BEST article that is related to one of mine (I realize, I am covering more topics than most authors on Substack). My impression is that we might make good allies.
It seems that it's becoming clearer to me that fear of death is inversely proportional to desire for freedom in Life.
Fear of Death ∝ 1/Desire for Freedom in Life
Or to say it another way, those who fear death the most are the same people who crave and demand security the most. These same people are most easily willing to exchange their freedom for (perceived & temporary) security.
Thus, spiritually Waking Up to one's eternal essence gives all of us the best chance to make things right. The best thing anyone can do toward establishing freedom for all is first get free yourself.
Definitely. Perhaps that's why so many clueless people are mesmerized by death:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-sacrifice-of-the-human-animal
STOP AND FRISK Kennedy: Stop and frisk is constitutional, let New Orleans use it to prevent crime https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfOo_igjLj8&t=3s
Does anyone know if your post/your name can be hijacked?
I JUST realized that 9 people liked a posting that wasn't mine!!
Further, I MAY have written the first 2 sentences. But the anecdote
was impossible as I never had a 'grandma', let alone one who
worked outside. Ray critiqued the use of 'we', which I FINALLY
realized I never wrote.
At first I took the criticism, then REREAD, and WHOA, I didn't
write this, but it's my avatar name.
Why would anyone do that?
Yes, it's TIME.
Yes, impersonating you is easy, especially if you use a password to log in. The innocuousness shows that it is AI and it is probably only a test run. Still, I am always extremely cautious with authors using "we," because it is a mob-creation device as well as pulpit for those who want people to shut up and stop thinking, because it's "we" who is talking...
I've seen strangely contradictory posts before by the same author (Celia Farber comes to mind).
I've also assumed that quite a few interviews with famous people are AI-generated.
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/is-everything-fake
I have a lot of "Like"s for every single comment I make on Substack, which seem strange to me, because they look like data collection. I am finding it hard that so many readers hunt down my comments.
I'm seeing similar 'data-collection' events on Telegram.
Where was this post of which you speak?
Freaky of course.
Ray's post at end of January. On a tablet, can't table things.
Funny. Ray criticized the use of 'We must become strong.'?
In retrospect, I don't write like that!!
But I wasn't thinking, watching until the obvious about
'my grandma' which I never had!!
I didn't know that could be done.
Thanks for support. It is weird.
Maybe Ray will repost your post for our edification.
Ray is too prolific a poster for me to go searching for it.
Some other commenter might throw some light on this once we all get a good look at it.
It's a violation of your self of course.
Even I couldn't find is easily. Lucky me, I usually remember previous relevant articles so that I can at least insert links to them into new posts, because everything I write belongs together.
Once I start contradicting myself, you can safely assume that it's not me. :)
And THIS one was innocuous, but they don't have to be.
And I could never prove anything.
Now, do I preface my replies, or...'let it roll'?
Maybe? a light 'let's hope no one insults you changing my reply'
but that can go wrong.
It was a red flag when 9 people liked my reply; I never get that!!!
From a review of Scontenti by Marcello Veneziani (published by Marsilio): "a surprising book. It awakened in me a strange hope: that of a reformed Faust, capable of evoking, together with the medieval Mephistopheles, the ancient Seneca. This essay was a specialist in recovering the sense of limitation and destiny after having almost entirely lost it alongside Nero. He knew that the excesses of the infinite come from passions, but both Seneca and current politics ignore the "counter-logic" of the unconscious. And yet, if one horn of the dilemma is ignored, one does not manage to temper it thanks to the other horn - that of Aristotle's "logic". The unicorn is evil! "
Below is the review:
We are discontented with ourselves and with modern civilization… Discontent is not just about inequalities and hardships since it also pervades the wealthy. We are long-lived and wealthy, we have effective techniques and medicines, yet in every class we live badly. Discontent is now a universal condition, which in the West declines in a peculiar way. Discontent is not unhappiness, because it is also about context; nor is it sadness, melancholy and restlessness that do not lead to the animosity proper to the unhappy.
Once upon a time politics led to contentment - the worst was at hand - while today it arouses stable dissatisfaction with what we are, do and have, enslaving ourselves to unlimited desires and consumption that alienate. It is an individual and social malaise typical of modernity, which concerns human and institutional relationships, the pre-eminence of technology and the economy over culture, aggravated by the pandemic, environmental emergency, inequality and war.
Discontent is a state of incompleteness which has no religious outlet and which leads to discontent or rebellion, even if no revolution has freed us from discontent, because it does not depend only on oppression and injustice, being an internal and general, psychic and anthropological evil. Discontent is an alien who says to himself: "I am more than what life gives me in terms of body, age, gender, family, status, religion and expectation."
The ancients, on the other hand, ignored discontent: most resigned themselves soberly and easily to institutions, events and realities: they had fewer pretensions than amor Fati. Latin has the term contentus - "one who contains himself" - which is equivalent to being tenuously but lastingly content. Yet the Romans did not have the opposite term equivalent to "discontented." The imperial power did not want disgruntled citizens: it gave bread and circuses, as well as instilling fear. The ideal citizen of today, on the contrary, must change everything: status, ties, nature, sex, place of origin, houses, things and technological devices, moving forward the goals and sharpening the shortcomings to be filled.
Uninterrupted flow is the opposite of identity. If peoples and the weak lose their primary heritage, they no longer recognize each other and feel alone amidst consumption, suburbs, waste and global upheavals. Free time is a void to be filled with the most disparate goods, appetites and services. Desire has now replaced destiny, passing from identity to fluctuation, within liquid lives, temporary domiciles, precarious jobs. With no more principles, loyalty and coherence, we enter a void of firm points, of ties of origin, of horizons of expectation, of moral imperatives… It is the freedom of maniacally pursued whims that subjects us to the yoke of discontent.
More free time and means have led to less culture and the more wealthy one is, the more sumptuous one can be ignorant: opulence favors laziness, the pursuit of vulgar pleasures and addiction to distractions. In the United States Michelangelo's David has recently been mistaken for a pornographic image: we are - the United States is part of our intercontinental world - the opposite of what we have been... But culture is the only truly emancipatory energy, which the school destroyed it no longer arouses. Meanwhile, the banalities of the ignorant and the transgressions of the wise are rampant, united in disgust for Western civilization, for which we would be responsible for much of the evil in the world (while Putin seeks colonies and vassal states like an emperor).
Modernity is time, the West is the place and the mass is the subject of discontent: dissatisfied with the finite and the unfinished, it navigates the infinite, feeling omnipotent. The patron of modernity is Faust, to whom Mephistopheles gives all power. The first movements towards discontent were Sturm und Drang and Romanticism, which loved what was not there, the contradictions and confusions that are the faces of emotions… In antiquity there certainly were supermen who imitated Greek heroes — supremely amoral and arational (Brelich) —, like archaic and imperial tyrants. But the philosophers of the first Greek cities - together with other archaic sages of the globe - had discovered morality and reason, accusing omnipotence of arrogance and praising moderation.
Of course, discontent is inherent in Sapiens, because it has always been devoured and revived by faiths, emotions and desires. But this vice capable of changing into virtue has not remained the same in history: first the order of Fate governed by Zeus; then the salvation of that great impatient - if compared to the prophets - who wanted the Messiah immediately and the kingdom of God on earth within a generation... Thus Jesus broke up the cyclical time of the ancients and built unilinear time: officially from the end of the fourth century AD, when paganism was abolished. It is as if Christianity had said to the globe: "Do not afflict yourselves and be content: you can harbor infinity on this earth, however, living in goodness, because you will only reach it in heaven".
The industrial revolution killed God and humans began transferring infinity from the sky onto the planet. Then the divisible real and the indivisible fantastic began to fight each other more and more actively, giving the triumph to discontent. Thus were born the ideologies of progress, as strong as faiths even if they do not have an afterlife. The single God has been replaced by Mammon, with his entourage of goods and rubbish. Thus we are faced with the maximum contradiction: we feel the homogeneous and indivisible infinite while we experience the finite and divisible.
Science and technology, in progress, justify omnipotence, which however also arouses discontent in the rest of the humanities. Stretched out in the frenzy of satisfactions, we have forgotten the limits demanded by morality, value, duties, wisdom, beauty and education, sinking into the will to power, nihilism, relativism, ugliness, anger and sloth. We desire infinity and eternity and we obtain discontent, because there is nothing more that helps to contain greed in satiating us, benefiting us as only the spirit can do.
A lot of thinking here Stegiel.
I don't know about you but I am relating most everything ( not recipes for dinner maybe, but most everything) to our current situation.
I have no time for mere "discontent", which sounds like a vague wishing for meaning.
However, I could think that TPTB have suffered from a life of leisure which has led to "discontent" and hence to using us inconsequentials as part of their giving meaning to their world. That we are fodder for them to use to their heart's content. :)
His comments would usually make good articles. He is authentic.
“Science and technology, in progress, justify omnipotence, which however also arouses discontent in the rest of the humanities. “
Bertrand Russell ‘The History of Western Philosophy’ 1945, describing the period of history called modern, makes a useful distinction between ‘theoretical science (an attempt to understand the world) and practical science (an attempt to change the world) which he claimed, ‘has ousted theoretical science from men’s thoughts’.
The effect to make ‘science’ more and more a technique and less and less a doctrine as to the nature of the world. He concludes, perceptively, this omnipotent ‘science’ means
“ends are no longer considered; only the skilfulness of the process is valued. This also is a form of madness” he opines.
‘It is, [practical science ] in our day, the most dangerous form and the one against which a sane philosophy should provide an antidote”. The result, he foresees, is a modern world with a social order imposed by force by the will of the powerful.
‘A new philosophy will be needed’ he concludes.
Every argument must be processed at the matching cognitive level of truth judgment:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-makes-you-think-you-are-right
Russell was a(n empiricist-)rationalist and advocated that logic can solve all problems. Consequently, he defaulted to being an atheist. Not very smart, but at least intellectually honest. Still, Wittgenstein got on his nerves in Cambridge in 1928, when he pointed out that Bertie couldn't prove that there was no rhinoceros in the room. Logically, of course, it is impossible to prove that something doesn't exist, but I tackle the problem by assigning the problem to its matching cognitive level: a rhino in the room is a truth judgment for perception, not for logic. :)
So Wittgenstein was wasting his time appealing to Bertie’s logic. Perhaps one, such as a blind man, and even an uneducated one at that, would have improved the nature of such discourse. And therein rests the void of the modern science perhaps. Sadly, the sage Berties’ alone get to ‘talk’ and spin, their limits in logic often blatant and evident, catastrophically so. None so blind.
Between the two of us (and I would prefer not to post this in an article, because I don't want my readers to lose their appetite), the two probably slept together, so "philosophical" disagreements between them were not really addressed. :)
Bertie, by my standards, is a Satanist (relying only on perception and logic) and a moron (for the same reason).
For the cognitive levels of truth judgment, please, read my previous article (it is ground-breaking, but I've never cared for making money or even a career out of my knowledge):
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-makes-you-think-you-are-right
Well nothing would come of those personal arrangements. I have been inclined to notice at times, when I revisit his Hx of Western Phil book that his selection of the historically ‘important’ and narrative supports your insight somewhat.
My article involves the highest levels of cognitive science that I developed around 1992, but nobody has chosen to steal it from me.
Please, at least read it or, if you have, ask me questions, if I was unclear about a few details.
How very true!
Nice graphic that I sometimes resemble!
The ‘ awake’ is by degrees and seems to be on a scale with an unlimited range.
Just today, quietly, I discovered the might US dollar is no longer the World’s reserve currency, tipped that way a few weeks ago. You won’t hear it on any news source, for a while anyway. I think the media heads are all spouting things to produce calm, normalizing things, high crime rates, murders and the perpetrators being released. All this may be to make the masses calm, ‘don’t get upset, it may be dangerous for you to think for yourselves’. Trust us to handle all, don’t worry your little heads about anything.
Just the Postman here bringing the latest gossip ;)
When I wrote about the end of the Petrodollar last December, many readers objected:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-petrodollar-is-dead
By now, it's clear, but people still think that other currencies will survive. They won't. The CBDCs will be the ultimate tools of control worldwide.
Having been very rudely awoken precipitously a couple of decades ago, the genesis of which was a very rapid fall from good health into chronic disabling dysfunction, I have survived long enough to re-prioritize what "waking up would entail".
My first priority is to retain and where possible regain enough life force to address the very close next priority for me. Can't do the work if you can't breathe.
That very close next priority has been to take a deep, hard honest look at myself, my responsibility for who I am and what I do way beyond just in this 3D world of predator/parasite/prey paradigm. And then own it, all of it.
More importantly for my bigger picture is how I treat my relationship with eternal God/Source/Love, however one views or labels that indefinable power.
Last priority for me on what waking up entails is to share, whenever that looks like it would be advantageous to all involved, whatever I've experienced that might provide some life value to others in my sphere.
Thanks again to you and your discerning subscribers for the very useful forum. 🙏
Thank YOU for participating! Bringing people together was one of my "secret" objectives and it seems to work.
Ray, possible edit.
'thing' should be 'think' in subheading.
:)
Thank you kindly; it's always a good idea to give me a couple of hours with my typos, but this time, you caught me before I managed to correct it. Still, I am catching old ones, because nobody cares to warn me. :)
As my readership is expanding, I'll need proofreaders and people who peruse my comment sections, because from the very beginning, I promised everything would be free (I do offer a few perks to "paid subscribers," but that's beyond the site.
I had liquid nanoparticles instead of lipid nanoparticles on one of my stacks. Haha.
We are all here to help one another!
Sorry, I've been flooded. Your stuff looks pretty good, and I am more than willing to cross-post it and recommend it, but please, send me your BEST article that is related to one of mine (I realize, I am covering more topics than most authors on Substack). My impression is that we might make good allies.
Let me do a better job of rereading yours first, then will try to link ones that have synergies. Always open for the discussion as well.
#SupportTeamThinkingHuman
In the meantime, one for laughs in a time that is not funny.
Songs for the Syringed
https://open.substack.com/pub/inugo/p/sunday-serenade-for-the-syringed?r=qx9b5&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post