Do You Believe in the Constitution?
If I did, I wouldn't write this...
Who is “We”?
There are a couple of problems with the Constitution (besides the fact that it was signed under shady circumstances1):
1. It replaced The Articles of Confederation and granted The Federal Government power over the states:
The Law of the Land
Which would you prefer? The Constitution or The Articles of Confederation? Anyway, what choices do you have?
If you think of it, the “weaknesses” in the following chart would be strengths by now, because it could prevent one Evil power from presiding over the nation:
A reader, “Finding Liberty,” provided the following excellent 11:35-minute presentation as its author:
2. The Federal Government, after being centralized by the “Constitution,” was hijacked with The Federal Reserve Act of 19132, and by now, the Congress is but a bunch of globalist lackeys, doing as they are told:
If People Knew What’s Being Done to Them, They Would Rise up with Pitchforks
“‘If the American People ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the street and lynch us’ - H.W. Bush June 1992 to Sarah McClendon (White House Press Corps)”
Snoopy is making a point here, considering that the IRS is the Fed’s lapdog, a private company:
3. When it comes to interpreting the “Constitution,” it’s a bunch of government stooges, appointed by the government for life, who form The Supreme Court. You might remember that the latest nominee, after asked if she knew what a woman is, said, “I don’t know, I am not a biologist.”3 These justices badly need the apparel, just like a “doctor” needs a white coat, in order to exhibit a minimal sign of legitimacy, which is indispensable for them, considering the amount of authority and power they are wielding:
4. Since the (un)Patriot(is) Act, the “Constitution,” to borrow Dmitri Orlov’s4 words, as is just about as relevant as an old copy of Pravda in an abandoned Siberian outhouse. You can be arrested and indefinitely detained, if the “authorities” use the magic T-word against you. You can be forced to get “vaccinated” even through the food supply with any kind of toxins without being told. After the vast computer complex in Utah, Trump is now expanding the scope and the capacity of public surveillance with its data centers:
Conclusion
So, there are four major reasons why the Constitution is only for a show at best, and at worst, it’s a device for public coercion.
The US Is a Giant House of Cards, Designed To Collapse
https://www.occupy.com/article/wall-street-s-house-cards-let-s-play-bankster-three-card-monte
Orlov is not always right, but he is always informative and entertaining:
A constitution implies that there is still a master overriding the slaves. The constitution was supposed to protect the people from government tyranny. The government is the constitution and is never to be questioned in its outrageous authority.
No, I don't think the constitution is impenetrable. The government has poked so many holes in it the Swiss cheese makers are complaining. As long as there is government, there will be no piece of paper that will keep it from destroying the citizen.
The trouble was that the Founding Fathers replaced one set of tyrannical thugs with another. We have a behemoth of a shark trying to swallow us whole. And it can't read.
Excellent tp bring this up, Ray! How many are willing to "defend the constitution " without having looked into its origin, etc.?!
In this audio I also discovered additional historical information I previously was unaware of, such as who the authors of the constitution were (the majority freemasons) and that Patrick Henry immediately recognized the badly written document and fought (unsuccessfully) against its inception as such. Worth a listen for sure, even if you aren't Christian:
https://open.substack.com/pub/dfreality/p/christianity-and-the-constitution?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1nfb39