(there are more and probably better sources than a1997 article in the Guardian, but most are behind a paywall and I'm not going there). merry christmas :-))
As far as I can see, eugenicist tendencies stem from the tribal nature of humans. Each tribe considers itself superior to the rest, which is a survival strategy, and it allows for the extermination of others (consider the stories of King David in the Bible).
Tribalism is now led by technocrats and the goal is the elimination of the dysfunctional and the useless, "starting with the old, and then, the stupid."
not wanting to care for the weak (meek?) is, indeed, a survival strategy in times of hardship for any poor community, or tribe if you will. but in times of opulence and prosperity it's different: affluent citizens (burghers) are seen to estasblish care for the sick, the elderly, widows, mental patients, orphans. didn't doing good in this world guarantee being treated well in the afterlife? modern-day technocrats apparently don't see the benefits of making investments in the reduction of poverty. perhaps, for some reason, they don't believe in the afterlife.
What I have seen in my life was two kinds of generosity:
1. Those, who were able to afford it, used to practice it;
2. Those, who depended on the community, practiced it as long as the community had enough sources.
Sometimes people must decide who lives and who doesn't (e.g. shipwrecked sailors at the time of sail-ships).
Transcendental consideration tend to surface only after nobody is likely to survive... Of course, collecting treasure in heaven can be a choice, but "if I have no love in me, it's no use" to sacrifice myself.
Without appreciating the useless and the disposable, there is not much joy left in life.
Apart from a few credible reports from people who came back from the state of clinical death, people have had all kinds of ideas about life after life, which makes it difficult to pick one these days, when so many people don't believe in anything. These days, it has become difficult for the young even to see if they are doing something good or not-so-good.
appreciate your reaction, 1) and 2) are great points. we also know that in extreme circumstances (brutal civilian war camps) the pack can turn on the weakest ones. "homo homini lupus est": man is to man a wolf. 'Sometimes people must decide who lives and who doesn't...': very true! it happened during the German occupation in some of the European countries, where a local council of respected elders were to decide who would and who wouldn't be eligible for deportation to the concentration camps. on an indiviual level choices over life or death are made daily in many places, but most often in extreme situations, like shortages of food, water, medicine and other scarce supplies. limited (access to) resources is the central element. and our top-of-the-foodchain eugenicists proclaiming the need for population control really is a bit.... well, rich.
Talking about fake narratives, if FOX is part of the mainstream media, why did they denounce "vaccines" before and today they denounce the climate change panic that Davos is pushing? They have even openly said that the WEF intends to institute a feudalism 2.0..... What could be behind this supposed "adherence to the Truth" on the part of this media megacorporation?
About Jon Rappoport, maybe he's just confused about the topic. I know he's not the type of person who tends to get confused (on the contrary, he's one of the smartest persons --just like you are-- that I have ever read), but we all have our first time in something...
The MSM has to gaslight people, and the simplest way to do that is to come out with contradictory narratives.
Also, the globalists seem to enjoy teasing people by telling them about Agenda 2030, because commoners simply cannot do anything about it. It's like beating up on a caged animal...
Your description of Rappoport matches my longtime experience. On the other hand, I am wary of my opinions, because I can be easily sloppy or plain wrong. When in doubt, I prefer to wait, which is why, for example, I haven't written about the Gaza Strip.
Part of the show for sure, and it works just fine, occupying people's attention, while they are literally slaughtered.
I guess, Israel might be planning to emigrate to Ukraine and to Hungary (possibly to Poland and Czechia, too, among other places). WW3 on TV with some "collateral losses" is also an option.
It's only a guess. Hungary, for example, has the largest underground freshwater reservoir in Europe, and water is soon to be a major asset. The people either fled or are used to constant humiliation and disempowerment; the place is ripe for being ruled. Currently, "nationalistic" governments seem to work there that operate like crime syndicates, but have no real power, because their money supply is also controlled by the globalists. These countries cover an area that could be easily self-sufficient.
It's curious: I always felt a certain attraction for Eastern Europe, and especially for Hungary...
But, back to the subject, what you tell me then implies that the Arabs / Palestinians will "win" in the Middle East, and Israel will be "punished" by going to a prodigious land...???
Indeed, Muslims are privileged in almost all European countries, in despite of the claims in support of Israel of some of them now... I mean by "privileged" that their usages and customs are fully respected and admitted, even to the detriment of the customs and habits of the European citizens themselves...
Other than for bodily mechanical breakdowns, the use of the modern stone age medical mafia is in direct proportion to your fear of death from some mysterious disease or virus. If you belong to the disease of the month club, you can trust your doctor to keep you immersed in several big pharma drug potions. Unbeknownst to you, none will have much effect on prolonging your life. But they will prolong your doctor's exorbitant retirement.
Ray, I also received Rappoport's stack this morning. I didn't read it, I got up late and was just scrolling through my email inbox. I read yours because of the opening line.
I have skipped most of Jon's letters recently. I am not a paid subscriber to him as I once was, and can only read the first part. But you may be onto something. This one doesn't "read" like Rappoport.
I do know that he has never believed in viruses, or virus-caused illness, and backs that up with logic. But he does make a good point about all the crap in the injections.
Personally, I'm just trying to maintain my precarious health status, trying to stay alive for another year without seeing a "doctor". I have a scheduled appointment with my pulmonologist in Jan.
There are still too many of us older folks alive consuming our Social Security, me being one of them. Pretty sure I am on their list of the next flock to exterminate, but I do still work part time, so maybe they'll give me a reprieve. LOL
If the enablers and the enforcers realized they are going to be next on the path to the slaughterhouse, the globalists might run out of servants. Still, I'm expecting robotic cops to enforce the muzzles during the next plandemic...
Perhaps Jon's(?) point was pointed more to the mysterious nanoparticle contents vs a contamination excuse? Contamination was the excuse used many years ago when nano-sized heavy metals were found in over 40 different vaccines (and thus that researcher couple mysteriously "disappeared"). I just yesterday watched a video which explained nanoparticle creation (the chemistry), the payloading, the encapsulation and use of EMF activation. They discussed biologicals only require -20F to freeze state, yet moderna and pfizer required -50 and -70. The video also discussed various payload options with effects to known symptoms such as sudden death, paralysis, skin lesions, rapid cancers, magnetism, etc. (heavy metals and radioactive materials, toxins and venoms, etc., but did not mention nanobots). Despite the efforts of these alt-researchers showing images of things which certainly appear to be technology, I remain skeptical of pretty much everyone and everything. As there doesn't appear to be much at all we can do about it, whether there is or isn't mRNA, a spike protein, a spike nanobot or an internet of bodies - for myself I am simply avoiding all injections, all hospitals, all doctors, all industrial food and water, all TV, and ignoring all politicians. I viewed that video on telegram using my phone, so if I can find the link I will post here.
Jon has always called a spade a spade. In this sense, even Mercola is "telling the truth," assuming his "remedies" work.
Only researchers who are not on a major payroll might publish facts, but they don't have the money for the necessary equipment. Anyway, the impact of various toxic sources is now so complex that it's basically impossible to diagnose the sources and their combined effects.
The nanotech/5G combo produces the same results as mRNA would, but as opposed to mRNA, it is possible to control (through 5G or comparable technologies).
after his substack articles disappeared after a paywall I (had to) quit reading him, which I found sad. all those believable experts discussing the spike proteins, mRNA, long-covid even, it all seems to be part of this 3D mental maze where even the best get totally lost.
I've been suspicious of whoever "he" has been since "he" joined Substack. Somehow, he was falling behind, but that's a tool for disinformers, too (limited hangout). Whether he is not he anymore or only getting old, it's still sad...
I believe, my explanation of mRNA is logical and easy to understand. "Long covid" is probably mostly radiation sickness and nanoparticle poisoning. ("Covid" doesn't exist, but the symptoms do.) "Spike protein" is usually linked to the mRNA narrative, but similar results can be produced witht he 5G/nanoparticle technology.
agree (on Rappoport): moving to substack for a broader audience, yet hiding it for paid subscribers only doesn't make much sense; indeed (on your explanation of mRNA and the infamous spike): very readable and makes a lot of sense; and yes, you're absolutely right @ "Covid" doesn't exist, but the symptoms do....'. big TQ for all the work you do, much appreciated.
About a year ago, in NYC, a couple immediately lost custody of their newborn after they rejected the vit-K injection, and it took them several months to regain custody. By then, the baby must have been pumped full of toxic "vaccines," and was missing the parents...
How to give birth these days? Wrote about that, too, and the conclusion was pretty much of what you are saying:
that's quite a miserable quote by G.B. Shaw (top of this article), staunch advocate of eugenics - https://www.theguardian.com/politics/from-the-archive-blog/2019/may/01/eugenics-founding-fathers-british-socialism-archive-1997
(there are more and probably better sources than a1997 article in the Guardian, but most are behind a paywall and I'm not going there). merry christmas :-))
As far as I can see, eugenicist tendencies stem from the tribal nature of humans. Each tribe considers itself superior to the rest, which is a survival strategy, and it allows for the extermination of others (consider the stories of King David in the Bible).
Tribalism is now led by technocrats and the goal is the elimination of the dysfunctional and the useless, "starting with the old, and then, the stupid."
not wanting to care for the weak (meek?) is, indeed, a survival strategy in times of hardship for any poor community, or tribe if you will. but in times of opulence and prosperity it's different: affluent citizens (burghers) are seen to estasblish care for the sick, the elderly, widows, mental patients, orphans. didn't doing good in this world guarantee being treated well in the afterlife? modern-day technocrats apparently don't see the benefits of making investments in the reduction of poverty. perhaps, for some reason, they don't believe in the afterlife.
What I have seen in my life was two kinds of generosity:
1. Those, who were able to afford it, used to practice it;
2. Those, who depended on the community, practiced it as long as the community had enough sources.
Sometimes people must decide who lives and who doesn't (e.g. shipwrecked sailors at the time of sail-ships).
Transcendental consideration tend to surface only after nobody is likely to survive... Of course, collecting treasure in heaven can be a choice, but "if I have no love in me, it's no use" to sacrifice myself.
Without appreciating the useless and the disposable, there is not much joy left in life.
Apart from a few credible reports from people who came back from the state of clinical death, people have had all kinds of ideas about life after life, which makes it difficult to pick one these days, when so many people don't believe in anything. These days, it has become difficult for the young even to see if they are doing something good or not-so-good.
appreciate your reaction, 1) and 2) are great points. we also know that in extreme circumstances (brutal civilian war camps) the pack can turn on the weakest ones. "homo homini lupus est": man is to man a wolf. 'Sometimes people must decide who lives and who doesn't...': very true! it happened during the German occupation in some of the European countries, where a local council of respected elders were to decide who would and who wouldn't be eligible for deportation to the concentration camps. on an indiviual level choices over life or death are made daily in many places, but most often in extreme situations, like shortages of food, water, medicine and other scarce supplies. limited (access to) resources is the central element. and our top-of-the-foodchain eugenicists proclaiming the need for population control really is a bit.... well, rich.
I totally agree with you!! Thank you!!
Talking about fake narratives, if FOX is part of the mainstream media, why did they denounce "vaccines" before and today they denounce the climate change panic that Davos is pushing? They have even openly said that the WEF intends to institute a feudalism 2.0..... What could be behind this supposed "adherence to the Truth" on the part of this media megacorporation?
About Jon Rappoport, maybe he's just confused about the topic. I know he's not the type of person who tends to get confused (on the contrary, he's one of the smartest persons --just like you are-- that I have ever read), but we all have our first time in something...
The MSM has to gaslight people, and the simplest way to do that is to come out with contradictory narratives.
Also, the globalists seem to enjoy teasing people by telling them about Agenda 2030, because commoners simply cannot do anything about it. It's like beating up on a caged animal...
Your description of Rappoport matches my longtime experience. On the other hand, I am wary of my opinions, because I can be easily sloppy or plain wrong. When in doubt, I prefer to wait, which is why, for example, I haven't written about the Gaza Strip.
Since you say so, I'm very curious to know your opinion about all this mess in the Middle East.
Part of the show for sure, and it works just fine, occupying people's attention, while they are literally slaughtered.
I guess, Israel might be planning to emigrate to Ukraine and to Hungary (possibly to Poland and Czechia, too, among other places). WW3 on TV with some "collateral losses" is also an option.
Israel emigrating to Eastern Europe 😳?
It's only a guess. Hungary, for example, has the largest underground freshwater reservoir in Europe, and water is soon to be a major asset. The people either fled or are used to constant humiliation and disempowerment; the place is ripe for being ruled. Currently, "nationalistic" governments seem to work there that operate like crime syndicates, but have no real power, because their money supply is also controlled by the globalists. These countries cover an area that could be easily self-sufficient.
It's curious: I always felt a certain attraction for Eastern Europe, and especially for Hungary...
But, back to the subject, what you tell me then implies that the Arabs / Palestinians will "win" in the Middle East, and Israel will be "punished" by going to a prodigious land...???
Indeed, Muslims are privileged in almost all European countries, in despite of the claims in support of Israel of some of them now... I mean by "privileged" that their usages and customs are fully respected and admitted, even to the detriment of the customs and habits of the European citizens themselves...
The Kalergi Plan?
I mean, HORRENDOUS mess in the Gaza Strip.
This is what happens when you let A.I. Write for you :) LOLOLOL
Maybe his post improves with a bit of spunk in the paywalled part.
The extract we see is not only missing the microscopy exposed structures in the shots but is also boring.
Other than for bodily mechanical breakdowns, the use of the modern stone age medical mafia is in direct proportion to your fear of death from some mysterious disease or virus. If you belong to the disease of the month club, you can trust your doctor to keep you immersed in several big pharma drug potions. Unbeknownst to you, none will have much effect on prolonging your life. But they will prolong your doctor's exorbitant retirement.
Ray, I also received Rappoport's stack this morning. I didn't read it, I got up late and was just scrolling through my email inbox. I read yours because of the opening line.
I have skipped most of Jon's letters recently. I am not a paid subscriber to him as I once was, and can only read the first part. But you may be onto something. This one doesn't "read" like Rappoport.
I do know that he has never believed in viruses, or virus-caused illness, and backs that up with logic. But he does make a good point about all the crap in the injections.
Personally, I'm just trying to maintain my precarious health status, trying to stay alive for another year without seeing a "doctor". I have a scheduled appointment with my pulmonologist in Jan.
I enjoyed the chicken meme.
There are still too many of us older folks alive consuming our Social Security, me being one of them. Pretty sure I am on their list of the next flock to exterminate, but I do still work part time, so maybe they'll give me a reprieve. LOL
The "useless eaters" must definitely go, but it's more about global control and depopulation.
What is the pace of the genocide? Do you agree with the projection that 70% of Americans will be dead by 2025?
So far I have been quite impressed by the resilience of the human race! I definitely thought that we would be in a much worse place right now.
A lot of the mercenaries are injured now too, let’s hope they can wake up and stop doing the dirty work for the elites/satanists.
If the enablers and the enforcers realized they are going to be next on the path to the slaughterhouse, the globalists might run out of servants. Still, I'm expecting robotic cops to enforce the muzzles during the next plandemic...
Bermuda Triangle is for rockets:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDqVWwK5Wcc
Thanks for the link!
And for nuclear missiles. :)
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/is-everything-fake
Perhaps Jon's(?) point was pointed more to the mysterious nanoparticle contents vs a contamination excuse? Contamination was the excuse used many years ago when nano-sized heavy metals were found in over 40 different vaccines (and thus that researcher couple mysteriously "disappeared"). I just yesterday watched a video which explained nanoparticle creation (the chemistry), the payloading, the encapsulation and use of EMF activation. They discussed biologicals only require -20F to freeze state, yet moderna and pfizer required -50 and -70. The video also discussed various payload options with effects to known symptoms such as sudden death, paralysis, skin lesions, rapid cancers, magnetism, etc. (heavy metals and radioactive materials, toxins and venoms, etc., but did not mention nanobots). Despite the efforts of these alt-researchers showing images of things which certainly appear to be technology, I remain skeptical of pretty much everyone and everything. As there doesn't appear to be much at all we can do about it, whether there is or isn't mRNA, a spike protein, a spike nanobot or an internet of bodies - for myself I am simply avoiding all injections, all hospitals, all doctors, all industrial food and water, all TV, and ignoring all politicians. I viewed that video on telegram using my phone, so if I can find the link I will post here.
Jon has always called a spade a spade. In this sense, even Mercola is "telling the truth," assuming his "remedies" work.
Only researchers who are not on a major payroll might publish facts, but they don't have the money for the necessary equipment. Anyway, the impact of various toxic sources is now so complex that it's basically impossible to diagnose the sources and their combined effects.
The nanotech/5G combo produces the same results as mRNA would, but as opposed to mRNA, it is possible to control (through 5G or comparable technologies).
after his substack articles disappeared after a paywall I (had to) quit reading him, which I found sad. all those believable experts discussing the spike proteins, mRNA, long-covid even, it all seems to be part of this 3D mental maze where even the best get totally lost.
I've been suspicious of whoever "he" has been since "he" joined Substack. Somehow, he was falling behind, but that's a tool for disinformers, too (limited hangout). Whether he is not he anymore or only getting old, it's still sad...
I believe, my explanation of mRNA is logical and easy to understand. "Long covid" is probably mostly radiation sickness and nanoparticle poisoning. ("Covid" doesn't exist, but the symptoms do.) "Spike protein" is usually linked to the mRNA narrative, but similar results can be produced witht he 5G/nanoparticle technology.
agree (on Rappoport): moving to substack for a broader audience, yet hiding it for paid subscribers only doesn't make much sense; indeed (on your explanation of mRNA and the infamous spike): very readable and makes a lot of sense; and yes, you're absolutely right @ "Covid" doesn't exist, but the symptoms do....'. big TQ for all the work you do, much appreciated.
Even "vitamin K" is a fraud. Newborns get it:
https://amuro.substack.com/p/vitamin-k1-foreign-objects-phase
WOW - Incredible!!
About a year ago, in NYC, a couple immediately lost custody of their newborn after they rejected the vit-K injection, and it took them several months to regain custody. By then, the baby must have been pumped full of toxic "vaccines," and was missing the parents...
How to give birth these days? Wrote about that, too, and the conclusion was pretty much of what you are saying:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-to-give-birth-these-days
The camp number, however, is issued shortly after birth, indicating that the new human being is already property of the state...
It seems irresponsible to bring children to this world, anyway.