Compliance ensures that it will end, but not in the way the herd has been hoping.
Edwin published the following today:
https://edwin797.substack.com/p/the-hidden-agenda-behind-lockdowns
The article gave me the idea of sharing my thoughts as well.
As you must know by now, the term “lockdown” comes from prisons1, which alone indicates that for the rulers, their subjects are assets and inmates.
The lockdowns forced small- and medium-sized businesses out of business. Workers received an incentive not to work: $600 a week for four months and, in some places, $400 for another two months, which made sure that several private businesses went under. The workers didn’t know that they would end up with no jobs2 and the money they were receiving was taken out of the loans the Federal Government was forcing them to “borrow” from the Federal Reserve at an interest as “pandemic assistance3.” They received only four percent of the full amount and the remaining 96% went to the Fed’s friends and family, but it is the people who will be “required” to repay the debt4. In the meanwhile, corporate stores were deemed “essential.”
The non-compliant were also losing their jobs and their livelihood, which often forced them to sell their property, and the resulting labor shortages opened up room for unsupervised changes all, whose nature and results are still to be identified and evaluated.
The lockdowns also closed down churches, which was not an accident. Those, who have something greater in their lives than the animals instinct to survive, cannot be intimidated so easily, so they are prone to disobey more than the herd. For the rest, false hope was constantly raised:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/false-hope-sells-because-its-cheap
When I tried on a muzzle in March, 2020, for 10-15 seconds, I had no idea that the muzzles were toxic, but I immediately became familiar with the oxygen deprivation they cause, and their humiliating impact, while even the sign on the boxes said that they were no good for “viruses.” At that time, I didn’t even known that pathogenic “viruses” and “viral infection,” as described in Virology, do not exist, but I had to make a decision. I figured that even if 98% of the people would die, I’d prefer to take my chances over living in constant fear and humiliation. The following three years assisted me with drawing the line in the full spectrum of my life5:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freedom-is-what-freedom-does-but
Incidentally, public schools tend to have the same architecture as prisons, and I don’t think that is by accident.
Many of the “super-compliant” were relieved from their jobs after accepting the (sooner-or-later) lethal “covid” injections, so in September, 2023, unemployment doesn’t seem to be a problem. You can safely ignore official mortality statistics, and make your own calculations regarding the true number of victims.
In comparison, it is quite revealing that the federal government is offering $600 to the survivors of the Maui massacre after they lost everything.
Chances are that only assets with intrinsic value will be accepted as forms of repayment, because the USD is under controlled demolition, but the “loans” use the land and the people for collateral…
The government is treating me as an asset:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/government-property-in-action
But the government itself has been hijacked and is owned by the globalists:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/hijacked-governments
I think the lockdowns (and other restrictions) divided us, and maybe never to return to 'normal'.
I think I noticed a certain 'superiority'?, a certain smug criticism that we just weren't 'good enough'
to enter various establishments.
We had to travel a distance, and it was cold so we needed to use a hotel. Getting meals was hard,
and there was sometimes a sense of 'you're trash'. I took note of these places and won't
go to them today.
Another place quietly said they'd serve us if we'd agree to sitting out of the way, at the back,
and of course, we happily did that.
Lockdowns separated people, separated their positions, and definitely the powers do know far more
who their enemies are. We are their public enemy and want to consider this.
As you've often written, Ray, there's either no freedom in the system, or very little, might as well
be no freedom. In Canada, the head tried to bring in 'thought police' so they could know
when and where a crime was about to happen. Or, so they said.
Since they routinely let off criminals, and paid off terrorists, I think that reason was a false flag.
So, the lockdowns, I believe did a LOT for the elites, showing them who were the
'compliant slaves' who would pose no problem. They knew who the whistleblowers were,
and jailed some of those, giving them a criminal record for obeying our charter of rights.
And didn't it help some of us know where we stood? Didn't it spur you on, Ray, to write about
many things that were needed? This was caused.
Weren't the injustices right 'in your face', glaring and proud, like the entire pride thing in Canada
where they're marching for the kids. Kids have never been so targeted, so attacked as in
Canada that I know of. Parents are mostly furious. They've lost control of their own families.
Lockdowns opened the way to violate far more. Canadians, and I think US people too, just hadn't
faced such restrictions, and didn't know how to mobilize. Because we had to mobilize, and
have groups writing, and posting all over the place to let people know what it all meant.
I think many didn't know the meaning of any of it, and just hoped it would 'go away'.
It doesn't, it didn't and it won't.
We may have learned more ,and I believe we need 'sites' or blogs where we can 'gather', and
plan how to deal with what is going on. I'm not strictly talking 'opposing', or 'not complying' which
are fighting words. No, I mean collectively writing articles, putting up Youtube videos as a GROUP,
perhaps gettting lawyers who are themselves incensed to help us all with the laws.
Then begin to challenge their 'loose' interpretation of our laws and statutes.
Any backlash, which they'd SEE as opposing, (which it is not, but requesting clarification) would
cause HUGE reaction, and we'd have to be ready for this. But I think they'd pare back what
they were trying to do.
It is through our differences, our disagreements if we want to call it that, that we can
come up with the best plans to actually continue LIVING in the next while as things move
quickly to complete darkness.
if We are assets what asset protection is being offered???