Are "Vaccine" Mandates Constitutional?

Steve Kirsch asked the question, here is my answer.

Who is paying the bill?

---

Today, I am upset again after checking this out:

Are vaccine mandates constitutional? Yes. But are these "vaccines"?

If “vaccine” mandates are constitutional, there is something wrong with the Constitution or the minds of those who are interpreting it.

After 2001, the Constitution has been completely ignored, anyway.

The Constitution is supposed to safeguard the minority from the tyranny of the majority, and rightly so, because the majority is nearly always wrong, but it likes freebies.

A representative government is supposed to represent the majority of voters, but is there such a government anywhere in the world? That’s a notch down from constitutionality, but even that would be better than the current tyranny of a few oligarchs:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/hijacked-governments

Only slaves obey unjust laws, and the majority is oh-so-obedient.

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/care-to-fight-against-slavery

Remember the manipulative argument about “saving lives”? It’s easy to destroy, but only if you possess a healthy amount of self-esteem:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-fallacy-of-saving-lives

The muzzling served several purposes. The disposable ones were toxic, containing carcinogens and graphene, they were the prominent props for keeping up the appearance of a “pandemic,” but perhaps most importantly, they dehumanized and humiliated people in order to erase their self-esteem:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-wudda-thunk

The question, “Are these vaccines?” itself implies that useful and good “vaccines” exist, whereas all of them only harm by toxic ingredients and by employing a technology that actually weakens the immune system, assuming there is one, because children under two don’t have theirs developed. The science behind Virology itself is fraudulent:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/an-alternative-theory-of-diseases

How can one lie by implications?

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/one-article-one-title-a-dozen-lies

What to read and how?

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-to-read-now-and-how

However, after engaging in the pretentiousness of legalities, much of Steve’s conclusion rings true:

No government should be able to mandate a vaccine unless they can show beyond a reasonable doubt that the intervention’s benefits outweigh the risks. The burden should be on the government, not on us to prove it is unsafe.

And even then, I would have trouble with this reasoning because they can’t prove it is safe and where there is risk, there must be choice.

Congress needs to change the law to make it clear: no more vaccine mandates.

Of course, there is plenty of evidence that all “vaccines” only harm, so “we” don’t have to prove anything beyond “our” determination that remaining human supersedes the objectives of transhumanism, because living a decent life is preferable to mere survival, and those immune to the “herd immunity” of mindless obedience prefer not to be culled.

Congress overwhelmingly voted for a lot of things that have been bad for people, so I would be absolutely flabbergasted, if the sock puppets ever voted for eliminating “vaccine” mandates.

However, it must be remembered that the “covid” theater was only the next step in mass compliance training in order to ensure that people would accept the upcoming technocratic tyranny.