25 Comments

Hiya, thanks for the link but the Daily History article 'what if the Black Death had never happened' is not on the same subject as mine at all. The article is a thought piece of what might have happened in Europe if it had not occurred and lots of people died, but seems to. be saying that it did occur. I am saying that perhaps it didn't even occur at all, that lots of people didn't die and that any deaths were definitely not caused by fleas, rats, or bacteria.

Jo

Expand full comment

Hey ray i can’t leave a reply on the black hole piece at 1022 which isn’t showing up on your list of articles and it contains no content

Expand full comment

I know you've heard about Japan's dumping nuclear waste(ah,

filtered, so no problem) into the Pacific to be carried by streams all over, doing damage.

Again, who knows? Nobody.

But things are going to happen and I think they'll call it a virus, and bring a vaccine.

What it will do to fish, the ocean, marine 'life', if there will be any.

Whether oceans will be too toxic to swim in?

I think we're different so everyone may react differently.

I can't see answers.

Man has been inventive but I can't see all this working out.

Getting worse from bad, short term solutions, yes.

Expand full comment

I read many of Ray's articles. The protocols authorship is beyond me although I've long leaned into it's the Jesuits, the masters of the shell game. But I don't have to be right. And that's not the primary purpose of my commenting. Instead I did read the PDF on hydrogels and did not read that Lidocaine was sited as one of the liquid injections that needed it. I can always be wrong and welcome correction. I can attest that in 2017, after reading a lot of Anthony Patch's material from Entangled magazine I asked for the insert for a cortico-steriod injections and did not see hydrogels, or quantum dots, or luciferase or aborted fetal tissue listed. The nurse said you're the first person to ask. I said, "that bums me out, and it also bums me out that I had to ask and I am sure the radiologist (they need something for these peeps to do beside read scans and "treat" cancer.....) and I am sure the doc will pursue the "informed consent" angle if I decide to proceed ((;-(. Curiously, the nurse was nice to me afterwards. Alas, I need to get a tooth extracted and I asked the dentist to look into lidocaine for me so I could receive informed consent. He says he's unaware of hydrogel in lidocaine but has five days to look into it. I thought the PDF below would answer the question. Perhaps its an error of omission.

Expand full comment

My favorite new book is by an MD who sees through the bioweapons fog (he is very even handed and matter of fact in the brief places he addresses what happened the last 3 years...and beyond...but says just enough to let you know that he knows.) The book is "The Virus and the Host," by Chlebowski. Dr. C makes a very good case that it's not Germ Theory OR Terrain Theory, but that good health is about both--that a compromised terrain is what makes us vulnerable to disease vectors. That health is a matter of maintaining a balanced terrain and when needed, using the proper substances to support our body's defensive reactions to bacterial/viral/fungal/protozoal vectors. That two key factors, toxicity and chronic inflammation, are what make us vulnerable to health threatening reactions to microbial vectors, and being proactive about those things is what provides us the best protection against disease in general--not shots with multiple questionable ingredients. Most intriguing he catalogues how the body reacts to infections with a deep cleanse and fever, positive responses, but when we are toxic and chronically inflamed, the cytokine storms and toxic dumping mediated by the body can become overwhelming, and lead to health crises.

Expand full comment

In many ways I feel I just got here recently, mentally, so forgive me if this has been addressed but the origin story of Germ Theory still resonates with. I believe in Dissolving Illusions Humpries goes over how medical men were in such a rush to push mid-wives out of the birth business they couldn't be bothered to wash there hands. Which is a shame because they were coming form working on cadavers and so didn't have the cleanest of hands. The results were incalculable though Humphiries implies they may very well dwarf the real harm from childhood diseases ever caused. The men that did suggest hand washing were kicked out of medicine ... they were the misinformation spewers of the day... My point is that story seems to implicate germs as much as terrain and I like it too much to part with it without much deliberation.

Expand full comment