Specific Details about "Medications" Causing Illnesses

Filling a few gaps with new pieces in the global jigsaw puzzle

Gaps can be filled only, when there is a board.

---

In this article, you will find possibly life-saving details hidden between the lines, but I wanted to make sure the AI evaluating it would not understand it. (This note will hopefully confuse it even a little further. :) ) Mercola, as one of the most professional disinformer, can often be helpful in details, but only as long as the whole picture is kept in mind.

Mercola published some important details a few days ago. Yes, he is sometimes capable to a certain extent, although one always has to be on high alert and notice, when his statements sidetrack at best, and instigate dangerous reactions just because he was correct about the first item on his list, which, by the way, constitutes a bait-and-switch, that is, a typical case of conditioning the reader.

Although he focuses on diabetes, he mentions a number of other significant details (e.g. “corticosteroids include osteoporosis, cataracts and hyperglycemia” and “are no better than a placebo for knee pain while doubling cartilage loss”).

Steroids, antipsychotics, commonly prescribed cholesterol, blood pressure and heart madications are addressed.

Let me emphasize that Mercola was one of the first well-known source to point out the damages of statins and similar drugs, while suggesting that they usually do NOT prevent strokes and heart attacks; instead, they come with a large number of potential (and usually very intentional) “side effects.”

He intimates that only few patients realize that “Glyburide is an oral diabetes medicine with its own list of adverse effects. These include liver damage, nausea, heartburn, blurred vision, muscle and joint pain.”

Diuretics are also among the harmful ones. In his words, “Thiazide diuretics, another popular class of drug used to treat hypertension, also have a deserved association with new onset diabetes.”

Mercola doesn’t mention proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) here, perhaps because they don’t cause diabetes (?), but according to his “friend,” the MWD, they are probably the worst drugs that happen to cause a lot of irreversible symptoms (e.g. kidney failure). I have also experienced life-threatening reactions to PPIs.

He is also saying that is remarably similar to something I’ve also been saying: “Virtually every disease known to man, including the major one like heart disease, cancer and obesity, are linked to compromised cellular energy production, brought on by these toxins, which create a gut environment where endotoxin-producing bacteria thrive.” Of course, he is a bit off the tracks, which I can hardly put down to an accident. Juxtaposing “energy production” and “mitochondrial health” involves some unmistakable mystification. In my understanding, intercellular communication and neural paths are intimately connected, and it is the disruptions that cause the problem, either because the endocrine system cannot get rid of dead cells [possibly, either because

1. some of its ducts are obstructed,

2. there is some kind of acute poisoning (out of which radiation exposure has played a major part since the introduction of electricity), which causes the cells to be dying too rapidly), or

3. some essential components are missing due to deficiency].

   Well, surgeons also like to remove lymph nodes (which they most likely sell), and the practice weakens the detox system. Blaming it on energy shortages is oversimplification at best, but the way the world is working now makes it nearly irrelevant, because in most cases, only delaying the final damages might be possible, and the body is beyond repair, unless the causes could be reverse-engineered, but there are too many of them.

If you think of it, the presence of endotoxins indicates that the body is experiencing a rapid and large-scale episode of cell deaths that the endocrine system cannot detox fast enough, which causes poisoning. He also says it in another article (in which he places a lot of blame on diet) that “the No. 1 cause of death, that exceeds heart disease and cancer, is endotoxemia,” which incurs the typical allopathic mistake of replacing the cause(s) with the symptom(s) in diagnostics. (I would be hard-pressed to assume that the practice is due to stupidity…) As opposed to Mercola’s opinion, poisoning is only one cause of illnesses.

While I agree with Mercola, when he admits that “Like many, I used to believe glucose was an inferior fuel to dietary fat, when in fact it’s the complete opposite.”, I am finding the “the” exaggerated in the statement, “Excess linoleic acid and estrogen dominance are the major contributors to mitochondrial dysfunction,” because the same dysfunction can be caused by microplastics, nanoparticle-poisoning (both are playing a prominent role these days), radiation (EMF/ELF/Wi-Fi/cell towers/”smart” meters/devices, military antennas, and even the electric grid; he does mention EMFs, but he has never gone into the details I have). Of course, Mercola’s omission is most likely intentional (it is even a trolling technique to dump technical terms on the audience, while only creating confusion), but that doesn’t mean that a few gaps cannot be filled with the information in his article. After all, focusing on healthy oils is important, but it’s like a beaver dam trying to stop a tsunami or a picket fence against an avalanche.

As I stated in my flagship article on the subject, I believe, under normal circumstances, “health” is maintained by the equilibrium of bacteria, parasites, and proteins, which seems to be preserved and maintained in the gut flora. Mitochondrial dysfunction is already a sign of poisoning or it signals the entry of a new player in the gut flora, which the body must regulate.

Mercola’s text is still recommended reading, assuming one doesn’t lose sight of the forest for the trees:

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/06/19/medication-induced-diabetes.aspx

One more note: “light therapy” has been pushed by shady characters, which doesn’t mean it’s necessarily bad, but it can be bad

1. When LED bulbs are used that can “program” the human body either by built-in cycles or through the electric grid;

2. When the frequencies are messed up. How can one know for sure that the recommended frequencies are the right ones for the person? 5G technology would not be used for downloading individual DNA, if the same frequencies worked for everyone.

People beyond the arctic circle have been just fine without light for up to six months a year, while light is promoted as indispensable for human life. It surely is needed for the biological cycle, because plants couldn’t do without it for long, and this time, it looks like extreme heat is used for convincing the populace that the Sun MUST be shaded… That sort of thing would only totally and irreversibly concentrate food resources into the hands of those who own the “seed banks,” and I understand, Bill Gates owns the largest one…

Sound and microwave frequency “healing” and “preventative” methods can also affect individuals differently, and nobody has ever been able to identify too many long-term effects of anything, either.

The tragicomical part is that many “truth-seekers” fall for partial facts, perhaps because they exhaust their intellectual capacity, perhaps because all they look for is some cognitive security, or perhaps they are incapable to look for facts, because their lives are based on lies, anyway. Those who follow anyone else’s leadership or authority are most likely playing the game that if the advice/instructions/commands are bad, they will be able to make the other party responsible, but they forget that the dead don’t complain, and the living just never stand up for the dead, especially when the enemy is invisible, as it happened during the plandemic and, for that matter, in Maui.