The Fake Narratives of "mRNA" and "Vaccine Contamination"
Is it really Jon Rappoport?
Jon was one of the first who opened my eyes to all “vaccines” being based on fraudulent “science,” Germ Theory, and his work on HIV/AIDS also suggested that illnesses have been invented in the last 100 years or more in order to shield chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturers, water fluoridation (that forces the taxpayer to buy and consume toxic industrial waste), forever chemicals, microplastics, fracking, preservatives and additives in food and drinks and even tobbaco (!), carcinogenic artificial sweeteners, flame retardants and, most recently, nanoparticles and excessive levels of radiation. In the meantime triage questions at “healthcare” facilities are phrased in a manner that turns the patient into statistics and blame them for being stupid, weak, or both:
To my surprise, Jon published to following today, which is making me suspect that he is not he anymore, for whatever reason:
First of all, mRNa is a red herring that prevents people from looking at radiation poisoning from new 5G and 6G (etc.) installations that include ad-hoc cellular networks between cell phones in targeted areas (the ones with 5G coverage are obvious and permanent targets), networked daisy-chained home routers (that make 5G towers redundant) and “smart” meters, and all forms of “smart” technologies by now (well, HAARP is also there, and signals transmitted through municipal water pipes and the electric grid can also sicken or kill people):
“Doctors” are apparently forbidden to consider the possibility of radiation poisoning, so people are on their own:
The lies about mRNA are popular, but easy to disprove even with simple explanations:
As opposed to Jon’s naively (?) blaming the system for ignoring contaminants in “vaccines,” it’s safe to conclude that there is no “contamination” in “covid,” or any other “vaccines”; “vaccines” are exclusively meant to harm. “Contamination” or “human error” (in a system that leaves out human interaction and makes sure no two batches are the same, which ensures plausible deniability) is only an excuse for the manufacturers in order to maintain their legal indemnity, so they cannot be sued for “intent to harm” that, nevertheless, has been possible to substantiate since November, 2021:
“Jon” is focusing on a tiny segment of the general poisoning, while people are nearly totally defenseless against many mil-grade attacks with various and virtually unlimited number of toxic combinations with an impact that cannot even be diagnosed in most cases:
Many people are stuck at the discussion of “viruses,” whereas the WHO tyranny is easy to impose even without “viruses”:
And I’m not going to waste time discussing (s)elections that also occupy a lot of misdirecrted minds…
I can’t help thinking that Jon’s name is used for misleading people.